Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Name: Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
Brand: Asus

Thin and powerful.

A Asus lançou a versão de 17 polegadas de seu portátil de jogos de gama alta, conhecido como GX531, logo após a Nvidia lançar suas GPUs baseadas em Turing. Apesar de sua espessura, o ROG Zephyrus S GX701 é extremamente capaz e deve causar medo no coração dos competidores. Continue lendo nossa análise para descobrir teve sucesso com isso.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/06/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX (ROG Zephyrus S GX701 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 990 MHz, Memoría: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 418.81, Optimus

Memória

24 GB

, 16 GB de RAM DDR4 SO-DIMM 2666 MHz + 8 GB de RAM soldada, todos os slots ocupados, máx. 24 GB de RAM

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, certificação Pantone, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, 1024 GB

, NVMe. dois slots; formato: M2.2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 19 x 399 x 272

Bateria

76 Wh Lítio-Ion, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2x 2,5-watt, Teclado: RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Adaptador de força de 230 watts, Webcam Full HD externa, Armoury Crate, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.636 kg, Suprimento de energia: 622 g

Preço

3200 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW MSI GE75 8SG Raider Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Acer Predator Triton 500 Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q DIN A4 ❌

Left side: power socket, HDMI 2.0 port, USB-A 3.1 Gen2 port, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 port with support for DisplayPort 1.4, 3.5-mm headphone jack

Right side: two USB-A 3.0 ports, USB-C 3.0 port, Kensington Lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s +6%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	655 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	647 MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	356 MBit/s -45%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Wireless-AC 9560	679 MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s 0%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	674 MBit/s -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	671 MBit/s -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Wireless-AC 9560	598 MBit/s -12%


300 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	282 cd/m²
299 cd/m²	288 cd/m²	293 cd/m²
286 cd/m²	274 cd/m²	276 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 300 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 287.2 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 288 cd/m²
Contraste: 1440:1 (Preto: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.47
ΔE Greyscale 1.19 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GE75 8SG Raider CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		3%	5%	3%	-1%	-0%
Display P3 Coverage	62.9	64.2 2%	65.3 4%	63.5 1%	60.6 -4%	62.9 0%
sRGB Coverage	87.8	92.6 5%	94.9 8%	93.1 6%	91.2 4%	87.1 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.9	65.7 3%	66.3 4%	64.5 1%	62.6 -2%	63.7 0%
Response Times		-14%	-77%	-85%	-4%	-81%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)	8 ?(4, 4) -11%	16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6) -133%	16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6) -128%	8 ?(4, 4) -11%	17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2) -144%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -17%	11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4) -21%	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) -42%	9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4) 4%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -17%
PWM Frequency					26040 ?(17)
Screen		-50%	-23%	-3%	-12%	-16%
Brightness middle	288	304 6%	314.7 9%	250 -13%	363 26%	295 2%
Brightness	287	299 4%	312 9%	235 -18%	342 19%	291 1%
Brightness Distribution	91	89 -2%	90 -1%	85 -7%	86 -5%	96 5%
Black Level *	0.2	0.27 -35%	0.38 -90%	0.29 -45%	0.27 -35%	0.24 -20%
Contrast	1440	1126 -22%	828 -42%	862 -40%	1344 -7%	1229 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.33	4.66 -100%	2.56 -10%	1.46 37%	2.29 2%	3.2 -37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.34	9.65 -81%	4.89 8%	2.47 54%	4.54 15%	6.64 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.47	1.72 30%	1.71 31%		2.45 1%	2.52 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.19	5.53 -365%	3.4 -186%	1.27 -7%	3.02 -154%	2.16 -82%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.5 ^88%	2.3 ^96%	2.4 ^92%	2.38 ^92%	2.46 ^89%
CCT	6710 ^97%	8028 ^81%	6435 ^101%	6749 ^96%	7048 ^92%	6872 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	60 5%	60.7 6%	60 5%	58 2%	57 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88	93 6%	94.6 8%	93 6%	91 3%	87 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-20% / -36%	-32% / -25%	-28% / -13%	-6% / -9%	-32% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.6 ms rise
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1112 (1090.93-1218.55)

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)

Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)

MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø938 (913.12-1068.63)

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.94 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.5 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1218 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +62%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H	176.3 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +179%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel Core i7-8750H	1227 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1218 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points -5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider Intel Core i7-8750H	1069 (913.12^min - 1068.63^max) Points -12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1019 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	999 Points -18%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +72%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H	1.94 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +176%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Intel Core i7-8750H	13.5 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	10.98 Points -19%

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +39%
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	5883 Points +5%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	5816 Points +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	5596 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5555 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5416 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points -4%

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	MSI GE75 8SG Raider Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		30%	8%	12%	-24%	-6%
Write 4K	92.4	93.6 1%	93.9 2%	97.1 5%	73.4 -21% 73.4 -21%	99.6 8%
Read 4K	39.59	38.82 -2%	40.56 2%	53.7 36%	31.97 -19% 31.93 -19%	48.99 24%
Write Seq	1221	2455 101%	1468 20%	1526 25%	882 -28%	972 -20%
Read Seq	1005	2107 110%	1540 53%	2020 101%	922 -8%	1515 51%
Write 4K Q32T1	292.5	298.7 2%	293.5 0%	285.6 -2%	310.1 6% 297.1 2%	280.6 -4%
Read 4K Q32T1	330.8	338.7 2%	346 5%	321.8 -3%	327.5 -1% 325.5 -2%	327.8 -1%
Write Seq Q32T1	2385	2902 22%	1941 -19%	1533 -36%	1007 -58% 929 -61%	970 -59%
Read Seq Q32T1	3339	3536 6%	3266 -2%	2351 -30%	1611 -52% 1607 -52%	1757 -47%
Write 4K Q8T8					625
Read 4K Q8T8					818

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3339 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2385 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 330.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 292.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1005 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1221 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 39.59 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 92.4 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +86%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	4655 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3679 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	3557 Points -24%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +53%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9816 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	8512 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	7431 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6728 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	6562 Points -23%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +45%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	25203 Points +17%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	21515 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	19236 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	18153 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	17598 Points -18%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +48%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	33741 Points +15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	29453 Points
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28083 Points -5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile	24172 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22723 Points -23%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points -25%

3DMark 11 Performance		21874 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		161739 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		37830 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18147 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		8098 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø80.8 (71-85)

MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ: Ø92.5 (80-98)

Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)

Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø70.1 (61-75)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +55%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	92.1 fps +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	81.7 (68^min) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	76.5 (63^min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	71.8 fps -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	68.9 fps -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	58.3 (48^min) fps -29%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years)	238 fps +58%
MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	162 fps +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	151 (123^min) fps
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	136 (104^min) fps -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	133.6 fps -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	130.1 fps -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	86.5 fps -43%

	média	alto	ultra	QHD	4K
The Witcher 3 (2015)		151	81.7		57.6
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)		230	217		98.2
The Division (2016)		127	100		51.7
Doom (2016)		134	129		79.3
Overwatch (2016)		292	196		111
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)		135	123		50.2
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)		107	63.5		40.6
Battlefield 1 (2016)		146	134		65
Dishonored 2 (2016)		109	94		61.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	360	220	182		65.1
For Honor (2017)	171	164	131		57.2
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	105	98.2	58		42
Prey (2017)	142	141	139		69.5
Rocket League (2017)	248	218			112
Dirt 4 (2017)	225	150	102
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)	207	175	139		51.5
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	157	125	99		44
ELEX (2017)	117	115	99	68.1	35.7
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)	82	80	69	61	39
Need for Speed Payback (2017)	127	120	115	95.6	54.3
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017)	145	131	117	80.9	42.7
Fortnite (2018)	143	138	136	105	50.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	106	81.4			35.9
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	115	89.5	68.4	50.2	27.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	109	106	100	79	44
The Crew 2 (2018)	60	60	60	60	39.9
Monster Hunter World (2018)	123	111	90.9	58.4	29.7
F1 2018 (2018)	169	130	102	87	56
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	84	82	78	61	37
FIFA 19 (2018)	271	254	248	237	188
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018)	87	76	59	48	32
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)	151	138	131	91.4	41.6
Hitman 2 (2018)	78.8	70.9	69.1	66
Battlefield V (2018)	143	130	122	98.2	57.8
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)	161	141	131	113
Darksiders III (2018)	130	121	112	82.6	42.7
Just Cause 4 (2018)	137	103	101	69.9	39.9

Barulho

Ocioso		29 / 32 / 33 dB
Carga		47 / 51 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		2%	10%	-0%	-7%	-4%	10%
off / environment *	29	29 -0%	28.8 1%	30 -3%	30 -3%	29 -0%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	29	30 -3%	28.8 1%	32 -10%	30 -3%	29 -0%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years) 12%
Idle Average *	32	32 -0%	28.8 10%	34 -6%	34 -6%	32 -0%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Maximum *	33	34 -3%	29.4 11%	36 -9%	37 -12%	40 -21%	30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years) 8%
Load Average *	47	44 6%	35.7 24%	42 11%	52 -11%	46 2%	42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years) 10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49	46 6%	42.5 13%	44 10%	53 -8%	51 -4%
Load Maximum *	51	47 8%	45 12%	48 6%	54 -6%	52 -2%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years) -5%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


51 °C	53 °C	49 °C
46 °C	48 °C	42 °C
38 °C	37 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 44.3 °C


49 °C	49 °C	47 °C
49 °C	50 °C	46 °C
43 °C	45 °C	43 °C

Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 46.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
27 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 27 °C
Médio: 26.7 °C


29 °C	27 °C	27 °C
30 °C	29 °C	28 °C
29 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 30 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 31 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


52 °C	52 °C	50 °C
46 °C	48 °C	42 °C
38 °C	38 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 44.6 °C


47 °C	47 °C	45 °C
46 °C	47 °C	45 °C
42 °C	43 °C	42 °C

Máximo: 47 °C
Médio: 44.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 52 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-10%	6%	-7%	7%	-15%	-2%
Maximum Upper Side *	53	49 8%	49 8%	56 -6%	46 13%	59 -11%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years) 13%
Maximum Bottom *	50	58 -16%	49 2%	66 -32%	45 10%	54 -8%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Upper Side *	27	33 -22%	25.4 6%	27 -0%	27 -0%	33 -22%	31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years) -16%
Idle Bottom *	30	33 -10%	27.2 9%	27 10%	29 3%	35 -17%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years) -7%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.8 / 1.3 Watt
Ocioso	19 / 22 / 30 Watt
Carga	104 / 203 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H	MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		8%	26%	20%	14%	-4%	6%
Idle Minimum *	19	16 16%	10.4 45%	16 16%	7 63%	19 -0%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Average *	22	22 -0%	14.6 34%	18 18%	15 32%	22 -0%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 14%
Idle Maximum *	30	32 -7%	16.3 46%	23 23%	22 27%	29 3%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 11%
Load Average *	104	89 14%	88.5 15%	88 15%	92 12%	102 2%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	167	147 12%	155.4 7%	120 28%	207 -24%	190 -14%
Load Maximum *	203	173 15%	182.4 10%	167 18%	254 -25%	231 -14%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) -23%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 58min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 50min
Carga (máximo brilho)		0h 52min

	Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh	MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, 65 Wh	Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		17%	89%	128%	27%	19%	72%
Reader / Idle	298	335 12%	682 129%	549 84%	468 57%	372 25%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 90%
WiFi v1.3	230	190 -17%	387 68%	382 66%	281 22%	235 2%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 63%
Load	52	81 56%	88 69%	174 235%	53 2%	67 29%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 64%
H.264				364			408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra					50	52	78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Os usuários podem escolher entre G-Sync e Optimus

+ Certificação Pantone

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade

+ Muito bom desempenho

+ Iluminação RGB

+ Fino

+ Webcam externa

+ SSD PCIe grande

+ Ferramentas práticas

+ Design chique

+ Painel de 144 Hz

+ Marcos finos

Contra

- Sem Thunderbolt 3, sem Gigabit ethernet, sem leitor de cartões SD

- A duração da bateria poderia ser mais longa

- Gerenciamento do ventilador em aplicativos 3D

- Sem opções de manutenção

- Dispositivos de entrada inferiores

ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX, review device provided courtesy of Asus Taiwan.

Devido a que as opções de portáteis muito finos e sofisticados de 17,3 polegadas são extremamente limitadas, a Asus tem um trunfo na manga com o novíssimo ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX.

Claro, há detalhes para analisar, como a seleção de portas, controle do ventilador, opções de manutenção e dispositivos de entrada. No entanto, ainda estávamos agradavelmente surpresos com o portátil de 17 polegadas. Os usuários podem ficar entusiasmados, não apenas com o painel de 144 Hz colorido, mas também com uma das implementações mais rápidas do RTX 2080 Max-Q no mercado.

No entanto, este portátil tem um preço alto: A Asus pede 3000 Euros ($ 3407) pelo modelo topo de linha. Aqueles que preferem um dispositivo de 15 polegadas devem dar uma olhada no Acer Triton 500, o Razer Blade 15 ou o Gigabyte Aero 15 X9.

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX - 02/28/2019 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

75%

Mouse

72%

Conectividade

57 / 81 → 70%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 87%

Bateria

74%

Pantalha

91%

Desempenho do jogos

100%

Desempenho da aplicação

99%

Temperatura

78 / 95 → 82%

Ruído

70 / 90 → 78%

Audio

76%

Médio

78%

86%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX701GX (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)

Florian Glaser, 2019-03- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX audio analysis

MSI GE75 8SG Raider audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison