Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus Strix GL702VSK (7700HQ, FHD, GTX 1070) Xotic PC Edition
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1507:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| Asus Strix GL702VSK AU Optronics AUO119D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus GL702VM-GC102D LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Chi Mei N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Eurocom Tornado F5 IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -1% | 4% | -1% | 39% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 61.3 | 65.1 6% | 63.9 4% | 68.3 11% | 64.5 5% | 87.8 43% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.7 | 83.5 -4% | 83.1 -4% | 86.7 0% | 83 -4% | 100 15% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.3 | 61.1 -2% | 60.8 -2% | 63.4 2% | 60.7 -3% | 98.9 59% |
| Response Times | -34% | -36% | 18% | -39% | -121% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 21.2 ? | 38 ? -79% | 37 ? -75% | 29 ? -37% | 33.6 ? -58% | 55.6 ? -162% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 26 ? | 23 ? 12% | 25 ? 4% | 7 ? 73% | 31.2 ? -20% | 46.8 ? -80% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | |||||
| Screen | -40% | -15% | -42% | -17% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle | 316.5 | 326 3% | 310 -2% | 299 -6% | 315.8 0% | 441.3 39% |
| Brightness | 306 | 312 2% | 311 2% | 277 -9% | 310 1% | 408 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 85 -9% | 87 -6% | 90 -3% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.5 -138% | 0.3 -43% | 0.27 -29% | 0.33 -57% | 0.44 -110% |
| Contrast | 1507 | 652 -57% | 1033 -31% | 1107 -27% | 957 -36% | 1003 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 6.3 -50% | 4.82 -15% | 9.65 -130% | 5 -19% | 5.1 -21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.1 | 11.69 -65% | 10.14 -43% | 15.43 -117% | 10.1 -42% | 9.8 -38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 7.37 -89% | 3.94 -1% | 9.68 -148% | 4.2 -8% | 4.3 -10% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.37 93% | 2.45 90% | 1.89 116% | 2.12 104% | 2.08 106% |
| CCT | 7242 90% | 7116 91% | 6877 95% | 11652 56% | 6107 106% | 7345 88% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 55 -2% | 54 -4% | 75 34% | 54.5 -3% | 87 55% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 83 -3% | 83 -3% | 100 16% | 83 -3% | 100 16% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -25% /
-31% | -17% /
-15% | -7% /
-25% | -19% /
-17% | -30% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4246 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4787 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4782 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Strix GL702VSK HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Asus GL702VM-GC102D HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 | Eurocom Tornado F5 Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 32% | 10008% | 9753% | 20175% | 8383% | |
| Read Seq | 78.3 | 134.6 72% | 521 565% | 521 565% | 2145 2639% | 517 560% |
| Write Seq | 75.5 | 130.6 73% | 422.8 460% | 311.8 313% | 1724 2183% | 305.7 305% |
| Read 512 | 34 | 44.85 32% | 462 1259% | 403.1 1086% | 715 2003% | 315 826% |
| Write 512 | 43.9 | 63.3 44% | 286.9 554% | 332.3 657% | 967 2103% | 306.1 597% |
| Read 4k | 0.5 | 0.602 20% | 38.55 7610% | 33.35 6570% | 55.9 11080% | 26.04 5108% |
| Write 4k | 1.1 | 1.146 4% | 122.8 11064% | 111.1 10000% | 180.6 16318% | 82.3 7382% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.1 | 1.106 1% | 388.4 35209% | 331.1 30000% | 744 67536% | 281.3 25473% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.1 | 1.186 8% | 257.9 23345% | 318.3 28836% | 634 57536% | 296 26809% |
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15287 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 102217 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25144 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 13532 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 7528 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1920x1080 high | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Mafia 3 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
| MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 | |
| MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 187 | 121 | ||
| Metro: Last Light (2013) | 102 | 89 | ||
| Thief (2014) | 86 | 80 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 58 | |||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 119 | 105 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 110 | 92 | ||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 52 | 49 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 112 | 110 | ||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 58 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 39.8 / 48 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Strix GL702VSK GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Asus GL702VM-GC102D GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 | Eurocom Tornado F5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700K, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2 | Gigabyte P57X v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -8% | -7% | -8% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 28.6 | 30.5 -7% | 30 -5% | 31 -8% | 29.4 -3% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.6 | 31.4 -3% | 34 -11% | 34 -11% | 33.3 -9% | 30.4 1% |
| Idle Average * | 30.6 | 31.4 -3% | 35 -14% | 35 -14% | 33.5 -9% | 32.1 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.6 | 31.5 -3% | 36 -18% | 37 -21% | 33.5 -9% | 32.1 -5% |
| Load Average * | 39.8 | 40.9 -3% | 40 -1% | 37 7% | 44.2 -11% | 45.6 -15% |
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 46.2 4% | 46 4% | 44 8% | 52.5 -9% | 51.5 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.4 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.1 °C / 2 F).
Asus Strix GL702VSK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 20.9 / 22.9 / 23.1 Watt |
| Carga |
147.2 / 188.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Strix GL702VSK i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD 960 Pro 512 GB m.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 3% | -1% | -10% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 20.9 | 15.6 25% | 20 4% | 20 4% | 21.2 -1% | 15.7 25% |
| Idle Average * | 22.9 | 20.2 12% | 24 -5% | 27 -18% | 25.1 -10% | 23.4 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.1 | 21.4 7% | 29 -26% | 31 -34% | 26.3 -14% | 23.5 -2% |
| Load Average * | 147.2 | 90 39% | 82 44% | 86 42% | 169.4 -15% | 184.6 -25% |
| Load Maximum * | 188.1 | 147 22% | 193 -3% | 184 2% | 202.4 -8% | 233.1 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Strix GL702VSK i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh | MSI GT62VR 7RE-223 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh | MSI GT72VR 7RE-433 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 83 Wh | Eurocom Tornado F5 i7-7700K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | 22% | 9% | -5% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 306 | 353 15% | 377 23% | 316 3% | 291 -5% | 256 -16% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 203 | 250 23% | 246 21% | 230 13% | 216 6% | 155 -24% |
| Load | 81 | 87 7% | 98 21% | 91 12% | 67 -17% | 98 21% |
Pro
Contra
O GL702VSK é um portátil de compromissos. O aparelho tenta ter tudo, colocando muitos componentes poderosos em um chassi portável. Enquanto o portátil certamente é mais portável que outros monstros de jogos der 17,3 polegadas no mercado, o desempenho e a gestão térmica sofrem por causa disso. Isso é uma pena; de outra forma o aparelho é fantástico. O teclado é bom e agradável para a digitação, a seleção de portas é ótima e o aparelho é comparativamente fino e leve. A inclusão da Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 e de uma tela de 120 Hz G-Sync fornecem uma jogabilidade fantasticamente fluente e visuais absolutamente incríveis. O preço relativamente baixo do nosso SKU (~$1700 USD) fazem com que o aparelho seja muito mais atraente. Raramente você pode conseguir todo esse poder por tão pouco dinheiro.
O calor fere o GL702VSK. Devido à falta de um design térmico e gestão de calor, a CPU e GPU rapidamente engasgam e a falta de espaço que elas precisam para respirar. Gostaríamos de ver um sistema térmico mais robusto, mas isto aumentaria o tamanho e peso do aparelho.
O sentido do GL702VSK é ser uma máquina potente que os gamers possam levar para viagens sem quebrar suas costas. Nesse sentido, o portátil certamente é bem sucedido. Embora possa não atingir os mesmo níveis de poder bruto que seus rivais podem desfrutar, a concorrência também é mais grossa, pesada e muito menos portável. Existem outras opções para portáteis de jogos compactos, mas isso poderia significar um downgrade no tamanho da tela e, por isso, uma experiência inferior.
Apesar dos problemas com a gestão da temperatura, achamos que a Asus acertou em cheio com o GL702VSK. O aparelho oferece uma excelente experiência de jogos com resoluções Full HD sem tirar a totalidade de seu backup; por isso, recomendamos o Asus GL702VSK para gamers à procura de uma máquina de jogos poderosa, porém, portável.
Asus Strix GL702VSK
-
03/22/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
