Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 324.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 927:1 (Preto: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.32
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Chi Mei CMN1747 M173JJE-G32, TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 AU Optronics AUO309D, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Aorus X7 DT v8 AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX705GM AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 30% | 31% | 3% | 4% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 62 | 90 45% | 90.8 46% | 65.4 5% | 65.3 5% | 62.4 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 89.2 | 100 12% | 99.9 12% | 90 1% | 91.2 2% | 88.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.3 | 84.8 34% | 85.8 36% | 65.8 4% | 66.3 5% | 63.8 1% |
| Response Times | 3% | 15% | -74% | -86% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 6.8 ? | 8.8 ? -29% | 7.8 ? -15% | 17.6 ? -159% | 18 ? -165% | 7.4 ? -9% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 11.2 ? | 7.4 ? 34% | 6.2 ? 45% | 10 ? 11% | 12 ? -7% | 10 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | 25510 ? | ||||
| Screen | 2% | 13% | 4% | 19% | 17% | |
| Brightness middle | 324.4 | 297.8 -8% | 262 -19% | 343.6 6% | 297 -8% | 234 -28% |
| Brightness | 314 | 285 -9% | 261 -17% | 320 2% | 281 -11% | 228 -27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 84 -9% | 94 2% | 87 -5% | 84 -9% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.33 6% | 0.2 43% | 0.34 3% | 0.23 34% | 0.2 43% |
| Contrast | 927 | 902 -3% | 1310 41% | 1011 9% | 1291 39% | 1170 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.82 | 3.68 4% | 3.96 -4% | 3.74 2% | 2.19 43% | 2.16 43% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.4 | 7.71 -20% | 7.29 -14% | 5.33 17% | 4.81 25% | 3.39 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.32 | 2.71 18% | 2.18 34% | 3.49 -5% | 2.02 39% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5 -16% | 3.09 28% | 3.7 14% | 1.31 70% | 2 53% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.06 107% | 2.48 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7366 88% | 6728 97% | 6977 93% | 6388 102% | 6464 101% | 6394 102% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57.5 | 84.77 47% | 76 32% | 58 1% | 59 3% | 58 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88.8 | 99.97 13% | 100 13% | 90 1% | 91 2% | 89 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
7% | 20% /
16% | -22% /
-6% | -21% /
2% | 6% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Aorus X7 DT v8 | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (4119 - 5371, n=15) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5111 - 5731, n=15) | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5294 - 7765, n=4) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4357 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5668 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5053 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS Liteon CA1-8D512 | Aorus X7 DT v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 21% | 38% | 46% | -7% | 20% | |
| Seq Read | 1102 | 1993 81% | 1749 59% | 1473 34% | 1361 24% | 2182 98% |
| Seq Write | 1204 | 1031 -14% | 1173 -3% | 1962 63% | 536 -55% | 1342 11% |
| 4K Read | 28.76 | 35.76 24% | 42.81 49% | 31.66 10% | 29.31 2% | 23.28 -19% |
| 4K Write | 92.9 | 88.4 -5% | 98.4 6% | 84.4 -9% | 84.5 -9% | 89.9 -3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 649 | 1285 98% | 1238 91% | 1125 73% | 912 41% | 817 26% |
| 4K-64 Write | 593 | 633 7% | 691 17% | 1866 215% | 339.3 -43% | 757 28% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.141 | 0.066 53% | 0.077 45% | 0.071 50% | 0.136 4% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.042 -5% | 0.038 5% | 0.047 -18% | 0.062 -55% | 0.044 -10% |
| Score Read | 788 | 1520 93% | 1456 85% | 1304 65% | 1077 37% | 1058 34% |
| Score Write | 806 | 825 2% | 906 12% | 2147 166% | 477 -41% | 981 22% |
| Score Total | 2008 | 3075 53% | 3083 54% | 4142 106% | 2066 3% | 2539 26% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1727 | 1043 -40% | 1080 -37% | 2810 63% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 742 | 780 5% | 481.1 -35% | 368.5 -50% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1337 | 481 -64% | 875 -35% | 1160 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (12620 - 15607, n=77) | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Razer Blade 15 Base Model | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5655 - 12930, n=76) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 | |
| Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1050Ti | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13334 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28181 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10750 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Asus Chimera G703GI | |
| MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 | |
| Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Acer Predator 17 NX.QK4EP.022 | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus GL552VW-DK725T | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 236 | 214.4 | 202.5 | 105.4 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 186.6 | 134.9 | 80.5 | 41.8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 132.1 | 120.7 | 81.4 | 68.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 31.8 / 34.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 56 / 56.7 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | Asus TUF FX705GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 9% | 6% | 8% | -3% | 0% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.6 -1% | 30 -6% | 27.8 1% | 29 -3% | 29 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 29.4 2% | 30 -0% | 31.1 -4% | 35 -17% | 32 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.8 | 29.4 8% | 34 -7% | 31.1 2% | 36 -13% | 33 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 34.6 | 33.7 3% | 36 -4% | 35 -1% | 41 -18% | 44 -27% |
| Load Average * | 56 | 41.2 26% | 43 23% | 42 25% | 43 23% | 46 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.2 | 47.3 13% | 45 17% | 44.5 18% | 53 2% | 48 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.7 | 48.3 15% | 45 21% | 46.5 18% | 54 5% | 50 12% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Asus GL704GM-DH74 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.07 / 2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.2 / 20.4 / 27.3 Watt |
| Carga |
92.9 / 190.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Liteon CA1-8D512, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | 14% | -13% | -41% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.2 | 18.88 -24% | 8 47% | 17.8 -17% | 24.6 -62% | 23 -51% |
| Idle Average * | 20.4 | 24.36 -19% | 14 31% | 24.7 -21% | 33.1 -62% | 33 -62% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.3 | 32.27 -18% | 22 19% | 29.6 -8% | 37.2 -36% | 37 -36% |
| Load Average * | 92.9 | 107.74 -16% | 92 1% | 110 -18% | 124 -33% | 115 -24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 143 | 142 1% | 154 -8% | 167.8 -17% | 180 -26% | 225 -57% |
| Load Maximum * | 190.6 | 160.28 16% | 207 -9% | 178.6 6% | 236.5 -24% | 281 -47% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus GL704GM-DH74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 74 Wh | MSI GS73 Stealth 8RF-011 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 51 Wh | HP Omen 17t-3AW55AV_1 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 500 PH517-51-93LS i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 74 Wh | Aorus X7 DT v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -16% | 5% | -33% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 427 | 320 -25% | 346 -19% | 268 -37% | 296 -31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 255 | 213 -16% | 200 -22% | 253 -1% | 172 -33% | 228 -11% |
| Load | 64 | 70 9% | 60 -6% | 97 52% | 80 25% |
Pro
Contra
Assim como a MSI GS65 e Asus ROG GL504 sinalizaram o início dos portáteis de jogos de 15 polegadas de marcos estreitos, o GL704 sinaliza o início de portáteis de jogos de 17 polegadas de marcos mais estreitos a vir. Ele estabelece um precedente para os fabricantes concorrentes tentarem inevitavelmente ultrapassar os painéis de 7 mm e adotar a noção de que os portáteis de jogos de 17 polegadas têm que ser grossos e grandes.
Como o primeiro portátil premier de 17 polegadas da Asus com marcos estreitos, ele faz a maioria das coisas certas. A qualidade de construção e rigidez deve sempre ser prioridade e o GL704 é mais forte em torno da tampa quando comparado com oGS73 e inclusive o Zephyrus GX501, apesar do design de marcos estreitos. As teclas do teclado e o trackpad têm excelente resposta e a qualidade da tela é excelente para provar que os marcos grossos não são necessários para uma ótima tela IPS com todos os recursos mais recentes de tempo de resposta de 5 ms e 144 Hz. A Asus ainda conseguiu extrair mais desempenho da CPU i7-8750H em 10 a 12 por cento, em relação ao GL703GM.
Há uma pequena lista de desvantagens com algumas notáveis. Em primeiro lugar, o ruído do ventilador é mais alto do que o esperado durante os jogos ou quando no perfil de alto desempenho. Não é realista esperar um portátil de jogos silencioso, de alta potência, mas, ao mesmo tempo, o ruído e a pulsação do ventilador devem estar em níveis mais razoáveis para não impactar a experiência de jogo. Em segundo lugar, a falta do Thunderbolt 3, a iluminação RGB por tecla e as opções de GPU mais altas são difíceis de engolir pelo alto preço inicial. A GTX 1070 Max-Q, por exemplo, seria ainda melhor em combinação com a tela de 144 Hz, e tal opção é limitada para a linha Zephyrus por enquanto. Alternativas com o mesmo desempenho de jogo do nosso GL704GM podem ser encontradas por centenas de dólares mais baratas em portáteis como o MSI GF72, HP Omen 17, ou Acer Predator Helios 300. Um preço premium para o design de marcos estreitos do GL704 está muito ativo.
Os jogadores não ficarão desapontados com a estética, design compacto e tela de alta qualidade do ROG GL704GM. O ruído do ventilador deixa muito a desejar e os jogadores hardcore vão desejar opções de GPU mais poderosas, como a GTX 1070, como encontrada na série Zephyrus.
Asus GL704GM-DH74
- 11/02/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
