Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC: Mate, poderoso rei da duração da bateria
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.7 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870 | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | 2 kg | 16.2 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 300 cd/m²
Contraste: 1424:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 LTPS IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 3% | 35% | 33% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 66.6 2% | 67.2 3% | 86.1 32% | 88.1 36% | |
sRGB Coverage | 86.2 | 87.7 2% | 88.4 3% | 100 16% | 99.6 16% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.9 | 64.1 2% | 64.6 3% | 99.2 58% | 91.8 46% | |
Response Times | 2% | -8% | -33% | 94% | -13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45 ? | 41.2 ? 8% | 45 ? -0% | 63 ? -40% | 2.3 ? 95% | 52.4 ? -16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 33.2 ? -4% | 37 ? -16% | 40 ? -25% | 2.4 ? 92% | 34.9 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 131700 | ||||
Screen | -14% | -6% | 5% | 15% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 299 | 312.6 5% | 311 4% | 350 17% | 421.2 41% | 519 74% |
Brightness | 280 | 290 4% | 303 8% | 329 18% | 417 49% | 477 70% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 81 -9% | 86 -3% | 94 6% | 86 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.31 -48% | 0.24 -14% | 0.265 -26% | 0.39 -86% | |
Contrast | 1424 | 1008 -29% | 1296 -9% | 1321 -7% | 1331 -7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.76 | 5.78 -21% | 5.1 -7% | 5.08 -7% | 6.06 -27% | 2.28 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9 | 8.86 2% | 8.91 1% | 10.25 -14% | 11.89 -32% | 6.54 27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.53 | 5.4 -53% | 4.93 -40% | 3.62 -3% | 2.8 21% | 0.9 75% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.44 90% | 2.27 97% | 2.15 102% | 2145 0% |
CCT | 7228 90% | 7864 83% | 7641 85% | 6389 102% | 6235 104% | 6572 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 57.1 2% | 58 4% | 88 57% | 81 45% | 78 39% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 87.4 2% | 88 2% | 100 16% | 99.6 16% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.78 | 2.48 | 4.38 | 0.86 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-9% | -4% /
-4% | 2% /
6% | 47% /
31% | 7% /
20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (16742 - 16838, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (4369 - 4485, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (macOS 10.15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (13116 - 18364, n=14) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (macOS 10.15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (4976 - 5832, n=14) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T |
Geekbench 5.0 | |
5.0 Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4955 - 14690, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (mac OS 15.1.0) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3143 - 4476, n=12) | |
5.0 Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (1279 - 1898, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (mac OS 15.1.0) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1118 - 1278, n=12) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Edge) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T (Edge 44) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Edge 44.18362.267.0) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M (Win 10 Chrome 82) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (742 - 1184, n=36) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
Average of class Multimedia (254 - 1016, n=91, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (43921 - 119954, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (31505 - 51741, n=17) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Edge 44.18362.267.0) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T (Edge 44) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 (Edge) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (367 - 711, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Edge 44.18362.267.0) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T (Edge 44) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 (Edge 44.17763.1.0) | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (142.6 - 296, n=15) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3761 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3959 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5265 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4490 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 0% | -6% | -5% | -29% | -12% | -2% | |
Write 4K | 138.1 | 141.6 3% | 120.6 -13% | 104.3 -24% | 126.2 -9% | 55.5 -60% | 165.7 ? 20% |
Read 4K | 45.89 | 45.28 -1% | 41.43 -10% | 45.23 -1% | 41.2 -10% | 16.21 -65% | 44.6 ? -3% |
Write Seq | 2147 | 1975 -8% | 2402 12% | 1729 -19% | 1055 -51% | 1959 -9% | 1982 ? -8% |
Read Seq | 2188 | 2272 4% | 1997 -9% | 1861 -15% | 884 -60% | 1763 -19% | 1764 ? -19% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 427.8 | 458.6 7% | 335.2 -22% | 509 19% | 445.5 4% | 398.5 -7% | 395 ? -8% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 404 | 391.4 -3% | 381.7 -6% | 388.5 -4% | 338.8 -16% | 648 60% | 434 ? 7% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2396 | 2393 0% | 2553 7% | 2813 17% | 1453 -39% | 2727 14% | 2351 ? -2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3454 | 3464 0% | 3356 -3% | 2906 -16% | 1734 -50% | 3242 -6% | 3234 ? -6% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 32594 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 10585 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 88439 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22796 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6906 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2945 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (70.2 - 84.3, n=7) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (27.5 - 36.5, n=11) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 |
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (54.3 - 59.1, n=3) |
Need for Speed Heat - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q (44 - 46.8, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 309.6 | 294.4 | 258.6 | 166.6 |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 367.2 | 253.9 | 191.5 | 92.7 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 286.7 | 208.1 | 182 | 72.7 |
GTA V (2015) | 162.7 | 142.8 | 76.5 | 36 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 144.6 | 87.2 | 48.7 | 28.1 |
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 121 | 75 | 64 | 38 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 158.2 | 130.9 | 128 | 101.7 |
World of Warships (2015) | 179 | 144.1 | 117.7 | 104.2 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 60.3 | 42.5 | 36.9 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 249.4 | 193.9 | 131 | |
World of Tanks enCore (2018) | 414.6 | 160.1 | 59.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 91 | 52 | 48 | 45 |
Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 112 | 74 | 69 | 55 |
Apex Legends (2019) | 143.9 | 78.7 | 59.4 | 59.1 |
Anthem (2019) | 51.3 | 44.6 | 40.9 | 30.3 |
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 150.1 | 52.4 | 31.9 | 23 |
Control (2019) | 102.8 | 36.1 | 26.3 | |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 103.1 | 50.5 | 33.2 | 25.1 |
FIFA 20 (2019) | 198.6 | 127.9 | 121.5 | 117.7 |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 75 | 43 | 41 | 24 |
GRID 2019 (2019) | 121.5 | 60 | 47.6 | 35.2 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 85 | 54.8 | 44.1 | 38.4 |
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 68.9 | 50.6 | 44 | 40.6 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 54.4 | 40.1 | 26.5 | 16.2 |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 114.8 | 45.6 | 35.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.9 dB |
Carga |
| 31.3 / 38.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -1% | -9% | -7% | -10% | -5% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 30.3 | 28.4 6% | 30.3 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.5 -1% | 29.8 2% | 29.6 ? 2% | 24 ? 21% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.3 | 28.4 6% | 30.3 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.5 -1% | 29.9 1% | 30.2 ? -0% | 24.3 ? 20% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 28.4 6% | 30.3 -0% | 28.2 7% | 30.5 -1% | 29.9 1% | 30.4 ? -0% | 24.8 ? 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.9 | 28.4 8% | 30.3 2% | 30.4 2% | 30.5 1% | 29.9 3% | 30.9 ? -0% | 26.3 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 31.3 | 33.9 -8% | 32.6 -4% | 43.8 -40% | 40.8 -30% | 43 -37% | 38.2 ? -22% | 38.1 ? -22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.1 | 39.8 -4% | 47.2 -24% | 45.4 -19% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 38.2 | 40.2 -5% | 40.2 -5% | 47.2 -24% | 41.8 -9% | 46.1 -21% | 41.2 ? -8% | 46.5 ? -22% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -33% | -6% | -30% | -7% | 3% | -18% | -10% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.4 | 45.4 -10% | 44.6 -8% | 50.4 -22% | 47.2 -14% | 42 -1% | 47.4 ? -14% | 43.2 ? -4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.3 | 51.6 -28% | 45.4 -13% | 49.2 -22% | 43.2 -7% | 38 6% | 49.4 ? -23% | 46.1 ? -14% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 35.4 -38% | 26.1 -2% | 34.8 -35% | 27.7 -8% | 25 3% | 29.9 ? -16% | 28.1 ? -9% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.8 | 40 -55% | 26.4 -2% | 36.4 -41% | 25.6 1% | 25 3% | 30.8 ? -19% | 28.8 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (63.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.6 / 1.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.8 / 7.7 / 9.4 Watt |
Carga |
57 / 116 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870 | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -55% | -110% | -70% | -4% | -48% | -66% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 5 -79% | 12 -329% | 6.2 -121% | 2.7 4% | 3.7 -32% | 7.75 ? -177% | 6.54 ? -134% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 13.2 -71% | 17.8 -131% | 9.6 -25% | 8 -4% | 12.1 -57% | 11.8 ? -53% | 11.3 ? -47% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 24 -155% | 19.7 -110% | 21.2 -126% | 10.6 -13% | 17 -81% | 16.6 ? -77% | 13.3 ? -41% |
Load Average * | 57 | 70 -23% | 59 -4% | 104.3 -83% | 74 -30% | 91.5 -61% | 75.2 ? -32% | 70.7 ? -24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 62 | 63.3 -2% | 91.7 -48% | 103 -66% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 116 | 114 2% | 87 25% | 135.3 -17% | 89 23% | 102.3 12% | 105.5 ? 9% | 116.1 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 73 Wh | Acer ConceptD 5 CN515-51-73Z7 i7-8705G, Vega M GL / 870, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 i9-9980HK, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 97 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | -54% | -14% | -10% | -27% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1629 | 1587 -3% | 462 -72% | 910 -44% | 1289 -21% | 1168 ? -28% | |
H.264 | 714 | 416 -42% | 580 -19% | 847 ? 19% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 743 | 519 -30% | 275 -63% | 467 -37% | 503 -32% | 718 -3% | 640 ? -14% |
Load | 142 | 171 20% | 85 -40% | 199 40% | 174 23% | 58 -59% | 97.1 ? -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 54 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
Contra
Com o ZenBook 15 UX534FTC, a Asus criou um portátil fino e elegante de 15,6 polegadas que quase tem as dimensões de um dispositivo de 14 polegadas. Apesar da construção compacta, não falta desempenho. Ambos os Intel Core i7-10510U de quatro núcleos e a GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q dedicada, são capazes de funcionar consistentemente em alta velocidade.
No entanto, para a CPU, isso só é válido enquanto estiver conectado na tomada. No modo de bateria, o uso do Turbo Boost da CPU é ruim ou inexistente. Evidentemente, esse é o custo da excelente duração da bateria do portátil. Positivo: O desenvolvimento de calor é moderado na pior das hipóteses e o nível de ruído também é aceitável.
O Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC combina alto desempenho com excelente duração da bateria.
O SSD NVMe instalado fornece armazenamento suficiente e taxas de transferência rápidas. Substituir o SSD exigiria que os usuários abrissem a carcaça, o que não é uma tarefa particularmente complicada. Por outro lado, a RAM (até 16 GB) não pode ser atualizada, pois está soldada. Gostaríamos de ver um modelo ZenBook opcional com 32 GB de RAM para usuários que procuram uma configuração mais preparada para o futuro.
A tela IPS mate de 15,6 polegadas brilha com ângulos de visão sólidos, uma boa relação de contraste e boa representação das cores. Dito isto, o nível de brilho é insuficiente para um dispositivo nessa faixa de preço. A luz de fundo do teclado provou ser um extra útil durante o uso diário.
Além disso, criticamos a falta de uma porta Thunderbolt 3. Em um portátil compacto e portável de 1.600 Euros (~US$ 1.787), ele deve ser incluído por padrão. O conector teria permitido o uso de estações docking ricas em recursos e GPUs externas mais poderosas. Tal como está, a Asus apenas equipou o ZenBook com duas portas USB 3.2 Gen 2 (1x Tipo A, 1x Tipo C). Aqui, a porta Type-C pode ser usada apenas para periféricos. Ele não suporta o recurso DisplayPort via USB Type-C.
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T
- 03/16/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck