Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zephyrus GX501VS (i7-7700HQ, GTX 1070 Max-Q)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Gigabyte P56XT | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 877:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P56XT LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v6 IPS, 15.6", 2880x1620 | EVGA SC15 ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, , 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 1% | 1% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62.1 | 64.8 4% | 64.8 4% | 62.5 1% | 62.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 85.6 | 91.8 7% | 84.6 -1% | 86.2 1% | 89.6 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.4 | 65.9 6% | 61.8 -1% | 62.5 0% | 63.6 2% |
| Response Times | -4% | -1% | -8% | -18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.2 ? | 40.4 ? -22% | 37.2 ? -12% | 34 ? -2% | 41.6 ? -25% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 24 ? 14% | 24.8 ? 11% | 32 ? -14% | 30.8 ? -10% |
| PWM Frequency | 20000 ? | 198.4 | |||
| Screen | -35% | -44% | -28% | -16% | |
| Brightness middle | 307.1 | 328 7% | 301 -2% | 280.4 -9% | 281.5 -8% |
| Brightness | 309 | 305 -1% | 280 -9% | 271 -12% | 253 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 83 -3% | 87 1% | 83 -3% | 73 -15% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.25 29% | 0.32 9% | 0.249 29% | 0.27 23% |
| Contrast | 877 | 1312 50% | 941 7% | 1126 28% | 1043 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 6.02 -77% | 6.21 -83% | 4.94 -45% | 3.9 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 10.14 -24% | 10.78 -31% | 8.13 1% | 7.1 13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 6.32 -351% | 6.08 -334% | 5.13 -266% | 3.8 -171% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.26 97% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6558 99% | 8194 79% | 7375 88% | 7433 87% | 7322 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55.6 | 60 8% | 55 -1% | 55.9 1% | 57.8 4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 92 8% | 84 -1% | 85.9 1% | 89.3 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-23% | -15% /
-30% | -12% /
-19% | -11% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Eurocom Sky MX5 R3 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| MSI GP62-2QEi781FD | |
| Eurocom Sky X7E2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Aorus X5 v6 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5009 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7653 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5358 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4333 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Aorus X5 v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2 | EVGA SC15 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -63% | 22% | -76% | -20% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 719 | 377.8 -47% | 1310 82% | 1073 49% | 977 36% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 383.3 | 199 -48% | 635 66% | 351.5 -8% | 442.3 15% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1795 | 354.7 -80% | 1614 -10% | 351.1 -80% | 1071 -40% |
| Score Total | 3995 | 1019 -74% | 3943 -1% | 1630 -59% | 2474 -38% |
| Score Write | 1293 | 304 -76% | 1689 31% | 514 -60% | 896 -31% |
| Score Read | 1818 | 472 -74% | 1512 -17% | 756 -58% | 1081 -41% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.037 -16% | 0.024 25% | 0.025 22% | 0.035 -9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.1 -113% | 0.03 36% | 0.367 -681% | 0.054 -15% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1035 | 171.6 -83% | 1334 29% | 272.5 -74% | 706 -32% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1527 | 383.4 -75% | 1179 -23% | 521 -66% | 822 -46% |
| 4K Write | 117.3 | 104 -11% | 150.5 28% | 131.3 12% | 95.5 -19% |
| 4K Read | 50.2 | 37.2 -26% | 51 2% | 44.6 -11% | 39.13 -22% |
| Seq Write | 1409 | 288.2 -80% | 2046 45% | 1099 -22% | 943 -33% |
| Seq Read | 2412 | 510 -79% | 2819 17% | 1904 -21% | 2203 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
| Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| EVGA SC15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 Killer Edition | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| MSI GP62 7REX-1045US | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15479 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 140612 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27890 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13136 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 6993 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| MSI GS43VR 7RE-069US | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Gigabyte Sabre 15G | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 70 | |||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 131.6 | |||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 108.4 | |||
| Thief (2014) | 98.8 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 96 | 51 | ||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 111 | 79 | ||
| Metal Gear Solid V (2015) | 60 | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 95.3 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 85.9 | |||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 74.2 | 72.8 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 81.3 | |||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 56 | |||
| Prey (2017) | 140.8 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 82.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 30.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 35.2 / 48.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Gigabyte P56XT GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | EVGA SC15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -15% | -13% | -5% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 31 -9% | 30 -5% | 30 -5% | 28 2% | 28.8 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 32 -12% | 34 -19% | 34 -19% | 31.9 -12% | 33.1 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 33 -16% | 35 -23% | 35 -23% | 32 -12% | 33.1 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 34 -13% | 39 -30% | 36 -20% | 32 -6% | 34 -13% |
| Load Average * | 35.2 | 39 -11% | 39 -11% | 40 -14% | 36.5 -4% | 37.2 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 42 -1% | 48 -15% | 40.3 3% | 46.1 -11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 46 6% | 49 -0% | 46 6% | 53.4 -9% | 47.1 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.4 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.1 °C / -18.2 F).
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.38 / 0.63 Watt |
| Ocioso | 19.1 / 20.8 / 21.8 Watt |
| Carga |
73.7 / 173.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, LiteOn CX2-8B256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0), TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -13% | -14% | -88% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 19.1 | 13 32% | 25.8 -35% | 18 6% | 34 -78% |
| Idle Average * | 20.8 | 17 18% | 26.6 -28% | 23 -11% | 41 -97% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21.8 | 22 -1% | 26.7 -22% | 31 -42% | 50 -129% |
| Load Average * | 73.7 | 85 -15% | 80.3 -9% | 79 -7% | 106 -44% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 130.2 | 154 -18% | 121.2 7% | 148 -14% | 257 -97% |
| Load Maximum * | 173.1 | 208 -20% | 159.3 8% | 196 -13% | 320 -85% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | Gigabyte P56XT i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 91.2 Wh | Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | EVGA SC15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 77% | 151% | 46% | 25% | -13% | |
| Reader / Idle | 229 | 377 65% | 568 148% | 249 9% | 222 -3% | 188 -18% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 147 | 246 67% | 384 161% | 182 24% | 167 14% | 130 -12% |
| Load | 49 | 98 100% | 120 145% | 100 104% | 81 65% | 44 -10% |
Pro
Contra
O GX501VS é vendido atualmente $500 mais barato do que o GX501VI de $2800. Os gamers que possam lidar com a queda de 15 por cento de desempenho do GTX 1080 Max-Q para o GTX 1070 Max-Q encontrarão uma barreira inferior mais atraente para entrar nesta última configuração Zephyrus. Isto é verdade especialmente se os jogos em 120 FPS ou 4K não são atraentes, pois o GTX 1070 Max-Q é atualmente mais do que suficiente para 1080p60 na maioria dos títulos testados. Quando comparado com os concorrentes não Max-Q mais próximos, o GX501 é impressionantemente mais rápido e mais silencioso.
Além das discrepâncias de desempenho entre as duas SKUs Max-Q, nossas análises no GX501VI ainda se aplicam ao GX501VS. O ruído da ventoinha é quase o mesmo, apesar do mais lento GTX 1070 Max-Q que funciona a 10 C a menos quando sob cargas de jogos. O desempenho da CPU é estável ao custo de altas temperaturas do núcleo e o teclado ainda é bastante inferior para fins de jogo.
A característica de dobradiça única continua a ser uma bolsa mista. Ele permite um chassi muito plano e atraente, mas este definitivamente não é um portátil para usar no colo ou no trem sem uma mesa plana. Mesmo assim, o posicionamento do teclado fechado é desfavorável em espaços apertados como em aviões. Essas desvantagens estão em desacordo com o design fino e portátil.
O GX501VS mais acessível da Asus possui uma enorme quantidade de poder e funciona de forma mais silenciosa do que outros portáteis superfinos atualmente no mercado. Os usuários que querem o Zephyrus pelo seu tamanho, ruído da ventoinha decente e potencial de gráficos de 1080p, encontrarão muito do que gostar. Caso contrário, portáteis de jogos maiores e mais tradicionais de 15 polegadas com gráficos GTX 1070 padrão, ainda darão mais pelo seu dinheiro.
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS
- 08/25/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
