Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (i9-8950HK, GTX 1050 Ti, 4K UHD)

Vendo duplo. A Asus deseja competir com o Touch Bar da Apple com uma ideia ainda mais maluca de tornar o touchpad tradicional em uma tela secundária de 1080p. Surpreendentemente, ela é, de fato, bastante útil e mais do que apenas uma novidade. Vemos que este recurso exclusivo poderia se tornar um recurso padrão na série carro chefe da Asus em outra geração, onde todos os outros pontos fracos podem ser ironizados.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/03/2018 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (Zenbook Pro 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1493 MHz, Memoría: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 397.31, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, Dual-Channel, 1333.3 MHz, 17-17-17-39

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Capacitiva de 10 pontos, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, AUO31EB, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), 1024 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.9 x 365 x 251

Bateria

71 Wh Lítio-Polímero, 8 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: VGA

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Asus Sync, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.88 kg, Suprimento de energia: 529 g

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, HDMI, 2x Thunderbolt 3

Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, MicroSD reader, 2x USB 3.1

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	191 MB/s +198%
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II)	156.4 MB/s +144%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	64.2 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	584 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	539 MBit/s -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	379 MBit/s -35%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	682 MBit/s +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Intel Wireless-AC 9560	662 MBit/s
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	542 MBit/s -18%


348.4 cd/m²	378.6 cd/m²	371.5 cd/m²
328.1 cd/m²	357.6 cd/m²	348.3 cd/m²
323.3 cd/m²	351.8 cd/m²	341.9 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 378.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 357.6 cd/m²
Contraste: 1022:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.23
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
99.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 BOE06C3, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) 15.4", 2880x1800
Display		-20%	0%	-24%	-22%
Display P3 Coverage	85.9	66 -23%	86.6 1%	66.6 -22%	63.6 -26%
sRGB Coverage	100	96.5 -3%	100 0%	86.9 -13%	93.8 -6%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	99.1	66.7 -33%	99.5 0%	63.5 -36%	64.9 -35%
Response Times		-22%	-23%	-12%	57%	-10%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44 ?(22, 22)	49 ?(25, 40) -11%	52 ?(25, 27) -18%	41.2 ?(23.2, 18) 6%	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) 62%	42.4 ?(20.4, 22) 4%
Response Time Black / White *	22.8 ?(12, 10.8)	30 ?(16, 14) -32%	29 ?(15, 14) -27%	29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2) -30%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) 51%	28 ?(14.8, 13.2) -23%
PWM Frequency		961 ?(10)		1000
Screen		13%	-2%	-22%	14%	25%
Brightness middle	357.6	413 15%	380 6%	338.7 -5%	313 -12%	534 49%
Brightness	350	378 8%	371 6%	325 -7%	300 -14%	502 43%
Brightness Distribution	85	86 1%	87 2%	91 7%	78 -8%	86 1%
Black Level *	0.35	0.29 17%	0.28 20%	0.28 20%	0.33 6%	0.31 11%
Contrast	1022	1424 39%	1357 33%	1210 18%	948 -7%	1723 69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.12	2.44 41%	4.38 -6%	4.9 -19%	1.29 69%	1.8 56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.91	4.46 55%	7.59 23%	8.7 12%	2.04 79%	3.8 62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.23	2.48 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2.48 -38%	3.6 -100%	5.5 -206%	0.69 62%	2.4 -33%
Gamma	2.17 ^101%	2.43 ^91%	2.32 ^95%	2.08 ^106%	2.43 ^91%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6613 ^98%	7006 ^93%	6860 ^95%	7498 ^87%	6550 ^99%	6563 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	87.5	62 -29%	88 1%	63.5 -27%	60 -31%	77.92 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	100	96 -4%	100 0%	86.92 -13%	94 -6%	99.94 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-10% / 3%	-8% / -4%	-19% / -21%	16% / 12%	8% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	5358 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5059 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4479 Points -16%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4249 Points -21%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3673 Points -31%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	4504 Points +23%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4030 Points +10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	3661 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	3614 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	3457 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	5676 Points +27%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	5271 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	4456 Points
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN	4401 Points -1%
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	4217 Points -5%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3661 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4456 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5358 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
AS SSD		-234%	-4%	17%	-46%
Copy Game MB/s	728	465.9 -36%	878 21%	1134 56%
Copy Program MB/s	430.9	117.2 -73%	393.4 -9%	534 24%
Copy ISO MB/s	1045	632 -40%	1533 47%	1936 85%
Score Total	4065	750 -82%	3548 -13%	3781 -7%	2536 -38%
Score Write	1547	58 -96%	1515 -2%	1556 1%	939 -39%
Score Read	1679	492 -71%	1342 -20%	1493 -11%	1092 -35%
Access Time Write *	0.036	0.889 -2369%	0.033 8%	0.026 28%	0.046 -28%
Access Time Read *	0.04	0.086 -115%	0.059 -48%	0.04 -0%	0.119 -198%
4K-64 Write	1273	19.19 -98%	1278 0%	1262 -1%	742 -42%
4K-64 Read	1431	301.8 -79%	1153 -19%	1206 -16%	847 -41%
4K Write	100.9	5.12 -95%	110.9 10%	141.1 40%	80.4 -20%
4K Read	37.78	32.5 -14%	51.5 36%	51.9 37%	23.36 -38%
Seq Write	1729	340.3 -80%	1262 -27%	1530 -12%	1163 -33%
Seq Read	2099	1574 -25%	1373 -35%	2342 12%	2213 5%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2171 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1763 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 614 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 507 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 772 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1059 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.68 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600	15182 Points +71%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	14975 Points +69%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	14302 Points +62%
Dell G5 15 5587 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H	13871 Points +57%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (8304 - 10402, n=36)	9591 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	9240 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	8854 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7133 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4826 Points -45%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	10391 Points +19%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	9333 Points +7%
Dell G5 15 5587 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H	8788 Points +1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	8709 Points
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	8503 Points -2%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600	7838 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (6104 - 9172, n=35)	7823 Points -10%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7025 Points -19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4466 Points -49%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H	79420 Points +82%
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	71431 Points +63%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600	70020 Points +60%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	59162 Points +35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	50205 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (43721 - 53978, n=37)	50013 Points +14%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	48597 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	43721 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	38881 Points -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	25986 Points -41%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11733 Points +61%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R5 1600	11512 Points +58%
Dell G5 15 5587 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H	10970 Points +50%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	10248 Points +41%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (6792 - 8376, n=38)	7743 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	7457 Points +2%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points 0%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	7291 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	6356 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	4133 Points -43%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Dell G5 15 5587 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H	5106 Points +48%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	4405 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (3452 - 3945, n=15)	3692 Points +7%
Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ	3649 Points +6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK	3452 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	2733 Points -21%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U	1988 Points -42%

3DMark 11 Performance		8990 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24182 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		6504 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		3372 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		2281 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

BioShock Infinite | Rise of the Tomb Raider

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GV62 8RE-016US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	112 fps +68%
Gigabyte Aero 14-K7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	74.4 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (61 - 97, n=23)	73.2 fps +10%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	67.5 fps +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	66.5 fps
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	39.4 fps -41%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GV62 8RE-016US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-8300H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	59 fps +70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (27.8 - 40.7, n=16)	36.3 fps +4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	34.8 fps
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	33.2 fps -5%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra	4K
BioShock Infinite (2013)	270.5	157.4	149.9	66.5
The Witcher 3 (2015)		88.3	44.6	24.2	15.8
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)		95	50	29	15
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)		75.5	39.6	34.8	14.1
Ashes of the Singularity (2016)	51.4	36.2	28.5
Overwatch (2016)			108.3	58.7	31.4

Barulho

Ocioso		28.6 / 29.9 / 30.5 dB
Carga		42.5 / 44.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A)

	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i9-8950HK, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) Radeon Pro 560, i7-7820HQ	Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Noise		1%	6%	-11%	2%	-3%
off / environment *	28	30.3 -8%	28.4 -1%	29 -4%	30.8 -10%	28.3 -1%
Idle Minimum *	28.6	30.3 -6%	28.4 1%	30 -5%	31 -8%	30.4 -6%
Idle Average *	29.9	30.3 -1%	28.4 5%	31 -4%	31 -4%	31 -4%
Idle Maximum *	30.5	30.3 1%	28.4 7%	35 -15%	31 -2%	31.2 -2%
Load Average *	42.5	37.1 13%	41.6 2%	49 -15%	31.3 26%	43.3 -2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44.8	43.3 3%	36.1 19%	51 -14%		46.2 -3%
Load Maximum *	44.8	43 4%	41.6 7%	54 -21%	41.8 7%	46.2 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35.8 °C	40 °C	41.2 °C
32.6 °C	42.4 °C	31 °C
29.2 °C	28 °C	30.8 °C

Máximo: 42.4 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C


45 °C	50.8 °C	44.6 °C
39.4 °C	45.6 °C	39.2 °C
35.4 °C	37.4 °C	35.6 °C

Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 41.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


29.8 °C	31.4 °C	30.4 °C
30.2 °C	33 °C	30 °C
27.8 °C	26.8 °C	28.6 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 29.8 °C


33.4 °C	35.2 °C	33.6 °C
33 °C	34 °C	32.8 °C
31.2 °C	31.4 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 35.2 °C
Médio: 32.8 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


35.4 °C	40 °C	41 °C
32.4 °C	42 °C	31.2 °C
29.8 °C	28.2 °C	31.8 °C

Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 34.6 °C


43.2 °C	49.2 °C	43.8 °C
39.4 °C	44 °C	38.2 °C
34.6 °C	35.6 °C	34 °C

Máximo: 49.2 °C
Médio: 40.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.11 / 0.56 Watt
Ocioso	11.7 / 18.5 / 22.8 Watt
Carga	97.5 / 111.1 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, , , 2880x1800, 15.4"	Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		42%	28%	-17%	32%	32%
Idle Minimum *	11.7	2.9 75%	11.6 1%	14 -20%	3.7 68%	6.3 46%
Idle Average *	18.5	5.8 69%	13.8 25%	18 3%	16.2 12%	7.9 57%
Idle Maximum *	22.8	7.5 67%	14.2 38%	22 4%	18 21%	8.1 64%
Load Average *	97.5	77.5 21%	67.9 30%	91 7%	58.4 40%	84.9 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	102.9	84 18%	59 43%	142 -38%		96.3 6%
Load Maximum *	111.1	107 4%	76.9 31%	173 -56%	89.6 19%	102.4 8%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		14h 02min
WiFi Websurfing		6h 15min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 16min

	Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 71 Wh	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh	HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh	Asus Zenbook Pro UX550VE-DB71T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 73 Wh
Battery Runtime		101%	42%	44%	35%	18%
Reader / Idle	842		934 11%	762 -10%		1023 21%
WiFi v1.3	375	942 151%	511 36%	513 37%	677 81%	532 42%
Load	76	114 50%	136 79%	156 105%	67 -12%	70 -8%
Witcher 3 ultra		62			76

Pro

+ Nítida tela táctil 4K UHD; cobertura AdobeRGB plena

+ A exclusiva Screenpad de 5,5 polegadas e 1080p é prática

+ A superfície do trackpad proporciona um deslizamento fluente

+ Sem modulação por largura de pulso

+ Duas portas Thunderbolt 3

+ Veloz WLAN Intel 9560

+ Fácil de fazer manutenção

Contra

- Sem leitor SD de tamanho completo; taxas de transferência poderiam ser mais rápidas

- O desempenho da GTX 1050 Ti está um pouco abaixo da média

- A Screenpad pode ser desconfortável sem um mouse

- Ruído de bobina perceptível do nosso modelo de teste

- Consumo de energia mais alto durante o modo inativo

- A RAM está soldada e não é atualizável

- A resposta do clickpad e suave e fraca

- Marcos mais grossos que os da concorrência

- A visibilidade em exteriores poderia ser melhor

- A Screenpad é muito granulada

- Duração de bateria mais curta

In review: Asus Zenbook Pro 15 UX580GE. Test model provided by Asus US

Não podemos dar um veredicto abrangente sobre o UX580 no momento, dado que tivemos acesso a uma amostra de pré-produção e a CPU Core i9 em nossa unidade não estava funcionando como esperado. Um julgamento mais completo sobre seu desempenho terá que esperar até que possamos testar novamente e reconfirmar os resultados em uma segunda unidade. Podemos, no entanto, dar a nossa opinião final sobre os recursos exclusivos do UX580.

O Screenpad é uma inovação que é mais prática do que o Touch Bar da Apple. O conceito central de uma tela secundária de 1080p 16:9 quando comparado à abordagem pouco ortodoxa da Apple tem suas vantagens inerentes para cargas de trabalho de multimídia e de produtividade. Nenhum aplicativo especial é necessário para que o Screenpad seja útil; a simples capacidade de ter uma tela secundária sempre disponível nos faz querer uma tela de trackpad em todos os portáteis. Os usuários de desktop com dois ou mais monitores saberão exatamente como as configurações de vários monitores podem ser benéficas em termos de eficiência e quão difícil seria voltar a um monitor. A este respeito, o UX580 é uma das ideias mais inovadoras que já vimos em um portátil Windows. Não podemos esperar até que o SDK se torne público para que os desenvolvedores explorem ainda mais o que uma segunda tela pode oferecer.

Embora o conceito tenha um potencial inexplorado, há desafios ergonômicos a serem superados. Olhar para cima e para baixo entre as telas separadas pode se tornar cansativo, enquanto o Apple Touch Bar está fisicamente mais próximo da tela principal. Além disso, a tela do trackpad pode ser desconfortável de usar sem um mouse externo, pois sua superfície está constantemente alternando entre o controle do cursor do mouse e o controle do aplicativo na tela. Há uma curva de aprendizado envolvida antes que a Asus Screenpad se torne algo mais natural.

Por fim, uma desvantagem importante na Screenpad é sua sobreposição granulada. Embora o texto apareça pequeno, mas nítido no Touch Bar ou até mesmo em um smartphone econômico de 1080p, o texto na Screenpad é mais granulado e em nenhum lugar tão nítido, especialmente no modo de tela estendida. Entendemos que o grosso revestimento mate era necessário para melhorar as propriedades de deslizamento do trackpad, mas isso é vem com o preço da qualidade da tela. Desde esta perspectiva, a Screenpad do UX580 se parece muito com um produto de primeira geração.

O UX580 parece o mesmo que o UX550 em quase todos os outros aspectos e, portanto, nossos comentários existentes ainda se aplicam aqui. Os alto-falantes são ainda melhores, a capacidade de manutenção é fácil e o chassi de alumínio é relativamente forte com as mesmas advertências de antes. Esperamos ver melhorias na duração da bateria e um possível salto para uma tela AMOLED/OLED mais nítida no futuro.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5243 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook Pro 15 UX580GE (i9-8950HK, GTX 1050 Ti, 4K UHD)

Allen Ngo, 2018-07- 3 (Update: 2024-11- 4)