Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook UX3410UA
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 376 cd/m²
Contraste: 1175:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA ChiMei N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T AU Optronics AUO142D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV AU Optronics B140HAN3.2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE AU Optronics B140HAN03.0, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | -7% | -45% | -9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.7 | 61.9 -9% | 62.8 -7% | 36.97 -45% | 62 -8% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 88.3 -11% | 91.3 -8% | 55.6 -44% | 89.5 -10% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.4 | 63 -9% | 64.3 -7% | 38.2 -45% | 63.3 -9% |
Response Times | 6% | -19% | -5% | -29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33 ? | 39 ? -18% | 51 ? -55% | 42 ? -27% | 53 ? -61% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 24 ? 29% | 28 ? 18% | 28 ? 18% | 33 ? 3% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 50 ? | |||
Screen | -26% | -22% | -21% | -34% | |
Brightness middle | 376 | 247 -34% | 393 5% | 230 -39% | 340 -10% |
Brightness | 355 | 240 -32% | 338 -5% | 226 -36% | 302 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 90 3% | 79 -9% | 86 -1% | 77 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.43 -34% | 0.29 9% | 0.2 37% | 0.31 3% |
Contrast | 1175 | 574 -51% | 1355 15% | 1150 -2% | 1097 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 4.74 -48% | 6.17 -93% | 5.07 -58% | 6.75 -111% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 9.14 -29% | 11.21 -58% | 10.07 -42% | 12.4 -75% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.87 -11% | 6.8 -55% | 3.64 17% | 8.47 -93% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.57 86% | 2.27 97% | 2.46 89% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 7440 87% | 7450 87% | 6873 95% | 6521 100% | 6557 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.78 | 57 -11% | 51 -20% | 35 -45% | 58 -9% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98.98 | 88 -11% | 91 -8% | 55 -44% | 89 -10% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-18% | -16% /
-19% | -24% /
-24% | -24% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3965 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5033 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 Liteonit CV3-8D512 | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE Samsung MZYTY256HDHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -18% | -6% | 8% | 3% | |
Read Seq | 494.5 | 468.1 -5% | 517 5% | 484.1 -2% | 490.5 -1% |
Write Seq | 461.7 | 319.2 -31% | 258.1 -44% | 449.8 -3% | 452.3 -2% |
Read 512 | 328 | 318.6 -3% | 355 8% | 399.1 22% | 386.2 18% |
Write 512 | 419.7 | 272.8 -35% | 258.5 -38% | 355.1 -15% | 219.9 -48% |
Read 4k | 27.53 | 22.03 -20% | 29.65 8% | 33.44 21% | 34.35 25% |
Write 4k | 56.5 | 72.1 28% | 77.3 37% | 67.5 19% | 91.2 61% |
Read 4k QD32 | 351 | 147.4 -58% | 277.1 -21% | 368.5 5% | 378.9 8% |
Write 4k QD32 | 249.3 | 200.2 -20% | 242.5 -3% | 280.6 13% | 152.2 -39% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U) | |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE | |
HP ProBook 430 G4-Y8B47EA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1863 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7237 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1019 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 100.1 | 47.2 | 29.4 | 13.5 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 62.9 | 32.7 | 28.5 | 9.2 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 49.2 | 32.9 | 23.6 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 15.8 | 10.3 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.5 | 13.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.9 / 29.9 / 35.2 dB |
Carga |
| 43.5 / 43.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.9 dB(A) |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620 | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 10% | 8% | 7% | |
off / environment * | 29.9 | 30.5 -2% | 30.5 -2% | 31.15 -4% | 30.16 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.9 | 30.5 -2% | 30.5 -2% | 31.5 -5% | 30.16 -1% |
Idle Average * | 29.9 | 30.5 -2% | 30.5 -2% | 31.5 -5% | 30.16 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 35.2 | 31.5 11% | 30.5 13% | 31.5 11% | 30.5 13% |
Load Average * | 43.5 | 36.2 17% | 32.25 26% | 31.7 27% | 37.2 14% |
Load Maximum * | 43.8 | 40 9% | 32.6 26% | 34.1 22% | 37 16% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.5 °C / 88.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.14 / 0.44 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.7 / 6 / 6.78 Watt |
Carga |
37.3 / 47.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | -4% | -8% | 3% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3 19% | 3.6 3% | 4.9 -32% | 3.7 -0% |
Idle Average * | 6 | 5.6 7% | 7 -17% | 7.3 -22% | 7.16 -19% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.78 | 6.8 -0% | 9.3 -37% | 9.4 -39% | 8.3 -22% |
Load Average * | 37.3 | 48.7 -31% | 37 1% | 26 30% | 30.4 18% |
Load Maximum * | 47.4 | 63 -33% | 32.6 31% | 36 24% | 30.3 36% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T 6500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Acer Swift 5 SF514-51-59AV i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.9 Wh | Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 48.9 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 710-14IKB 80V4002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | 3% | -18% | 8% | |
Reader / Idle | 1063 | 878 -17% | 1014 -5% | 675 -37% | 957 -10% |
H.264 | 607 | 419 -31% | 555 -9% | 400 -34% | 520 -14% |
WiFi v1.3 | 443 | 486 10% | 549 24% | 392 -12% | 561 27% |
Load | 98 | 103 5% | 100 2% | 109 11% | 126 29% |
Pro
Contra
O novo Asus ZenBook UC3410UA segue a tendência de usar uma tela maior. O painel de 14 polegadas funciona muito bem dentro do chassi de 13,3 polegadas e não existem aspectos negativos em comparação com o ZenBook UX310 regular, exceto pela duração um pouco mais curta com o Wi-Fi. Muito pelo contrário: A estabilidade é ainda melhor graças à tampa um pouco mais grossa e a ótima tela IPS inclusive supera a tela TN do UX310 em todos os aspectos.
O ZenBook UX3410UA é ainda mais atraente com a tela maior. A Asus também usa um muito bom painel FHD-IPS mate.
O ZenBook também consegue convencer em muitas outras seções. A carcaça de alumínio é sofisticada e sólida, a utilização do desempenho do processador é muito boa, e os dispositivos de entrada também são bons. Oferecer quatro portas USB é loável, mas não esperamos portas USB 2.0 lentas em um aparelho que custa 1.200 Euros (~$1287). O leitor de cartões integrado também não é um modelo veloz.
Estamos menos convencidos pela ventoinha, que pode ser bastante barulhenta e também começa a girar com cargas leves. Isto talvez esteja relacionado com o nosso modelo de teste pré-produção, e esperamos que uma atualização do software melhore a situação. A solução de resfriamento idêntica é, pelo menos notoriamente mais silenciosa no ZenBook UX310UQ regular, apesar da placa de vídeo dedicada.
Asus Zenbook UX3410UA
-
01/20/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff