Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD)

Name: Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Brand: Asus

Premiere para Coffee Lake. Depois que a nova arquitetura de CPU da Intel teve sua estreia no segmento de desktops há alguns meses, a Coffee Lake agora está finalmente disponível para portáteis. Os jogadores podem esperar por dispositivos como o ROG Zephyrus M GM501 da Asus, que olhamos mais de perto nesta análise.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 04/09/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 (Zephyrus M GM501 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1443 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 389.04, Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, ambos slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, Full-HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, AHVA, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, 512 GB

, NVMe-SSD + Seagate FireCuda ST1000LX015, 1 TB SSHD, 5400 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC294 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Combinado (fones e microfone)

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20 x 384 x 261

Bateria

55 Wh, 3605 mAh Lítio-Ion, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: Chiclet 4-zoned RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 230-watts, Várias ferramenta do fabricante, McAfee Security trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.51 kg, Suprimento de energia: 630 g

Preço

2399 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Acer Predator Triton 700 Asus Zephyrus M GM501 MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Asus Zephyrus GX501 Gigabyte Aero 15X DIN A4 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	585 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	551 MBit/s -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	524 MBit/s -10%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	413 MBit/s -29%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	354 MBit/s -39%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	698 MBit/s +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	684 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	683 MBit/s 0%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s
Acer Predator Triton 700 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	682 MBit/s 0%


292 cd/m²	306 cd/m²	278 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	307 cd/m²	286 cd/m²
295 cd/m²	302 cd/m²	311 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 311 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 295.7 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080
Display		-2%	-5%	-2%	25%
Display P3 Coverage	66.1	64.8 -2%	62.5 -5%	64.7 -2%	91.6 39%
sRGB Coverage	92.7	91.8 -1%	88.7 -4%	90.4 -2%	100 8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.2	65.9 -2%	63.5 -6%	65.7 -2%	86.6 29%
Response Times		-322%	-382%	-364%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)	40.4 ?(23.2, 17.2) -512%	44.8 ?(21.2, 23.6) -579%	43.2 ?(22.8, 20.4) -555%	10.4 ?(6, 4.4) -58%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)	24 ?(11.6, 12.4) -131%	29.6 ?(15.6, 14) -185%	28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8) -173%	6.6 ?(4.4, 2.2) 37%
PWM Frequency				26000 ?(20)	25510 ?(25)
Screen		2%	0%	-7%	18%
Brightness middle	307	328 7%	291 -5%	338 10%	269 -12%
Brightness	296	305 3%	277 -6%	324 9%	254 -14%
Brightness Distribution	89	83 -7%	84 -6%	88 -1%	85 -4%
Black Level *	0.25	0.25 -0%	0.22 12%	0.34 -36%	0.21 16%
Contrast	1228	1312 7%	1323 8%	994 -19%	1281 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.74	6.02 -5%	5.52 4%	5.92 -3%	3 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.32	10.14 10%	10.72 5%	11.77 -4%	5.62 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.94
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.44	6.32 2%	6.59 -2%	7.45 -16%	3.18 51%
Gamma	2.48 ^89%	2.28 ^96%	2.44 ^90%	2.58 ^85%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	8395 ^77%	8194 ^79%	7816 ^83%	6366 ^102%	7274 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	58 -3%	59 -2%	77 28%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	92 -1%	89 -4%	90 -3%	100 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-107% / -42%	-129% / -52%	-124% / -53%	11% / 15%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.2 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.4 ms rise
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=197, last 2 years)	276 Points +62%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	160 Points -6%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	158 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	156 Points -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=200, last 2 years)	3387 Points +190%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1168 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	742 Points -36%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -37%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	735 Points -37%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	734 Points -37%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +73%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.84 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	1.82 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +180%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Intel Core i7-8750H	13.29 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.21 Points -38%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.15 Points -39%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.14 Points -39%
Acer Predator Triton 700 Intel Core i7-7700HQ	8.13 Points -39%

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6426

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

34892

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

13.29 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

170 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1168 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years)	7770 Points +50%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (4854 - 5939, n=6)	5414 Points +4%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5277 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5194 Points
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5125 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4933 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4542 Points -13%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +13%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5160 Points +12%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5057 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (4271 - 5557, n=6)	4962 Points +7%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4627 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	4394 Points -5%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	4193 Points -9%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5662 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (5210 - 5968, n=6)	5621 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH	5289 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	5211 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	5195 Points -8%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	5176 Points -9%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4627 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5662 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5194 pontos
Ajuda

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0)	Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL	Average Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD		5%	2%	8%	5%
Seq Read	2091	2517 20%	2508 20%	2382 14%	2576 ?(1369 - 2826, n=15) 23%
Seq Write	1580	2372 50%	1124 -29%	1281 -19%	1438 ?(350 - 1694, n=15) -9%
4K Read	43.42	41.47 -4%	46.56 7%	51 17%	47.8 ?(38.9 - 51.5, n=15) 10%
4K Write	90.2	93 3%	113.8 26%	124.7 38%	114.2 ?(1.6 - 155.3, n=15) 27%
Score Read	1471	1350 -8%	1522 3%	1795 22%	1475 ?(1072 - 2067, n=15) 0%
Score Write	1446	1243 -14%	1333 -8%	1185 -18%	1267 ?(104 - 1507, n=15) -12%
Score Total	3649	3282 -10%	3570 -2%	3848 5%	3447 ?(1852 - 4020, n=15) -6%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3157 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1659 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 325.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 269.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1104 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1652 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 96 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years)	31223 Points +83%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18219 Points +7%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	18120 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (15718 - 19059, n=56)	17228 Points +1%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	17046 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14607 Points -14%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	14394 Points -16%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years)	43480 Points +98%
Acer Predator Triton 700 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23694 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q	23540 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (13760 - 25604, n=58)	22405 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	21925 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15X NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18689 Points -15%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18205 Points -17%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		31045 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		18278 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36015 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14945 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

The Witcher 3 ultra

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	126.6 fps +113%
Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	62.9 fps +6%
Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	61.9 fps +4%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	59.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (48.2 - 68.4, n=41)	59.1 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	52.4 fps -12%
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	50.2 fps -15%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	106	59.4
Rocket League (2017)	143
Dirt 4 (2017)	126	78.4
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017)	131	86.2
F1 2017 (2017)	119	88
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017)	102	75
The Evil Within 2 (2017)	59.6	58.1
ELEX (2017)	99.1	75
Call of Duty WWII (2017)	144	117
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)	75.6	54.2

Barulho

Ocioso		30 / 31 / 33 dB
Carga		49 / 52 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	-1%	2%	2%	-3%	11%
off / environment *	29	31 -7%	31 -7%	30 -3%	30 -3%	29.8 ?(27.8 - 32, n=48) -3%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=158, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Minimum *	30	32 -7%	33 -10%	31 -3%	31 -3%	31.9 ?(28.2 - 35, n=54) -6%	25.4 ?(22.8 - 35, n=159, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	31	33 -6%	34 -10%	32 -3%	34 -10%	33.4 ?(29.2 - 37, n=54) -8%	27.1 ?(23 - 37.5, n=159, last 2 years) 13%
Idle Maximum *	33	34 -3%	40 -21%	36 -9%	35 -6%	36.3 ?(30.1 - 50, n=54) -10%	30.1 ?(23 - 47, n=159, last 2 years) 9%
Load Average *	49	39 20%	41 16%	39 20%	42 14%	44.5 ?(33.2 - 55, n=54) 9%	42.4 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=159, last 2 years) 13%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50	42 16%	43 14%	44 12%	44 12%
Load Maximum *	52	46 12%	48 8%	52 -0%	46 12%	51.4 ?(42.2 - 62, n=54) 1%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=159, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


49 °C	50 °C	52 °C
41 °C	47 °C	45 °C
37 °C	38 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 52 °C
Médio: 44 °C


43 °C	43 °C	49 °C
44 °C	45 °C	48 °C
33 °C	35 °C	31 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 41.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 50 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


27 °C	28 °C	28 °C
28 °C	31 °C	31 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 28.8 °C


28 °C	28 °C	26 °C
31 °C	30 °C	27 °C
29 °C	28 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 31 °C
Médio: 28 °C

alimentação elétrica 34 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


51 °C	49 °C	53 °C
40 °C	44 °C	43 °C
36 °C	37 °C	37 °C

Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 43.3 °C


40 °C	40 °C	49 °C
41 °C	41 °C	47 °C
35 °C	35 °C	32 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 40 °C

alimentação elétrica 51 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-6%	-14%	6%	3%	2%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	52	57 -10%	61 -17%	51 2%	47 10%	47.1 ?(37.1 - 65, n=54) 9%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=158, last 2 years) 11%
Maximum Bottom *	49	54 -10%	69 -41%	58 -18%	63 -29%	50.9 ?(37.2 - 71, n=54) -4%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=158, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Upper Side *	31	32 -3%	29 6%	25 19%	25 19%	30.6 ?(25 - 40, n=54) 1%	31.1 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=158, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Bottom *	31	31 -0%	32 -3%	25 19%	27 13%	30.3 ?(24.3 - 41, n=54) 2%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=158, last 2 years) -4%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.6 / 1.6 Watt
Ocioso	16 / 19 / 26 Watt
Carga	103 / 223 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-1%	-33%	28%	21%	-21%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	16	18 -13%	28 -75%	10 37%	12 25%	21 ?(9 - 31, n=54) -31%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=158, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	19	23 -21%	33 -74%	13 32%	16 16%	26.4 ?(14 - 38.6, n=54) -39%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=158, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Maximum *	26	31 -19%	41 -58%	20 23%	21 19%	31.8 ?(19 - 49.2, n=54) -22%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=158, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	103	79 23%	94 9%	79 23%	85 17%	117.7 ?(82 - 234, n=54) -14%	106.7 ?(32.1 - 201, n=157, last 2 years) -4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	164	148 10%	160 2%	120 27%	128 22%
Load Maximum *	223	196 12%	222 -0%	165 26%	162 27%	219 ?(170.1 - 309, n=54) 2%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=158, last 2 years) -13%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		3h 57min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 44min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		2h 39min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 10min

	Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh	Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 50 Wh	Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh	MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-24%	-21%	185%	29%	112%
Reader / Idle	237	188 -21%	150 -37%	781 230%	340 43%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 138%
H.264	159	132 -17%	106 -33%	456 187%	229 44%	408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 157%
WiFi v1.3	164	130 -21%	144 -12%	491 199%	232 41%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=158, last 2 years) 129%
Load	70	44 -37%	70 0%	157 124%	61 -13%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) 22%

Pro

+ Opção entre G-Sync e Optimus

+ Carcaça fina e de alta qualidade

+ Desempenho de primeira classe

+ Bons dispositivos de entrada

+ Bom som

+ Iluminação de fundo RGB

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Painel de 144-Hz

+ SSD NVMe

Contra

- A GTX 1070 Max-Q teria combinado melhor com o conceito

- Som de inicialização irritante (pode ser desativado no BIOS)

- Barulhento sob uso intenso

- Tempos curtos de duração da bateria devido à bateria pequena

- Sem LAN RJ45, sem leitor de cartões

ROG Zephyrus M GM501, test unit provided by Asus Germany

Se você tivesse que escolher entre o ROG Zephyrus GX501VI(GTX 1080 Max-Q) e o ROG Zephyrus M GM501GS (GeForce GTX 1070), pessoalmente, escolheríamos a última opção. Embora o GM501 seja significativamente mais barulhento durante aplicativos 3D, é muito mais barato, oferecendo desempenho de jogo quase idêntico e, acreditamos que tem melhores dispositivos de entrada. A tela de alto contraste de 144Hz com suporte para G-Sync e comutação gráfica opcional também é um forte motivo para compra.

Infelizmente, o GM501 não consegue muito tempo de duração da bateria devido à sua tecnologia Optimus. Seria necessária uma bateria maior. Assim, o Aero 15X permanece como o número 1 na arena do portáteis de gama alta de 15 polegadas. O concorrente da Acer (Predator Triton 700), bem como o MSI GS63VR pode ser mantido em xeque pelos nossos Gamers Zephyrus M. que viajam muito e esperam alto desempenho, bem como uma carcaça fina, confortavelmente leve e de boa aparência.

A arquitetura de seis núcleos da Intel, que agora testamos pela primeira vez em um dispositivo móvel, garante um aumento generoso no desempenho em aplicativos multi-core. Isso foi extremamente necessário após o lançamento dos chips de seis e oito núcleos da AMD baseados em Ryzen. Ou, como se diz: A competição é boa para os negócios.

A propósito, os comentários para a novíssima MSI GS65 e a atualização da Gigabyte Aero 15X (ambos com Coffee Lake) estarão disponíveis em breve - e provavelmente serão fortes concorrentes contra a Zephyrus M.

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 - 2018-04-02 04/02/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

86 / 98 → 87%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

59 / 81 → 73%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Bateria

67%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

97%

Desempenho da aplicação

97%

Temperatura

80 / 95 → 84%

Ruído

73 / 90 → 81%

Audio

80%

Médio

78%

86%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD)

Florian Glaser, 2018-04- 9 (Update: 2018-04-14)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison