Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T (jseb) | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng |
|
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 341 cd/m²
Contraste: 931:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.84 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
80% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
80.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T IPS, 3840x2160 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 IPS-Panel, 2880x1800 | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus G501VW-FY081T IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 9% | 7% | 18% | 2% | -13% | 16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 61.5 | 64.3 5% | 61.4 0% | 68.8 12% | 63.6 3% | 59.9 -3% 40.34 -34% | 66.8 9% |
sRGB Coverage | 80.4 | 89.9 12% | 90.8 13% | 97.9 22% | 82 2% | 85.9 7% 60.3 -25% | 97.3 21% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 58.8 | 65.4 11% | 62.9 7% | 70.7 20% | 59.9 2% | 61.6 5% 41.73 -29% | 68.6 17% |
Response Times | -7% | -55% | 5% | -29% | -38% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 43.2 ? -8% | 62 ? -55% | 50 ? -25% | 55 ? -38% | 50 ? -25% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 27.2 ? -5% | 40 ? -54% | 17 ? 35% | 31 ? -19% | 39 ? -50% | |
PWM Frequency | 362 ? | 200 ? | |||||
Screen | -11% | 24% | 14% | 8% | -16% | 13% | |
Brightness middle | 326 | 252.9 -22% | 341 5% | 399 22% | 328 1% | 214 -34% | 341 5% |
Brightness | 316 | 250 -21% | 315 0% | 394 25% | 310 -2% | 203 -36% | 312 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 89 11% | 82 3% | 89 11% | 86 8% | 79 -1% | 83 4% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.5 -43% | 0.34 3% | 0.24 31% | 0.33 6% | 0.28 20% | 0.32 9% |
Contrast | 931 | 506 -46% | 1003 8% | 1663 79% | 994 7% | 764 -18% | 1066 15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 5.22 5% | 2.07 62% | 5.95 -8% | 4.74 14% | 6.04 -10% | 4.23 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.36 | 8.33 27% | 3.27 71% | 12 -6% | 8.02 29% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.84 | 6.74 -39% | 1.9 61% | 8.41 -74% | 3.15 35% | 5.91 -22% | 4.69 3% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.45 90% | 2.62 84% | 2.35 94% | 2.51 88% | 2.44 90% | 2.53 87% |
CCT | 5971 109% | 6026 108% | 6514 100% | 7010 93% | 6336 103% | 7362 88% | 7549 86% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 53 | 58.4 10% | 58 9% | 64 21% | 54 2% | 38 -28% | 63 19% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 80 | 89.7 12% | 91 14% | 98 23% | 82 3% | 60 -25% | 97 21% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-6% | 16% /
20% | -8% /
5% | 5% /
7% | -19% /
-16% | -3% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
PCMark 7 Score | 4986 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3370 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4118 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4341 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 Apple SSD SM0512G | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + LiteON CS1-SP32-11 M.2 2242 32GB | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 Lite-On CV1-8B128 | HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 236% | 172% | -40% | -34% | 6% | |
Read Seq | 459.3 | 1633 256% | 1442 214% | 238.6 -48% | 435.3 -5% | 475.7 4% |
Write Seq | 325.5 | 1579 385% | 1558 379% | 64 -80% | 178.2 -45% | 169.2 -48% |
Read 512 | 279.2 | 1068 283% | 897 221% | 321 15% | 310 11% | 327.6 17% |
Write 512 | 280.1 | 1570 461% | 1430 411% | 44.78 -84% | 167.8 -40% | 169.6 -39% |
Read 4k | 22.43 | 50.4 125% | 19.27 -14% | 31.36 40% | 13.7 -39% | 33.14 48% |
Write 4k | 74.9 | 128.6 72% | 30.98 -59% | 1.051 -99% | 27.86 -63% | 81.4 9% |
Read 4k QD32 | 149 | 534 258% | 403.1 171% | 199.5 34% | 121.1 -19% | 276.8 86% |
Write 4k QD32 | 234 | 344 47% | 353.2 51% | 1.085 -100% | 74.8 -68% | 168 -28% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 19872 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4732 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 47117 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10115 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3651 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1915 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1206 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 232.6 | 153.6 | 110.2 | 50.1 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 143.6 | 103.5 | 92.3 | 39.4 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 110.7 | 93.5 | 70.9 | 33 |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 64 | 57 | 31 | 18 |
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 104.8 | 69.7 | 35 | 30.2 |
Far Cry Primal (2016) | 61 | 29 | 26 | 19 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 31.2 | 23.1 | 20.5 | |
Doom (2016) | 73.9 | 60.4 | 35.1 | 34.7 |
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 64.8 | 49 | 26.2 | 23.3 |
No Man's Sky (2016) | 46.2 | 39.7 | 24.3 | 10.9 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 38.1 | 30.2 | 17.1 | 9.8 |
FIFA 17 (2016) | 147.6 | 132.7 | 83 | 81.5 |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 34.2 | 24.2 | 11 |
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
Saelic Veni G731 | |
Hyperbook SL502 VR | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Y700-15ACZ | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 |
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 High Preset | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Y700-15ACZ | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 |
Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV | |
Asus G501VW-FY081T | |
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Y700-15ACZ | |
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 |
Doom - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1366x768 Normal / Off AF:4x | |
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Y700-15ACZ |
Star Wars Battlefront - 1366x768 Medium Preset AA:FX | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo Y700-15ACZ |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x | |
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.6 / 31.6 / 33.4 dB |
Carga |
| 41.7 / 44.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M | Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus G501VW-FY081T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 4% | -1% | -3% | -0% | -3% | -0% | |
off / environment * | 31.6 | 31.3 1% | 30 5% | 31.2 1% | ||||
Idle Minimum * | 31.6 | 28.9 9% | 28.9 9% | 32.6 -3% | 31.2 1% | 29.6 6% | 32 -1% | 32.1 -2% |
Idle Average * | 31.6 | 28.9 9% | 28.9 9% | 33.6 -6% | 31.2 1% | 32.1 -2% | 33 -4% | 32.1 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.4 | 30.2 10% | 28.9 13% | 33.6 -1% | 36.2 -8% | 32.8 2% | 36 -8% | 32.1 4% |
Load Average * | 41.7 | 41.8 -0% | 46 -10% | 37.1 11% | 45.3 -9% | 41.4 1% | 43 -3% | 43.3 -4% |
Load Maximum * | 44.8 | 43.9 2% | 46 -3% | 47.5 -6% | 47.3 -6% | 48.4 -8% | 49 -9% | 44.3 1% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.2 °C / 79.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.6 °C / 4.6 F).
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M | Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus G501VW-FY081T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -19% | -17% | -53% | -34% | -23% | -30% | -16% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.6 | 44.2 -24% | 43.2 -21% | 62.5 -76% | 50.1 -41% | 48.4 -36% | 48.5 -36% | 41 -15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37 | 48 -30% | 39 -5% | 54.4 -47% | 56.2 -52% | 46 -24% | 59 -59% | 48.2 -30% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.8 | 26.2 -6% | 30 -21% | 33.5 -35% | 28.3 -14% | 28.9 -17% | 28.7 -16% | 26.4 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.1 | 27.8 -15% | 29.3 -22% | 36.7 -52% | 31.1 -29% | 27.9 -16% | 25.7 -7% | 26.7 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.34 / 0.58 Watt |
Ocioso | 5 / 8.9 / 11.8 Watt |
Carga |
55 / 93 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, GeForce GTX 960M | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 6300HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 6500U, GeForce GTX 950M | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M | Asus G501VW-FY081T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -25% | -46% | -51% | 0% | -39% | -24% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 6 -20% | 9.9 -98% | 8.9 -78% | 5.2 -4% | 7 -40% | 6.9 -38% |
Idle Average * | 8.9 | 12.8 -44% | 12.6 -42% | 13.9 -56% | 9.4 -6% | 11 -24% | 10.7 -20% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.8 | 13.3 -13% | 16.8 -42% | 15.6 -32% | 10.8 8% | 19 -61% | 13.2 -12% |
Load Average * | 55 | 82.4 -50% | 70 -27% | 89 -62% | 60 -9% | 79 -44% | 82 -49% |
Load Maximum * | 93 | 91.8 1% | 114 -23% | 118 -27% | 80.9 13% | 119 -28% | 94 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T 6500U, 48 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T 6700HQ, 96 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, 100 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2016 9550 6300HQ, 56 Wh | Acer Aspire V15 Nitro BE VN7-592G-79DV 6700HQ, 52 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-572G-72L0 6500U, 53 Wh | HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, 61.5 Wh | Asus G501VW-FY081T 6700HQ, 60 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -2% | 9% | -6% | -38% | 0% | -31% | -28% | |
Reader / Idle | 816 | 689 -16% | 1039 27% | 544 -33% | 530 -35% | 761 -7% | 467 -43% | 610 -25% |
H.264 | 428 | 413 -4% | 361 -16% | 231 -46% | 244 -43% | 303 -29% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 430 | 379 -12% | 432 0% | 332 -23% | 218 -49% | 359 -17% | 272 -37% | 330 -23% |
Load | 95 | 117 23% | 105 11% | 140 47% | 75 -21% | 118 24% | 93 -2% | 64 -33% |
Pro
Contra
O Zenbook vem com um processador Core i7 que tem poder mais que suficiente para o uso rotineiro. A Asus dispensa um processador quad-core e instala um processador dual-core ULV em seu lugar. Ele tem um efeito muito positivo na ergonomia e na duração da bateria. No entanto, o Zenbook fica um pouco atrás da taxa de fotogramas de outros portáteis GTX 960M em jogos de computador. Apesar de tudo, quase todos os jogos atuais podem ser jogados no Zenbook. O portátil funciona de forma silenciosa, pelo menos no modo inativo e dificilmente esquenta, nem mesmo sob uso intenso. Um veloz SSD garante um sistema veloz. O disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas, adicionalmente instalado, fornece a capacidade de armazenamento necessária. O painel IPS mate do Zenbook agrada com bom brilho, bom contraste, e ângulos de visão estáveis. O pacote é completado com boas durações da bateria.
Com o Zenbook UX510UW, a Asus tem um poli funcional bem-sucedido com qualidades aptas para jogos que inclusive permitem o uso móvel graças a um boa duração da bateria em sua linha.
No entanto, o Zenbook não está livre de críticas. O teclado poderia ter uma resistência mais nítida e um ponto de pressão mais claro. A unidade base deveria ser mais rígida. Isto pode ser esperado, em vista do nível de preços do portátil. Além disso, uma porta Ethernet não está presente - uma decisão incomum.
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
- 12/09/2016 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck