Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: Portátil fino e gigante para jogos com Painel de 300 Hz

Name: Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
Brand: Asus

17 polegadas, hardware apto para jogos, e compacto.

A Asus deseja combinar essas características no Zephyrus S17. Com a RTX 2080 Super da Nvidia no design Max-Q e um poderoso Intel Core i7-10875H, os requisitos básicos são atendidos, e usando vários truques, é suposto que resfriamento suficiente seja garantido. Nossa análise esclarece se este conceito também funciona na prática.

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/18/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Windows Laptop / Notebook Comet Lake

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS (ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 735 MHz, Memoría: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, NVIDIA 442.80, Intel UHD Graphis 630

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-3200 dual channel

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, G-Sync, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz

placa mãe

Intel HM470

Disco rígido

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB

, 890 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS

Conexões

2 USB 3.0, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Porta de áudio combinada de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 18.7 x 399 x 272

Bateria

76 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 240-Watts, fonte de alimentação de 65-Watts, Armoury Crate, GameFirst VI, GameVisual, Sonic Studio III, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.62 kg, Suprimento de energia: 615 g

Preço

3300 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.4 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	2.6 kg	18.7 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	06/2020	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.7 kg	19.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
83.7 % v7 ^(old)	08/2020	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	2.3 kg	18.9 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84 % v7 ^(old)	05/2020	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	3 kg	25.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
84.2 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	2.6 kg	20.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Alienware m17 R2 P41E Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz MSI GS75 10SF-609US DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power, HDMI 2.0b, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C (incl. DisplayPort 1.4), combined 3.5-mm audio

Right side: 2x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3 (incl. DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0), Kensington lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1390 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1283 (1089^min - 1413^max) MBit/s -8%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 (1080^min - 1388^max) MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -16%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1260 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1182 (1085^min - 1338^max) MBit/s -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1177 (773^min - 1353^max) MBit/s -7%


348 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	346 cd/m²
313 cd/m²	308 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	265 cd/m²	281 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Sharp SHP14DC tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 348 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 310.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 308 cd/m²
Contraste: 906:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.99
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
74% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
73.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.193

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Sharp SHP14DC, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GS75 10SF-609US Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE AUO_B173HAN03, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Alienware m17 R2 P41E Chi Mei 173HCE, CMN175F, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		-1%	2%	-10%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	73.6	72.2 -2%	75.6 3%	63.8 -13%	70.8 -4%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	98.5 -1%	99.8 0%	92.7 -7%	98.5 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73.7	73 -1%	75.1 2%	65.3 -11%	72.2 -2%
Response Times		-16%	9%	-129%	-140%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	5 ?(2.2, 2.8)	5.6 ?(2.6, 3) -12%	5 ?(2.2, 2.8) -0%	16 ?(8, 8) -220%	17.2 ?(8.8, 8.4) -244%
Response Time Black / White *	8 ?(3.6, 4.4)	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) -20%	6.6 ?(2.6, 4) 17%	11 ?(6, 5) -38%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -35%
PWM Frequency					26320 ?(25)
Screen		-59%	-8%	-35%	13%
Brightness middle	308	328 6%	299.4 -3%	310 1%	384.2 25%
Brightness	310	329 6%	299 -4%	281 -9%	357 15%
Brightness Distribution	76	78 3%	84 11%	85 12%	90 18%
Black Level *	0.34	0.35 -3%	0.31 9%	0.31 9%	0.29 15%
Contrast	906	937 3%	966 7%	1000 10%	1325 46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.49	4.74 -218%	1.82 -22%	3.86 -159%	1.35 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.97	8.99 -126%	3.91 2%	7.8 -96%	3.45 13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.99	2.12 -114%	1.59 -61%		1.42 -43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	6.8 -196%	2.7 -17%	4.48 -95%	1.2 48%
Gamma	2.193 ^100%	2.2 ^100%	2.18 ^101%	2.5 ^88%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6981 ^93%	6446 ^101%	6837 ^95%	7542 ^86%	6580 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	74	64.8 -12%	67.1 -9%	60 -19%	65.5 -11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96	98.6 3%	99.8 4%	93 -3%	98.5 3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -43%	1% / -4%	-58% / -43%	-43% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.6 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.2 ms rise
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1561 (1522.36-1646.36)

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1362 (1352.68-1494.38)

MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)

Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1123 (1105.49-1224.89)

Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1640 (1625.22-1699.96)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)	276 Points +37%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (190 - 220, n=37)	204 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	202 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	200 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	198 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	195 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	175 Points -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)	3387 Points +106%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	1754 Points +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1713 (1596.04^min - 1713.21^max) Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	1646 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1003 - 1833, n=38)	1554 Points -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1549 (1352.68^min - 1494.38^max) Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	1225 Points -26%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	389.5 Seconds * -39%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (259 - 535, n=30)	327 Seconds * -16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	324 Seconds * -15%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	281 Seconds *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	280 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=188, last 2 years)	172.4 Seconds * +39%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=192, last 2 years)	6279 MIPS +19%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5071 - 5780, n=31)	5360 MIPS +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	5284 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	5284 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	5245 MIPS -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	5232 MIPS -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	4585 MIPS -13%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=192, last 2 years)	84502 MIPS +88%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	48397 MIPS +8%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	44947 MIPS
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	44947 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (29844 - 49562, n=31)	43117 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	33674 MIPS -25%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	33364 MIPS -26%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=193, last 2 years)	721 Points +56%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (430 - 524, n=32)	486 Points +5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	483 Points +5%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	478 Points +4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	475 Points +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	461 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	429 Points -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=193, last 2 years)	8222 Points +110%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E Intel Core i9-9980HK	4136 Points +6%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	3917 Points
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	3885 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1986 - 4176, n=32)	3455 Points -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	3367 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	2738 Points -30%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=193, last 2 years)	1881 Points +44%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	1307 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (1233 - 1371, n=29)	1304 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	1278 Points -2%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	1271 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	1128 Points -14%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=193, last 2 years)	14867 Points +99%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	8363 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (5715 - 8620, n=29)	7734 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	7531 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	7474 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	5909 Points -21%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=192, last 2 years)	23.3 fps +82%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	12.8 fps 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)	11.7 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	9.47 fps -26%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Intel Core i7-10875H	57.8 s * -21%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)	50.3 s * -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	50.2 s * -5%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	47.7 s *
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=189, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -0%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Intel Core i7-9750H	0.676 sec * -16%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US Intel Core i7-10875H	0.589 sec * -1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Intel Core i7-10875H	0.583 sec *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)	0.582 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=193, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * +24%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

202 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

136.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1646 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=169, last 2 years)	10832 Points +19%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	10064 Points +10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	9933 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	9831 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (9118 - 9599, n=4)	9290 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9140 Points
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8827 Points -3%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=169, last 2 years)	9878 Points +18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	8469 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	8386 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	8253 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7633 - 8386, n=4)	8106 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8028 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7749 Points -8%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=169, last 2 years)	12015 Points +137%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9082 Points +79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	8560 Points +69%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	8240 Points +63%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4747 - 7296, n=4)	6074 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5514 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5069 Points

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5539 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	5217 Points +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	4780 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4666 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (4375 - 4666, n=3)	4569 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	4384 Points -6%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6370 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	6317 Points -1%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	6191 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (5682 - 6370, n=3)	6131 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5949 Points -7%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK, 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	5818 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4666 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6370 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5231 pontos
Ajuda

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512	1030 μs * -127%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	453 μs *
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	364 μs * +20%

* ... smaller is better

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz Lite-On CA5-8D512	MSI GS75 10SF-609US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Alienware m17 R2 P41E 2x SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB (RAID 0)	Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		9%	18%	1%	4%	9%
Write 4K	120	119 -1%	177.9 48%	101.2 -16%	110.6 -8%	139.7 ?(76.2 - 229, n=36) 16%
Read 4K	45.24	51.9 15%	47.42 5%	44.61 -1%	41.46 -8%	49.9 ?(34.3 - 75.5, n=36) 10%
Write Seq	2090	2258 8%	2707 30%	2295 10%	2378 14%	2036 ?(776 - 2975, n=35) -3%
Read Seq	2246	2283 2%	2369 5%	2174 -3%	2114 -6%	2014 ?(973 - 2639, n=35) -10%
Write 4K Q32T1	392.5	491 25%	427.8 9%	401.2 2%	445.4 13%	461 ?(268 - 656, n=36) 17%
Read 4K Q32T1	348.4	540 55%	543 56%	475.5 36%	509 46%	499 ?(289 - 730, n=36) 43%
Write Seq Q32T1	3015	2253 -25%	2703 -10%	2397 -20%	2735 -9%	2903 ?(788 - 3033, n=36) -4%
Read Seq Q32T1	3445	3172 -8%	3387 -2%	3337 -3%	3206 -7%	3479 ?(2853 - 3568, n=36) 1%
AS SSD		-60%	-13%	9%	-27%	13%
Seq Read	2744	2019 -26%	2327 -15%	2800 2%	1938 -29%	2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37) -7%
Seq Write	1351	1314 -3%	2479 83%	2424 79%	2094 55%	2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37) 54%
4K Read	47.24	46.61 -1%	45.46 -4%	42.77 -9%	25.88 -45%	53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37) 12%
4K Write	109.1	90.2 -17%	157.4 44%	94.8 -13%	100.8 -8%	131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37) 20%
4K-64 Read	1118	665 -41%	1050 -6%	1406 26%	1217 9%	1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37) 32%
4K-64 Write	1926	813 -58%	938 -51%	1697 -12%	1137 -41%	1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37) -6%
Access Time Read *	0.064	0.058 9%	0.076 -19%	0.05 22%	0.051 20%	0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36) 22%
Access Time Write *	0.034	0.167 -391%	0.071 -109%	0.039 -15%	0.107 -215%	0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37) -24%
Score Read	1439	913 -37%	1328 -8%	1729 20%	1437 0%	1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37) 24%
Score Write	2170	1034 -52%	1343 -38%	2034 -6%	1447 -33%	2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37) -1%
Score Total	4283	2392 -44%	3366 -21%	4630 8%	3624 -15%	4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37) 13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-26% / -31%	3% / -0%	5% / 6%	-12% / -14%	11% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3445 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 348.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 392.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2246 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2090 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.24 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120 MB/s

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)	43480 Points +32%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	32995 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (26292 - 32995, n=10)	29663 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	29220 Points -11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	27694 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	27203 Points -18%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	24066 Points -27%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=102, last 2 years)	142963 Points +11%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	134255 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	128974 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (101976 - 140750, n=7)	126108 Points -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	124815 Points -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	121539 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	114826 Points -11%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years)	31223 Points +32%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	23649 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	22391 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (19655 - 23649, n=10)	21743 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	21191 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	18877 Points -20%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18517 Points -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years)	13010 Points +46%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	8906 Points
Alienware m17 R2 P41E NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	8479 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (7372 - 8979, n=11)	8210 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	8065 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	7597 Points -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	7057 Points -21%

3DMark 11 Performance		25058 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		45467 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		19929 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8883 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	126.6 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (74.3 - 96, n=11)	85.3 fps +3%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	82.6 (69^min) fps
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	81 (72^min - 91^max) fps -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	80.9 (75^min - 90^max) fps -2%
Alienware m17 R2 P41E GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-9980HK	78 fps -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	67.5 (61^min - 75^max) fps -18%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=198, last 2 years)	106.9 fps +29%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	85.3 fps +3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	83.7 fps +1%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	82.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (76.8 - 87.6, n=6)	82 fps -1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	81.6 fps -1%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average of class Gaming (31.6 - 244, n=191, last 2 years)	160 fps +29%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	135 (117.7^min) fps +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	133 (116^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (117.4 - 139, n=6)	126.6 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	126.4 (110.3^min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	124.2 (108^min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=192, last 2 years)	149.1 fps +27%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	126 (108.2^min) fps +7%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H	126 (109.8^min) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (115 - 128, n=6)	120 fps +2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H	119.6 (103.2^min) fps +2%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	117.7 (102.5^min) fps

Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)	130.5 fps +29%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	101 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (91 - 110, n=4)	101 fps 0%

Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	177.7 fps
Average of class Gaming (160.9 - 179, n=2, last 2 years)	170 fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (140 - 177.7, n=8)	155.7 fps -12%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=186, last 2 years)	118.9 fps +77%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (67 - 80.8, n=2)	73.9 fps +10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H	67 fps

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø83.3 (73-88)

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)				82.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	146.6	135.8	124.2	117.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			67
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	114	97.6	82.8
Far Cry 5 (2018)				101
Doom Eternal (2020)				177.7

Barulho

Ocioso		32 / 35 / 43 dB
Carga		44 / 45 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


56 °C	57 °C	54 °C
49 °C	52 °C	46 °C
39 °C	38 °C	36 °C

Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 47.4 °C


50 °C	50 °C	51 °C
49 °C	49 °C	50 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 47.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 54 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 27.6 °C


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
28 °C	28 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 28 °C
Médio: 27.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 36 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


57 °C	59 °C	56 °C
51 °C	52 °C	46 °C
40 °C	39 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 59 °C
Médio: 48.6 °C


52 °C	54 °C	53 °C
51 °C	52 °C	51 °C
45 °C	46 °C	46 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 50 °C

alimentação elétrica 57 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 2.2 Watt
Ocioso	10 / 16 / 29 Watt
Carga	143 / 205 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-25%	-26%	-18%	-75%	-3%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	10	19.6 -96%	19.2 -92%	15.7 -57%	24.7 -147%	12.9 ?(9 - 23, n=8) -29%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	16	21.7 -36%	22.4 -40%	26.3 -64%	35.9 -124%	17.3 ?(12.6 - 30, n=8) -8%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) -19%
Idle Maximum *	29	36.1 -24%	34.7 -20%	28 3%	69.6 -140%	26.9 ?(15.8 - 42, n=8) 7%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) 8%
Load Average *	143	115.6 19%	106.7 25%	136 5%	141.8 1%	123.9 ?(94.8 - 156, n=8) 13%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years) 25%
Witcher 3 ultra *	146	157 -8%	160.5 -10%	160 -10%	185.8 -27%
Load Maximum *	205	219.9 -7%	248.7 -21%	177 14%	235.4 -15%	205 ?(169 - 216, n=8) -0%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		3h 28min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 28min

	Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 76 Wh	Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	MSI GS75 10SF-609US i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Alienware m17 R2 P41E i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		74%	132%	-1%	37%	97%
Reader / Idle	208		513 147%	229 10%	426 105%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 172%
WiFi v1.3	170	296 74%	295 74%	178 5%	290 71%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years) 121%
Load	88		243 176%	73 -17%	31 -65%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -3%

Pro

+ Muito bom desempenho de jogos

+ Taxas de quadros fluentes também no modo "silencioso"

+ Tela de 300-Hz oferece uma imagem atraente

+ Bom sistema de resfriamento

Contra

- Sem leitor de cartões de armazenamento

- Sem LAN Gigabit

- Pequeno touchpad

Veredicto - Um portátil moderno para jogos com muito desempenho

In review: Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS. Test unit provided by Asus Germany.

Após a compra do Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS, os usuários não precisam se preocupar com o desempenho do hardware de seu portátil por muito tempo. Isso é completamente suficiente para os jogos atuais, mesmo permitindo que eles sejam jogados no modo "Silencioso" significativamente menos barulhento, onde os ventiladores não soam como uma casa de máquinas. Em nossa opinião, o design de resfriamento da Asus funciona, e não fomos afetados negativamente na operação diária pelo reposicionamento resultante do teclado. No entanto, a leve abertura da parte inferior da carcaça quando a tampa é aberta cria uma impressão muito instável, de forma que gostaríamos de usar o Zephyrus S17 apenas em uma superfície fixa.

O Asus Zephyrus S17 oferece muito desempenho que também pode ser mantido por longos períodos devido ao sistema de resfriamento refinado.

No entanto, aqueles que desejam obter o desempenho máximo de seu Asus Zephyrus S17, mais cedo ou mais tarde, irão querer usar o modo "Turbo". Particularmente durante aplicativos 4K ou VR, os requisitos de desempenho serão significativamente maiores do que para os jogos de resolução Full HD que testamos aqui. Nós nos preocuparíamos menos com o desempenho constante do que com o nível de ruído. Quando os ventiladores aceleram, precisa de fones de ouvido para tudo. Mas como isso não é incomum para um portátil para jogos, o Asus Zephyrus S17 ainda deixa uma boa impressão geral.

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS - 2020-08-16 08/16/2020 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

69%

Conectividade

61 / 80 → 76%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria

51 / 95 → 54%

Pantalha

87%

Desempenho do jogos

96%

Desempenho da aplicação

92%

Temperatura

75 / 95 → 79%

Ruído

66 / 90 → 73%

Audio

89%

Médio

69%

82%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: Portátil fino e gigante para jogos com Painel de 300 Hz

Mike Wobker, 2020-08-18 (Update: 2020-08-22)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Constant Performance Reads: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - Um portátil moderno para jogos com muito desempenho

More articles related to this device

Price comparison