Breve Análise do Portátil Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI: Híbrido multimídia para jogos
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
78.6 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.1 kg | 21.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | 2 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
81.5 % v7 (old) | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.7 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
85.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
79.7 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.8 kg | 19.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 263.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1015:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 Panda LM156LF-GL03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr Samsung SDC4145, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G LG Display LP156WFC SPD1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T BOE CQ NV156FHM-N63, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 109% | -16% | 52% | 54% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.2 | 88.5 120% | 33.78 -16% | 65 62% | 66.8 66% | 37.31 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.4 | 100 66% | 50.8 -16% | 86.2 43% | 86.5 43% | 56.2 -7% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.56 | 99.9 140% | 34.9 -16% | 62.9 51% | 63.2 52% | 38.55 -7% |
Response Times | 93% | -16% | -46% | -60% | -7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.4 ? | 0.8 ? 97% | 36 ? -27% | 45 ? -58% | 49.6 ? -75% | 28.4 ? -0% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 2.7 ? 89% | 25 ? -4% | 32 ? -33% | 34.8 ? -45% | 27.2 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 242.7 ? | 202 ? | ||||
Screen | 45% | 6% | 28% | 25% | -1% | |
Brightness middle | 263.9 | 374.3 42% | 248 -6% | 299 13% | 299 13% | 253.6 -4% |
Brightness | 246 | 379 54% | 238 -3% | 280 14% | 278 13% | 227 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 86 -1% | 89 2% | 87 0% | 84 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.23 12% | 0.21 19% | 0.25 4% | 0.27 -4% | |
Contrast | 1015 | 1078 6% | 1424 40% | 1196 18% | 939 -7% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.56 | 5.47 2% | 5.05 9% | 4.76 14% | 4.32 22% | 6.05 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.11 | 8.22 49% | 14.34 11% | 9 44% | 9.3 42% | 14.03 13% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.3 | 4.61 -7% | 4.76 -11% | 2.58 40% | 4.97 -16% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 2.3 60% | 1.37 76% | 3.53 39% | 4.21 27% | 3.2 45% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.4 92% | 2.3 96% | 2.39 92% | 2 110% |
CCT | 7828 83% | 6340 103% | 6592 99% | 7228 90% | 6799 96% | 6820 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.2 | 87.8 130% | 32 -16% | 56 47% | 57 49% | 35.5 -7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.1 | 100 66% | 51 -15% | 86 43% | 86 43% | 55.6 -7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 82% /
65% | -9% /
-1% | 11% /
23% | 6% /
20% | -5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.2 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S740-15IRH | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4090 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5343 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4837 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i7 4K UHD | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G532LWS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-52-77DS |
* ... smaller is better
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -5% | 31% | 63% | 119% | -0% | |
Seq Read | 1323 | 1005 -24% | 1405 6% | 2643 100% | 2642 100% | 398.9 -70% |
Seq Write | 1572 | 436.8 -72% | 953 -39% | 1533 -2% | 2433 55% | 884 -44% |
4K Read | 38.09 | 51.5 35% | 54 42% | 49.12 29% | 58 52% | 34.54 -9% |
4K Write | 127.4 | 88 -31% | 93 -27% | 134.7 6% | 145.3 14% | 82.1 -36% |
4K-64 Read | 812 | 517 -36% | 959 18% | 1028 27% | 1431 76% | 647 -20% |
4K-64 Write | 276 | 839 204% | 772 180% | 1353 390% | 1753 535% | 985 257% |
Access Time Read * | 0.035 | 0.088 -151% | 0.051 -46% | 0.033 6% | 0.072 -106% | 0.072 -106% |
Access Time Write * | 0.411 | 0.151 63% | 0.044 89% | 0.028 93% | 0.027 93% | 0.047 89% |
Score Read | 983 | 669 -32% | 1153 17% | 1342 37% | 1753 78% | 721 -27% |
Score Write | 561 | 970 73% | 961 71% | 1641 193% | 2142 282% | 1155 106% |
Score Total | 2066 | 1972 -5% | 2695 30% | 3622 75% | 4790 132% | 2279 10% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2846 | 1173 -59% | 2226 -22% | 862 -70% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 728 | 769 6% | 506 -30% | 457 -37% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 1610 | 1045 -35% | 1230 -24% | 902 -44% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -5% | -27% | 15% | 11% | -43% | |
Write 4K | 169.7 | 100.2 -41% | 100.4 -41% | 138.1 -19% | 170.7 1% | 105.9 -38% |
Read 4K | 53.2 | 112.8 112% | 47.16 -11% | 45.89 -14% | 49.51 -7% | 36.56 -31% |
Write Seq | 1679 | 537 -68% | 993 -41% | 2147 28% | 1156 -31% | 1165 -31% |
Read Seq | 1698 | 1270 -25% | 1176 -31% | 2188 29% | 1136 -33% | 423.2 -75% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.7 | 480.6 7% | 354.7 -21% | 427.8 -5% | 420.5 -7% | 332.1 -26% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 577 | 364.9 -37% | 473 -18% | 404 -30% | 527 -9% | 229.3 -60% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1657 | 1224 -26% | 1034 -38% | 2396 45% | 2984 80% | 1460 -12% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1851 | 2635 42% | 1635 -12% | 3454 87% | 3550 92% | 472.5 -74% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-5% | 2% /
7% | 39% /
45% | 65% /
74% | -22% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 12523 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29531 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8903 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3801 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 | |
MSI Alpha 15 A3DDK-034 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 199.3 | 126.6 | 74.5 | 38.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 138 | 124 | 115 | 109 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 104 | 54.9 | 39.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 95.6 | 80.5 | 71 |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08 | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, i7-10750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | 7% | 9% | 1% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 25.7 | 26.4 -3% | 29.8 -16% | 30.3 -18% | 30 -17% | 28.3 -10% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.9 | 32.2 -1% | 29.8 7% | 30.3 5% | 30 6% | 28.3 11% |
Idle Average * | 31.9 | 32.2 -1% | 29.8 7% | 30.3 5% | 32 -0% | 28.3 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.9 | 32.2 -1% | 29.8 7% | 30.9 3% | 37 -16% | 28.3 11% |
Load Average * | 44.2 | 48.3 -9% | 37.3 16% | 31.3 29% | 41 7% | 31.4 29% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.9 | 53.7 -22% | 38.1 13% | 39 11% | 41.4 6% | |
Load Maximum * | 50.7 | 58.8 -16% | 40.1 21% | 38.2 25% | 42 17% | 41.4 18% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.9 / 31.9 / 31.9 dB |
Carga |
| 44.2 / 50.7 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25.7 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 72 °C / 162 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.1 / 0.9 Watt |
Ocioso | 6.4 / 10.6 / 18.4 Watt |
Carga |
103.7 / 154.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), AMOLED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | 52% | 40% | 42% | 55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.4 | 9.2 -44% | 3.4 47% | 2.8 56% | 5 22% | 4.2 34% |
Idle Average * | 10.6 | 14.5 -37% | 6.4 40% | 7.7 27% | 7 34% | 6.8 36% |
Idle Maximum * | 18.4 | 18 2% | 9.2 50% | 9.4 49% | 10 46% | 7 62% |
Load Average * | 103.7 | 110.9 -7% | 38 63% | 57 45% | 64 38% | 36.5 65% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 99.1 | 125.5 -27% | 62 37% | 44 56% | 37.9 62% | |
Load Maximum * | 154.9 | 194.6 -26% | 59 62% | 116 25% | 67 57% | 44 72% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 42 Wh | HP Envy 15-ep0098nr i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, 83 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-54G i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T i7-10510U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 71 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 62% | 143% | 188% | 157% | 59% | |
Reader / Idle | 611 | 900 47% | 1629 167% | 1810 196% | 856 40% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 220 | 361 64% | 534 143% | 743 238% | 724 229% | 421 91% |
Load | 55 | 97 76% | 142 158% | 81 47% | 81 47% |
Pro
Contra
O VivoBook 15 K571 é a melhor opção para estudantes que desejam um portátil acessível tanto para jogos quanto para trabalhos de aula e que também seja relativamente portátil. É poderoso para o tamanho e peso e como uma solução intermediária entre um Ultrabook tradicional e um portátil para jogos de nível de entrada. Muito poucos portáteis nesta faixa de preço também vêm com uma opção de painel de 120 Hz.
Se você não precisa de uma CPU Core da série H ou GPU GTX 1650 Ti, então um ZenBook seria a melhor opção. A duração da bateria, o ruído do ventilador e as temperaturas são apenas médias, no máximo, no VivoBook 15 devido aos exigentes processadores.
Recomendamos escolher a tela com cuidado. A Asus oferece três opções: 1080p120 45% NTSC, 1080p60 45% NTSC, ou 1080p60 72% NTSC. A opção 1080p120 45% NTSC será a melhor para jogos, mesmo depois de considerar os tempos médios de resposta em preto e branco. Para trabalhos de edição e de gráficos, a opção 1080p60 72% NTSC será melhor por suas cores mais profundas.
O Asus VivoBook 15 K571 não se destaca particularmente em um aspecto singular, mas consegue chegar a ser uma máquina multimídia e máquina de jogos bastante boa, por seu preço barato.
Asus VivoBook 15 K571LI-PB71
- 09/13/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo