Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ (7500U, 940MX, 512 GB)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 377 cd/m²
Contraste: 1038:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.88 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.24 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T Chi Mei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -11% | 0% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 65.3 -3% | 67.2 0% | 68.9 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.7 | 82.9 -16% | 99.2 1% | 98.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.3 | 60.6 -13% | 69.3 0% | 70.9 2% |
Response Times | -9% | -7% | -61% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 45 ? -13% | 44 ? -10% | 54 ? -35% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 29 ? -4% | 29 ? -4% | 52.4 ? -87% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | |||
Screen | -12% | 2% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 353 | 343 -3% | 381 8% | 400 13% |
Brightness | 366 | 306 -16% | 368 1% | 392 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 81 -8% | 84 -5% | 89 1% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.3 12% | 0.3 12% | 0.26 24% |
Contrast | 1038 | 1143 10% | 1270 22% | 1538 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.88 | 4.73 -64% | 2.84 1% | 4.9 -70% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.61 | 9.05 -37% | 6.5 2% | 11 -66% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.24 | 3.29 22% | 4.02 5% | 7.2 -70% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.36 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 7380 88% | 6437 101% | 7430 87% | 6911 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64 | 54 -16% | 56 -12% | 64.2 0% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 83 -16% | 86 -13% | 98.9 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-11% | -2% /
1% | -23% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 20 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3913 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4812 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 143% | -14% | -82% | |
Read Seq | 500 | 1577 215% | 497 -1% | 123 -75% |
Write Seq | 457.4 | 1472 222% | 323.7 -29% | 74.2 -84% |
Read 512 | 345.6 | 1165 237% | 289 -16% | 101.7 -71% |
Write 512 | 415 | 1244 200% | 288 -31% | 42.51 -90% |
Read 4k | 28.34 | 54.8 93% | 22.78 -20% | 10.84 -62% |
Write 4k | 56.8 | 121.5 114% | 79.5 40% | 1.021 -98% |
Read 4k QD32 | 311.3 | 407.5 31% | 147 -53% | 69.8 -78% |
Write 4k QD32 | 251.1 | 321.4 28% | 257.2 2% | 1.057 -100% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2335 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6852 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1373 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diablo III (2012) | 70.2 | 66.8 | 41.7 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 27.8 | 17.3 | ||
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 79.7 | 34.1 | 23.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.8 / 30.8 / 32.4 dB |
Carga |
| 35.1 / 38.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.4 °C / 92.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.27 / 0.6 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.6 / 5.9 / 6.25 Watt |
Carga |
42 / 46 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Voltcraft VC 940 |
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -19% | -15% | -109% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 3.6 -38% | 3.5 -35% | 6.6 -154% |
Idle Average * | 5.9 | 7.4 -25% | 6.6 -12% | 9 -53% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.25 | 8.7 -39% | 7.1 -14% | 10.7 -71% |
Load Average * | 42 | 43 -2% | 30 29% | 77.5 -85% |
Load Maximum * | 46 | 42 9% | 65 -41% | 130 -183% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3410UQ-GV077T i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -36% | -3% | -35% | |
Reader / Idle | 1292 | 468 -64% | 565 -56% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 338 -36% | 511 -3% | 334 -37% |
Load | 97 | 89 -8% | 84 -13% |
Pro
Contra
Por que, mas por que a Asus optou pela quase antiga e certamente ultrapassada GeForce 940MX? E por que ala não gerenciou uma implementação decente deste conhecido chip, para começar? Lembre-se que o 940MX do Zenbook é apenas cerca de 30% mais rápido que o Intel HD Graphics 620 integrado. A única pretensão restante de "multimídia" pode ser encontrada na excelente tela do portátil. Multimídia? Certamente não.
Negócios? Certamente sim. O Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ é muito mais um parceiro de negócios e de escritório, e não irá prejudicar as aspirações de edição de fotos não profissionais. Graças a seus finos marcos, a carcaça bem feita de 14 polegadas é bastante compacto. A muito longa duração da bateria e os recursos de segurança incluídos no portátil o tornam muito portátil. Se não fosse pelas teclas grandes bastante altas no teclado, o aparelho teria sido muito silencioso em geral. Em resumo, os dispositivos de entrada devem agradar os escritores mais prolíficos.
Os usuários de escritório e de negócios que procuram um portátil apresentável de alta qualidade são o público-alvo principal do aparelho. Os gamers, por outro lado, devem ficar longe.
Em seus níveis de preços atuais de $1.500 (GV010T) e $1.600 (GV012T), ambos os modelos UX3430UQ são muito caros. Esperar por um tempo poderia acabar recompensando potenciais compradores, com uma relação preço-desempenho mais adequada.
Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T
- 07/05/2017 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn