Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Core i7, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 298 cd/m²
Contraste: 1150:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U AUO B133HAN04.9, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 SHP1484, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, , 3000x2000, 13.9" | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | -0% | 4% | 3% | 33% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.4 | 68.9 7% | 64 -1% | 65.9 2% | 65.8 2% | 99.2 54% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.5 | 96.6 7% | 90.7 0% | 95.2 5% | 96.2 6% | 99.9 10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 69.6 7% | 65.1 0% | 67.6 4% | 66.8 2% | 87.1 34% |
| Response Times | -48% | 29% | 11% | 22% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 62.4 ? -39% | 27 ? 40% | 40.4 ? 10% | 33 ? 26% | 42.8 ? 4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.2 ? | 45.6 ? -56% | 24 ? 18% | 25.6 ? 12% | 24 ? 18% | 28.8 ? 1% |
| PWM Frequency | 1008 ? | |||||
| Screen | 20% | 14% | 14% | 19% | 37% | |
| Brightness middle | 299 | 428 43% | 304 2% | 442.7 48% | 408 36% | 588 97% |
| Brightness | 300 | 405 35% | 287 -4% | 428 43% | 395 32% | 561 87% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 87 -5% | 80 -13% | 84 -9% | 88 -4% | 92 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.26 -0% | 0.21 19% | 0.31 -19% | 0.45 -73% | 0.45 -73% |
| Contrast | 1150 | 1646 43% | 1448 26% | 1428 24% | 907 -21% | 1307 14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 3.8 32% | 3.66 35% | 2.24 60% | 1.55 72% | 1.7 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 7.2 21% | 5.66 38% | 7.19 21% | 2.19 76% | 3.5 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.6 | 1.11 57% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 4.4 20% | 3.51 36% | 9.7 -76% | 1.91 65% | 1.9 65% |
| Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.21 100% | 2.55 86% | 1.42 155% | 2.34 94% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7533 86% | 7067 92% | 6955 93% | 6227 104% | 6491 100% | 6738 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.9 | 62.8 7% | 59 0% | 61.6 5% | 61 4% | 77.92 32% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.3 | 96.4 7% | 91 1% | 95 5% | 96 6% | 99.94 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
9% | 14% /
13% | 10% /
12% | 15% /
16% | 24% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode off) | |
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode on) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (108 - 172, n=76) | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (macOS) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (Win10) | |
| HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode off) | |
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U (Quiet Mode on) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8550U (301 - 761, n=78) | |
| Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (macOS) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 (Win10) | |
| Huawei MateBook X | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3554 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4707 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4882 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3321 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1592 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 39992 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6256 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 897 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 78.1 | 39.2 | 27.4 | 12.4 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 52.8 | 30.7 | 26.7 | 9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 17.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 30.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.8 / 36.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 3% | 1% | -0% | |
| off / environment * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.7 | 29.1 2% | 30.13 -1% | 27.9 6% | 30.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 29.1 3% | 30.13 -0% | 27.9 7% | 30.2 -0% |
| Load Average * | 36.8 | 32.2 12% | 31.5 14% | 36.2 2% | 32.9 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.8 | 37.3 -1% | 33.5 9% | 45.2 -23% | 39.3 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.9 °C / 80.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Asus ZenBook S UX391U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.48 / 0.73 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.24 / 6.1 / 9.2 Watt |
| Carga |
38.8 / 52.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, LITEON CB1-SD256, , 2160x1440, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | 11% | -25% | -24% | 3% | -1% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.24 | 3.14 3% | 2.8 14% | 3.5 -8% | 4.6 -42% | 3.7 -14% | 3.81 ? -18% | 4.43 ? -37% |
| Idle Average * | 6.1 | 5.22 14% | 6.2 -2% | 8.9 -46% | 11 -80% | 5.2 15% | 6.94 ? -14% | 7.58 ? -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.2 | 6 35% | 9.4 -2% | 12.3 -34% | 12 -30% | 7.6 17% | 8.75 ? 5% | 9.43 ? -3% |
| Load Average * | 38.8 | 38.5 1% | 32.2 17% | 54.2 -40% | 39.5 -2% | 41.6 -7% | 35 ? 10% | 45.8 ? -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 52.6 | 50.4 4% | 36.6 30% | 52.1 1% | 34.6 34% | 50.5 4% | 47.5 ? 10% | 68.7 ? -31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus ZenBook S UX391U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Huawei MateBook X i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 40 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 23% | -11% | 15% | 5% | 6% | 32% | |
| H.264 | 621 | 831 34% | 649 5% | 683 10% | 917 ? 48% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 491 | 644 31% | 352 -28% | 557 13% | 337 -31% | 681 39% | 729 ? 48% |
| Load | 115 | 119 3% | 104 -10% | 133 16% | 162 41% | 78 -32% | 116.5 ? 1% |
Pro
Contra
Quanto desempenho precisa um dispositivo móvel? Os dispositivos finos geralmente têm problemas para utilizar o potencial de desempenho dos atuais processadores quad-core móveis. No entanto, as tarefas diárias normalmente não precisam desse nível de desempenho. Nós gostamos da abordagem com um Modo Silencioso adicional, que é mais abrangente em comparação com as configurações de energia do Windows regulares ou o controle deslizante de desempenho, respectivamente.
O novo ZenBook S UX391 da Asus é extremamente móvel e tem como alvo clientes que frequentemente estão na estrada e precisam de um dispositivo compacto. Aplicativos muito complexos geralmente não estão no topo da lista de requisitos e, na maioria das vezes, serão usados para escrever e-mails, usar aplicativos baseados na nuvem ou apenas usar o pacote do Office. O desempenho do ZenBook S é mais do que suficiente para esses cenários, mesmo quando você ativa o modo silencioso.
O ZenBook S UX391 é uma muito boa escolha se você deseja um companheiro muito leve e compacto. No entanto, alguns dos rivais podem utilizar melhor o desempenho do quad-core ULV e durar mais com a bateria.
Você também obtém um dispositivo de alta qualidade com um chassi de metal e boa qualidade de construção. Gostamos da tela mate de 1080p, embora possa ser um pouco mais brilhante e melhor calibrada, de fábrica. Os dispositivos de entrada são decentes e a Asus implementa portas modernas. Uma pequena estação docking adiciona portas tradicionais e está incluída.
Já mencionamos o desempenho medíocre acima. Se você precisa de mais desempenho em um chassi compacto, você deve procurar outro modelo. Caso contrário, podemos recomendar o ZenBook S UX391.
Asus ZenBook S UX391U
- 09/11/2018 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
