Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC (Ryzen 5 1600, Radeon RX 580, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Nexoc G739 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 415 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
82% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
82.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus GL702ZC-GC104T IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GF72VR 7RF TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator Helios 300 AH-IPS, WLED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GL72 7RDX-602 TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Nexoc G739 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 34% | 3% | 8% | 7% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.4 | 67.1 3% | 90.8 39% | 66.8 2% | 65.2 0% | 66.7 2% | 67.2 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 82.6 | 85.4 3% | 99.8 21% | 85.8 4% | 94.3 14% | 91 10% | 93.1 13% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 60.4 | 62.5 3% | 85.6 42% | 62.8 4% | 65.6 9% | 66.4 10% | 67.4 12% |
Response Times | -4% | 39% | 7% | 3% | -24% | -10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 39.2 ? -9% | 24.4 ? 32% | 36 ? -0% | 29 ? 19% | 45 ? -25% | 38 ? -6% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 22.8 ? 1% | 12.6 ? 45% | 20 ? 13% | 26 ? -13% | 28 ? -22% | 26 ? -13% |
PWM Frequency | 122000 ? | 25000 ? | 119000 ? | 961 | 450 ? | 200 ? | |
Screen | 9% | -13% | 4% | -42% | 11% | 5% | |
Brightness middle | 415 | 379 -9% | 329.2 -21% | 384 -7% | 299 -28% | 312 -25% | 318 -23% |
Brightness | 365 | 354 -3% | 318 -13% | 373 2% | 274 -25% | 304 -17% | 295 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 92 12% | 93 13% | 80 -2% | 85 4% | 79 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.31 26% | 0.4 5% | 0.35 17% | 0.25 40% | 0.23 45% | 0.25 40% |
Contrast | 988 | 1223 24% | 823 -17% | 1097 11% | 1196 21% | 1357 37% | 1272 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.95 | 4.32 13% | 6.4 -29% | 4.81 3% | 12.92 -161% | 4.19 15% | 4.7 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.34 | 8.56 8% | 11.7 -25% | 8.69 7% | 19.91 -113% | 8.7 7% | 8.8 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.69 | 4 15% | 9.2 -96% | 5.33 -14% | 13.16 -181% | 3.72 21% | 5 -7% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.47 89% | 2.18 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.36 93% | 2.29 96% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6485 100% | 6984 93% | 10484 62% | 7137 91% | 15046 43% | 7104 91% | 7374 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54 | 56 4% | 76 41% | 56 4% | 60 11% | 59 9% | 61 13% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 82 | 85 4% | 92 12% | 86 5% | 94 15% | 91 11% | 93 13% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
6% | 20% /
3% | 5% /
4% | -10% /
-26% | -2% /
5% | 1% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Geekbench 4.0 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
no name | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
no name | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
no name | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
no name | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C (Edge 41.16299.15.0) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X (Edge 41) | |
Nexoc G739 (Edge 38.14393.0.0) | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF (Microsoft Edge 40.15063.674.0) | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 (EDGE 38.14393.1066.0) | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (Edge 40.15063.0.0) | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 (Edge 40) | |
Acer Aspire VX15 VX5-591G-589S (Edge 38) | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T (Edge 15) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T (Edge 41) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 7 Score | 5444 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4186 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5608 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4988 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4440 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Nexoc G739 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | Acer Predator Helios 300 Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | MSI GL72 7RDX-602 HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | Nexoc G739 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 37802% | 119% | 50561% | 47936% | |
Read Seq | 92.5 | 899 872% | 135.3 46% | 1666 1701% | 1606 1636% |
Write Seq | 105.1 | 569 441% | 127 21% | 1192 1034% | 1176 1019% |
Read 512 | 37.67 | 580 1440% | 45.57 21% | 857 2175% | 846 2146% |
Write 512 | 101.8 | 425.9 318% | 58.3 -43% | 827 712% | 805 691% |
Read 4k | 0.484 | 34.29 6985% | 0.582 20% | 60.7 12441% | 59.9 12276% |
Write 4k | 0.169 | 125.5 74160% | 1.022 505% | 154.5 91320% | 155.6 91971% |
Read 4k QD32 | 1.294 | 457.7 35271% | 1.068 -17% | 636 49050% | 588 45340% |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.221 | 404.5 182932% | 1.102 399% | 544 246054% | 505 228407% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 28909 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12626 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 28295 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9866 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3718 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Guru Mars K | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
no name | |
Guru Mars K | |
Smart7 Karme GX17E G2 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Score | |
no name | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
X-Plane 10.25 (2013) | 72 | 42.2 | 21.8 | 20.6 |
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014) | 163.5 | 102.6 | 81.3 | 54.1 |
GTA V (2015) | 120.4 | 115.5 | 83.4 | 39.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 173 | 121 | 68.9 | 36 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86 | 77 | 76.3 | 69 |
World of Warships (2015) | 135.1 | 115 | 101 | 95.9 |
Anno 2205 (2015) | 98.6 | 95.4 | 65.5 | 25.7 |
XCOM 2 (2016) | 82 | 66 | 51.1 | 24.5 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 56.2 | 54.4 | 49.8 | 47.7 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 35.3 | 30 | 29.2 | |
Overwatch (2016) | 276.3 | 276 | 191.1 | 96.2 |
Mafia 3 (2016) | 55.9 | 45.9 | 35 | |
Civilization VI (2016) | 105.6 | 84.8 | 69.8 | 63.5 |
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 38.2 | 33.6 | 27.1 | 25.1 |
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 106.7 | 72.3 | 69.4 | 53.4 |
Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 108 | 105 | 102 | 101 |
FIFA 18 (2017) | 242.9 | 242.2 | 218.1 | 215.4 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 117 | 85 | 66 | 49 |
The Evil Within 2 (2017) | 56.4 | 47.1 | 45.4 | 44.3 |
ELEX (2017) | 117.1 | 80 | 63.5 | 48.6 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 97.6 | 91.4 | 83.3 | 69.7 |
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) | 50 | 44 | 43 | 37 |
Call of Duty WWII (2017) | 132.3 | 128.8 | 68 | 39.1 |
Need for Speed Payback (2017) | 92.8 | 86 | 78.5 | 75.6 |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) | 62 | 53.9 | 45.6 | 45.7 |
Fortnite (2018) | 238.5 | 183.1 | 80.6 | 59.5 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Guru Mars K | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Saelic Vidi G771D | |
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Nexoc G739 | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-51-788E | |
Acer Aspire Nitro BE VN7-793G-5811 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 |
World of Warships - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:High FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-706L |
Need for Speed Payback - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV |
Call of Duty WWII - 1920x1080 High / On AA:Filmic 1X SM | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Civilization VI - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
HP Omen 17-w100ng |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Hitman 2016 - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF |
Mafia 3 - 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
Saelic Vidi G771D | |
MSI GF62VR 7RF-877 | |
Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Star Wars Battlefront 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Destiny 2 - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:SM AF:16x | |
Eurocom Sky X9C | |
PC Zentrum Defiance IV | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 32.7 / 32.7 dB |
HDD |
| 31.2 dB |
Carga |
| 38.9 / 50.6 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.3 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 4 °C / 39 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 6.2 °C / 43 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.9 Watt |
Ocioso | 49 / 60 / 68 Watt |
Carga |
150 / 262 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
Nexoc G739 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 | |
MSI GL72 7RDX-602 | |
MSI GF72VR 7RF | |
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T |
Pro
Contra
O portátil de jogos da Asus pode rodar a maioria dos jogos sem problemas na resolução Full HD e com altas configurações de gráficos. Apenas alguns títulos exigem a redução da resolução e/ou das configurações de gráficos. A tecnologia FreeSync da AMD cria uma experiência de jogo fluida na tela de 60Hz. A tela IPS mate agrada com uma alta relação de contraste, bom brilho e ângulos de visão estáveis.
O processador integrado hexa-core deixa uma boa impressão.
Oferece potência de computação mais que suficiente para todos os aplicativos modernos. Em termos de desempenho multi-core, a CPU se sai melhor do que a concorrência da Intel - na verdade, foi apenas derrotada pelo Core i7-8700K. No entanto, o Core i7-8700K é um chip de 95 watts, que não compete diretamente com o processador Ryzen. Além disso, o Core i7-8700K custa significativamente mais do que a CPU Ryzen.
O portátil oferece muito espaço de armazenamento. A Asus equipou o portátil com uma unidade híbrida de 1 TB. Para alcançar o menor preço possível, a Asus decidiu renunciar a um SSD. No entanto, um SSD pode ser adicionado após a compra, porque o portátil vem com um slot M.2-2280 livre.
Como o portátil vem apenas com uma poderosa GPU dedicada, ele precisa de muita energia, mesmo durante o modo inativo. Portanto, os usuários que gostariam de usar o portátil para o trabalho diário do escritório devem ficar longe dele. Aqui, o portátil da Asus não possui uma GPU integrada energeticamente eficiente. Além disso, o portátil produz muito barulho para uso no escritório.
A Asus cobra 1200 Euros (~$1485) pelo modelo de nível de entrada na linha GL702ZC. Portanto, em termos de preços, é comparável aos portáteis que vêm equipados com um processador Intel Core e uma placa gráfica Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060. No entanto, esses dispositivos geralmente são utilizáveis em cenários cotidianos, porque, como norma, eles vêm com uma GPU dedicada e uma GPU integrada. Como resultado, esses dispositivos têm uma demanda de energia significativamente menor durante o modo inativo e produzem muito menos ruído - aqui, por exemplo, temos em mente o Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G. Portanto, o GL702ZC é para aqueles que querem o máximo de desempenho de vários núcleos quanto possível por um preço relativamente baixo e que colocam uma vantagem na capacidade de substituir a CPU.
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
- 02/02/2018 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck