Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook UX530UX (i7-7500U, GTX 950M)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 80 %
Contraste: 1288:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.75 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T Chi Mei CMN15E8, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -38% | -39% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.3 | 38.65 -40% | 38.57 -40% | 65.7 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.6 | 58 -36% | 57.4 -37% | 90.3 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 39.94 -39% | 39.89 -39% | 65.9 1% |
| Response Times | -2% | 8% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 44.8 ? -12% | 39 ? 2% | 38.8 ? 3% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 25.6 ? 9% | 24 ? 14% | 27.2 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 25910 ? 4% | ||
| Screen | -16% | -61% | -4% | |
| Brightness middle | 309 | 242 -22% | 176 -43% | 335 8% |
| Brightness | 296 | 243 -18% | 169 -43% | 313 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 80 | 75 -6% | 91 14% | 83 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.24 -0% | 0.47 -96% | 0.27 -13% |
| Contrast | 1288 | 1008 -22% | 374 -71% | 1241 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.09 | 4.65 -14% | 8.83 -116% | 4.7 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.44 | 9.64 -30% | 14.01 -88% | 8.1 -9% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.75 | 3.39 29% | 8.97 -89% | 5.8 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.7 81% | 2.43 91% | 2.06 107% |
| CCT | 7034 92% | 6246 104% | 10234 64% | 6518 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 36.69 -37% | 36.8 -37% | 58.7 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 57.66 -36% | 57.3 -36% | 90.1 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-18% | -31% /
-47% | 0% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3515 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4661 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 188% | -86% | 334% | |
| Read Seq | 282.2 | 1140 304% | 95.3 -66% | 1434 408% |
| Write Seq | 184.5 | 468.1 154% | 85.6 -54% | 1365 640% |
| Read 512 | 233.5 | 759 225% | 29.32 -87% | 614 163% |
| Write 512 | 140.1 | 414 196% | 25.93 -81% | 688 391% |
| Read 4k | 24.42 | 34.3 40% | 0.366 -99% | 60.6 148% |
| Write 4k | 48.98 | 123.4 152% | 0.726 -99% | 158 223% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 170 | 530 212% | 0.647 -100% | 617 263% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 98.5 | 319.2 224% | 0.722 -99% | 525 433% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (4046 - 4678, n=28) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (18547 - 25900, n=28) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (2931 - 3638, n=28) | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4006 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 1262 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2638 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 42.5 | 36.04 | 20.02 | 10.71 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 67.1 | 37.32 | 21.49 | 17.89 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 143.2 | 54.8 | 40.33 |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (42.5 - 67, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (33 - 40.7, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (16.2 - 22.3, n=7) | |
| Rocket League | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M () | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:Medium FX | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M () | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (40.3 - 68.4, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (42.6 - 71.4, n=9) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (28.8 - 41, n=10) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M (16.9 - 23.1, n=10) | |
| Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T GeForce GTX 950M, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 0% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 30.2 | 29 4% | 28.9 4% | 29.4 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.2 | 29 4% | 30.8 -2% | 29.4 3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.2 | 29 4% | 30.8 -2% | 29.9 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 29 8% | 30.8 3% | 29.9 5% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 34.3 5% | 33.4 7% | 38.3 -6% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.6 | 40.1 -10% | 40.1 -10% | 39.6 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 31.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 36 / 36.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T GeForce GTX 950M, i7-7500U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -21% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.2 | 46.6 3% | 48.1 -0% | 43.6 10% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45.8 | 49.1 -7% | 60.8 -33% | 44.5 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 24.6 2% | 30.8 -23% | 28 -12% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.9 | 25.1 -1% | 31.9 -28% | 26.7 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.3 / 9.1 Watt |
| Carga |
60 / 65 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T i7-7500U, GeForce GTX 950M, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 6% | -29% | -51% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 2.8 20% | 6 -71% | 5.05 -44% |
| Idle Average * | 5.3 | 6.3 -19% | 8.1 -53% | 8.2 -55% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.1 | 6.9 24% | 9.8 -8% | 12.2 -34% |
| Load Average * | 60 | 51.6 14% | 52.5 12% | 82 -37% |
| Load Maximum * | 65 | 69.7 -7% | 81.6 -26% | 120 -85% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 93.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T i7-7500U, GeForce GTX 950M, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 73 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 39% | 12% | 31% | |
| Reader / Idle | 526 | 883 68% | 767 46% | 1061 102% |
| H.264 | 420 | 460 10% | 465 11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 370 | 462 25% | 451 22% | 535 45% |
| Load | 105 | 129 23% | 75 -29% | 70 -33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 68 |
Pro
Contra
É bastante óbvio que público o Asus ZenBook UX530UX atende: Pessoas que desejam mobilidade, mas que não querem abrir mão de uma tela de 15 polegadas, e podem poupar o dinheiro. O novo ZenBook é pequeno, leve, elegante e de alta qualidade. Tem uma boa tela, e geralmente permanece agradavelmente frio e relativamente silencioso.
Qualquer pessoa que não se preocupa muito com o peso e a mobilidade provavelmente deve procurar um novo dispositivo em outro lugar. Do ponto de vista do desempenho, o ZenBook não vai inspirar muito entusiasmo, porque ele se afoga muito. O SSD instalado é de gama média e a inclusão de apenas o USB 2.0 não é mais adequado hoje em dia. Os concorrentes com um desempenho similar ou até mesmo melhor estão disponíveis por muito menos dinheiro. Por exemplo, o LenovoThinkPad E570, que é maior e mais pesado, mas com o mesmo desempenho, custa quase 500 euros (~$622) menos!
O preço do Asus ZenBook UX530 é definitivamente muito alto para o desempenho oferecido. Por isso, um paga menos por seu desempenho e mais por adquirir um dos dispositivos de 15 polegadas mais leve e pequeno existente. Se esse aspecto for de menor importância para um usuário, eles serão mais felizes com outras opções. No entanto, o novo ZenBook oferece uma grande mobilidade junto com um desempenho aceitável, apenas o tempo de duração da bateria poderia ser melhor.
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
-
01/31/2018 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze