Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Strix G GL531GV: Como um Zephyrus, mas mais barato
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Dell G7 15-7588 | |
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 | |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Dell G7 15-7588 | |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 | |
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 |
|
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 537:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.35
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.48% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.13% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell G7 15-7588 LG Philips LGD053F, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus 15-SA LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GF63 8RC AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 57% | -6% | 56% | 58% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.13 | 39.56 -1% | 64.9 62% | 37.82 -6% | 63.5 58% | 64.3 60% | 39.43 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 60.3 | 59.5 -1% | 91 51% | 56.2 -7% | 92.4 53% | 93.6 55% | 59.3 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.48 | 40.91 -1% | 65.9 59% | 39.2 -5% | 64.7 56% | 65.6 58% | 40.73 -2% |
Response Times | -13% | 69% | -27% | 38% | 45% | -17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 26 ? | 30.4 ? -17% | 7.2 ? 72% | 38.8 ? -49% | 18.8 ? 28% | 15.6 ? 40% | 33.2 ? -28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.6 ? | 27.6 ? -8% | 8.8 ? 66% | 26.8 ? -5% | 13.2 ? 48% | 12.8 ? 50% | 27.2 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | 6% | 38% | -11% | 33% | 38% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 290.1 | 286.2 -1% | 286 -1% | 250.9 -14% | 320.4 10% | 266 -8% | 266.6 -8% |
Brightness | 274 | 267 -3% | 275 0% | 246 -10% | 298 9% | 254 -7% | 257 -6% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 84 -2% | 90 5% | 89 3% | 85 -1% | 90 5% | 89 3% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.33 39% | 0.37 31% | 0.34 37% | 0.42 22% | 0.28 48% | 0.29 46% |
Contrast | 537 | 867 61% | 773 44% | 738 37% | 763 42% | 950 77% | 919 71% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.16 | 5.45 -6% | 2.19 58% | 7.34 -42% | 3.21 38% | 3.11 40% | 5.93 -15% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.09 | 18.08 -0% | 4.4 76% | 28.66 -58% | 5.54 69% | 5.84 68% | 16.28 10% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.35 | 4.47 -3% | 2.27 48% | 4.42 -2% | 2.36 46% | 1.37 69% | 3.6 17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 5.3 -20% | 2.2 50% | 6.8 -55% | 3.6 18% | 3.94 10% | 6.8 -55% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 2.41 91% | 2.164 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.53 87% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 7362 88% | 7679 85% | 6405 101% | 6780 96% | 6503 100% | 6210 105% | 7192 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.1 | 37.6 -1% | 59 55% | 36 -6% | 59 55% | 60 57% | 37.6 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 59.1 -1% | 91 52% | 56 -7% | 92 53% | 93 55% | 59.3 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
2% | 55% /
46% | -15% /
-12% | 42% /
38% | 47% /
42% | -4% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Medion Erazer X15805 | |
Dell G7 15-7588 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (28251 - 36304, n=13) | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Medion Erazer X15805 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H (6659 - 7214, n=13) | |
Dell G7 15-7588 | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
MSI GF63 8RC-040XPL | |
Asus FX503VM-EH73 | |
Eurocom Tornado F5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-9750H () | |
Dell G7 15-7588 | |
MSI GE75 9SG |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4251 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5419 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5528 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Aorus 15-SA Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -8% | 48% | 41% | 47% | |
Seq Read | 1280 | 1019 -20% | 2506 96% | 1953 53% | 2601 103% |
Seq Write | 905 | 889 -2% | 1712 89% | 1629 80% | 1507 67% |
4K Read | 48.73 | 48.22 -1% | 48.32 -1% | 33.2 -32% | 56.3 16% |
4K Write | 107 | 115.5 8% | 103.6 -3% | 88.1 -18% | 110.3 3% |
4K-64 Read | 321.1 | 321.5 0% | 624 94% | 757 136% | 877 173% |
4K-64 Write | 761 | 787 3% | 1253 65% | 1501 97% | 914 20% |
Access Time Read * | 0.058 | 0.065 -12% | 0.08 -38% | 0.077 -33% | 0.05 14% |
Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.047 -2% | 0.04 13% | 0.043 7% | 0.034 26% |
Score Read | 498 | 472 -5% | 923 85% | 985 98% | 1193 140% |
Score Write | 958 | 992 4% | 1528 59% | 1752 83% | 1175 23% |
Score Total | 1711 | 1717 0% | 2896 69% | 3230 89% | 2938 72% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1519 | 942 -38% | 1872 23% | 2104 39% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 749 | 444.5 -41% | 478.2 -36% | 387.7 -48% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 943 | 867 -8% | 1165 24% | 1021 8% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 17903 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36566 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14439 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6154 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
MSI GE75 9SG | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Alienware m15 P79F | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (54 - 86, n=22) | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW | |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 | |
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74 | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 17-cd0085cl | |
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 297 | 273.2 | 258.5 | 145.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 266.7 | 189.9 | 117.4 | 63.3 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 122 | 92 | 86 | 74 |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0) | Aorus 15-SA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 | MSI GF63 8RC GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate BarraCuda Pro Compute 1TB ST1000LM049 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | -10% | -8% | -11% | 2% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.2 -0% | 29 -3% | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 28 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 28.2 2% | 30 -4% | 31 -8% | 32 -11% | 33.8 -17% |
Idle Average * | 31.4 | 28.2 10% | 37 -18% | 33 -5% | 35 -11% | 34 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.3 | 31.4 6% | 39 -17% | 38 -14% | 41 -23% | 34.2 -3% |
Load Average * | 46.2 | 39.8 14% | 54 -17% | 50 -8% | 54 -17% | 37.3 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.5 | 47 7% | 54 -7% | 53 -5% | 52 -3% | 43.4 14% |
Load Maximum * | 51.3 | 50.2 2% | 54 -5% | 56 -9% | 56 -9% | 46 10% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 31.4 / 33.3 dB |
Carga |
| 46.2 / 51.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.3 °C / 2.3 F).
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.49 / 0.99 Watt |
Ocioso | 10.9 / 14.7 / 32.4 Watt |
Carga |
121.9 / 209.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell G7 15-7588 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Strix GL504GM i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 41% | -40% | 40% | -21% | -13% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 10.9 | 7 36% | 24 -120% | 5.5 50% | 22.9 -110% | 20 -83% | 10 8% |
Idle Average * | 14.7 | 9.9 33% | 27 -84% | 7.6 48% | 27.2 -85% | 23 -56% | 16.9 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.4 | 12 63% | 33 -2% | 9 72% | 27.5 15% | 29 10% | 21.1 35% |
Load Average * | 121.9 | 68.4 44% | 129 -6% | 94 23% | 83.4 32% | 87 29% | 112.4 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 143.5 | 94.9 34% | 176 -23% | 116.3 19% | 143.6 -0% | 136 5% | 135.5 6% |
Load Maximum * | 209.6 | 130.9 38% | 216 -3% | 154.4 26% | 160.5 23% | 173 17% | 157.3 25% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 66 Wh | Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73 R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh | Dell G7 15-7588 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh | Aorus 15-SA i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 154% | 96% | 304% | 48% | 51% | 58% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 112 | 285 154% | 220 96% | 452 304% | 166 48% | 169 51% | 177 58% |
Reader / Idle | 466 | 353 | 656 | 235 | 208 | 328 | |
Load | 87 | 62 | 132 | 46 | 122 | 81 |
Pro
Contra
Muitos dos nossos comentários sobre o Strix G GL731 de 17,3 polegadas se aplicam aqui para o Strix G GL531 de 15,6 polegadas, pois eles compartilham a mesma linguagem geral de design com hardware interno similar. Em particular, desvantagens como a manutenção não amigável ao usuário, pequenas teclas de seta, bateria de curta duração e ventoinhas barulhentas, todas poderiam ser revisadas para criar um modelo melhor da próxima geração. A capacidade de personalizar a luz do teclado e a barra LED de forma independente seria especialmente útil.
As melhores qualidades do GL531 são seus poderosos alto-falantes de 3,5 W e o design do chassi. Para um portátil que é principalmente de plástico, as superfícies texturizadas realmente o elevam para parecer mais como uma máquina de jogos de ponta quando comparado a outros designs de plástico como no Acer Nitro 5 ou no MSI GP e série GL.
O preço é a maior vantagem. Por cerca de US $1.600, o sistema custa várias centenas de dólares a menos que a série Zephyrus S enquanto oferece muitas das mesmas especificações e opções de desempenho. Para economizar ainda mais, recomendamos a utilização da SKU GTX 1660 Ti, pois ela é apenas cerca de 10% mais lenta nos jogos, quando não é responsável por nenhum recurso específico do RTX.
Ele se desempenha como um Zephyrus sem custar tanto. Você terá que conviver com alguns aborrecimentos, como a dificuldade na manutenção, teclas de seta pequenas, ventiladores barulhentos e falta de webcam. O desempenho dos jogos é tão rápido quanto a maioria dos portáteis para jogos entusiastas.
Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74
-
07/18/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo