Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Zephyrus M GM501 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, Full-HD)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307 cd/m²
Contraste: 1228:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.94
ΔE Greyscale 6.44 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X Chi Mei N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Chi Mei N156HHE-GA1 (CMN15F4), TN LED, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | -5% | -2% | 25% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 64.8 -2% | 62.5 -5% | 64.7 -2% | 91.6 39% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.7 | 91.8 -1% | 88.7 -4% | 90.4 -2% | 100 8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 65.9 -2% | 63.5 -6% | 65.7 -2% | 86.6 29% |
| Response Times | -322% | -382% | -364% | -11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.6 ? | 40.4 ? -512% | 44.8 ? -579% | 43.2 ? -555% | 10.4 ? -58% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 24 ? -131% | 29.6 ? -185% | 28.4 ? -173% | 6.6 ? 37% |
| PWM Frequency | 26000 ? | 25510 ? | |||
| Screen | 2% | 0% | -7% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 307 | 328 7% | 291 -5% | 338 10% | 269 -12% |
| Brightness | 296 | 305 3% | 277 -6% | 324 9% | 254 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 83 -7% | 84 -6% | 88 -1% | 85 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.25 -0% | 0.22 12% | 0.34 -36% | 0.21 16% |
| Contrast | 1228 | 1312 7% | 1323 8% | 994 -19% | 1281 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.74 | 6.02 -5% | 5.52 4% | 5.92 -3% | 3 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.32 | 10.14 10% | 10.72 5% | 11.77 -4% | 5.62 50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.94 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.44 | 6.32 2% | 6.59 -2% | 7.45 -16% | 3.18 51% |
| Gamma | 2.48 89% | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.58 85% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 8395 77% | 8194 79% | 7816 83% | 6366 102% | 7274 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 60 0% | 58 -3% | 59 -2% | 77 28% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 92 -1% | 89 -4% | 90 -3% | 100 8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -107% /
-42% | -129% /
-52% | -124% /
-53% | 11% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4627 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5662 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5194 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Asus Zephyrus GX501 Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Gigabyte Aero 15X Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | Average Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 5% | 2% | 8% | 5% | ||
| Seq Read | 2091 | 2517 20% | 2508 20% | 2382 14% | 2576 ? 23% | |
| Seq Write | 1580 | 2372 50% | 1124 -29% | 1281 -19% | 1438 ? -9% | |
| 4K Read | 43.42 | 41.47 -4% | 46.56 7% | 51 17% | 47.8 ? 10% | |
| 4K Write | 90.2 | 93 3% | 113.8 26% | 124.7 38% | 114.2 ? 27% | |
| Score Read | 1471 | 1350 -8% | 1522 3% | 1795 22% | 1475 ? 0% | |
| Score Write | 1446 | 1243 -14% | 1333 -8% | 1185 -18% | 1267 ? -12% | |
| Score Total | 3649 | 3282 -10% | 3570 -2% | 3848 5% | 3447 ? -6% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 31045 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18278 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36015 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14945 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile (48.2 - 68.4, n=41) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 106 | 59.4 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 143 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 126 | 78.4 | ||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 131 | 86.2 | ||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 119 | 88 | ||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 102 | 75 | ||
| The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 59.6 | 58.1 | ||
| ELEX (2017) | 99.1 | 75 | ||
| Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 144 | 117 | ||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 75.6 | 54.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 31 / 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | -1% | 2% | 2% | -3% | 10% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 31 -7% | 31 -7% | 30 -3% | 30 -3% | 29.8 ? -3% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 32 -7% | 33 -10% | 31 -3% | 31 -3% | 31.9 ? -6% | 25.5 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 33 -6% | 34 -10% | 32 -3% | 34 -10% | 33.4 ? -8% | 27.3 ? 12% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 34 -3% | 40 -21% | 36 -9% | 35 -6% | 36.3 ? -10% | 30.3 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 39 20% | 41 16% | 39 20% | 42 14% | 44.5 ? 9% | 42.5 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 42 16% | 43 14% | 44 12% | 44 12% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 46 12% | 48 8% | 52 -0% | 46 12% | 51.4 ? 1% | 53.4 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -14% | 6% | 3% | 2% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 52 | 57 -10% | 61 -17% | 51 2% | 47 10% | 47.1 ? 9% | 46.2 ? 11% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 54 -10% | 69 -41% | 58 -18% | 63 -29% | 50.9 ? -4% | 49.2 ? -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 31 | 32 -3% | 29 6% | 25 19% | 25 19% | 30.6 ? 1% | 31.2 ? -1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 31 | 31 -0% | 32 -3% | 25 19% | 27 13% | 30.3 ? 2% | 32.2 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 16 / 19 / 26 Watt |
| Carga |
103 / 223 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -1% | -33% | 28% | 21% | -21% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 16 | 18 -13% | 28 -75% | 10 37% | 12 25% | 21 ? -31% | 13.5 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * | 19 | 23 -21% | 33 -74% | 13 32% | 16 16% | 26.4 ? -39% | 18.9 ? 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 31 -19% | 41 -58% | 20 23% | 21 19% | 31.8 ? -22% | 26.6 ? -2% |
| Load Average * | 103 | 79 23% | 94 9% | 79 23% | 85 17% | 117.7 ? -14% | 106.7 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 164 | 148 10% | 160 2% | 120 27% | 128 22% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 223 | 196 12% | 222 -0% | 165 26% | 162 27% | 219 ? 2% | 249 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh | Asus Zephyrus GX501 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 50 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 94.2 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 52.4 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -24% | -21% | 185% | 29% | 112% | |
| Reader / Idle | 237 | 188 -21% | 150 -37% | 781 230% | 340 43% | 566 ? 139% |
| H.264 | 159 | 132 -17% | 106 -33% | 456 187% | 229 44% | 408 ? 157% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 164 | 130 -21% | 144 -12% | 491 199% | 232 41% | 376 ? 129% |
| Load | 70 | 44 -37% | 70 0% | 157 124% | 61 -13% | 85.6 ? 22% |
Pro
Contra
Se você tivesse que escolher entre o ROG Zephyrus GX501VI(GTX 1080 Max-Q) e o ROG Zephyrus M GM501GS (GeForce GTX 1070), pessoalmente, escolheríamos a última opção. Embora o GM501 seja significativamente mais barulhento durante aplicativos 3D, é muito mais barato, oferecendo desempenho de jogo quase idêntico e, acreditamos que tem melhores dispositivos de entrada. A tela de alto contraste de 144Hz com suporte para G-Sync e comutação gráfica opcional também é um forte motivo para compra.
Infelizmente, o GM501 não consegue muito tempo de duração da bateria devido à sua tecnologia Optimus. Seria necessária uma bateria maior. Assim, o Aero 15X permanece como o número 1 na arena do portáteis de gama alta de 15 polegadas. O concorrente da Acer (Predator Triton 700), bem como o MSI GS63VR pode ser mantido em xeque pelos nossos Gamers Zephyrus M. que viajam muito e esperam alto desempenho, bem como uma carcaça fina, confortavelmente leve e de boa aparência.
A arquitetura de seis núcleos da Intel, que agora testamos pela primeira vez em um dispositivo móvel, garante um aumento generoso no desempenho em aplicativos multi-core. Isso foi extremamente necessário após o lançamento dos chips de seis e oito núcleos da AMD baseados em Ryzen. Ou, como se diz: A competição é boa para os negócios.
A propósito, os comentários para a novíssima MSI GS65 e a atualização da Gigabyte Aero 15X (ambos com Coffee Lake) estarão disponíveis em breve - e provavelmente serão fortes concorrentes contra a Zephyrus M.
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
- 04/02/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
