Breve Análise do Portátil Dell Alienware m17 R2: Fazendo o Core i9 valer a pena
Alienware m17 R2 P41E (m17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 990 MHz, Memoría: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 442.19, Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, Soldada, DDR4, 1333.3 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, Dell P/N: 8TV4Y, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB
peso
2.586 kg, Suprimento de energia: 940 g
Preço
3900 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 18.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.5 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.6 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.9 kg | 26.4 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (625-645)
Alienware m17 R2 P41E; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø502 (459-531)
7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
4 ∆E
18 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 385.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 356.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
Contraste: 1325:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.42
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware m17 P37E AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 AU Optronics B173ZAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | -9% | -13% | 21% | -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 70.8 | 86.4 22% | 62.6 -12% | 60.6 -14% | 86.8 23% | 62.9 -11% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 99.9 1% | 93.5 -5% | 89 -10% | 100 2% | 87.1 -12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.2 | 99.1 37% | 64.7 -10% | 62.1 -14% | 99.5 38% | 63.7 -12% |
| Response Times | -133% | 21% | 36% | -173% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.2 ? | 35.6 ? -107% | 7.2 ? 58% | 6.8 ? 60% | 45.6 ? -165% | 17.6 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.8 ? | 28 ? -159% | 10 ? 7% | 9.6 ? 11% | 30.4 ? -181% | 11.2 ? -4% |
| PWM Frequency | 26320 ? | 25510 ? -3% | ||||
| Screen | -110% | -4% | -46% | -24% | -40% | |
| Brightness middle | 384.2 | 357.9 -7% | 366 -5% | 299.3 -22% | 667.3 74% | 295 -23% |
| Brightness | 357 | 347 -3% | 343 -4% | 294 -18% | 633 77% | 291 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 94 4% | 91 1% | 94 4% | 90 0% | 96 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.29 -0% | 0.29 -0% | 0.46 -59% | 0.24 17% |
| Contrast | 1325 | 1085 -18% | 1262 -5% | 1032 -22% | 1451 10% | 1229 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.35 | 6.57 -387% | 1.51 -12% | 2.55 -89% | 3.53 -161% | 3.2 -137% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.45 | 9.86 -186% | 3.22 7% | 4.73 -37% | 6.88 -99% | 6.64 -92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.42 | 6.74 -375% | 0.71 50% | 2.9 -104% | 3.79 -167% | 2.52 -77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 4.3 -258% | 1.93 -61% | 3.5 -192% | 0.9 25% | 2.16 -80% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.6 85% | 2.38 92% | 2.28 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 6580 99% | 6403 102% | 6881 94% | 7101 92% | 6533 99% | 6872 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65.5 | 88.4 35% | 60 -8% | 57 -13% | 87.1 33% | 57 -13% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.5 | 100 2% | 94 -5% | 88.7 -10% | 100 2% | 87 -12% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -74% /
-88% | 3% /
-0% | -8% /
-29% | -59% /
-34% | -18% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26320 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26320 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26320 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1496 (1486.55-1622.78)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2019 i9 Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 20, i9-9980HK, Apple SSD AP1024; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1308 (1257.47-1327.02)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (2.25 - 2.4, n=3) | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (14.8 - 18, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (39440 - 50439, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (7709 - 9734, n=4) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
| Medion Erazer X15805 | |
| MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Average Intel Core i9-9980HK (110.4 - 120.2, n=2) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4384 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5818 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5502 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -23% | 13% | -34% | -26% | 28% | |
| Seq Read | 1938 | 1835 -5% | 2855 47% | 1812 -7% | 1315 -32% | 2564 32% |
| Seq Write | 2094 | 1121 -46% | 2687 28% | 1512 -28% | 927 -56% | 2268 8% |
| 4K Read | 25.88 | 23.98 -7% | 30.31 17% | 32.68 26% | 52.4 102% | 57 120% |
| 4K Write | 100.8 | 100 -1% | 96.3 -4% | 107.7 7% | 122.8 22% | 141.4 40% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1217 | 687 -44% | 1460 20% | 504 -59% | 326.5 -73% | 1175 -3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1137 | 776 -32% | 1224 8% | 534 -53% | 727 -36% | 1665 46% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.047 8% | 0.054 -6% | 0.05 2% | 0.11 -116% | 0.032 37% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.107 | 0.053 50% | 0.038 64% | 0.227 -112% | 0.045 58% | 0.025 77% |
| Score Read | 1437 | 895 -38% | 1776 24% | 718 -50% | 510 -65% | 1488 4% |
| Score Write | 1447 | 988 -32% | 1589 10% | 793 -45% | 942 -35% | 2033 40% |
| Score Total | 3624 | 2306 -36% | 4259 18% | 1871 -48% | 1715 -53% | 4279 18% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1926 | 773 -60% | 2226 16% | 946 -51% | 2118 10% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 626 | 493 -21% | 426.4 -32% | 414.3 -34% | 495.6 -21% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1533 | 647 -58% | 1152 -25% | 1263 -18% | 1174 -23% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -18% | 6% | 2% | -33% | 6% | |
| Write 4K | 110.6 | 120.2 9% | 95.5 -14% | 169.6 53% | 99.6 -10% | 176.3 59% |
| Read 4K | 41.46 | 44.3 7% | 42.59 3% | 58 40% | 48.99 18% | 48.98 18% |
| Write Seq | 2378 | 1278 -46% | 2851 20% | 1516 -36% | 972 -59% | 1789 -25% |
| Read Seq | 2114 | 1389 -34% | 2696 28% | 2362 12% | 1515 -28% | 1671 -21% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 445.4 | 436.2 -2% | 402.6 -10% | 481.8 8% | 280.6 -37% | 433.5 -3% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 509 | 515 1% | 443.9 -13% | 506 -1% | 327.8 -36% | 526 3% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2735 | 1157 -58% | 3420 25% | 1530 -44% | 970 -65% | 2983 9% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3206 | 2671 -17% | 3514 10% | 2645 -17% | 1757 -45% | 3555 11% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1688 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1036 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-21% | 10% /
11% | -16% /
-21% | -30% /
-29% | 17% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3206 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2735 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
509 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
445.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2114 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2378 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
110.6 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (38256 - 129506, n=17) | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (18048 - 23032, n=19) | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (6464 - 8844, n=19) | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (23386 - 30910, n=20) | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Maingear Vector 15 | |
| Dell G5 15 5590-P8RVW | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (9212 - 14894, n=20) | |
| Alienware 17 R5 | |
| HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
| MSI GT72S-6QEG16SR421BW | |
| MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23774 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50705 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19583 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8604 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (114 - 142, n=5) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (71 - 105, n=8) | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Corsair One i160 | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q (65.7 - 92.7, n=22) | |
| MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl | |
| Walmart EVOO Gaming 17 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0015ng | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0017ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Dell G3 3590 | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0): Ø75 (60-80)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 396.1 | 337.3 | 321 | 179 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 326.6 | 239.3 | 149.6 | 78 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 142 | 110 | 105 | 99 |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0) | Alienware m17 P37E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0) | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | -3% | 4% | -2% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 29.1 | 28.2 3% | 30 -3% | 28.2 3% | 29.3 -1% | 29 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.4 | 28.2 4% | 31 -5% | 28.2 4% | 33 -12% | 29 1% |
| Idle Average * | 29.4 | 28.2 4% | 32 -9% | 28.2 4% | 33 -12% | 32 -9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31 2% | 38 -21% | 30.8 2% | 33 -5% | 40 -27% |
| Load Average * | 49.7 | 50.8 -2% | 47 5% | 42 15% | 42.5 14% | 46 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.5 | 50.8 -3% | 48 3% | 51 -3% | 42 15% | 51 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.3 | 50.8 5% | 49 8% | 53 1% | 59.6 -12% | 52 2% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.4 / 29.4 / 31.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 49.7 / 53.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.4 °C / 143 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61.4 °C / 143 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.4 °C / 88.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.18 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 24.7 / 35.9 / 69.6 Watt |
| Carga |
141.8 / 235.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | 35% | 30% | 25% | 25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 21.2 14% | 13 47% | 16.2 34% | 13.9 44% | 19 23% |
| Idle Average * | 35.9 | 29.6 18% | 17 53% | 20.4 43% | 24.3 32% | 22 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 69.6 | 34 51% | 25 64% | 26.1 62% | 35.5 49% | 29 58% |
| Load Average * | 141.8 | 130.9 8% | 96 32% | 96.5 32% | 127.6 10% | 102 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 185.8 | 177.5 4% | 156 16% | 182.9 2% | 158 15% | 190 -2% |
| Load Maximum * | 235.4 | 219.7 7% | 239 -2% | 214.3 9% | 237.5 -1% | 231 2% |
* ... smaller is better
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Alienware m17 P37E i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh | MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 29% | 57% | 48% | 111% | 28% | |
| Reader / Idle | 426 | 543 27% | 461 8% | 295 -31% | 711 67% | 372 -13% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 290 | 296 2% | 357 23% | 280 -3% | 431 49% | 235 -19% |
| Load | 31 | 49 58% | 74 139% | 86 177% | 98 216% | 67 116% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 |
Pro
+ Excelente sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost em relação ao tamanho pequeno
+ Resposta satisfatória das teclas; teclas numéricas de tamanho completo
+ Ruído baixo do ventilador no modo de economia de energia
+ Porta Ethernet de 2,5 Gbps e Thunderbolt 3
+ 2 slots M.2 2280 com placas de cobre
+ Tela bem calibrada de fábrica
+ Iluminação RGB por tecla
Contra
- Alto consumo de energia durante cargas de processamento leves
- Temperaturas da CPU muito quentes sob uso intenso
- RAM e WLAN não atualizáveis
- Limitado a 16 GB de RAM por enquanto
- A duração da bateria poderia ser melhor
- Sem opção SATA III de 2,5 polegadas
- Barulhento durante os jogos
- Sem opção 4K UHD
- Adaptador de CA grande
- Formato grande
Os usuários sempre esperam que os modelos de segunda geração sejam melhores que os de primeira geração em todos os aspectos. No caso do Alienware m17 R2, no entanto, é mais um passo lateral do Alienware m17 R1. Esta iteração mais recente adiciona e remove recursos que podem irritar alguns entusiastas. Os proprietários terão que trocar RAM removível, Wi-Fi removível, opções SATA III de 2,5 polegadas, opções de tela UHD 4K e uma bateria maior, como encontrada no m17 R1 original, por um teclado aprimorado, um clickpad maior, iluminação RGB por tecla, e um design de chassi mais recente. Se suas cargas de trabalho são muito pesadas no uso de RAM e armazenamento, convém considerar a Alienware Area-51m maior.
Na frente do desempenho, estamos impressionados com a sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost da CPU. Os portáteis Core i9 - especialmente os mais finos - geralmente decepcionam, pois a maioria dos modelos não utiliza totalmente o potencial do processador, mas esse Alienware é uma exceção notável. As principais desvantagens são o formato maior, as temperaturas do núcleo muito mais quentes e o barulho alto do ventilador, que realmente não melhorou em relação ao m17 R1. Essas são as consequências desafortunadas por colocar uma CPU Core i9 em um chassi tão fino. Ainda assim, suspeitamos que os SKUs menos equipados com o Core i5 ou Core i7 funcionarão mais frios do que o que registramos aqui.
O Alienware m17 R2 oferece o suficiente para ser uma recomendação forte? A menos que você valorize as opções de rastreamento ocular Tobii, o melhor teclado e o Core i9, poderá obter desempenho semelhante em jogos com alternativas menores e mais portáteis do Core i7, como oAsus ROG Strix Scar GL704GW ou Breve Análise do Portátil Razer Blade Pro (17).
O Alienware m17 R2 tem como objetivo maximizar o desempenho do chassi mais fino da série até agora. Os proprietários terão que lidar com os ventiladores inevitavelmente mais barulhentos, as temperaturas mais quentes do núcleo e o formato maior, mesmo para um portátil para jogos de 17,3 polegadas, se quiserem aproveitar totalmente o que o sistema oferece.
Alienware m17 R2 P41E
- 07/31/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
