Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX: Fora deste mundo

Name: Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX
Brand: Asus

Gaming 2-em-1.

Devido a seus produtos particularmente inovadores, a Asus sempre foi o centro das atenções no passado. Agora, com o ROG GZ700 e depois do ROG GX700 com refrigeração a água, vem mais um portátil de jogos incomum. O dispositivo de 17 polegadas se destaca com um design conversível. No entanto, o preço nos deixa sem palavras.

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/18/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Taiwan

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX (ROG Mothership GZ700 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i9-9980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1675 MHz, Memoría: 1788 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.41, Optimus oder G-Sync

Memória

64 GB

, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não, detachable screen

placa mãe

Intel HM370

Disco rígido

1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0), 1536 GB

, Slots: 3x M.2 Type 2280

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH - cAVS

Conexões

1 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1 saída para fones, 1 entrada para microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 30 x 410 x 320

Bateria

90 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: FHD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 4x 4W, Teclado: Chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2x 280-Watt AC adapter, backpack, Cerberus gaming headset, Gladius II gaming mouse, Armoury Crate, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

4.76 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.686 kg

Preço

7000 EUR

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.7 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	4.8 kg	30 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	4.7 kg	48 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	3.3 kg	27 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	05/2019	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	2.7 kg	27.5 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.5 % v7 ^(old)	06/2019	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	4.2 kg	42 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	03/2019	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	3.9 kg	42 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Size Comparison

Asus ROG G703GXR Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG HP Omen 17-cb0020ng MSI GE75 9SG DIN A4 ❌

Left: Thunderbolt 3, USB Type-A 3.0, Microphone, Headset, RJ45 LAN, 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2

Right: 2x AC adapter, HDMI, USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	194 MB/s +134%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83 MB/s
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76 MB/s -8%
MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	27.14 MB/s -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	246 MB/s +170%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +31%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	91 MB/s
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81 MB/s -11%
MSI GE75 9SG (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	33.17 MB/s -64%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1420 MBit/s
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	749 MBit/s -47%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	730 MBit/s -49%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	680 MBit/s -52%
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Wireless-AC 9560	677 MBit/s -52%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	629 MBit/s -56%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1490 MBit/s
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	690 MBit/s -54%
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Wireless-AC 9560	676 MBit/s -55%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	675 MBit/s -55%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	661 MBit/s -56%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	652 MBit/s -56%


300 cd/m²	302 cd/m²	272 cd/m²
285 cd/m²	283 cd/m²	294 cd/m²
276 cd/m²	282 cd/m²	271 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 285 cd/m² Minimum: 31 cd/m²
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 283 cd/m²
Contraste: 1230:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.82
ΔE Greyscale 7.19 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus ROG G703GXR AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng CMN175D, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GE75 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, AHVA, 1920x1080	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 LG Philips 173WFG, IPS, 1920x1080
Display		2%	4%	0%	1%	6%
Display P3 Coverage	62.3	63.2 1%	63.7 2%	61.5 -1%	62.3 0%	66.3 6%
sRGB Coverage	90.4	92 2%	96 6%	92 2%	93.4 3%	96.9 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.7	64.7 2%	65.8 3%	63.5 0%	64.3 1%	66.5 4%
Response Times		-15%	-101%	9%	-15%	-62%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	6 ?(3, 3)	6.4 ?(3.4, 3) -7%	17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2) -193%	7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4) -20%	8 ?(4.4, 3.6) -33%	13.2 ?(8, 5.2) -120%
Response Time Black / White *	10.4 ?(6, 4.4)	12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2) -23%	11.2 ?(6, 5.2) -8%	6.6 ?(3.2, 3.4) 37%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) 4%	10.8 ?(6, 4.8) -4%
PWM Frequency			25510 ?(44)	26040 ?(10)	26040 ?(20)
Screen		10%	28%	25%	25%	-3%
Brightness middle	283	290 2%	360 27%	400.7 42%	396 40%	335.2 18%
Brightness	285	281 -1%	342 20%	372 31%	373 31%	297 4%
Brightness Distribution	90	91 1%	91 1%	89 -1%	89 -1%	82 -9%
Black Level *	0.23	0.2 13%	0.26 -13%	0.34 -48%	0.33 -43%	0.66 -187%
Contrast	1230	1450 18%	1385 13%	1179 -4%	1200 -2%	508 -59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.87	4.77 19%	1.91 67%	1.33 77%	2.04 65%	2.02 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.01	9.08 18%	4.08 63%	3.51 68%	3.85 65%	7.23 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.82	1.46 20%	0.78 57%	1.39 24%	0.82 55%	1.17 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.19	5.83 19%	2.72 62%	1.3 82%	2.83 61%	3.2 55%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.47 ^89%	2.37 ^93%	2.24 ^98%	2.49 ^88%	2.16 ^102%
CCT	8239 ^79%	8076 ^80%	6692 ^97%	6735 ^97%	7113 ^91%	6746 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	58	59 2%	60 3%	58.2 0%	59 2%	61.3 6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	90	92 2%	96 7%	92.1 2%	94 4%	96.9 8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 6%	-23% / 7%	11% / 18%	4% / 16%	-20% / -8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1650 (1611.73-1806)

MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H, Intel Core i9-9880H: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)

MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1998 (1943.92-2022.14)

Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K, Intel Core i9-9900K: Ø1875 (1847.15-1952.27)

Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points +62%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	509 Points +14%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	467 Points +5%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK	445 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	441 Points -1%
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	423 Points -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points +99%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	4926 Points +19%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK	4150 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	3712 Points -11%
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	3110 Points -25%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	2953 Points -29%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points +47%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	212 Points +13%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	207 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	197 Points +5%
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	189 Points +1%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK	188 Points
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	171 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points +88%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG Intel Core i9-9900K	2022 Points +12%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 Intel Core i9-9900K	1979 Points +10%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX Intel Core i9-9980HK	1806 Points
MSI GE75 9SG Intel Core i9-9880H	1721 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng Intel Core i9-9880H	1450 Points -20%
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H	1256 Points -30%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

188 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1806 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4150 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

445 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +15%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)	7006 Points +3%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, 1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)	6789 Points
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	6599 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	6558 Points -3%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	6306 Points -7%
Asus ROG G703GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5780 Points -15%

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX 1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)	Asus ROG G703GXR Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)	MSI GE75 9SG Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 2x SK Hynix PC400 512GB (RAID 0)
AS SSD		-18%	-14%	-11%	-9%	-18%
Seq Read	4401	1030 -77%	2568 -42%	1358 -69%	2646 -40%	2082 -53%
Seq Write	4146	1888 -54%	2608 -37%	2381 -43%	2214 -47%	2335 -44%
4K Read	37.41	43.83 17%	41.2 10%	27.02 -28%	30.42 -19%	24.14 -35%
4K Write	123.7	97.1 -22%	98 -21%	89.2 -28%	95.9 -22%	91.8 -26%
4K-64 Read	1315	1092 -17%	1352 3%	1642 25%	1609 22%	1561 19%
4K-64 Write	1178	1647 40%	1138 -3%	1799 53%	1573 34%	1350 15%
Score Total	4412	3856 -13%	3994 -9%	4899 11%	4740 7%	4390 0%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9006 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4413 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 581 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 510 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5378 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 4081 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 159.5 MB/s

3DMark 11 Performance		28126 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		55579 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		22005 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		10150 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, 1x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ + 2x Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8 (RAID 0): Ø100 (95-104)

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)	8661 Points +44%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	6005 Points
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5852 Points -3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5660 Points -6%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5582 Points -7%
Asus ROG G703GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5543 Points -8%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	5538 Points -8%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points +28%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10720 Points +6%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10243 Points +1%
Asus ROG G703GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10181 Points 0%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	10149 Points
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9754 Points -4%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	9480 Points -7%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points +20%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	27080 Points +4%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	26009 Points
Asus ROG G703GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	25727 Points -1%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	25126 Points -3%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	24623 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	22820 Points -12%

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points +21%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	38485 Points +7%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	35882 Points
Asus ROG G703GXR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	35754 Points 0%
MSI GE75 9SG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	34050 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	31826 Points -11%

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps +29%
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	101.1 fps +3%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K	100 fps +2%
Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK	98.3 (83^min) fps
Asus ROG G703GXR GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H	97.1 (80^min) fps -1%
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	95.3 fps -3%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H	91.7 (76^min) fps -7%

	alto	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	181	98.3
Control (2019)	92.1
Borderlands 3 (2019)	104	89.4
FIFA 20 (2019)	267	262
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	111	83
GRID 2019 (2019)	127	89.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	159	136
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	99.2	90.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)	111	108
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)	88.9	56.8

Barulho

Ocioso		37 / 38 / 39 dB
Carga		40 / 52 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Noise		4%	0%	6%	-5%	-1%	16%
off / environment *	30	30 -0%	30 -0%	28.2 6%	30 -0%	28.1 6%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Minimum *	37	33 11%	34 8%	30.4 18%	33 11%	28.1 24%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Average *	38	34 11%	35 8%	30.4 20%	34 11%	28.6 25%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years) 28%
Idle Maximum *	39	35 10%	36 8%	33.4 14%	44 -13%	51 -31%	30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	40	38 5%	51 -28%	37.1 7%	47 -18%	51 -28%	42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years) -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48	50 -4%	47 2%	54.2 -13%	53 -10%	51 -6%
Load Maximum *	52	54 -4%	51 2%	56.4 -8%	59 -13%	51 2%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years) -3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


31 °C	39 °C	34 °C
27 °C	27 °C	28 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 29.7 °C


49 °C	49 °C	50 °C
50 °C	51 °C	45 °C
31 °C	32 °C	39 °C

Máximo: 51 °C
Médio: 44 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


25 °C	25 °C	25 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C
25 °C	25 °C	25 °C

Máximo: 25 °C
Médio: 25 °C


33 °C	32 °C	31 °C
33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
26 °C	26 °C	28 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 38 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


34 °C	31 °C	30 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 28.2 °C


48 °C	47 °C	48 °C
48 °C	48 °C	43 °C
30 °C	29 °C	38 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 42.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 47 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-9%	-12%	-27%	-8%	-17%	-9%
Maximum Upper Side *	39	46 -18%	47 -21%	48.8 -25%	51 -31%	47 -21%	46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years) -18%
Maximum Bottom *	51	49 4%	54 -6%	52 -2%	57 -12%	58.8 -15%	49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Upper Side *	25	31 -24%	32 -28%	36.2 -45%	26 -4%	31 -24%	31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Bottom *	33	32 3%	30 9%	44.4 -35%	28 15%	35 -6%	32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years) 2%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG G703GXR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	3 / 5 Watt
Ocioso	37 / 48 / 59 Watt
Carga	105 / 349 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		10%	21%	32%	21%	1%	41%
Idle Minimum *	37	27 27%	26 30%	13.9 62%	14 62%	23.3 37%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 64%
Idle Average *	48	32 33%	29 40%	18.8 61%	18 62%	33.5 30%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 61%
Idle Maximum *	59	39 34%	38 36%	23.1 61%	23 61%	38.4 35%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) 55%
Load Average *	105	124 -18%	106 -1%	112.3 -7%	114 -9%	114.1 -9%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) -2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	233	274 -18%	228 2%	231 1%	283 -21%	339.5 -46%
Load Maximum *	349	338 3%	287 18%	291.5 16%	443 -27%	485.1 -39%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		3h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		2h 36min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 45min

	Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	Asus ROG G703GXR i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 96 Wh	HP Omen 17-cb0020ng i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 70 Wh	MSI GE75 9SG i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh	MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 90 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		87%	8%	88%	57%	-23%	112%
Reader / Idle	180	484 169%	250 39%		409 127%	155 -14%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 214%
WiFi v1.3	156	367 135%	196 26%	294 88%	302 94%	127 -19%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 141%
Load	105	61 -42%	63 -40%		52 -50%	66 -37%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -19%

Pro

+ Bom desempenho da CPU e GPU Boost

+ Seleção de portas generosa

+ SSD RAID extremamente veloz

+ Conceito interessante

+ Optimus ou G-Sync

+ (W)LAN muito veloz

+ Som poderoso

+ 144 Hz

Contra

- Alto nível de ruído (particularmente no modo turbo)

- A unidade de teclado pode ser dobrada significativamente quando conectada

- Um ventilador sacode levemente (azar?)

- Um pouco pesado

- Extremamente caro

- Dois adaptadores de CA

ROG Mothership GZ700GX, test device courtesy of Asus Taiwan

Em termos de tecnologia e qualidade, o ROG Mothership GZ700GX é um excelente portátil de gama alta. O chassi de metal premium não apenas aloja muitas portas, mas também uma tela de 144 Hz com uma boa taxa de contraste, bons ângulos de visão e ótimos tempos de resposta.

O desempenho é estelar. O Core i9-9980HK da Intel e o GeForce RTX 2080 da Nvidia formam uma dupla extremamente rápida, complementada por 64 GB de RAMM DDR4 e três SSDs em RAID 0. Além disso, ficamos impressionados com o bom som e a opção de escolher entre o G-Sync e Optimus.

O principal problema do GZ700GX é seu preço ridículo. A Asus cobra um bom preço pelo design 2-em-1, cuja praticidade permanece em questão. A ROG Mothership custa quase o dobro dos outros portáteis RTX 2080.

Asus ROG Mothership GZ700GX - 05/14/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

73 / 80 → 91%

Peso

41 / 10-66 → 54%

Bateria