Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Thin and powerful.

A Asus lançou a versão de 17 polegadas de seu portátil de jogos de gama alta, conhecido como GX531, logo após a Nvidia lançar suas GPUs baseadas em Turing. Apesar de sua espessura, o ROG Zephyrus S GX701 é extremamente capaz e deve causar medo no coração dos competidores. Continue lendo nossa análise para descobrir teve sucesso com isso.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX (ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 990 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.81, Optimus
Memória
24 GB 
, 16 GB de RAM DDR4 SO-DIMM 2666 MHz + 8 GB de RAM soldada, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 24 GB de RAM
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, certificação Pantone, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB 
, NVMe. dois slots; formato: M2.2280
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Conexões
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 399 x 272
Bateria
76 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 células
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2x 2,5-watt, Teclado: RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, Webcam Full HD externa, Armoury Crate, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
2.636 kg, Suprimento de energia: 622 g
Preço
3200 EUR
Links
Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg397 mm 269 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 272 mm 19 mm 2.6 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left side: power socket, HDMI 2.0 port, USB-A 3.1 Gen2 port, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 port with support for DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5-mm headphone jack
Left side: power socket, HDMI 2.0 port, USB-A 3.1 Gen2 port, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 port with support for DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5-mm headphone jack
Right side: two USB-A 3.0 ports, USB-C 3.0 port, Kensington Lock
Right side: two USB-A 3.0 ports, USB-C 3.0 port, Kensington Lock
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
647 MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
679 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s 0%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
674 MBit/s -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
300
cd/m²		287
cd/m²		282
cd/m²
299
cd/m²		288
cd/m²		293
cd/m²
286
cd/m²		274
cd/m²		276
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 300 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 287.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 1440:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.47
ΔE Greyscale 1.19 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
3%
5%
3%
-1%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
62.9
64.2
2%
65.3
4%
63.5
1%
60.6
-4%
62.9
0%
sRGB Coverage
87.8
92.6
5%
94.9
8%
93.1
6%
91.2
4%
87.1
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.9
65.7
3%
66.3
4%
64.5
1%
62.6
-2%
63.7
0%
Response Times
-14%
-77%
-85%
-4%
-81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
8 ?(4, 4)
-11%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
-133%
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
-128%
8 ?(4, 4)
-11%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-144%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-17%
11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4)
-21%
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
-42%
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
4%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-17%
PWM Frequency
26040 ?(17)
Screen
-50%
-23%
-3%
-12%
-16%
Brightness middle
288
304
6%
314.7
9%
250
-13%
363
26%
295
2%
Brightness
287
299
4%
312
9%
235
-18%
342
19%
291
1%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
90
-1%
85
-7%
86
-5%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.27
-35%
0.38
-90%
0.29
-45%
0.27
-35%
0.24
-20%
Contrast
1440
1126
-22%
828
-42%
862
-40%
1344
-7%
1229
-15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.33
4.66
-100%
2.56
-10%
1.46
37%
2.29
2%
3.2
-37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.34
9.65
-81%
4.89
8%
2.47
54%
4.54
15%
6.64
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.47
1.72
30%
1.71
31%
2.45
1%
2.52
-2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.19
5.53
-365%
3.4
-186%
1.27
-7%
3.02
-154%
2.16
-82%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
2.38 92%
2.46 89%
CCT
6710 97%
8028 81%
6435 101%
6749 96%
7048 92%
6872 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
60
5%
60.7
6%
60
5%
58
2%
57
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88
93
6%
94.6
8%
93
6%
91
3%
87
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-20% / -36%
-32% / -25%
-28% / -13%
-6% / -9%
-32% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø938 (913.12-1068.63)
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
13.5 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1218 Points
Ajuda
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)
276 Points +62%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
176.3 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)
3387 Points +178%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1227 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1218 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points -5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Intel Core i7-8750H
1069 (913.12min - 1068.63max) Points -12%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points -18%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.94 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +176%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Intel Core i7-8750H
13.5 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points -19%
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years)
7770 Points +39%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points +5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
5816 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5596 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
30%
8%
12%
-24%
-6%
Write 4K
92.4
93.6
1%
93.9
2%
97.1
5%
73.4
-21%

73.4
-21%

99.6
8%
Read 4K
39.59
38.82
-2%
40.56
2%
53.7
36%
31.97
-19%

31.93
-19%

48.99
24%
Write Seq
1221
2455
101%
1468
20%
1526
25%
882
-28%
972
-20%
Read Seq
1005
2107
110%
1540
53%
2020
101%
922
-8%
1515
51%
Write 4K Q32T1
292.5
298.7
2%
293.5
0%
285.6
-2%
310.1
6%

297.1
2%

280.6
-4%
Read 4K Q32T1
330.8
338.7
2%
346
5%
321.8
-3%
327.5
-1%

325.5
-2%

327.8
-1%
Write Seq Q32T1
2385
2902
22%
1941
-19%
1533
-36%
1007
-58%

929
-61%

970
-59%
Read Seq Q32T1
3339
3536
6%
3266
-2%
2351
-30%
1611
-52%

1607
-52%

1757
-47%
Write 4K Q8T8
625
Read 4K Q8T8
818
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3339 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2385 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 330.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 292.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1005 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1221 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.4 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=116, last 2 years)
8616 Points +85%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
4655 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3557 Points -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=193, last 2 years)
13010 Points +53%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
9816 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
8512 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7431 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years)
31223 Points +45%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
25203 Points +17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
21515 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19236 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points -18%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)
43480 Points +48%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
33741 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
29453 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24172 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points -25%
3DMark 11 Performance
21874 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
161739 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37830 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18147 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score
8098 pontos
Ajuda
05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø92.5 (80-98)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)
126.6 fps +55%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
92.1 fps +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
81.7 (68min) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
71.8 fps -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
68.9 fps -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 449, n=126, last 2 years)
238 fps +58%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H
162 fps +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
151 (123min) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
136 (104min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
133.6 fps -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
130.1 fps -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
86.5 fps -43%
baixomédiaaltoultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 151 81.7 57.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 230 217 98.2
The Division (2016) 127 100 51.7
Doom (2016) 134 129 79.3
Overwatch (2016) 292 196 111
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) 135 123 50.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 107 63.5 40.6
Battlefield 1 (2016) 146 134 65
Dishonored 2 (2016) 109 94 61.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 360 220 182 65.1
For Honor (2017) 171 164 131 57.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 105 98.2 58 42
Prey (2017) 142 141 139 69.5
Rocket League (2017) 248 218 112
Dirt 4 (2017) 225 150 102
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) 207 175 139 51.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) 157 125 99 44
ELEX (2017) 117 115 99 68.1 35.7
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 82 80 69 61 39
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 127 120 115 95.6 54.3
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 145 131 117 80.9 42.7
Fortnite (2018) 143 138 136 105 50.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 106 81.4 35.9
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 115 89.5 68.4 50.2 27.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 109 106 100 79 44
The Crew 2 (2018) 60 60 60 60 39.9
Monster Hunter World (2018) 123 111 90.9 58.4 29.7
F1 2018 (2018) 169 130 102 87 56
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 84 82 78 61 37
FIFA 19 (2018) 271 254 248 237 188
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 87 76 59 48 32
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) 151 138 131 91.4 41.6
Hitman 2 (2018) 78.8 70.9 69.1 66
Battlefield V (2018) 143 130 122 98.2 57.8
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 161 141 131 113
Darksiders III (2018) 130 121 112 82.6 42.7
Just Cause 4 (2018) 137 103 101 69.9 39.9

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga
47 / 51 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
10%
-0%
-7%
-4%
10%
off / environment *
29
29
-0%
28.8
1%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29
-0%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=158, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
29
30
-3%
28.8
1%
32
-10%
30
-3%
29
-0%
25.4 ?(22.8 - 35, n=159, last 2 years)
12%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
28.8
10%
34
-6%
34
-6%
32
-0%
27.1 ?(23 - 37.5, n=159, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
33
34
-3%
29.4
11%
36
-9%
37
-12%
40
-21%
30.1 ?(23 - 47, n=159, last 2 years)
9%
Load Average *
47
44
6%
35.7
24%
42
11%
52
-11%
46
2%
42.4 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=159, last 2 years)
10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
46
6%
42.5
13%
44
10%
53
-8%
51
-4%
Load Maximum *
51
47
8%
45
12%
48
6%
54
-6%
52
-2%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 51 °C53 °C49 °C 
 46 °C48 °C42 °C 
 38 °C37 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C
49 °C49 °C47 °C
49 °C50 °C46 °C
43 °C45 °C43 °C
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 46.8 °C
alimentação elétrica  52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-10%
6%
-7%
7%
-15%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
53
49
8%
49
8%
56
-6%
46
13%
59
-11%
46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=158, last 2 years)
13%
Maximum Bottom *
50
58
-16%
49
2%
66
-32%
45
10%
54
-8%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=158, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Upper Side *
27
33
-22%
25.4
6%
27
-0%
27
-0%
33
-22%
31.1 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=158, last 2 years)
-15%
Idle Bottom *
30
33
-10%
27.2
9%
27
10%
29
3%
35
-17%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=158, last 2 years)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.243.32538.238.23130.8294036.334.4502728.76328.4358028.73610027.345.512524.852.316021.961.420022.967.92502470.231520.470.240018.969.150018.768.263018.273.180017.673.5100017.67312501971.3160017.771.9200017.171.8250017.271.1315017.272.9400017.365.8500017.462.5630017.362.980001754.71000017.254.51250017.151.21600016.941.4SPL3082.4N1.355.7median 17.6median 68.2Delta1.86.937.944.634.235.930.335.135.94027.840.72734.230.745.829.255.625.545.422.754.822.962.722.565.220.466.819.163.918.965.317.270.316.875.217.274.320.873.817.680.11784.6178317.278.817.275.417.27617.2751775.51774.11771.116.973.43090.71.481.1median 17.2median 74.126.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zephyrus S GX701GXMSI GE75 8SG Raider
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.8 / 1.3 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 19 / 22 / 30 Watt
Carga midlight 104 / 203 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
8%
26%
20%
14%
-4%
5%
Idle Minimum *
19
16
16%
10.4
45%
16
16%
7
63%
19
-0%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years)
29%
Idle Average *
22
22
-0%
14.6
34%
18
18%
15
32%
22
-0%
19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years)
14%
Idle Maximum *
30
32
-7%
16.3
46%
23
23%
22
27%
29
3%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years)
11%
Load Average *
104
89
14%
88.5
15%
88
15%
92
12%
102
2%
106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years)
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
167
147
12%
155.4
7%
120
28%
207
-24%
190
-14%
Load Maximum *
203
173
15%
182.4
10%
167
18%
254
-25%
231
-14%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
4h 58min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 52min
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh		MSI GE75 8SG Raider
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, 65 Wh		Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
17%
89%
128%
27%
19%
72%
Reader / Idle
298
335
12%
682
129%
549
84%
468
57%
372
25%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
90%
WiFi v1.3
230
190
-17%
387
68%
382
66%
281
22%
235
2%
375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years)
63%
Load
52
81
56%
88
69%
174
235%
53
2%
67
29%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
64%
H.264
364
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
50
52
78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Os usuários podem escolher entre G-Sync e Optimus
+ Certificação Pantone
+ Carcaça de alta qualidade
+ Muito bom desempenho
+ Iluminação RGB
+ Fino
+ Webcam externa
+ SSD PCIe grande
+ Ferramentas práticas
+ Design chique
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Marcos finos

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3, sem Gigabit ethernet, sem leitor de cartões SD
- A duração da bateria poderia ser mais longa
- Gerenciamento do ventilador em aplicativos 3D
- Sem opções de manutenção
- Dispositivos de entrada inferiores
ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX, review device provided courtesy of Asus Taiwan.
ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX, review device provided courtesy of Asus Taiwan.

Devido a que as opções de portáteis muito finos e sofisticados de 17,3 polegadas são extremamente limitadas, a Asus tem um trunfo na manga com o novíssimo ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX.  

Claro, há detalhes para analisar, como a seleção de portas, controle do ventilador, opções de manutenção e dispositivos de entrada. No entanto, ainda estávamos agradavelmente surpresos com o portátil de 17 polegadas. Os usuários podem ficar entusiasmados, não apenas com o painel de 144 Hz colorido, mas também com uma das implementações mais rápidas do RTX 2080 Max-Q no mercado.  

No entanto, este portátil tem um preço alto: A Asus pede 3000 Euros ($ 3407) pelo modelo topo de linha. Aqueles que preferem um dispositivo de 15 polegadas devem dar uma olhada no Acer Triton 500, o Razer Blade 15 ou o Gigabyte Aero 15 X9.

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX - 02/28/2019 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
75%
Mouse
72%
Conectividade
57 / 81 → 70%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 87%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
91%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
99%
Temperatura
78 / 95 → 82%
Ruído
70 / 90 → 78%
Audio
76%
Médio
78%
86%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Florian Glaser, 2019-03- 6 (Update: 2019-03- 7)