Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU: $1.800 pela RAM Single-Channel
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | 2 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 297.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 692:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.06
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -38% | 1% | 4% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.5 | 64.9 -2% | 39.56 -41% | 67.7 2% | 67.6 2% | 65.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.8 | 91 0% | 59.5 -34% | 91.6 1% | 97.5 7% | 91.8 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 65.9 -1% | 40.91 -38% | 67.1 1% | 68.9 4% | 66.5 0% |
| Response Times | -7% | -295% | -106% | -75% | -64% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.4 ? | 7.2 ? -13% | 30.4 ? -375% | 19 ? -197% | 13.6 ? -113% | 13.6 ? -113% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 8.8 ? -0% | 27.6 ? -214% | 10 ? -14% | 12 ? -36% | 10 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 23260 ? | 200 ? | ||||
| Screen | 10% | -44% | 34% | 26% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 297.7 | 286 -4% | 286.2 -4% | 477 60% | 282.3 -5% | 312.7 5% |
| Brightness | 280 | 275 -2% | 267 -5% | 431 54% | 269 -4% | 305 9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 90 7% | 84 0% | 84 0% | 90 7% | 90 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.37 14% | 0.33 23% | 0.175 59% | 0.32 26% | 0.27 37% |
| Contrast | 692 | 773 12% | 867 25% | 2726 294% | 882 27% | 1158 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.13 | 2.19 30% | 5.45 -74% | 4.17 -33% | 1.17 63% | 4.57 -46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 4.4 38% | 18.08 -155% | 6.97 2% | 3.29 54% | 6.81 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.06 | 2.27 26% | 4.47 -46% | 2.51 18% | 1.06 65% | 2.91 5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.2 -16% | 5.3 -179% | 3.49 -84% | 1.3 32% | 4.3 -126% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.41 91% | 2.1 105% | 2.5 88% | 2.2 100% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6325 103% | 6405 101% | 7679 85% | 7076 92% | 6643 98% | 7098 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.2 | 59 0% | 37.6 -36% | 60 1% | 63.8 8% | 59.4 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.5 | 91 1% | 59.1 -35% | 91 1% | 97.5 8% | 91.3 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
6% | -126% /
-74% | -24% /
10% | -15% /
9% | -22% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (4074 - 5217, n=11) | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
| MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5041 - 5913, n=12) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4094 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5610 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5273 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 27% | -18% | -9% | -29% | 24% | |
| Write 4K | 156 | 97 -38% | 93.9 -40% | 137.5 -12% | 134.2 -14% | 135 -13% |
| Read 4K | 60.7 | 49.58 -18% | 46.29 -24% | 57 -6% | 37.72 -38% | 41.1 -32% |
| Write Seq | 968 | 1838 90% | 974 1% | 984 2% | 389.2 -60% | 1427 47% |
| Read Seq | 1619 | 2421 50% | 1425 -12% | 1564 -3% | 1030 -36% | 1494 -8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 485 | 326.9 -33% | 259.4 -47% | 237.4 -51% | 238.9 -51% | 494.9 2% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 337.3 | 372.9 11% | 296.5 -12% | 340.7 1% | 343.9 2% | 578 71% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 969 | 1894 95% | 977 1% | 959 -1% | 789 -19% | 1417 46% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1825 | 2828 55% | 1666 -9% | 1732 -5% | 1502 -18% | 3251 78% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 293.4 | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 405.8 |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (59839 - 104780, n=18) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (14186 - 16488, n=24) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5335 - 6123, n=22) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, n=24) | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (9500 - 13311, n=23) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15912 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31253 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13381 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5641 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (62 - 73, n=8) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| MSI GE75 9SG | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (88 - 151, n=6) | |
| Alienware m15 P79F | |
| Asus Strix Hero III G731GV | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
| Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
| Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 235.5 | 216.4 | 201.6 | 121.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 177.3 | 148 | 95.9 | 55.2 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 88 | 68 | 67 | 62 |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -9% | -5% | 5% | 3% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 30 -6% | 28.7 -2% | 28.2 -0% | 28.3 -0% | 28.5 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.7 | 31 -8% | 29.8 -4% | 28.2 2% | 30.4 -6% | 30.3 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 30.5 | 33 -8% | 32.4 -6% | 28.2 8% | 30.5 -0% | 30.5 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31 | 38 -23% | 38 -23% | 31.4 -1% | 30.6 1% | 30.5 2% |
| Load Average * | 39 | 50 -28% | 38.2 2% | 39.8 -2% | 37.6 4% | 41 -5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.2 | 53 2% | 56.6 -4% | 47 13% | 46 15% | 48 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 59.6 | 56 6% | 56.6 5% | 50.2 16% | 55.1 8% | 51.9 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.7 / 30.5 / 31 dB |
| Carga |
| 39 / 59.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63.2 °C / 146 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.7 °C / -4.9 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.35 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 17.6 / 24.7 / 56.3 Watt |
| Carga |
111.1 / 170 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -11% | 9% | 49% | 4% | 1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 17.6 | 24 -36% | 16.1 9% | 7 60% | 22.2 -26% | 18.7 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 27 -9% | 20.9 15% | 9.9 60% | 24.9 -1% | 30.7 -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 56.3 | 33 41% | 27 52% | 12 79% | 30.6 46% | 33.9 40% |
| Load Average * | 111.1 | 129 -16% | 93.4 16% | 68.4 38% | 101 9% | 93.4 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 149 | 176 -18% | 168.2 -13% | 94.9 36% | 143 4% | 158.9 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 170 | 216 -27% | 215.3 -27% | 130.9 23% | 186 -9% | 195.3 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74 i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -32% | 1% | 23% | 35% | |
| Reader / Idle | 424 | 353 -17% | 466 10% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 268 | 220 -18% | 181 -32% | 285 6% | 330 23% | 362 35% |
| Load | 101 | 62 -39% | 87 -14% |
Pro
Contra
Analisamos recentemente o MSI GF65 de 15,6 polegadas que é fornecido com a mesma CPU e GPU do nosso Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU por quase a metade do preço. Quando um portátil concorrente abaixo de US$ 1.000 pode oferecer o mesmo desempenho de jogo que seu portátil de US$ 2000, é melhor oferecer recursos extras suficientes para garantir o preço mais alto. No caso da Asus, o GU502GU é um pacote misto. O dispositivo é maior, mais grosso, mais barulhento e mais flexível, com menor duração da bateria e menos opções de portas do que o Razer Blade 15 que é vendido pelo mesmo preço que o GU502GU. Portanto, se você está procurando algo mais resistente e luxuoso do que um portátil de jogos econômico como o GF65, seria difícil recomendar o Asus, pois ele não consegue enfrentar o Razer.
Existem algumas vantagens menores no Asus que vale a pena mencionar. Primeiro, este é um dos poucos portáteis para jogos com suporte para USB PD, o que significa que você pode recarregar o sistema com qualquer carregador USB de tipo C de 65 W de terceiros. Ter um único carregador USB tipo C para o seu smartphone, tablet, Switch e portátil para jogos durante as viagens certamente será útil para alguns usuários. Em segundo lugar, o desempenho do Turbo Boost de CPU acima da média pode ser aproveitado por usuários avançados. Em terceiro lugar, oferece iluminação RGB por tecla, que está visivelmente ausente no Razer acima mencionado. No entanto, essa pequena lista de pros empalidece em comparação à sua longa lista de recursos ausentes, chassi comparativamente mais fraco e RAM single-channel.
O Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU não é um portátil para jogos ruim, mas seu preço inicial de US$ 1.800 USD é cerca de US$ 200 a US$ 300 mais caro do que deveria ao considerar que se sente inferior ao Razer Blade 15, de preço semelhante.
Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502GU-XB74
- 10/25/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
