Breve Análise do Portátil Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD (i7-8550U, GTX 1050)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 376.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 896:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.95
ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.335
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 LP173WF4-SPF5, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T INNOLUX N156HGA-EAB, TN, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 AUO109D (AU Optronics), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV ID: AUO109D, Name: AU Optronics B173HW01 V0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -36% | -1% | 4% | -0% | 35% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 39.92 -41% | 63.9 -6% | 67.2 -1% | 64.3 -5% | 89.7 32% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.8 | 59.8 -31% | 88.7 2% | 93.1 7% | 88.5 2% | 100 15% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.5 | 41.27 -35% | 64.8 2% | 67.4 6% | 64.6 2% | 100 57% |
| Response Times | -26% | -16% | -45% | -23% | -85% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 44 ? -43% | 38 ? -23% | 38 ? -23% | 40.8 ? -32% | 57.2 ? -86% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23.2 ? | 13 ? 44% | 25 ? -8% | 26 ? -12% | 26.4 ? -14% | 39.2 ? -69% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | 25000 ? -79% | 200 ? -100% | 962 -99% | ||
| Screen | -22% | 17% | 4% | 6% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 376.2 | 247 -34% | 279 -26% | 318 -15% | 333.5 -11% | 370.1 -2% |
| Brightness | 355 | 224 -37% | 262 -26% | 295 -17% | 323 -9% | 356 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 85 -4% | 85 -4% | 79 -11% | 91 2% | 87 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.48 -14% | 0.18 57% | 0.25 40% | 0.32 24% | 0.37 12% |
| Contrast | 896 | 515 -43% | 1550 73% | 1272 42% | 1042 16% | 1000 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 5.39 -28% | 3.58 15% | 4.7 -12% | 4 5% | 5.3 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.31 | 7.98 4% | 5.98 28% | 8.8 -6% | 6.9 17% | 9.9 -19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.95 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 5.25 5% | 2.75 50% | 5 9% | 4.5 18% | 4.6 16% |
| Gamma | 2.335 94% | 2.48 89% | 2.57 86% | 2.28 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7056 92% | 7609 85% | 6836 95% | 7374 88% | 6386 102% | 6284 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 38 -33% | 58 2% | 61 7% | 57.5 1% | 88.3 55% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 60 -31% | 88 1% | 93 7% | 88.1 1% | 100 15% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -28% /
-25% | 0% /
9% | -12% /
-5% | -6% /
1% | -15% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 119000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 119000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 119000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4245 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5474 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5343 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4488 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -77% | -82% | -598% | -5% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 405.5 | 130.9 -68% | 540 33% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 305.8 | 107.8 -65% | 411.5 35% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1733 | 162.8 -91% | 1272 -27% | ||
| Score Total | 3488 | 830 -76% | 509 -85% | 2172 -38% | 2810 -19% |
| Score Write | 1091 | 360 -67% | 160 -85% | 165 -85% | 1022 -6% |
| Score Read | 1612 | 308 -81% | 234 -85% | 1390 -14% | 1206 -25% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.03 | 0.057 -90% | 0.061 -103% | 1.881 -6170% | 0.034 -13% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.056 | 0.132 -136% | 0.128 -129% | 0.056 -0% | 0.034 39% |
| 4K-64 Write | 828 | 246.8 -70% | 73.4 -91% | 129.5 -84% | 789 -5% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1329 | 236.7 -82% | 159.1 -88% | 1101 -17% | 962 -28% |
| 4K Write | 122.1 | 70.4 -42% | 68.8 -44% | 1.31 -99% | 112.2 -8% |
| 4K Read | 49.78 | 22.9 -54% | 25.6 -49% | 48.92 -2% | 41.34 -17% |
| Seq Write | 1409 | 426.7 -70% | 182.1 -87% | 346.2 -75% | 1207 -14% |
| Seq Read | 2339 | 482.9 -79% | 492.1 -79% | 2399 3% | 2026 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 24942 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7474 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15440 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5411 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile (15.7 - 25, n=33) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 277 | 169 | 157 | 62 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 25 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.3 / 29 / 29 dB |
| HDD |
| 29.9 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.7 / 42.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV Radeon R7 M340, A12-9720P, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | -8% | -3% | -18% | -5% | -10% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 30.5 -8% | 30.1 -6% | 30.1 -6% | 30 -6% | 28 1% | 28.4 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 30.6 -8% | 31.1 -10% | 31.4 -11% | 34 -20% | 30.4 -7% | 29 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 30.9 -7% | 31.1 -7% | 31.4 -8% | 35 -21% | 30.5 -5% | 29 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 31.9 -10% | 31.1 -7% | 31.7 -9% | 36 -24% | 30.5 -5% | 32.2 -11% |
| Load Average * | 36.7 | 38.6 -5% | 44.4 -21% | 35.2 4% | 47 -28% | 41.5 -13% | 47.1 -28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44.7 | 47.3 -6% | 39.9 11% | 48 -7% | 41.8 6% | 52 -16% | |
| Load Maximum * | 42.8 | 45.7 -7% | 41.7 3% | 43.5 -2% | 52 -21% | 48.2 -13% | 47.1 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.2 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.4 °C / 2.5 F).
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.406 / 0.63 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.06 / 10.3 / 10.7 Watt |
| Carga |
83 / 99.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba MQ01ABD100, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV A12-9720P, Radeon R7 M340, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | 32% | -28% | -62% | -1% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.06 | 4.7 7% | 4.08 19% | 7 -38% | 11 -117% | 7.8 -54% | 11.9 -135% |
| Idle Average * | 10.3 | 7.7 25% | 8.45 18% | 12.3 -19% | 18 -75% | 11.7 -14% | 17.1 -66% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 10.9 -2% | 9.6 10% | 14.2 -33% | 24 -124% | 15.7 -47% | 17.3 -62% |
| Load Average * | 83 | 82 1% | 40.2 52% | 72.6 13% | 84 -1% | 57.4 31% | 94.7 -14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 92.4 | 109 -18% | 125 -35% | 101 -9% | 53.3 42% | 104.8 -13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 99.9 | 120 -20% | 41.4 59% | 153 -53% | 146 -46% | 62.3 38% | 122 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76 i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 42 Wh | Asus VivoBook Pro 15 N580VD-DM028T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh | Dell Inspiron 17-5770-0357 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire 7 A717-71G-72VY i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 48 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV A12-9720P, Radeon R7 M340, 41.6 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 52% | 55% | 34% | 62% | 10% | 79% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 265 | 392 48% | 368 39% | 336 27% | 380 43% | 233 -12% | 434 64% |
| Load | 53 | 82 55% | 90 70% | 74 40% | 96 81% | 70 32% | 103 94% |
| Reader / Idle | 609 | 702 | 552 | 795 | 410 | 831 |
Pro
Contra
Nada sobre o VivoBook Pro 17 é particularmente chamativo, mas, novamente, esta não é uma máquina que procura quebrar barreiras em qualquer categoria específica. Em vez disso, é uma proposta de valor geral, um recurso para aqueles que gostariam de possuir uma máquina com desempenho diário competente e completo e capacidade para jogos ocasionais, mas que não estão interessados em pagar muito por estética de alto nível, design e os sinos e assobios afiliados.
Nada sobre o VivoBook Pro 17 é particularmente chamativo, mas, novamente, esta não é uma máquina que procura quebrar barreiras em qualquer categoria específica. Em vez disso, oferece um desempenho diário competente e uma capacidade para jogos ocasionais por um preço razoável - em troca de uma série de outras desvantagens.
E para a maior parte (com algumas complicações), ele é bem sucedido naquela tarefa. O VivoBook Pro 17, fino e leve, exibe resultados muito bons do desempenho geral do sistema, possui armazenamento rápido em estado sólido e pode lidar com uma sessão de jogo típica sem nenhum problema. A tela também é bastante boa em geral, com alto brilho, bons ângulos de visão, reprodução de cores respeitável e um acabamento mate.
Mas temos nossas reservas, e elas não são necessariamente menores. Enquanto o VivoBook Pro 17 resolve algumas das questões de sua contrapartida de 15 polegadas, o Core i7-8550U (como é frequentemente) não pode manter um desempenho multi-core suficientemente forte para justificar a sua seleção sobre, por exemplo, um Core i5-8250U (embora o desempenho de um único núcleo seja claramente superior). A máquina também possui uma seleção de portas de qualidade inferior, uma carcaça de plástico, manutenção difícil, um teclado medíocre com um layout estranho, altas temperaturas de superfície e uma duração fraca. Se nenhum desses itens for particularmente ofensivo para o usuário, pode ser uma alternativa valiosa para os modelos premium mais caros da sua classe (como o Dell XPS 15 9560). Mas as alternativas de preços semelhantes com diferentes conjuntos de prós e contras estão amplamente disponíveis (como o Acer Aspire 7 A71-71G-72VY) - assim, como é frequentemente o caso, a questão real com essas máquinas orientadas a valores é, qual o canto você deseja cortar?
Asus VivoBook Pro 17 N705UD-EH76
- 02/28/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein
Price comparison
