Breve Análise do Portátil Chuwi LapBook SE
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Trekstor Primebook C13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Trekstor Primebook C13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Jumper EZbook 3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB) | |
Chuwi LapBook SE |
|
iluminação: 89 %
Contraste: 516:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Calman 2D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Chuwi LapBook SE 1920x1080, 13.3" | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 SDC8353, , 2736x1824, 12.3" | Jumper EZbook 3 MS_9003, , 1920x1080, 14.1" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Sharp SHP14A6, , 1800x1200, 10" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -20% | 2% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 68 5% | 51.6 -21% | 66.5 2% | 66.8 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.8 | 98.4 4% | 77.3 -18% | 97.5 3% | 95.4 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 69.5 5% | 53 -20% | 67.5 2% | 68 2% |
Response Times | -17% | 14% | 135% | -8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 48.4 ? -23% | 46 ? -17% | 44 ? -12% | 41.2 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.7 ? | 30.8 ? -11% | 11.6 ? 58% | 25.6 ? 8% | 30.4 ? -10% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? 0% | 1020 ? 410% | ||
Screen | 63% | -28% | 77% | 53% | |
Brightness middle | 227 | 224 -1% | 384 69% | 456 101% | 387 70% |
Brightness | 210 | 219 4% | 341 62% | 426 103% | 358 70% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 81 -9% | 76 -15% | 88 -1% | 88 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.13 70% | 1.28 -191% | 0.31 30% | 0.47 -7% |
Contrast | 516 | 1723 234% | 300 -42% | 1471 185% | 823 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 2.4 64% | 8.7 -32% | 1.3 80% | 1.6 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.2 | 3.7 70% | 16.7 -37% | 3 75% | 4 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 1.1 42% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 2.5 68% | 11.1 -41% | 1.4 82% | 1 87% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 8879 73% | 6869 95% | 12445 52% | 6687 97% | 6680 97% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.4 | 62.3 | 61.6 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.3 | 96.8 | 82.2 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
37% | -11% /
-18% | 71% /
74% | 16% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 12.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 29 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 | |
Lenovo Flex 6-11IGM | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Microsoft Surface 3 | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 |
Chuwi LapBook SE SanDisk DF4032 | Chuwi LapBook SE FORESEE 128GB O1229B | Apple MacBook 12 2017 Apple SSD AP0256 | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 64 GB eMMC Flash | Trekstor Primebook C13 SanDisk DF4064 | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 SanDisk DF4128 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 194% | 536% | 92% | 7% | 26% | |
Read Seq | 247 | 422 71% | 940 281% | 268 9% | 264.7 7% | 293.6 19% |
Write Seq | 87.7 | 347 296% | 867 889% | 126.2 44% | 117 33% | 106.1 21% |
Read 4K | 7.2 | 10.37 44% | 22.8 217% | 19.72 174% | 5.04 -30% | 11.45 59% |
Write 4K | 11.17 | 52.1 366% | 95.7 757% | 26.91 141% | 13.16 18% | 11.87 6% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 3279 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 541 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2486 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 97 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1280x720 min (0/3) fastest | |
Average of class Subnotebook (33.7 - 171.8, n=61, last 2 years) | |
HP 15-da0405ng | |
HP ProBook 645 G4 3UP62EA | |
Eve-Tech Eve V m3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad V110-15IKB 80TH001SGE | |
HP mt43 | |
Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM | |
Acer Swift 1 SF114-32-P8GG | |
Chuwi LapBook SE | |
Jumper EZbook 3 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 27.4 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 30 | 14.4 | 6.5 | 5.9 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 0 game wont start | |||
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 34.8 | 4.8 | ||
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 0 game wont start (hangs) | |||
The Division 2 (2019) | 0 game wont start | |||
League of Legends (2019) | 42.5 | 29.8 | 22 | 19.2 |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.7 °C / -10.3 F).
Chuwi LapBook SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.4 / 0.9 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.7 / 6.3 / 7.6 Watt |
Carga |
12.6 / 24.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SM0128G, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3" | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | Lenovo Flex 6-11IGM Celeron N4000, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4064, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo Yoga 330-11IGM Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 128 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1800x1200, 10" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -1% | -51% | 4% | 12% | 14% | -3% | 1% | -113% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 2 26% | 3.4 -26% | 3.6 -33% | 2.7 -0% | 2.3 15% | 2.88 -7% | 3.47 ? -29% | 4.49 ? -66% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 5.4 14% | 6.3 -0% | 6.2 2% | 4.5 29% | 4.2 33% | 4.8 24% | 5.61 ? 11% | 7.66 ? -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 6.6 13% | 7 8% | 6.5 14% | 5.7 25% | 5.4 29% | 7.5 1% | 6.6 ? 13% | 9.56 ? -26% |
Load Average * | 12.6 | 22 -75% | 34.5 -174% | 13.5 -7% | 13.7 -9% | 15.4 -22% | 16.9 -34% | 13.6 ? -8% | 46.6 ? -270% |
Load Maximum * | 24.6 | 20 19% | 40 -63% | 14.3 42% | 20.3 17% | 21.4 13% | 23.8 3% | 20.2 ? 18% | 68.6 ? -179% |
* ... smaller is better
Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 36.48 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh | Microsoft Surface Go MHN-00003 Pentium 4415Y, UHD Graphics 615, 28 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -30% | -11% | 44% | 22% | -26% | 18% | |
H.264 | 564 | 384 -32% | 896 ? 59% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 444 | 372 -16% | 395 -11% | 638 44% | 540 22% | 448 1% | 719 ? 62% |
Load | 347 | 199 -43% | 180 -48% | 116.6 ? -66% | |||
Reader / Idle | 696 | 771 | 1750 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Chuwi LapBook SE é um portátil chinês acessível que parece consideravelmente mais caro e premium do que é. O SSD facilmente trocável é um bônus, mas gostaríamos de ver uma porta USB Type-C.
Os dispositivos de entrada também são bons pelo dinheiro, mas a tela diminui a avaliação com sua má luminosidade máxima. Os alto falantes são outro ponto negativo, mas, felizmente, o conector de fone de ouvido fornece áudio limpo. Além disso, a CPU quad-core é poderosa, mas o desempenho comparativamente fraco da GPU é desanimador.
O Chuwi LapBook SE é um portátil incrivelmente bom pelo dinheiro, mas é prejudicado por uma tela escura, alto-falantes fracos e desempenho de GPU relativamente ruim.
O LapBook SE custa cerca de €245 / $280 incluindo o envio, mas não com os cargos e impostos associados à importação de um dispositivo da China. Recomendamos que você pesquise os riscos de importar um dispositivo da China, pois não há garantia de receber garantia do fabricante e pode haver impostos adicionais.
Chuwi LapBook SE
- 10/02/2018 v6 (old)
Klaus Hinum