Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus S GX531GS (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, FHD)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 294 cd/m²
Contraste: 1225:1 (Preto: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.57 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.14
ΔE Greyscale 2.41 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS ID: AUO42ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HAN04.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -6% | -2% | -1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 62.1 -7% | 63.6 -5% | 64.3 -4% | 66.2 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.2 | 85.6 -6% | 93.8 3% | 93.7 3% | 92.1 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.7 | 62.4 -6% | 64.9 -3% | 65.5 -2% | 67.2 1% |
| Response Times | -265% | -70% | -76% | -83% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.4 ? | 33.2 ? -349% | 16.8 ? -127% | 17.2 ? -132% | 17.6 ? -138% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 28 ? -180% | 11.2 ? -12% | 12 ? -20% | 12.8 ? -28% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -13% | 13% | -4% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 294 | 307.1 4% | 313 6% | 290 -1% | 254 -14% |
| Brightness | 275 | 309 12% | 300 9% | 281 2% | 262 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 86 2% | 78 -7% | 82 -2% | 89 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.35 -46% | 0.33 -38% | 0.3 -25% | 0.22 8% |
| Contrast | 1225 | 877 -28% | 948 -23% | 967 -21% | 1155 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.57 | 3.4 -32% | 1.29 50% | 2.85 -11% | 2.37 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.88 | 8.2 -68% | 2.04 58% | 6.27 -28% | 4.71 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.14 | 1.39 35% | 1.84 14% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.41 | 1.4 42% | 0.69 71% | 2.4 -0% | 1.58 34% |
| Gamma | 2.5 88% | 2.19 100% | 2.43 91% | 2.34 94% | 2.48 89% |
| CCT | 6370 102% | 6558 99% | 6550 99% | 6718 97% | 6785 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 55.6 -6% | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 85 -7% | 94 3% | 94 3% | 92 1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -95% /
-45% | -20% /
-1% | -27% /
-13% | -26% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4620 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5706 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5170 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 39% | 8% | 17% | 19% | |
| Write 4K | 98.2 | 152.7 55% | 94.4 -4% | 94.2 -4% | 95.3 -3% |
| Read 4K | 39.43 | 48.81 24% | 37.65 -5% | 39.23 -1% | 40.13 2% |
| Write Seq | 1386 | 1013 -27% | 1335 -4% | 1483 7% | 1883 36% |
| Read Seq | 1100 | 1120 2% | 1404 28% | 1371 25% | 1322 20% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 270.3 | 498.1 84% | 268.6 -1% | 296.2 10% | 309.9 15% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 340.3 | 574 69% | 332.8 -2% | 342.5 1% | 353.7 4% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1454 | 1507 4% | 1375 -5% | 1527 5% | 1919 32% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1681 | 3327 98% | 2627 56% | 3280 95% | 2466 47% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 15856 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501VS | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 90.4 | 49.2 | ||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 | ||
| Monster Hunter World (2018) | 74.8 | 56.9 | ||
| F1 2018 (2018) | 108 | 70 | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 67 | 58 | ||
| FIFA 19 (2018) | 199 | 194 | ||
| Forza Horizon 4 (2018) | 99 | 80 | ||
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 61 | 44 | ||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018) | 91.4 | 84.7 | ||
| Hitman 2 (2018) | 68.1 | 66.3 | ||
| Fallout 76 (2018) | 60 | 60 | ||
| Battlefield V (2018) | 91.7 | 85.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 34 / 40 dB |
| Carga |
| 47 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 15% | 3% | 7% | 11% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 28.5 2% | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 28.5 14% | 30 9% | 29 12% | 30 9% | 25.5 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * | 34 | 28.5 16% | 31 9% | 30 12% | 31 9% | 27.2 ? 20% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 30.1 25% | 35 12% | 38 5% | 34 15% | 30.3 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 35.2 25% | 49 -4% | 46 2% | 43 9% | 42.7 ? 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 41.7 18% | 51 -0% | 49 4% | 42 18% | |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 48.8 8% | 54 -2% | 46 13% | 44 17% | 53.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.1 °C / -20 F).
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 2% | -6% | 10% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 54 | 54.4 -1% | 53 2% | 56 -4% | 49 9% | 46.1 ? 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 60 | 41.2 31% | 65 -8% | 59 2% | 63 -5% | 49 ? 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 31.2 -4% | 26 13% | 33 -10% | 24 20% | 31.3 ? -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 27.6 8% | 30 -0% | 34 -13% | 25 17% | 32.3 ? -8% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus GX501VS audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.8 / 1.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 17 / 20 / 29 Watt |
| Carga |
112 / 211 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | 16% | 16% | 29% | 4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 17 | 19.1 -12% | 14 18% | 14 18% | 7 59% | 13.6 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 20 | 20.8 -4% | 18 10% | 17 15% | 11 45% | 19 ? 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 21.8 25% | 22 24% | 21 28% | 20 31% | 26.8 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 112 | 73.7 34% | 91 19% | 95 15% | 98 12% | 106.3 ? 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 152 | 130.2 14% | 142 7% | 141 7% | 132 13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 211 | 173.1 18% | 173 18% | 179 15% | 182 14% | 249 ? -18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501VS i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 80 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 6% | 252% | 85% | 121% | 136% | |
| Reader / Idle | 213 | 229 8% | 762 258% | 382 79% | 507 138% | 567 ? 166% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 157 | 147 -6% | 513 227% | 322 105% | 362 131% | 376 ? 139% |
| Load | 42 | 49 17% | 156 271% | 72 71% | 81 93% | 85.7 ? 104% |
| H.264 | 504 | 324 | 356 | 413 ? |
Pro
Contra
O ROG Zephyrus S GX531GS é um exemplo perfeito de um fabricante indo longe demais em sua atual obsessão por fazer portáteis finos.
Sim, do ponto de vista de marketing, pode ser bom você poder dizer que oferece o portátil mais fino do mundo. No entanto, se o seu dispositivo for mais barulhento do que os concorrentes usando os mesmos componentes principais e seu desempenho ainda for um pouco mais fraco em aplicativos 3D, sua finura poderá desaparecer rapidamente no fundo, já que é apenas uma questão de poucos milímetros.
Também continua sendo um mistério para nós porque o teclado não está no lugar habitual para portáteis, por que a variedade de conexões foi reduzida (o GX501 ainda tinha Thunderbolt 3), por que a bateria é desnecessariamente pequena, e porque as opções de manutenção e atualização foram limitadas tão drasticamente (apenas 1 RAM e 1 M.2). Além do Gigabyte Aero 15X v8, o Razer Blade 15 e o MSI GS65 Stealth também podem mostrar como fazer um melhor trabalho.
Sem esses concorrentes, o GX531 teria as coisas significativamente mais fáceis, dado que a Asus teve sucesso com muitos outros aspectos do dispositivo para jogos de 15 polegadas, como a carcaça elegante e de alta qualidade, a iluminação RGB e o painel extremamente rápido de 144 Hz. com um alto contraste e cores precisas. No entanto, independentemente dos marcos finos, em geral, o GX531 ainda representa mais um passo atrás do que para frente.
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
- 11/06/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
