Breve Análise do Portátil Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH (N4200, HD)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 65 %
iluminação com acumulador: 253 cd/m²
Contraste: 1488:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
45.73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Dell Latitude 3189 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | ODYS Vario Pro 12 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Medion Akoya E2215T IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6" | HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 2% | 9% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 44.23 | 44.96 2% | 45.16 2% | 48.12 9% | 45.21 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 66.3 | 67.3 2% | 67.5 2% | 71.7 8% | 67.8 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 45.73 | 46.49 2% | 46.71 2% | 49.78 9% | 46.73 2% |
| Response Times | -13% | -49% | 9% | 30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39 ? | 40 ? -3% | 60 ? -54% | 31 ? 21% | 18.8 ? 52% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 30.4 ? -22% | 36 ? -44% | 26 ? -4% | 23.2 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | ||||
| Screen | 9% | -41% | -15% | -6% | |
| Brightness middle | 253 | 291 15% | 282 11% | 338 34% | 194 -23% |
| Brightness | 245 | 284 16% | 250 2% | 309 26% | 186 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 65 | 92 42% | 74 14% | 76 17% | 86 32% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.16 6% | 0.37 -118% | 0.39 -129% | 0.22 -29% |
| Contrast | 1488 | 1819 22% | 762 -49% | 867 -42% | 882 -41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.17 | 3.4 -7% | 5.63 -78% | 3.94 -24% | 3.06 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.13 | 9.6 -18% | 11.28 -39% | 9.96 -23% | 8.81 -8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 5.04 -152% | 2.54 -27% | 1.42 29% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.38 92% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 6850 95% | 6544 99% | 7254 90% | 6902 94% | 6432 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42 | 42.8 2% | 43 2% | 46 10% | 42.98 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 66 | 67 2% | 67 2% | 71 8% | 67.56 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
5% | -29% /
-33% | 1% /
-7% | 9% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| Dell Latitude 3180 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2094 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | Dell Latitude 3189 Liteonit CV3-8D128 | ODYS Vario Pro 12 32 GB eMMC Flash | Medion Akoya E2215T 64 GB eMMC Flash | HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 Hitachi Travelstar Z5K500 HTS545050A7E680 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 7181% | 1851% | 1279% | 68% | |
| Read Seq | 53.9 | 408.4 658% | 168.3 212% | 169.6 215% | 106 97% |
| Write Seq | 66.4 | 214.3 223% | 43.13 -35% | 39.77 -40% | 106.1 60% |
| Read 512 | 22.62 | 243.7 977% | 155 585% | 155.3 587% | 33.53 48% |
| Write 512 | 67.3 | 170.6 153% | 33.71 -50% | 27.45 -59% | 39.03 -42% |
| Read 4k | 0.378 | 8.864 2245% | 15.91 4109% | 13.09 3363% | 0.407 8% |
| Write 4k | 0.263 | 49.14 18584% | 11.64 4326% | 7.915 2910% | 1.026 290% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.998 | 132.2 13146% | 32.2 3126% | 15.11 1414% | 0.898 -10% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.518 | 111.7 21464% | 13.65 2535% | 10.05 1840% | 1.003 94% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 672 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| World of Warcraft (2005) | 62.3 | 25.2 | ||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 25.4 | 14.4 | 11.5 | |
| Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014) | 14.2 | 9.3 | ||
| GTA V (2015) | 9.5 | 4.3 | ||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 3 | |||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 9.7 | |||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 2.3 | |||
| Prey (2017) | 5.4 | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 26.6 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 14.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.7 / 31.7 / 31.7 dB |
| HDD |
| 32.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.7 / 31.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.8 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.8 °C / 92.8 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.46 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.7 / 7.8 / 8.7 Watt |
| Carga |
21 / 19 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Dell Latitude 3189 | |
| Medion Akoya E2215T | |
| ODYS Vario Pro 12 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T | |
| HP Pavilion 11-k103ng x360 | |
Pro
Contra
Com o VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH, a Asus oferece um conversível no formato de 11,6 polegadas. O processador incorporado do Apollo Lake oferece desempenho suficiente para aplicativos do escritório e áreas da Internet. Dado que o decodificador integrado na GPU permite reproduzir todos os formatos de vídeo habituais, o computador pode ser usado como um reprodutor de vídeo silencioso para a TV em casa.
A tela deixa uma boa impressão confusa. A Asus oferece uma tela de alto contraste com ângulos de visão estáveis, cujo brilho resulta ser um pouco baixo.
O VivoBook Flip 12 é destinado principalmente para uso em casa.
Graças ao disco rígido de 1 TB, o pequeno computador não é escasso de espaço de armazenamento. No entanto, um SSD de pouca capacidade teria sido a melhor escolha. Especialmente em computadores que possuem CPUs fracos, a diferença entre um SSD e HDD é considerável no uso diário. Os usuários que desejem mudar para um SSD devem fazê-lo sozinhos. No entanto, esta troca não é tão fácil. Infelizmente, a Asus não possui variantes do VivoBook equipadas com SSDs em suas ofertas.
A duração da bateria é média no melhor dos casos: Em nosso teste WLAN, o dispositivo atinge uma autonomia de 6:05 h. Se o aparelho é usado exclusivamente na sala de estar em casa, a duração da bateria é completamente suficiente. Mas se o aparelho deve ser usado longe de casa, como na escola ou na faculdade, você sempre precisa levar a fonte de alimentação. O Dell Latitude 3189, que está equipado com a mesma plataforma de hardware e capacidade da bateria, dura boas quatro horas a mais.
E, finalmente, devemos mencionar o preço da compra. A Asus pede 500 Euros (~ $560) pelo VivoBook, que é um preço bastante elevado para um conversível simples. No entanto, a este respeito, a concorrência não parece ser muito melhor e os modelos comparativos da concorrência estão no mesmo nível de preços.
Asus VivoBook Flip 12 TP203NAH-BP049T
- 06/16/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
