Breve Análise do Portátil Asus Zenbook UX330UA

Name: Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T
Brand: Asus

Elegante e duradouro. O novo Zenbook da Asus herda as melhores qualidades da série, como uma excelente carcaça e peso baixo. Além dos dispositivos de entrada um pouco medíocres, não apresenta muitas desvantagens especialmente nas fantásticas durações da bateria.

Sven Kloevekorn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 11/09/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Business Laptop / Notebook Security Skylake Windows Zen

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T (Zenbook UX330 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memória compartilhada, 20.19.15.4474

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel

Pantalha

13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH

Disco rígido

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, 256 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Áudio de entrada/saída combinado, conector de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.5 x 323 x 222.3

Bateria

57 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p CMOS

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, lado inferior, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 176 g

Preço

1100 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

▶ load Youtube video

Size Comparison

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Dell XPS 13-9350 Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK DIN A4 ❌

Right: Micro-HDMI, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen 1, USB 3.0, power

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK	71.2 MB/s +135%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T	31.4 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T	30.3 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK	81.3 MB/s +118%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T	38.3 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T	37.3 MB/s

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	609 MBit/s
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	505 MBit/s -17%
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	439 MBit/s -28%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Asus Zenbook UX360UA-C4159T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	526 MBit/s +25%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (jseb)	421 MBit/s
HP Spectre x2 12-a001ng Intel Wireless-AC 7265	323 MBit/s -23%


357 cd/m²	348 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
359 cd/m²	360 cd/m²	314 cd/m²
329 cd/m²	343 cd/m²	311 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 337.2 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 1636:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.23 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T AU Optronics AUO272D / B133HAN02.7, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13-9350 SHP1420, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Sharp SHP 1447 / LQ133M1JW15, , 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Samsung 133YL04-P02, , 3200x1800, 13.3"
Display		-29%	5%	-7%
Display P3 Coverage	64.2	44.53 -31%	66.4 3%	59.1 -8%
sRGB Coverage	90.6	66.8 -26%	97.5 8%	85.5 -6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.3	45.97 -30%	68.4 5%	61 -7%
Response Times			-16%	196%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	32 ?(12, 20)		52.4 ?(18.4, 34) -64%	38 ?(24, 14, Spikes in between) -19%
Response Time Black / White *	25 ?(5, 20)		23.6 ?(12, 11.6) 6%	27 ?(13, 14, Spikes in between) -8%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(80)		220 ?(50) 10%	1429 ?(20) 615%
Screen		-6%	-11%	-17%
Brightness middle	360	277.5 -23%	344 -4%	390 8%
Brightness	337	276 -18%	326 -3%	352 4%
Brightness Distribution	86	88 2%	87 1%	81 -6%
Black Level *	0.22	0.191 13%	0.36 -64%	0.69 -214%
Contrast	1636	1453 -11%	956 -42%	565 -65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.21	4.88 6%	6.09 -17%	3.04 42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.85		10 -13%	7.01 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.23	4.26 32%	5.36 14%	2.88 54%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.59 ^85%	2.01 ^109%	2.43 ^91%
CCT	6506 ^100%	6562 ^99%	7230 ^90%	6848 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	59	41.6 -29%	62.25 6%	55 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90	65.79 -27%	97.54 8%	85 -6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-18% / -12%	-7% / -9%	57% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 80 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Core i7-6560U	130 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Core i7-6500U	124 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	116 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75	100 Points -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel Core i7-6500U	319 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Core i7-6560U	318 Points 0%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel Core i5-6200U	287 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel Core m7-6Y75	214 Points -33%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

124 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

319 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	3883 Points +10%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	3527 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	2983 Points -15%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	2614 Points -26%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Iris Graphics 540, 6560U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	4680 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T HD Graphics 520, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4355 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	4078 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T HD Graphics 515, 6Y75, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2	3472 Points -20%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3527 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4355 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Dell XPS 13-9350 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		63%	106%	40%
Read Seq	447.6	1097 145%	1193 167%	475.2 6%
Write Seq	309.4	307.7 -1%	309.6 0%	423.7 37%
Read 512	265.9	684 157%	613 131%	404.8 52%
Write 512	275.2	308.6 12%	311 13%	396.2 44%
Read 4k	18.89	38.52 104%	42.43 125%	28.57 51%
Write 4k	75.1	113 50%	144.9 93%	90.7 21%
Read 4k QD32	142.2	244.7 72%	549 286%	288.9 103%
Write 4k QD32	228.9	151.5 -34%	311.3 36%	242.3 6%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002

Sequential Read: 447.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 309.4 MB/s

512K Read: 265.9 MB/s

512K Write: 275.2 MB/s

4K Read: 18.89 MB/s

4K Write: 75.1 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 142.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 228.9 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	2101 Points +43%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	1469 Points
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	1398 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	1083 Points -26%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK Intel Iris Graphics 540, Intel Core i7-6560U	11531 Points +48%
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	7966 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i7-6500U	7801 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	4286 Points -45%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13-9350 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U	929 Points
Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m7-6Y75	507 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		1626 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		60466 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6081 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	57.9	31.1	26.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	12.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)		48.3	25.8	22.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	13.9

Barulho

Ocioso		31.2 / 31.2 / 31.2 dB
Carga		37.4 / 41.4 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


30.3 °C	42.7 °C	31.9 °C
26.1 °C	39.4 °C	27.5 °C
24.2 °C	24.1 °C	24.3 °C

Máximo: 42.7 °C
Médio: 30.1 °C


29.8 °C	38.3 °C	34.7 °C
28.4 °C	31.6 °C	30.5 °C
26 °C	27.7 °C	26.8 °C

Máximo: 38.3 °C
Médio: 30.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 37.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20.5 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.7 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.3 °C / 75.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+4 °C / 7.2 F).

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (17.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (47.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.4 Watt
Ocioso	3 / 6.3 / 7.5 Watt
Carga	36 / 31.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Micron M600 MTFDDAV512MBF M.2, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"	Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3"
Power Consumption		-15%	-1%	-18%
Idle Minimum *	3	3.3 -10%	4.2 -40%	6.4 -113%
Idle Average *	6.3	7.4 -17%	8.4 -33%	6.6 -5%
Idle Maximum *	7.5	8.2 -9%	8.9 -19%	6.8 9%
Load Average *	36	36.5 -1%	15.9 56%	27.5 24%
Load Maximum *	31.5	43.7 -39%	22.5 29%	32.4 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		20h 25min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 12min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 55min

	Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 57 Wh	Dell XPS 13-9350 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 56 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 710S-13ISK 6560U, Iris Graphics 540, 46 Wh	Asus Zenbook UX305CA-FB055T 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		-11%	-30%	2%
Reader / Idle	1225	782 -36%	810 -34%	1013 -17%
WiFi v1.3	612	451 -26%	418 -32%	402 -34%
Load	115	150 30%	89 -23%	182 58%
H.264			486	418

Pro

+ Muitas configurações disponíveis

+ Leve e fino

+ Carcaça elegante e robusta

+ Construção muito boa, porém, imperfeita

+ USB 3.1 Tipo-C Gen.

+ Portas posicionadas de forma ergonômica

+ Muito bom desempenho do WiFi

+ Tela muito brilhante e com alto contraste

+ Boa adequação para exteriores

+ Silencioso e frio

+ Frugal durante o modo inativo

+ Fantástica duração da bateria

Contra

- Conectividade limitada

- Lento leitor de cartões SD

- Sem Ethernet

- PWM

- Sem escotilha de manutenção, parafusos torx

- A bateria não pode ser removida desde o exterior

- Touchpad medíocre

- O SSD poderia ser mais veloz

in review: Asus Zenbook UX330UA. Test model courtesy of CampusPoint

Embora o novo Asus Zenbook UX360UA-FC059T com um preço de aproximadamente 1100 Euros no momento do teste não passe da marca dos 90 por cento, mais uma vez é um portátil que o escritor gostaria de chamar de seu.

A excelente carcaça chama a atenção, e o peso baixo e as durações extremamente longas se relacionam com um fato móvel excelente. A tela também é totalmente convincente.

Ele oferece um muito bom desempenho do WiFi, as portas posicionadas de forma ideal, e operação silenciosa e fria. Ele também é alimentado impecavelmente e funciona como deveria.

É claro que existem alguns pontos de crítica menores: O teclado poderia ser de melhor qualidade, e não conseguimos nos adaptar bem às propriedades de deslizamento ou às teclas do touchpad. O fraco leitor de cartões de memória é realmente supérfluo; o fabricante somente teve que gastar pouco dinheiro por uma solução adequada.

Nós outorgamos ao novo Zenbook uma recomendação de compra ambígua. Os compradores que se empolgam pela carcaça e que podem viver com um desempenho mais baixo e durações de bateria um pouco mais curtas deveriam dar uma olhada no Zenbook UX305CA com um painel 4K. No entanto, os rivais um pouco mais massivos, pesados, e não tão duradouros da Dell e Lenovo atingiram muito boas pontuações de 90 e 86 %, e ambos possuem suas fortalezas. Por isso, podemos dizer que montamos um campo de teste exaustivo aqui.

Asus Zenbook UX330UA-FC059T - 11/04/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

50 / 80 → 62%

Peso

73 / 35-78 → 88%

Bateria