Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L: Portátil de jogos atualizado para Comet Lake
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L (ROG Zephyrus S GX502 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1140 MHz, Memoría: 1750 MHz, NVIDIA 451.67, Intel UHD Graphics
Memória
32 GB
, dual-channel DDR4 3200
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, Brilhante: não, 300 Hz
placa mãe
Intel HM470
Disco rígido
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, 1024 GB
, 870 GB livre
peso
2.089 kg, Suprimento de energia: 608 g
Preço
2.6 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.1 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 17.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 306 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 288.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 283 cd/m²
Contraste: 1179:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.228
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L B156HAN12.0 (AUOBC8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15G XB Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -8% | -2% | -1% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 64.9 -7% | 68 -2% | 69.4 0% | 67.2 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 91 -9% | 99 -1% | 98.8 -1% | 97.8 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 65.9 -7% | 69.8 -2% | 70.5 -1% | 68 -4% |
| Response Times | 29% | -13% | 47% | -16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 14 ? | 7.2 ? 49% | 16.4 ? -17% | 3.2 ? 77% | 16 ? -14% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 8.8 ? 8% | 10.4 ? -8% | 8 ? 17% | 11.2 ? -17% |
| PWM Frequency | 23580 ? | 23580 ? | |||
| Screen | -14% | 13% | -13% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 283 | 286 1% | 291 3% | 345.4 22% | 264 -7% |
| Brightness | 289 | 275 -5% | 278 -4% | 342 18% | 248 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 90 0% | 91 1% | 90 0% | 89 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.37 -54% | 0.25 -4% | 0.34 -42% | 0.3 -25% |
| Contrast | 1179 | 773 -34% | 1164 -1% | 1016 -14% | 880 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.26 | 2.19 3% | 1.19 47% | 3.18 -41% | 1.21 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.64 | 4.4 22% | 3.04 46% | 6.57 -16% | 3.07 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 2.27 -105% | 1.77 -59% | 0.92 17% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.2 35% | 1.9 44% | 3.8 -12% | 1.6 53% |
| Gamma | 2.228 99% | 2.41 91% | 2.216 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.192 100% |
| CCT | 7249 90% | 6405 101% | 7018 93% | 7109 91% | 6340 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71 | 59 -17% | 70 -1% | 64.3 -9% | 68 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 91 -2% | 92 -1% | 99 6% | 90 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-8% | -1% /
7% | 11% /
-3% | -4% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1627 (1603.72-1663.62)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1610 (1581.15-1708.45)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1366 (1323.8-1373.01)
Aorus 15G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.32-1826.4)
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Aorus 15G XB Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Average WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -11% | 15% | 12% | 7% | 7% | |
| Write 4K | 127.4 | 97 -24% | 158.2 24% | 139.8 10% | 121.6 -5% | 139.9 ? 10% |
| Read 4K | 46.38 | 49.58 7% | 50.7 9% | 48.62 5% | 44.37 -4% | 44.5 ? -4% |
| Write Seq | 2034 | 1838 -10% | 1790 -12% | 2260 11% | 2617 29% | 2346 ? 15% |
| Read Seq | 2172 | 2421 11% | 2469 14% | 2135 -2% | 1297 -40% | 2102 ? -3% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 413.7 | 326.9 -21% | 503 22% | 499.3 21% | 499 21% | 442 ? 7% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 354 | 372.9 5% | 579 64% | 552 56% | 557 57% | 460 ? 30% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 3063 | 1894 -38% | 3102 1% | 2960 -3% | 2978 -3% | 3049 ? 0% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3396 | 2828 -17% | 3413 1% | 3269 -4% | 3360 -1% | 3285 ? -3% |
| AS SSD | -18% | 33% | -9% | 13% | 0% | |
| Seq Read | 2714 | 2506 -8% | 2979 10% | 1957 -28% | 1795 -34% | 2606 ? -4% |
| Seq Write | 928 | 1712 84% | 2581 178% | 2092 125% | 2724 194% | 1935 ? 109% |
| 4K Read | 42.83 | 48.32 13% | 47.33 11% | 50.2 17% | 49.67 16% | 42.9 ? 0% |
| 4K Write | 120.5 | 103.6 -14% | 140 16% | 96.5 -20% | 109.3 -9% | 129.1 ? 7% |
| 4K-64 Read | 978 | 624 -36% | 1710 75% | 1594 63% | 1284 31% | 1361 ? 39% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2797 | 1253 -55% | 2188 -22% | 2005 -28% | 1962 -30% | 1920 ? -31% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.08 -40% | 0.05 12% | 0.057 -0% | 0.063 -11% | 0.0689 ? -21% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.04 -25% | 0.026 19% | 0.112 -250% | 0.034 -6% | 0.06215 ? -94% |
| Score Read | 1292 | 923 -29% | 2055 59% | 1840 42% | 1513 17% | 1664 ? 29% |
| Score Write | 3011 | 1528 -49% | 2586 -14% | 2310 -23% | 2344 -22% | 2242 ? -26% |
| Score Total | 4881 | 2896 -41% | 5673 16% | 5103 5% | 4685 -4% | 4726 ? -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -15% /
-15% | 24% /
25% | 2% /
-0% | 10% /
10% | 4% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3396 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
3063 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
354 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
413.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2172 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2034 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
46.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
127.4 MB/s
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23795 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 48072 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19416 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8293 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (76.3 - 94.6, n=8) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
| Aorus 15G XB | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
| Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (34 - 218, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (98 - 112, n=2) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years) | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (79.7 - 91.1, n=2) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
| MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (78.5 - 87, n=4) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L | |
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00: Ø75.5 (19-81)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 76.3 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 156 | 136 | 111 | 104 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 79.7 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 89.4 | 78.5 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 98 | |||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 190.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28 / 31 / 36 dB |
| Carga |
| 56 / 57 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 1.2 / 1.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 7 / 13 / 25 Watt |
| Carga |
148 / 232 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -61% | 0% | -31% | -29% | -25% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 7 | 24 -243% | 6 14% | 14.3 -104% | 16 -129% | 13.5 ? -93% |
| Idle Average * | 13 | 27 -108% | 14 -8% | 22.3 -72% | 20 -54% | 18.9 ? -45% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25 | 33 -32% | 25 -0% | 36.9 -48% | 30 -20% | 26.7 ? -7% |
| Load Average * | 148 | 129 13% | 108 27% | 118.4 20% | 102 31% | 106.3 ? 28% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 175 | 176 -1% | 195 -11% | 153.7 12% | 156 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 232 | 216 7% | 280 -21% | 220.8 5% | 256 -10% | 249 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 80 Wh | Aorus 15G XB i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -14% | 35% | 110% | 68% | 37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 520 | 353 -32% | 454 -13% | 579 11% | 565 ? 9% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 181 | 220 22% | 364 101% | 380 110% | 418 131% | 376 ? 108% |
| Load | 90 | 62 -31% | 106 18% | 147 63% | 85.6 ? -5% |
Pro
+ Bom desempenho dos jogos
+ Muito bons alto-falantes
+ Carcaça fina
Contra
- Os ventiladores podem se tornar muito barulhentos
- Sem leitor de cartões de memória
Verdict - Shorter battery life with a "Super" GPU
O Asus ROG Zephyrus S15 GX502L é, sem dúvida, um poderoso portátil para jogos. O design fino também o torna um dispositivo bastante móvel se estiver disposto a procurar regularmente uma tomada para o menor dos dois adaptadores de energia. No modo de jogo, o sistema de ventilação garante boas taxas de quadros, mesmo sem que os ventiladores tenham que funcionar ao máximo.
Com o Asus ROG Zephyrus S15, os jogos modernos podem ser jogados com os detalhes no máximo sem problemas.
Mas isso levanta a questão para os compradores em potencial de por que eles deveriam escolher este modelo. O dispositivo predecessor está disponível por um preço semelhante, oferece um desempenho de jogo comparável e dura um pouco mais com a energia da bateria. O aumento no desempenho não é muito grande apesar da CPU mais atual e da inclusão da RTX 2070 Super ao invés de "apenas" a RTX 2070. Mas se você valoriza o desempenho máximo em relação à duração da bateria, ficará muito satisfeito com o Zephyrus S15.
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
- 09/27/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
