Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix GL504 Scar II (i7-8750H, GTX 1070, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL504GS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 847:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 2.33
ΔE Greyscale 1.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| Asus GL504GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 2018 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -1% | 1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.4 | 64.3 -3% | 63.6 -4% | 66.2 0% | 64.3 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.2 | 93.7 4% | 93.8 4% | 92.1 2% | 94.1 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66 | 65.5 -1% | 64.9 -2% | 67.2 2% | 65.3 -1% |
| Response Times | -88% | -80% | -95% | -66% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.2 ? | 17.2 ? -139% | 16.8 ? -133% | 17.6 ? -144% | 16 ? -122% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 12 ? -36% | 11.2 ? -27% | 12.8 ? -45% | 9.6 ? -9% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 2% | 21% | 11% | 8% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 290 7% | 313 15% | 254 -6% | 325 20% |
| Brightness | 261 | 281 8% | 300 15% | 262 0% | 303 16% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 82 -5% | 78 -9% | 89 3% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.3 6% | 0.33 -3% | 0.22 31% | 0.33 -3% |
| Contrast | 847 | 967 14% | 948 12% | 1155 36% | 985 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.61 | 2.85 -9% | 1.29 51% | 2.37 9% | 2.69 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.93 | 6.27 -27% | 2.04 59% | 4.71 4% | 4.91 -0% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.33 | 1.39 40% | 1.84 21% | 1.27 45% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.97 | 2.4 -22% | 0.69 65% | 1.58 20% | 2.34 -19% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.34 94% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.38 92% |
| CCT | 6398 102% | 6718 97% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 6872 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% | 60 2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90 | 94 4% | 94 4% | 92 2% | 94 4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -29% /
-10% | -20% /
3% | -28% /
-4% | -19% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5390 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5673 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4854 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus GL504GS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 2018 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -6% | -31% | -7% | 13% | |
| Seq Read | 1837 | 2376 29% | 2213 20% | 1266 -31% | 1915 4% |
| Seq Write | 1730 | 1521 -12% | 1163 -33% | 1834 6% | 2324 34% |
| 4K Read | 53.3 | 46.45 -13% | 23.36 -56% | 48.94 -8% | 48.03 -10% |
| 4K Write | 105.7 | 93.6 -11% | 80.4 -24% | 107.2 1% | 106 0% |
| Score Read | 1542 | 1584 3% | 1092 -29% | 1346 -13% | 1837 19% |
| Score Write | 1983 | 1450 -27% | 939 -53% | 2051 3% | 2423 22% |
| Score Total | 4318 | 3806 -12% | 2536 -41% | 4122 -5% | 5224 21% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17775 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36818 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14394 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=198, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=170, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL504GS | |
| Razer Blade 15 2018 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 102 | 55.6 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 247 | 218 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 135 | 116 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 148 | 111 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 57.2 | |||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 92 | 87 | ||
| The Crew 2 (2018) | 60 | 60 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 33 / 40 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 53 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 3% | 10% | -2% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 32 | 29 9% | 30 6% | 30 6% | 29 9% | 25.4 ? 21% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 30 9% | 31 6% | 31 6% | 35 -6% | 27.1 ? 18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 38 5% | 35 12% | 34 15% | 40 -0% | 30.1 ? 25% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 46 6% | 49 -0% | 43 12% | 50 -2% | 42.4 ? 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51 | 49 4% | 51 -0% | 42 18% | 53 -4% | |
| Load Maximum * | 53 | 46 13% | 54 -2% | 44 17% | 58 -9% | 53.4 ? -1% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | 8% | 15% | 4% | 13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 55 | 56 -2% | 53 4% | 49 11% | 56 -2% | 46.2 ? 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 55 | 59 -7% | 65 -18% | 63 -15% | 68 -24% | 49.2 ? 11% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 33 8% | 26 28% | 24 33% | 28 22% | 31.1 ? 14% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36 | 34 6% | 30 17% | 25 31% | 29 19% | 32.2 ? 11% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GL504GS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 15 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 74% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.8 / 2.4 Watt |
| Ocioso | 29 / 32 / 38 Watt |
| Carga |
100 / 217 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 31% | 38% | 39% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 14 52% | 14 52% | 7 76% | 10 66% | 13.5 ? 53% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 17 47% | 18 44% | 11 66% | 13 59% | 19 ? 41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 38 | 21 45% | 22 42% | 20 47% | 18 53% | 26.7 ? 30% |
| Load Average * | 100 | 95 5% | 91 9% | 98 2% | 95 5% | 106.7 ? -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 170 | 141 17% | 142 16% | 132 22% | 114 33% | |
| Load Maximum * | 217 | 179 18% | 173 20% | 182 16% | 179 18% | 251 ? -16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus GL504GS GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh | Razer Blade 15 2018 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.7 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 89% | 235% | 122% | 89% | 143% | |
| Reader / Idle | 176 | 382 117% | 762 333% | 507 188% | 400 127% | 565 ? 221% |
| H.264 | 150 | 324 116% | 504 236% | 356 137% | 288 92% | 408 ? 172% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 146 | 322 121% | 513 251% | 362 148% | 262 79% | 375 ? 157% |
| Load | 71 | 72 1% | 156 120% | 81 14% | 111 56% | 85.3 ? 20% |
Pro
Contra
Error: More than one (2) Pro / Contra Item for this review found!
No segmento de portáteis de jogos finos com um design de marcos finos, podemos ver o início de uma dura concorrência. Depois de que o Gigabyte Aero 15X e o Razer Blade 15 já conseguiram convencer quase completamente nos últimos meses, com o ASUS ROG Strix GL504 Cicatriz II, agora há um terceiro candidato que alcança uma avaliação geral de 87% ou 88%.
O dispositivos de15 polegadas deve sua alta porcentagem na avaliação não só à carcaça estilosa com a tela de 144-Hz, mas também a seus bons dispositivos de entrada e o som surpreendentemente alto dos alto-falantes.
Por outro lado, é questionável porque a Asus escolheu um GeForce GTX 1070 convencional, em vez da versão Max-Q. Embora o modelo padrão traga um pouco mais de potência, como resultado, as emissões, a altura da carcaça e o peso sofrem, ficando melhor com os concorrentes na maioria dos casos.
No entanto, na prática, a falta da comutação gráfica é ainda mais um problema. Sem a tecnologia Optimus, torna-se difícil considerar o GL504GS uma plataforma móvel de jogos, uma vez que os compradores estarão muito dependentes da fonte de alimentação (de acordo com a Asus, pelo menos o GL504GM com uma GTX 1060 supostamente suporta Optimus). O fabricante também poderia fazer algumas melhorias em termos de conexões. Em 2018, esperamos uma porta Thunderbolt 3 na faixa de preço acima de 1000 Euros (~$1139).
Apesar destes déficits, o dispositivo de 15 polegadas pode superar o MSI GS65 cuja carcaça mostra diversas fraquezas. E no final do dia, o Schenker XMG Neo 15 também perde contra ele.
Asus GL504GS
-
08/21/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
