Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ZenBook 14 UX534F: O ScreenPad está aqui para ficar
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.4 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.4 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 994 g | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
80.9 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 936:1 (Preto: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.89
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 AU Optronics B140HAN03.2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 AU Optronics B140HAN04.E, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Chi Mei CMN14D4, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z90N LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -41% | -34% | 2% | 11% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 37.23 -42% | 41.55 -35% | 65 2% | 71.7 12% | 64.2 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 55.9 -39% | 62 -33% | 95.5 4% | 99.3 8% | 94.8 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.3 | 38.46 -41% | 42.99 -34% | 66.1 1% | 72.9 12% | 65.4 0% |
Response Times | -3% | 14% | -4% | -12% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 41 ? -9% | 34 ? 10% | 40.4 ? -7% | 45.6 ? -21% | 39.2 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 28 ? 3% | 24 ? 17% | 28.8 ? -0% | 29.6 ? -3% | 35.6 ? -24% |
PWM Frequency | 250 ? | 25000 ? | ||||
Screen | -11% | -20% | 19% | 17% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 355.8 | 360 1% | 220 -38% | 316.8 -11% | 399.6 12% | 324.1 -9% |
Brightness | 341 | 317 -7% | 204 -40% | 298 -13% | 385 13% | 301 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 82 -7% | 68 -23% | 89 1% | 89 1% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.41 -8% | 0.155 59% | 0.33 13% | 0.37 3% | 0.22 42% |
Contrast | 936 | 878 -6% | 1419 52% | 960 3% | 1080 15% | 1473 57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.47 | 4.75 -6% | 5.23 -17% | 1.74 61% | 3.2 28% | 1.63 64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.12 | 7.4 19% | 21.51 -136% | 5.41 41% | 6.44 29% | 4.25 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.89 | 4.86 -68% | 4.4 -52% | 1.37 53% | 1.73 40% | 1.42 51% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3.75 40% | 3.77 39% | 2.7 56% | 4.7 24% | 2.2 65% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.32 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 8072 81% | 6543 99% | 6666 98% | 6655 98% | 7184 90% | 6887 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.3 | 36 -39% | 40 -33% | 61.3 3% | 66.3 12% | 60.2 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.6 | 56 -39% | 62 -32% | 95.4 4% | 99.5 9% | 95 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-16% | -13% /
-19% | 6% /
13% | 5% /
12% | 5% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (954 - 1645, n=20) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (342 - 472, n=20) | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
LG Gram 14Z90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (452 - 815, n=52) | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
LG Gram 14Z90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (138.3 - 193, n=51) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (687 - 1175, n=22) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (2029 - 5923, n=23) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W | |
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (3.24 - 5.5, n=22) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
HP Elite Dragonfly-8MK79EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U () | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U (0.682 - 0.851, n=2) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Intel Reference Design Laptop 28W |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3578 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4844 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4202 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Asus ZenBook 13 UX325JA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL | |
HP Envy x360 15-ee0257ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | LG Gram 14Z90N Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 11% | -21% | 33% | 71% | -14% | |
Seq Read | 1171 | 1970 68% | 957 -18% | 1744 49% | 1658 42% | 1061 -9% |
Seq Write | 868 | 1268 46% | 353.1 -59% | 1450 67% | 2464 184% | 953 10% |
4K Read | 39.06 | 47.13 21% | 62.4 60% | 57.4 47% | 59.5 52% | 35.59 -9% |
4K Write | 130.6 | 121.6 -7% | 122.8 -6% | 140.9 8% | 128.6 -2% | 87 -33% |
4K-64 Read | 815 | 855 5% | 386.2 -53% | 907 11% | 1576 93% | 769 -6% |
4K-64 Write | 709 | 859 21% | 605 -15% | 1372 94% | 1986 180% | 733 3% |
Access Time Read * | 0.059 | 0.065 -10% | 0.107 -81% | 0.059 -0% | 0.049 17% | 0.084 -42% |
Access Time Write * | 0.077 | 0.032 58% | 0.046 40% | 0.081 -5% | 0.087 -13% | 0.136 -77% |
Score Read | 971 | 1100 13% | 544 -44% | 1138 17% | 1802 86% | 911 -6% |
Score Write | 926 | 1108 20% | 763 -18% | 1658 79% | 2361 155% | 916 -1% |
Score Total | 2387 | 2745 15% | 1581 -34% | 3380 42% | 5133 115% | 2294 -4% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1287 | 982 -24% | 1520 18% | 1588 23% | 956 -26% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 417 | 276.2 -34% | 539 29% | 550 32% | 496.5 19% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1017 | 681 -33% | 1070 5% | 1329 31% | 872 -14% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 10% | 27% | 42% | 72% | -9% | |
Write 4K | 134.2 | 102.8 -23% | 124.9 -7% | 183.6 37% | 146.1 9% | 107.7 -20% |
Read 4K | 45.41 | 45.48 0% | 147.9 226% | 48.51 7% | 47.18 4% | 39.73 -13% |
Write Seq | 1080 | 1255 16% | 753 -30% | 1520 41% | 2896 168% | 926 -14% |
Read Seq | 1168 | 1434 23% | 1223 5% | 1914 64% | 2754 136% | 1014 -13% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 412.5 | 441 7% | 369.2 -10% | 529 28% | 425.8 3% | 343.6 -17% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 357.2 | 474.1 33% | 358.1 0% | 560 57% | 514 44% | 499.1 40% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1457 | 1456 0% | 1057 -27% | 1540 6% | 2989 105% | 1033 -29% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1710 | 2085 22% | 2738 60% | 3408 99% | 3568 109% | 1604 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
11% | 3% /
-1% | 38% /
36% | 72% /
72% | -12% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 3930 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12886 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2726 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 990 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 109 | 95.4 | 35.9 | 16.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 59.5 | 33 | 19.4 | 10.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 113 | 88.6 | 61.3 | 54.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 33.7 | 16.4 | 11 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.2 | 41.1 | 37.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 71.3 | 26.7 | 19.9 | 15.7 |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 Vega 6, R5 4500U, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Vega 8, R7 4800U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -12% | -11% | 4% | 7% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 30.7 -17% | 28.6 -9% | 26.3 -0% | 28.7 -10% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 31 -18% | 28.6 -9% | 26.5 -1% | 29.5 -13% |
Idle Average * | 27.2 | 30.7 -13% | 31 -14% | 29.2 -7% | 26.5 3% | 29.5 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 30.7 -13% | 31.3 -15% | 29.2 -7% | 26.5 3% | 29.5 -8% |
Load Average * | 41.5 | 41.3 -0% | 43.4 -5% | 29.2 30% | 31.8 23% | 33.4 20% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.7 | 42.8 -8% | 35.9 10% | 37.9 5% | ||
Load Maximum * | 41.1 | 41.5 -1% | 29.5 28% | 35.9 13% | 40.5 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 26.2 / 27.2 / 27.2 dB |
Carga |
| 41.5 / 41.1 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.4 °C / 102.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.25 / 0.58 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.9 / 6.2 / 7 Watt |
Carga |
47.1 / 62.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 R5 4500U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -6% | 14% | -14% | -23% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 4.4 -52% | 2.4 17% | 2.6 10% | 4 -38% | 4.2 -45% |
Idle Average * | 6.2 | 7.6 -23% | 4.2 32% | 5.9 5% | 6.3 -2% | 5.9 5% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 9.9 -41% | 7.8 -11% | 8 -14% | 7.7 -10% | 7.2 -3% |
Load Average * | 47.1 | 46 2% | 57 -21% | 29.8 37% | 48.3 -3% | 63.4 -35% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.7 | 52 -50% | 30.9 11% | 49 -41% | 53.5 -54% | |
Load Maximum * | 62.8 | 59 6% | 64 -2% | 39.5 37% | 57.6 8% | 67.4 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77 i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 R5 4500U, Vega 6, 56.5 Wh | Asus VivoBook S14 S433FL i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 72 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 34% | 17% | 99% | 18% | -7% | |
Reader / Idle | 966 | 2735 183% | 1623 68% | 986 2% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 440 | 591 34% | 514 17% | 838 90% | 619 41% | 515 17% |
Load | 171 | 211 23% | 79 -54% | 105 -39% |
Pro
Contra
Conforme configurado, nosso ZenBook 14 UX434FL atualmente é vendido por cerca de US$ 1.400 a US$ 1.500 e é mais caro do que outros sistemas de gama média como o Lenovo Yoga Tablet 7 HD+. Muito do preço premium vai para o ScreenPad exclusivo, já que você não encontrará suporte para Thunderbolt 3, carregamento USB-C, DisplayPort, obturador de webcam ou leitor de digitais aqui. A GPU GeForce MX250 de 10 W mais lenta também é uma chatice para jogadores casuais.
Se você frequentemente se encontra em situações em que um segundo monitor não é possível, o ScreenPad seria a próxima melhor solução. Pode ser inestimável para os viajantes, especialmente em voos onde o espaço da mesa é limitado. Mas para usuários domésticos ou de escritório, pode ser mais sensato considerar emparelhar o mais barato ZenBook 14 UX433 sem ScreenPad com um monitor externo.
O ScreenPad é útil em situações onde um monitor externo está fora de alcance. O ScreenPad 2.0 resolve muitas das deficiências do ScreenPad 1.0 por uma experiência do usuário mais suave e uma tela um pouco menos granulada. Se você não espera usar tanto o recurso, então outros subportáteis estão disponíveis com o mesmo, ou melhor desempenho por menos dinheiro.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX434FL-DB77
- 09/21/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo