Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL504GM Hero II (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 350 cd/m²
Contraste: 1061:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.83
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Asus Strix GL504GM AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus GL503VD-DB74 LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 0% | -1% | 1% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.3 | 66.4 2% | 66.2 1% | 64.4 -1% | 66.1 1% | 64.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.8 | 90.2 -3% | 92.1 -1% | 93.4 1% | 92.7 0% | 84.4 -9% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.7 | 66 -1% | 67.2 1% | 65.5 -2% | 67.2 1% | 61.7 -7% |
| Response Times | 12% | -75% | -45% | 8% | -260% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.8 ? | 7.2 ? 8% | 17.6 ? -126% | 13.6 ? -74% | 6.6 ? 15% | 36.4 ? -367% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 8.8 ? 15% | 12.8 ? -23% | 12 ? -15% | 10.4 ? -0% | 26.2 ? -152% |
| PWM Frequency | 21010 ? | |||||
| Screen | 7% | 16% | 11% | -7% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 350 | 271 -23% | 254 -27% | 304.3 -13% | 307 -12% | 315.9 -10% |
| Brightness | 338 | 261 -23% | 262 -22% | 293 -13% | 296 -12% | 304 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 89 -1% | 80 -11% | 89 -1% | 88 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.32 3% | 0.22 33% | 0.38 -15% | 0.25 24% | 0.37 -12% |
| Contrast | 1061 | 847 -20% | 1155 9% | 801 -25% | 1228 16% | 854 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 2.61 39% | 2.37 45% | 1.79 58% | 5.74 -33% | 4.9 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.78 | 4.93 37% | 4.71 39% | 3.69 53% | 11.32 -46% | 9.7 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.83 | 2.33 18% | 1.84 35% | 1.94 31% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 1.97 55% | 1.58 64% | 1.1 75% | 6.44 -46% | 3.8 14% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.27 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7517 86% | 6398 102% | 6785 96% | 6665 98% | 8395 77% | 6847 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 59 -2% | 60 0% | 59.8 0% | 60 0% | 55 -8% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92.5 | 90 -3% | 92 -1% | 92.8 0% | 93 1% | 84 -9% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
6% | -20% /
2% | -12% /
1% | 1% /
-4% | -92% /
-42% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (29664 - 35307, n=25) | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (6236 - 6645, n=25) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Asus GL702ZC-GC104T | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Asus FX504GD | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-8750H (125.5 - 180.5, n=6) | |
| Eurocom Sky X4C | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4362 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5474 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5463 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus Strix GL504GM Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 75% | 66% | 53% | 50% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1088 | 882 -19% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 752 | 370.7 -51% | |||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1006 | 1452 44% | |||
| Score Total | 2233 | 4318 93% | 4122 85% | 4095 83% | 3649 63% |
| Score Write | 724 | 1983 174% | 2051 183% | 1955 170% | 1446 100% |
| Score Read | 1007 | 1542 53% | 1346 34% | 1407 40% | 1471 46% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.045 | 0.035 22% | 0.035 22% | 0.037 18% | 0.041 9% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.072 | 0.049 32% | 0.073 -1% | 0.05 31% | 0.046 36% |
| 4K-64 Write | 520 | 1704 228% | 1760 238% | 1664 220% | 1198 130% |
| 4K-64 Read | 832 | 1305 57% | 1170 41% | 1177 41% | 1218 46% |
| 4K Write | 96.5 | 105.7 10% | 107.2 11% | 99.2 3% | 90.2 -7% |
| 4K Read | 32 | 53.3 67% | 48.94 53% | 48.56 52% | 43.42 36% |
| Seq Write | 1071 | 1730 62% | 1834 71% | 1917 79% | 1580 48% |
| Seq Read | 1433 | 1837 28% | 1266 -12% | 1820 27% | 2091 46% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (12620 - 15607, n=77) | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Eurocom Sky X7C | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5655 - 12930, n=76) | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (10708 - 12298, n=77) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (4098 - 4602, n=69) | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 | |
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (5822 - 17458, n=77) | |
| Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T | |
| Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12841 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30707 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10475 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 242.2 | 211 | 198 | 104.7 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 192 | 133.4 | 80.6 | 37.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 145.9 | 121.6 | 82 | 66.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 41.8 / 50 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Strix GL504GM GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -12% | 0% | -0% | -6% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 29 -2% | 30 -5% | 28.1 1% | 29 -2% | 30 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 32 -7% | 30 -0% | 28.1 6% | 30 -0% | 33 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 33 -10% | 31 -3% | 33 -10% | 31 -3% | 35 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 40 -33% | 34 -13% | 33.5 -12% | 33 -10% | 40 -33% |
| Load Average * | 41.8 | 49 -17% | 43 -3% | 42.2 -1% | 49 -17% | 45 -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.6 | 51 -7% | 42 12% | 45.3 5% | 50 -5% | 50 -5% |
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 53 -6% | 44 12% | 45.7 9% | 52 -4% | 55 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.3 °C / -0.6 F).
Asus Strix GL504GM audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.13 / 2 Watt |
| Ocioso | 10 / 16.9 / 21.1 Watt |
| Carga |
112.4 / 157.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -69% | 12% | -2% | -25% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 10 | 29 -190% | 7 30% | 14.9 -49% | 16 -60% | 12.35 -24% |
| Idle Average * | 16.9 | 32 -89% | 11 35% | 17.5 -4% | 19 -12% | 19.98 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21.1 | 38 -80% | 20 5% | 19.2 9% | 26 -23% | 25.44 -21% |
| Load Average * | 112.4 | 100 11% | 98 13% | 103.2 8% | 103 8% | 94.28 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 135.5 | 170 -25% | 132 3% | 123.1 9% | 164 -21% | 132.9 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 157.3 | 217 -38% | 182 -16% | 132.7 16% | 223 -42% | 140.63 11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus GL504GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 92.24 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -59% | 2% | 13% | -54% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 355 | 146 -59% | 362 2% | 402 13% | 164 -54% | |
| Reader / Idle | 176 | 507 | 237 | 294 | ||
| Load | 71 | 81 | 70 | 87 |
Pro
Contra
Similar ao Razer Blade (15) funciona com de forma mais fria, durante mais tempo, e mais silencioso que o Blade 15 GTX 1070, o GL503GM também funciona mais frio, durante mais tempo, e de forma mais silenciosa que o GL504GS. Há, portanto, várias razões pelas quais alguém preferiria o GL503GM menos caro do que o GL504GS, além do custo, pois o GL504GS poderia ter se beneficiado de uma solução de resfriamento mais potente. Afinal, há uma razão pela qual outros portáteis de 15 polegadas com a mesma opção de GPU GTX 1070, como a MSI GT63, pode ter o dobro de tubos de calor.
A melhor parte da série GL504 ainda é a tela mate de 144 Hz. Os marcos mais estreitos e a taxa de atualização da tela melhorada e os tempos de resposta, fazem com que a última geração dos modelos GL503 pareça muito atual em comparação. Para aproveitar ao máximo a alta taxa de atualização, no entanto, o GL504GS ainda é a melhor opção, pois a GTX 1070 é necessária para impulsionar esses quadros extras na maioria dos títulos. É uma atualização que vale a pena considerar com base apenas no design e na tela, especialmente para aqueles que ainda jogam em GPUs Maxwell.
A falta de G-Sync é uma chatice, mas o GL504GM compensa isso com o Optimus para maior duração da bateria e ventiladores mais silenciosos do que no GL504GS. É um dos designs de chassi de 15 polegadas com borda estreita mais forte atualmente disponível e certamente mais rígido do que o que o MSI GS65 tem a oferecer.
Asus Strix GL504GM
- 08/31/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
