Breve Análise do Portátil Chuwi AeroBook (2019): Um Ultrabook compacto financiado pelo público (crowdfunded)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II SDXC) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Asus E203MA-FD825TS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II SDXC) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 905:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.909
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 BOE BOE0719, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Air 2018 APPA039, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Asus E203MA-FD825TS AUO225C, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook 12 2017 APPA027, LED IPS, 12", 2304x1440 | Chuwi LapBook SE 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, IPS, 13.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | -43% | -37% | 3% | 1% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 67.8 1% | 35.75 -47% | 39.85 -41% | 65 -3% | 64.7 -4% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 87.6 | 96.1 10% | 53.8 -39% | 58.8 -33% | 94.8 8% | 93.1 6% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.1 | 69.8 9% | 36.94 -42% | 41.17 -36% | 66.5 4% | 65.3 2% | |
| Response Times | 1855% | 22% | 1387% | 1892% | -35% | -50% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 39.6 ? -16% | 41 ? -21% | 44 ? -29% | 40.8 ? -20% | 39.2 ? -15% | 58 ? -71% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 28 ? -0% | 10 ? 64% | 31 ? -11% | 29.2 ? -4% | 27.7 ? 1% | 36 ? -29% |
| PWM Frequency | 2000 ? | 113600 ? 5580% | 86000 ? 4200% | 116000 5700% | 200 ? -90% | ||
| Screen | 37% | -36% | -8% | -9% | 23% | ||
| Brightness middle | 307.6 | 320 4% | 235 -24% | 283 -8% | 227 -26% | 404 31% | |
| Brightness | 295 | 315 7% | 227 -23% | 252 -15% | 210 -29% | 389 32% | |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 95 6% | 93 3% | 75 -17% | 89 -1% | 85 -6% | |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.29 15% | 0.44 -29% | 0.63 -85% | 0.44 -29% | 0.37 -9% | |
| Contrast | 905 | 1103 22% | 534 -41% | 449 -50% | 516 -43% | 1092 21% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.31 | 1.2 84% | 11.73 -60% | 4.02 45% | 6.6 10% | 3.72 49% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.92 | 3.2 73% | 18.8 -58% | 8.77 26% | 12.2 -2% | 7.38 38% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.94 | 0.5 87% | 3.73 5% | 4.03 -2% | 1.9 52% | 2.06 48% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 0.8 88% | 12.64 -86% | 0.8 88% | 7.9 -16% | 4.44 35% | |
| Gamma | 1.909 115% | 2.2 100% | 2.61 84% | 2.35 94% | 2.16 102% | 2.34 94% | |
| CCT | 7695 84% | 6548 99% | 14819 44% | 6552 99% | 8879 73% | 7095 92% | |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 62.1 9% | 34 -40% | 38 -33% | 60 5% | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 96 10% | 54 -38% | 58 -33% | 93 7% | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 633% /
352% | -19% /
-30% | 447% /
233% | 1892% /
1892% | -14% /
-12% | -9% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2.75 - 3.62, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core m3-6Y30 (0.81 - 1.04, n=6) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16.5 - 34.3, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core m3-6Y30 (1.79 - 2.4, n=6) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (27647 - 56242, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core m3-6Y30 (6194 - 7355, n=4) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6304 - 10300, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core m3-6Y30 (3286 - 3477, n=4) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Average Intel Core m3-6Y30 (788 - 864, n=3) | |
| Chuwi LapBook SE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (170 - 885, n=7, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2650 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3735 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 2138 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 Netac SSD 256GB | Apple MacBook Air 2018 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook 12 2017 Apple SSD AP0256 | Asus E203MA-FD825TS SanDisk DA4064 | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | Chuwi LapBook SE SanDisk DF4032 | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Average Netac SSD 256GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 113% | 99% | -59% | 19% | -78% | 99% | -7% | |
| Write 4K | 81.8 | 118 44% | 95.7 17% | 38.28 -53% | 11.17 -86% | 84.6 3% | 86 ? 5% | |
| Read 4K | 33.97 | 29.97 -12% | 22.8 -33% | 12.14 -64% | 7.2 -79% | 38.52 13% | 23.2 ? -32% | |
| Write Seq | 422.4 | 1000 137% | 867 105% | 220.2 -48% | 158.1 -63% | 87.7 -79% | 557 32% | 364 ? -14% |
| Read Seq | 502 | 1218 143% | 940 87% | 262 -48% | 892 78% | 247 -51% | 1393 177% | 432 ? -14% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 152.9 | 232.1 52% | 342 124% | 45.72 -70% | 162.2 6% | 12.29 -92% | 339.5 122% | 188.9 ? 24% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 175.4 | 254 45% | 437.5 149% | 61 -65% | 320.4 83% | 32.46 -81% | 255.4 46% | 185.9 ? 6% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 464.9 | 1001 115% | 1085 133% | 167.1 -64% | 160.2 -66% | 92 -80% | 558 20% | 398 ? -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 530 | 2555 382% | 1634 208% | 211.5 -60% | 933 76% | 150.1 -72% | 2541 379% | 456 ? -14% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1121 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4145 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 617 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 32 | 13 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 28 | 11 | ||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 42 | 30 | 14 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.4 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.2 °C / 97.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-7.9 °C / -14.3 F).
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (37.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 2018 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado |   0.77 / 0.78 Watt |
| Ocioso |  4.6 / 7.8 / 8.9 Watt |
| Carga |
20.9 / 28.6 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Netac SSD 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Asus E203MA-FD825TS Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, SanDisk DA4064, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4032, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 28% | 49% | -9% | 26% | -36% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.6 | 2.2 52% | 2 57% | 1.9 59% | 5 -9% | 2.7 41% | 4.8 -4% |
| Idle Average * | 7.8 | 5.7 27% | 5.4 31% | 3.5 55% | 7.6 3% | 6.3 19% | 8.6 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.9 | 10.3 -16% | 6.6 26% | 3.9 56% | 8.6 3% | 7.6 15% | 10.4 -17% |
| Load Average * | 20.9 | 25.6 -22% | 22 -5% | 12.7 39% | 25.6 -22% | 12.6 40% | 37.9 -81% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.6 | 30.6 -7% | 20 30% | 19 34% | 34 -19% | 24.6 14% | 48.5 -70% |
* ... smaller is better
| Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 38 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 2018 i5-8210Y, UHD Graphics 617, 50.3 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh | Asus E203MA-FD825TS Pentium N5000, UHD Graphics 605, 38 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Chuwi LapBook SE Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 37 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 56% | 45% | 33% | 14% | 133% | 54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 556 | 754 36% | 1032 86% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 372 | 668 80% | 540 45% | 495 33% | 350 -6% | 444 19% | 498 34% |
| Load | 100 | 131 31% | 113 13% | 347 247% | 141 41% |
Pro
Contra
AeroBook Chuwi é um clone decente do Apple MacBook de 12 polegadas. O portátil chinês acerta em várias coisas; o design é de alto nível, a qualidade de construção é excelente e o teclado e o trackpad são muito bons, considerando o preço de $500.
Infelizmente, como o MacBook 12, o AeroBook não impressiona em termos de potência. Além disso, a Chuwi não pode confiar na otimização de software como o MacBook. Embora o portátil compacto da Apple possa suportar a transmissão de vídeo 4K e realizar trabalhos de escritório decentemente complexos graças às otimizações no MacOS, o AeroBook fica aquém dessas tarefas e é relegado aos mesmos casos de uso como Chromebooks e outros portáteis Windows baratos.
No geral, o Chuwi Aerobook é um portátil de boa aparência feito para o consumo de conteúdo leve, notas de escrita e trabalho de escritório básico. Qualquer coisa mais pesada deixará os usuários querendo (e esperando) mais.
Os compradores interessados podem economizar $30 usando o código de cupom "CHUWINOTE" neste link da Amazon.
Chuwi AeroBook 13 inch 2019
- 09/26/2019 v7 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
