Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Aorus 15 X9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 323.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1116:1 (Preto: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL504GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -3% | 1% | 0% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.6 | 64.9 -1% | 63.5 -3% | 65.3 0% | 65.3 0% | 64.8 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.2 | 95.6 4% | 89.4 -3% | 94.9 3% | 92.8 1% | 91.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 66.3 -1% | 64.5 -4% | 66.3 -1% | 66.7 0% | 65.9 -1% |
| Response Times | -73% | -91% | -81% | -10% | -314% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7 ? | 15.2 ? -117% | 18 ? -157% | 16.8 ? -140% | 7.8 ? -11% | 40.4 ? -477% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 12.4 ? -29% | 12 ? -25% | 11.6 ? -21% | 10.4 ? -8% | 24 ? -150% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 3% | -12% | 0% | -11% | -26% | |
| Brightness middle | 323.6 | 305.1 -6% | 353.6 9% | 314.7 -3% | 350 8% | 328 1% |
| Brightness | 315 | 295 -6% | 346 10% | 312 -1% | 338 7% | 305 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 78 -14% | 86 -5% | 90 -1% | 90 -1% | 83 -9% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.33 -14% | 0.3 -3% | 0.38 -31% | 0.33 -14% | 0.25 14% |
| Contrast | 1116 | 925 -17% | 1179 6% | 828 -26% | 1061 -5% | 1312 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 2.58 22% | 4.55 -37% | 2.56 23% | 4.3 -30% | 6.02 -82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.74 | 4.32 25% | 7.91 -38% | 4.89 15% | 7.78 -36% | 10.14 -77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.73 | 1.33 51% | 3.37 -23% | 1.71 37% | 2.83 -4% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 3.4 -17% | 4.1 -41% | 3.4 -17% | 4.4 -52% | 6.32 -118% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6765 96% | 6374 102% | 7434 87% | 6435 101% | 7517 86% | 8194 79% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.7 | 60.7 2% | 57.9 -3% | 60.7 2% | 60 1% | 60 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 95.2 4% | 88.9 -3% | 94.6 3% | 92.5 1% | 92 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-7% | -35% /
-20% | -27% /
-10% | -7% /
-9% | -114% /
-59% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3979 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5289 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5492 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Strix GL504GM Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 40% | 83% | 20% | 50% | |
| Seq Read | 1239 | 1912 54% | 1840 49% | 1433 16% | 903 -27% |
| Seq Write | 920 | 1553 69% | 1822 98% | 1071 16% | 1261 37% |
| 4K Read | 45.74 | 56.5 24% | 52.3 14% | 32 -30% | 40.02 -13% |
| 4K Write | 95.7 | 119.6 25% | 110.7 16% | 96.5 1% | 103.6 8% |
| 4K-64 Read | 322 | 869 170% | 1126 250% | 832 158% | 1030 220% |
| 4K-64 Write | 722 | 584 -19% | 1717 138% | 520 -28% | 1285 78% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.073 | 0.049 33% | 0.047 36% | 0.072 1% | 0.129 -77% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.031 34% | 0.033 30% | 0.045 4% | 0.036 23% |
| Score Read | 492 | 1116 127% | 1362 177% | 1007 105% | 1161 136% |
| Score Write | 910 | 859 -6% | 2010 121% | 724 -20% | 1515 66% |
| Score Total | 1654 | 2544 54% | 4079 147% | 2233 35% | 3294 99% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1236 | 1329 8% | 1975 60% | 1006 -19% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 703 | 404.3 -42% | 526 -25% | 752 7% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 812 | 1071 32% | 1200 48% | 1088 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21324 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32978 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17774 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7688 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 276.8 | 246.7 | 232.3 | 166 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 263.4 | 215.2 | 142 | 80.3 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 215 | 163.6 | 146.5 | 124 |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Strix GL504GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | 8% | 13% | 7% | 5% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 28.7 | 28.2 2% | 28.6 -0% | 28.8 -0% | 28.5 1% | 31 -8% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 32.6 -9% | 28.6 4% | 28.8 3% | 30 -1% | 32 -7% | 33 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 32.4 | 32.7 -1% | 28.6 12% | 28.8 11% | 30 7% | 33 -2% | 34 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 32.7 14% | 28.6 25% | 29.4 23% | 30 21% | 34 11% | 40 -5% |
| Load Average * | 38.2 | 38.9 -2% | 40.8 -7% | 35.7 7% | 41.8 -9% | 39 -2% | 47 -23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56.6 | 51.8 8% | 49.6 12% | 42.5 25% | 47.6 16% | 42 26% | 51 10% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.6 | 64.1 -13% | 49.6 12% | 45 20% | 50 12% | 46 19% | 53 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.8 / 32.4 / 38 dB |
| Carga |
| 38.2 / 56.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.98 Watt |
| Ocioso | 16.1 / 20.9 / 27 Watt |
| Carga |
93.4 / 215.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -3% | 22% | 18% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16.1 | 26 -61% | 17 -6% | 10.4 35% | 10 38% | 18 -12% |
| Idle Average * | 20.9 | 30.8 -47% | 20 4% | 14.6 30% | 16.9 19% | 23 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27 | 34.9 -29% | 29 -7% | 16.3 40% | 21.1 22% | 31 -15% |
| Load Average * | 93.4 | 90.7 3% | 112 -20% | 88.5 5% | 112.4 -20% | 79 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 168.2 | 175 -4% | 152 10% | 155.4 8% | 135.5 19% | 148 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 215.3 | 241.2 -12% | 211 2% | 182.4 15% | 157.3 27% | 196 9% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Aorus 15 X9 i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh | Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -48% | 156% | 114% | 96% | -28% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 181 | 95 -48% | 463 156% | 387 114% | 355 96% | 130 -28% |
| Reader / Idle | 105 | 627 | 682 | 188 | ||
| Load | 61 | 103 | 88 | 44 |
Pro
Contra
O GX531 se destaca em algumas áreas importantes. Além de ser atraentemente fino com marcos estreitos, as temperaturas centrais são mais baixas do que esperávamos quando os jogos e a tela em si são uma grande melhoria em relação à tela do GX501 onde o ghosting era muito notório. É claro que o design exclusivo do chassi significa que teclas desconfortavelmente quentes nunca serão um problema. Os usuários podem esperar de 17 a 45% melhor desempenho de jogos do RTX 2080 Max-Q em comparação com o GTX 1080 Max-Q.
Ainda há muito espaço para melhorias. O queixo da tela é muito grande e o ruído do ventilador é mais alto que nos concorrentes, incluindo o MSI GS65 ou Razer Blade 15. É necessário ter o portátil funcionando no Modo Turbo com os ventiladores no máximo para obter o máximo de desempenho dele, pois no Modo Balanceado acarretará uma penalidade no desempenho de 10%. Essas configurações de energia devem ser manipuladas por meio do aplicativo Armory Crate, pois elas operam independentemente dos perfis de energia padrão do Windows.
Outros recursos ausentes incluem o RJ-45, o leitor de cartões SD, a iluminação RGB por tecla e o Thunderbolt 3, que acreditamos ser padrão em portáteis de jogos carros chefe, que chegam aos US $ 2.500. Os entusiastas dos jogos podem preferir usar o G-Sync em vez do Optimus, já que a duração da bateria já é média, mesmo com a alternação de gráficos disponível. O perfil fino também exclui quaisquer opções de armazenamento secundário interno, o que pode ser um problema para usuários com grandes bibliotecas de jogos.
Devido às desvantagens do GX531, recomendamos que os usuários deem uma olhada na série Asus ROG GL504. Achamos melhor equilibrado com teclas mais firmes, tampa mais resistente, mais opções de armazenamento, mais portas e um trackpad maior. Ele ainda compartilha exatamente o mesmo painel IPS que o GX531. É uma alternativa mais grossa, mas achamos que sua longa lista de recursos úteis vale a pena.
Uma atualização significativa em relação ao antigo GX501 em termos de desempenho, peso, espessura e aparência. O GX531 é o portátil de 15,6 polegadas mais visualmente impressionante da Asus até hoje, mas teve que sacrificar alguns recursos úteis para alcançar um formato tão fino e leve.
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
- 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
