Breve Análise do Portátil Asus TUF FX705GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
Asus TUF FX705GM (TUF FX705 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1405 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 398.35, Optimus
Memória
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB
, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW, SSD NVMe de 256 GB + Seagate BarraCuda Pro ST1000LM049, HDD de 1 TB, 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
peso
2.753 kg, Suprimento de energia: 439 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 246 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 228.1 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 205 cd/m²
Contraste: 1170:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.02
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| Asus TUF FX705GM AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 1920x1080 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | 31% | -1% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62.4 | 90 44% | 90.8 46% | 66.1 6% | 67.1 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.8 | 100 13% | 99.9 13% | 84.4 -5% | 86.1 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.8 | 84.8 33% | 85.8 34% | 61.7 -3% | 63 -1% |
| Response Times | 4% | 17% | -281% | -253% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.4 ? | 8.8 ? -19% | 7.8 ? -5% | 39.2 ? -430% | 36 ? -386% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 7.4 ? 26% | 6.2 ? 38% | 23.2 ? -132% | 22 ? -120% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 25510 ? | 119000 ? | 122000 ? | |
| Screen | -33% | -15% | -61% | -68% | |
| Brightness middle | 234 | 297.8 27% | 262 12% | 362 55% | 365 56% |
| Brightness | 228 | 285 25% | 261 14% | 350 54% | 341 50% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 84 -1% | 94 11% | 91 7% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.33 -65% | 0.2 -0% | 0.29 -45% | 0.32 -60% |
| Contrast | 1170 | 902 -23% | 1310 12% | 1248 7% | 1141 -2% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.16 | 3.68 -70% | 3.96 -83% | 6.06 -181% | 6.51 -201% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.39 | 7.71 -127% | 7.29 -115% | 11.6 -242% | 12.32 -263% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.02 | 2.71 -34% | 2.18 -8% | 3.13 -55% | 2.9 -44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 5 -150% | 3.09 -55% | 7.22 -261% | 7.65 -283% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.06 107% | 2.48 89% | 2.51 88% | 2.64 83% |
| CCT | 6394 102% | 6728 97% | 6977 93% | 7659 85% | 8066 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 84.77 46% | 76 31% | 55 -5% | 56 -3% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89 | 99.97 12% | 100 12% | 84 -6% | 86 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-16% | 11% /
-3% | -114% /
-77% | -107% /
-78% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Asus TUF FX705GM Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1022 (992.14-1137)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø995 (976.78-1132)
SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (966-1112.47)
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (926.78-1026.8)
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4659 - 5937, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6712, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4660 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5719 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5169 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus TUF FX705GM WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 Hynix HFS128G39TND | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 8% | 12% | 34% | -61% | |
| Seq Read | 1571 | 1993 27% | 1749 11% | 2589 65% | 513 -67% |
| Seq Write | 1236 | 1031 -17% | 1173 -5% | 1449 17% | 128.2 -90% |
| 4K Read | 38.49 | 35.76 -7% | 42.81 11% | 52.8 37% | 26.5 -31% |
| 4K Write | 101.9 | 88.4 -13% | 98.4 -3% | 112.3 10% | 62.7 -38% |
| Score Read | 913 | 1520 66% | 1456 59% | 1153 26% | 414 -55% |
| Score Write | 1082 | 825 -24% | 906 -16% | 1592 47% | 196 -82% |
| Score Total | 2458 | 3075 25% | 3083 25% | 3291 34% | 811 -67% |
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1704 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1301 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
321.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
282.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1295 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
41.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
104.2 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13450 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Asus TUF FX705GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø37.1 (34-39)
MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP: Ø50.2 (46-54)
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Hynix HFS128G39TND: Ø24.7 (23-26)
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM | |
| Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
| SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.2 | 36.5 | ||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 | ||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 50.8 | 40.6 | ||
| F1 2018 (2018) | 92 | 58 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 53 | 47 | ||
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 205 | 203 | ||
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 85 | 66 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 52 | 37 | ||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 69.4 | 63.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 44 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 46 / 50 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 6% | 4% | 7% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 28.6 1% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 29.4 8% | 30 6% | 31 3% | 29 9% | 25.5 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 29.4 11% | 34 -3% | 32 3% | 31 6% | 27.2 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 44 | 33.7 23% | 36 18% | 44 -0% | 33 25% | 30.3 ? 31% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 41.2 10% | 43 7% | 44 4% | 45 2% | 42.7 ? 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48 | 47.3 1% | 45 6% | 42 12% | 45 6% | |
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 48.3 3% | 45 10% | 46 8% | 51 -2% | 53.4 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
| Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | -8% | -4% | -0% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 54.6 -1% | 58 -7% | 55 -2% | 50 7% | 46.1 ? 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 53 | 41.2 22% | 63 -19% | 49 8% | 52 2% | 49 ? 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 35 -17% | 32 -7% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% | 31.3 ? -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 35.2 -17% | 30 -0% | 34 -13% | 30 -0% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF FX705GM audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.8 / 2.2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 13 / 17 / 24 Watt |
| Carga |
106 / 179 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | 10% | 20% | 36% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13 | 18.88 -45% | 8 38% | 11 15% | 6 54% | 13.6 ? -5% |
| Idle Average * | 17 | 24.36 -43% | 14 18% | 14 18% | 9 47% | 19 ? -12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 32.27 -34% | 22 8% | 20 17% | 13 46% | 26.8 ? -12% |
| Load Average * | 106 | 107.74 -2% | 92 13% | 96 9% | 95 10% | 106.3 ? -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 151 | 142 6% | 154 -2% | 97 36% | 102 32% | |
| Load Maximum * | 179 | 160.28 10% | 207 -16% | 136 24% | 134 25% | 249 ? -39% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | SCHENKER XMG A707 Coffee Lake i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -24% | 57% | 41% | 34% | |
| Reader / Idle | 380 | 320 -16% | 346 -9% | 704 85% | 710 87% | 567 ? 49% |
| H.264 | 260 | 413 ? 59% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 272 | 213 -22% | 200 -26% | 378 39% | 354 30% | 376 ? 38% |
| Load | 95 | 70 -26% | 60 -37% | 141 48% | 100 5% | 85.7 ? -10% |
Pro
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Painel de 144-Hz
+ SSD NVMe
+ Marcos finos
Contra
- Muito barulho durante o uso em 3D
- Seleção limitada de portas
- Som impressionante
Com a série TUF, a Asus mostra que portáteis de jogos potentes não precisam ser escandalosamente caros.
Além da escassa seleção de portas (sem leitor de cartões, sem Thunderbolt 3, sem USB 3.1 Gen2) e o som medíocre, o FX705 não deixa muitas coisas a desejar. O modelo de 17 polegadas brilha com sua tela de 144 Hz com alta taxa de contraste e alta velocidade, que é impulsionado por um processador de seis núcleos e a GeForce GTX 1060 de alto desempenho.
A carcaça e a duração da bateria também não são muito ruins. A qualidade do chassi deve agradar a maioria dos compradores. Além disso, os jogadores ficarão felizes com a iluminação RGB (Cuidado: Existem duas variantes da carcaça com várias diferenças; Veja acima)
No entanto, há uma quantidade saudável de competição no setor de 17 polegadas, como o MSI GS73, o Schenker XMG A707 e o Acer Predator Helios 300. Enquanto os dois últimos desses portáteis ficaram ligeiramente para trás em termos de pontuação (82 em vez de 83%), o MSI alcançou uma avaliação geral um pouco melhor.
Asus TUF FX705GM
- 10/19/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
