Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus TUF A17 FA706IU Ryzen 7: Desempenho de Core i9 por $1.100 USD

Alto desempenho por um baixo orçamento.

A Asus reformulou completamente sua série TUF de cima para baixo e as mudanças são significativas. Se você estava considerando a série FX705/FX505 mais antiga, pule-a e considere a série FA706/FA506 mais recente.
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) AMD Renoir
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 (TUF Gaming A17 FA706 Serie)
Processador
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1555 MHz, Memoría: 1530 MHz, GDDR6, 445.87, Optimus
Memória
16 GB 
, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, Brilhante: não, 120 Hz
placa mãe
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, 1024 GB 
Placa de Som
NVIDIA TU116
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 26 x 399 x 269
Bateria
90 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Armoury Crate, , 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 573 g
Preço
1100 USD
Links
Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
82.9 %
v7 (old)
05/2020
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.6 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.1 %
v6 (old)
11/2019
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.6 kg29 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.3 %
v6 (old)
06/2019
Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		3.2 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.6 %
v7 (old)
07/2019
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q		2.8 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.3 %
v7 (old)
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile		2.8 kg26.3 mm17.30"1920x1080
77.8 %
v7 (old)
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile		2.7 kg26.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
❌
405 mm 282 mm 25 mm 2.8 kg404 mm 295.8 mm 25 mm 3.2 kg399.8 mm 279.4 mm 26.6 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 269 mm 29 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 290 mm 26.3 mm 2.8 kg399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB 2.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock
Right: USB 2.0 Type-A, Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0b, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, USB Type-C 3.2 Gen. 2 w/ DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5 mm combo audio
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1645 (1401min - 1773max) MBit/s +164%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1400 MBit/s +125%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1243 (1000min - 1395max) MBit/s +100%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
623 (577min - 656max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1349 (804min - 1497max) MBit/s +113%
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57AF1
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s +110%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1242 (1133min - 1283max) MBit/s +96%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
634 (621min - 646max) MBit/s
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630Tooltip
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø633 (621-646)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø623 (577-656)
ColorChecker
5.4 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76: 7.54 ∆E min: 3.64 - max: 11.75 ∆E
261.9
cd/m²		241.7
cd/m²		238.6
cd/m²
266.3
cd/m²		264.8
cd/m²		252.3
cd/m²
245.1
cd/m²		253.5
cd/m²		252.6
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
BOE NV173FHM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 266.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 253 cd/m² Minimum: 12.6 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 264.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 854:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.73 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.64
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.89% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.55% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Dell G7 17 7790
AU Optronics AUO409D, B173HAN, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
BOE0825, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
AU Optronics B173HAN04.4 (AUO449D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display
57%
51%
53%
68%
52%
Display P3 Coverage
40.55
63.4
56%
61.9
53%
63.3
56%
69
70%
62.3
54%
sRGB Coverage
59.7
94.9
59%
89.6
50%
90.2
51%
98.3
65%
89.1
49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
41.89
65.1
55%
63.2
51%
64.3
53%
70.7
69%
63.7
52%
Response Times
59%
30%
-22%
27%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)
8 ?(4, 4)
64%
17.2 ?(7.6, 9.6)
23%
31.6 ?(14, 17.6)
-41%
18 ?(8.4, 9.6)
20%
41 ?(20, 21)
-83%
Response Time Black / White *
19.2 ?(9.6, 9.6)
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
54%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
37%
19.6 ?(10.8, 8.8)
-2%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
33%
30 ?(16, 14)
-56%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(17)
Screen
26%
2%
6%
18%
14%
Brightness middle
264.8
420
59%
308.6
17%
299.6
13%
286
8%
316
19%
Brightness
253
393
55%
299
18%
285
13%
282
11%
294
16%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
92
2%
86
-4%
87
-3%
84
-7%
Black Level *
0.31
0.32
-3%
0.29
6%
0.33
-6%
0.19
39%
0.32
-3%
Contrast
854
1313
54%
1064
25%
908
6%
1505
76%
988
16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.73
3.04
36%
4.26
10%
3.68
22%
3.57
25%
3.39
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.89
7.22
62%
7.83
59%
8.05
57%
7.5
60%
5.56
71%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.64
0.89
81%
2.93
37%
3.15
32%
1.31
72%
2.14
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
3.91
-179%
5
-257%
3.8
-171%
4.51
-222%
3.17
-126%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.07 106%
2.12 104%
2.36 93%
2.39 92%
CCT
6641 98%
7138 91%
7488 87%
7240 90%
7411 88%
7098 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.4
60
56%
57.8
51%
58.1
51%
64
67%
51
33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.3
95
60%
89.2
50%
89.8
51%
98
65%
89
50%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
47% / 36%
28% / 15%
12% / 11%
38% / 28%
-1% / 10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
19.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.6 ms rise
↘ 9.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1773 (1724.58-1815.79)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900KS, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1835 (1810.86-1981.87)
MSI GS66 10SGS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1219 (1209.12-1272.47)
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)
Lenovo Yoga C940-15IRH GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1105 (1057.31-1230.47)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
4463 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (3692 - 4663, n=18)
4275 Points +3%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4132 Points
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points -10%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points -15%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
3443 Points -17%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points -17%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
2928 Points -29%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (2017 - 3133, n=55)
2564 Points -38%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2379 Points -42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
2357 Points -43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1825 Points -56%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
1737 Points -58%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
1659 Points -60%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
509 Points +7%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (462 - 491, n=17)
482 Points +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points 0%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points -1%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
464 Points -3%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
454 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (416 - 486, n=55)
443 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
422 Points -12%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
418 Points -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
387 Points -19%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
361 Points -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
340 Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
1962 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1652 - 1995, n=21)
1859 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1816 (1724.58min - 1815.79max) Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points -8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points -10%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points -11%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
1452 Points -20%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1273 (1209.12min - 1272.47max) Points -30%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1237 Points -32%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1097 Points -40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -56%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
797 Points -56%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
742 Points -59%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
215 Points +14%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points +12%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
205 Points +8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points +6%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-Y9
Intel Core i9-8950HK
193 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
189 Points
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
188 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (186 - 191, n=15)
188 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points -8%
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC
Intel Core i5-9300H
173 Points -8%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
144 Points -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -24%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
584 Seconds * -115%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (342 - 495, n=21)
433 Seconds * -60%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
371 Seconds * -37%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * -17%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
302.4 Seconds * -12%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * -10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * -9%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
271 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (248 - 299, n=15)
266 Seconds * +2%
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
244 Seconds * +10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
5674 MIPS +20%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS +15%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
5289 MIPS +12%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS +11%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
4923 MIPS +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4580 - 5090, n=21)
4846 MIPS +3%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4717 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (4575 - 4743, n=15)
4678 MIPS -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
3511 MIPS -26%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
55064 MIPS +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (44827 - 53883, n=15)
49860 MIPS +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48837 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS -1%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS -8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS -10%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
40379 MIPS -17%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
35505 MIPS -27%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28512 - 35174, n=21)
32357 MIPS -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
18689 MIPS -62%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
1372 Points +15%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
1286 Points +8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1218 Points +2%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1207 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1117 - 1251, n=13)
1190 Points 0%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1189 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1154 - 1207, n=17)
1188 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
9100 Points +17%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7782 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (5920 - 8672, n=17)
7725 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
7675 Points -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points -5%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
7248 Points -7%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6522 Points -16%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (4859 - 6262, n=13)
5597 Points -28%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS
Intel Core i9-9900KS
15.31 fps +25%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (10.8 - 14.1, n=16)
12.6 fps +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps 0%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
12.2 fps 0%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.2 fps
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.19 fps 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.89 fps -19%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (7.1 - 10.7, n=21)
8.72 fps -29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4.352 fps -64%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s * -37%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=14)
63.8 s * -4%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
61.4 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (54.5 - 64.7, n=9)
59 s * +4%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
56.9 s * +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s * +15%
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
46.06 s * +25%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (0.608 - 0.695, n=14)
0.643 sec * -8%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.631 sec * -6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.596 sec *
Intel Core i5-10600K
Intel Core i5-10600K
0.593 sec * +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (0.562 - 0.603, n=15)
0.579 sec * +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * +7%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11655
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
37316
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5725
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
73.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
19.95 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.18 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
189 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
95.5 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1816 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
477 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4132 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points +15%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5617 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5440 Points -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5429 Points -3%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5279 Points -6%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4339 Points -23%
Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10024 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9852 Points
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9320 Points -5%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
9090 Points -8%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
8967 Points -9%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
8149 Points -17%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8176 Points +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7587 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
7241 Points -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7165 Points -6%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
6783 Points -11%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6619 Points -13%
Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9022 Points +40%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
6640 Points +3%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
6565 Points +2%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6502 Points +1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
6436 Points
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4110 Points -36%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4780 Points
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4593 Points -4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
4148 Points -13%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
4010 Points -16%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
Points -100%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5749 Points
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
5636 Points -2%
Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G
5315 Points -8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5222 Points -9%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4898 Points -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4780 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5749 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
5617 pontos
Ajuda
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8852 μs *
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
2841 μs * +68%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1388 μs * +84%
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1172 μs * +87%

* ... smaller is better

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Dell G7 17 7790
Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G		HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
AS SSD
-71%
-90%
7%
-34%
Seq Read
1320
748
-43%
1033
-22%
1709
29%
1546
17%
Seq Write
1539
219
-86%
218.3
-86%
1345
-13%
1182
-23%
4K Read
56.3
25.7
-54%
24.12
-57%
49.73
-12%
36.54
-35%
4K Write
158.5
82.4
-48%
55
-65%
108.2
-32%
109.2
-31%
4K-64 Read
586
259.3
-56%
330.3
-44%
731
25%
612
4%
4K-64 Write
820
190.2
-77%
155.8
-81%
1233
50%
436.6
-47%
Access Time Read *
0.043
0.159
-270%
0.18
-319%
0.073
-70%
0.113
-163%
Access Time Write *
0.113
0.058
49%
0.314
-178%
0.034
70%
0.034
70%
Score Read
775
360
-54%
458
-41%
951
23%
803
4%
Score Write
1132
294
-74%
233
-79%
1476
30%
664
-41%
Score Total
2333
821
-65%
891
-62%
2909
25%
1869
-20%
Copy ISO MB/s
1736
382.9
-78%
1284
-26%
698
-60%
Copy Program MB/s
553
234.9
-58%
589
7%
114.1
-79%
Copy Game MB/s
1264
218.7
-83%
1107
-12%
379.6
-70%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-51%
-58%
5%
-26%
Write 4K
189.7
105.8
-44%
78.6
-59%
135.3
-29%
145
-24%
Read 4K
62.3
27.89
-55%
31.89
-49%
63.7
2%
45.28
-27%
Write Seq
1681
270.8
-84%
230.4
-86%
1337
-20%
1301
-23%
Read Seq
1608
879
-45%
925
-42%
1617
1%
1362
-15%
Write 4K Q32T1
468.6
273.3
-42%
159.1
-66%
568
21%
249.1
-47%
Read 4K Q32T1
541
361.2
-33%
315.6
-42%
645
19%
342.1
-37%
Write Seq Q32T1
1770
253
-86%
230.7
-87%
1428
-19%
1301
-26%
Read Seq Q32T1
1898
1505
-21%
1323
-30%
3184
68%
1732
-9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-61% / -63%
-74% / -78%
6% / 6%
-30% / -31%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1898 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1770 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 541 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 468.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1608 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1681 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 189.7 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK
26009 Points +70%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
21104 Points +38%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21004 Points +37%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
19230 Points +25%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points +16%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
17466 Points +14%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
16024 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
15650 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
15334 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (14186 - 16488, n=24)
14867 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points -13%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
12038 Points -21%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
9621 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK
10149 Points +77%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7358 Points +28%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7294 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6977 Points +21%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6695 Points +17%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6131 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
5850 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
5744 Points
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (5335 - 6123, n=22)
5653 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points -15%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3749 Points -35%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3461 Points -40%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK
10150 Points +68%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7633 Points +26%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7261 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
6942 Points +15%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
6521 Points +8%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
6405 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
6171 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
6045 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (4946 - 6261, n=21)
5717 Points -5%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5640 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4547 Points -25%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3751 Points -38%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
3554 Points -41%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK
35882 Points +73%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
28621 Points +38%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
27955 Points +34%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
24465 Points +18%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points +13%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
22523 Points +8%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
22128 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
21105 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
20793 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (18610 - 22670, n=24)
20096 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
15145 Points -27%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
13168 Points -37%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK
16358 Points +23%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
16266 Points +22%
Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop), R7 2700X
13940 Points +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, R9 4900HS
13533 Points +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H
13311 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
12643 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (9500 - 13311, n=23)
12019 Points -10%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points -15%
Asus ASUS ROG Strix SCAR III G731GW-XB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
10270 Points -23%
Dell G7 17 7790
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
9107 Points -32%
MSI GF75 Thin 10SCXR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-10300H
8969 Points -33%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7358 Points -45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points -50%
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark 11 Performance
18607 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
35957 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14010 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
6045 pontos
Ajuda
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | Metro Exodus | Borderlands 3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
133 fps +23%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
130 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (88 - 151, n=6)
122 fps +13%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
120 fps +11%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
111 fps +3%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
108 fps
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
98 (50min) fps -9%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
95 (65min) fps -12%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83 fps +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
80 fps +10%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
79 (52min) fps +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
78 fps +7%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
73 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (62 - 73, n=8)
68.4 fps -6%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
61 fps -16%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
47 fps -36%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
43 (35min) fps -41%
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
295.3 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
282.4 fps +11%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
258 (230min - 292max) fps +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
254 (230min - 280max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (177.3 - 298, n=14)
254 fps 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
251 fps -1%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
176 (138min) fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
72 (61min - 84max) fps +29%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
68.9 fps +24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
58.4 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (51.6 - 65.1, n=21)
56.2 fps +1%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
55.6 (53min - 60max) fps
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
55.3 fps -1%
Asus TUF FX705GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
36.5 fps -34%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
34.4 (26min) fps -38%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (94.6 - 125, n=11)
113.6 fps +9%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
109.7 fps +5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
104 (91min) fps
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
98.4 (85.7min) fps -5%
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
137.3 (122.7min) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (109 - 150, n=11)
136 fps +11%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
126.9 fps +4%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
122 (107.9min) fps
Metro Exodus
1920x1080 Ultra Quality AF:16x
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
57.7 (30min) fps +35%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
53.3 (28.06min - 86.21max) fps +25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
46 fps +8%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
42.6 (24min - 62.8max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (38.2 - 43.1, n=4)
40.9 fps -4%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
25.1 (14min) fps -41%
1920x1080 Medium Quality AF:4x
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
91.3 (43min) fps +24%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
87 (43.3min - 142.03max) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
73.8 fps 0%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
73.7 (34.3min - 120.6max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (64 - 73.7, n=4)
68.6 fps -7%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
41 (21min) fps -44%
Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
119.9 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (107.9 - 131, n=2)
119.5 fps +11%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
113 fps +5%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
107.9 fps
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
98.9 fps -8%
1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
62.3 fps +30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRH
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
52 fps +9%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
47.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (46.6 - 48.6, n=3)
47.7 fps 0%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
29.5 fps -38%
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø101.5 (89-108)
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 254 175.1 103 55.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 122 113 110 104
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 93 83.7 70.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 108 87 81 73
Metro Exodus (2019) 112.4 73.7 54.4 42.6
Borderlands 3 (2019) 107.9 87.5 61.7 47.8
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1		Dell G7 17 7790
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G		HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Noise
-8%
7%
11%
-3%
2%
off / environment *
28.7
29
-1%
28.2
2%
28.2
2%
30
-5%
30.8
-7%
Idle Minimum *
28.7
29
-1%
28.6
-0%
30.1
-5%
30
-5%
30.8
-7%
Idle Average *
30.5
34
-11%
28.6
6%
30.1
1%
32
-5%
30.8
-1%
Idle Maximum *
32.5
37
-14%
28.6
12%
30.1
7%
34
-5%
32.2
1%
Load Average *
42.5
53
-25%
31.8
25%
34.2
20%
44
-4%
38.6
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50.1
51
-2%
50.6
-1%
34.2
32%
50
-0%
Load Maximum *
53.4
55
-3%
50.8
5%
43.8
18%
52
3%
44.8
16%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso
28.7 / 30.5 / 32.5 dB
Carga
42.5 / 53.4 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.7 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 40.8 °C47.6 °C41.8 °C 
 31.4 °C45.2 °C32.6 °C 
 28.4 °C28.6 °C27.4 °C 
Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 36 °C
50.8 °C42.8 °C48 °C
27 °C40.6 °C35 °C
25.8 °C26.6 °C26.6 °C
Máximo: 50.8 °C
Médio: 35.9 °C
alimentação elétrica  54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.938.840.92536.734.436.73134.633.634.64034.733.434.75032.531.832.56330.936.130.98032.829.932.810035.429.635.412538.528.538.516043.927.343.920045.626.445.625051.726.551.731555.726.355.740060.726.560.750064.427.364.463066.225.966.280067.523.867.5100063.422.463.4125062.123.662.1160056.524.756.5200057.925.457.9250062.325.762.3315062.122.662.1400059.62259.6500064.221.964.2630058.822.158.8800055.922.655.91000055.822.655.81250052.422.852.41600045.222.945.2SPL7436.174N34.12.634.1median 57.9median 24.7median 57.9Delta6.31.96.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.1 / 1.9 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.4 / 10.5 / 17 Watt
Carga midlight 103.7 / 183.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba BG3 KBG30ZMS256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Power Consumption
-61%
-23%
-56%
37%
-57%
Idle Minimum *
7.4
13.6
-84%
9.5
-28%
19
-157%
3.9
47%
16
-116%
Idle Average *
10.5
26.2
-150%
16.2
-54%
22
-110%
9.6
9%
19
-81%
Idle Maximum *
17
35
-106%
23.8
-40%
30
-76%
12.2
28%
30
-76%
Load Average *
103.7
113.6
-10%
101.7
2%
79
24%
59
43%
109
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
128.1
134.1
-5%
155
-21%
134
-5%
167
-30%
Load Maximum *
183.2
200.2
-9%
172.2
6%
201
-10%
80
56%
246
-34%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
9h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
8h 32min
Carga (máximo brilho)
3h 16min
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh		MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 51 Wh		Dell G7 17 7790
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 60 Wh		HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 52.5 Wh		Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 57 Wh		Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
R5 3550H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 64 Wh
Battery Runtime
-64%
-33%
-25%
-55%
2%
Reader / Idle
543
286
-47%
511
-6%
695
28%
311
-43%
815
50%
WiFi v1.3
512
190
-63%
236
-54%
339
-34%
220
-57%
469
-8%
Load
196
38
-81%
119
-39%
59
-70%
68
-65%
124
-37%

Pro

+ O Ryzen 7 4800H oferece desempenho multi-thread mais rápido que o do Core i7-10875H
+ Chassi menor, mais leve e mais rígida que a da antiga série TUF FX705
+ Suporte simultâneo para sincronização adaptativa e Nvidia Optimus
+ Taxa de atualização de 120 Hz e tempos de resposta velozes do branco e preto
+ Agora com teclas de mouse dedicadas e porta USB tipo C
+ Manutenção fácil; 2 baias de armazenamento, 2 SODIMM
+ Bateria maior; duração de bateria respeitável
+ Webcam

Contra

- Sem obturador, IV ou leitor de digitais
- Sem iluminação RGB por tecla ou Thunderbolt 3
- Teclas de setas exageradamente pequenas
- Os alto-falantes poderiam ser mais potentes
- Ventiladores barulhentos durante os jogos
- Teclas numéricas estreitas
- O Wi-Fi 6 não é padrão
- Espaço de cor estreito
- Pequeno touchpad

Veredicto — Melhor que o FX705 em quase todos os sentidos

In review: Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76. Test unit provided by Asus
In review: Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76. Test unit provided by Asus

A série TUF é supostamente a família de portáteis de jogos econômicos da Asus, em contraste com a série ROG mais sofisticada. Este último modelo, no entanto, o aproxima muito mais de seus irmãos mais caros do que esperávamos em termos de características e desempenho. O fato de que você pode obter uma tela de 120 Hz com taxa de atualização rápida, adaptive sync e Optimus, longa duração da bateria, opções de armazenamento facilmente acessíveis, uma tampa externa rígida de metal e até mesmo o desempenho do Core i9, tudo isso em um portátil para jogos no valor de US$ 1.100 é bastante notável. Foi há apenas alguns anos que algumas dessas características eram exclusivas dos caros portáteis Zephyrus ou outros ultra-finos.

É claro que alguns cantos tiveram que ser cortados, mas a maioria é auxiliar ou superficial. Jogadores que querem iluminação RGB por tecla, Wi-Fi 6, taxas de atualização de 144+ Hz, tempos de resposta ainda mais rápidos em preto e branco, alto-falantes mais potentes, maior cobertura sRGB, Thunderbolt 3 e uma base não plástica, terão que gastar mais e olhar além da série TUF acessível. A experiência de jogo é a melhor que já vimos na série TUF, desde que você consiga lidar com os ventiladores barulhentos e teclas de setas despropositadamente pequenas.

O TUF FA706 é uma atualização de geração tão grande que faz com que a série TUF FX705 anterior pareça brincadeira de criança. Este é facilmente um dos portáteis para jogos mais econômicos que você pode comprar agora, tanto com o desempenho da CPU rivalizando com a maioria dos portáteis Core i9 quanto com um design de chassis mais forte do que a maioria dos outros portáteis de plástico para jogos.

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 - 05/25/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
81%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
55 / 80 → 69%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
83 / 95 → 87%
Pantalha
81%
Desempenho do jogos
92%
Desempenho da aplicação
92%
Temperatura
88 / 95 → 92%
Ruído
77 / 90 → 86%
Audio
69%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Médio
76%
83%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

More articles related to this device

Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76 (TUF Gaming A17 FA706 Serie)

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus TUF A17 FA706IU Ryzen 7: Desempenho de Core i9 por $1.100 USD
Allen Ngo, 2020-05-26 (Update: 2020-06- 3)