Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG GU501GM (i7-8750H, GTX 1060)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 286.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 735:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.274
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 AU Optronics AUO45ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v8 AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 5% | 4% | 6% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.4 | 66.2 4% | 66.1 4% | 63.6 0% | 67.1 6% | 62.5 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 87.7 | 92.1 5% | 92.7 6% | 93.8 7% | 93.4 6% | 88.7 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 67.2 | 64.9 | 68.1 | 63.5 | |
Response Times | 49% | 71% | 52% | 48% | -26% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30.8 ? | 17.6 ? 43% | 6.6 ? 79% | 16.8 ? 45% | 18.8 ? 39% | 44.8 ? -45% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 12.8 ? 54% | 10.4 ? 62% | 11.2 ? 59% | 12 ? 57% | 29.6 ? -7% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 21% | -13% | 27% | 23% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 286.7 | 254 -11% | 307 7% | 313 9% | 271 -5% | 291 1% |
Brightness | 281 | 262 -7% | 296 5% | 300 7% | 259 -8% | 277 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 89 -3% | 78 -15% | 87 -5% | 84 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.22 44% | 0.25 36% | 0.33 15% | 0.27 31% | 0.22 44% |
Contrast | 735 | 1155 57% | 1228 67% | 948 29% | 1004 37% | 1323 80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.17 | 2.37 43% | 5.74 -38% | 1.29 69% | 1.81 57% | 5.52 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.22 | 4.71 35% | 11.32 -57% | 2.04 72% | 3.33 54% | 10.72 -48% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.58 37% | 6.44 -158% | 0.69 72% | 1.09 56% | 6.59 -164% |
Gamma | 2.274 97% | 2.48 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.43 91% | 2.45 90% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6885 94% | 6785 96% | 8395 77% | 6550 99% | 6435 101% | 7816 83% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 60 5% | 60 5% | 60 5% | 61 7% | 58 2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 92 6% | 93 7% | 94 8% | 93 7% | 89 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 25% /
22% | 21% /
2% | 28% /
27% | 26% /
24% | -13% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4119 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5454 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5111 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5092 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | Average Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 253% | 213% | 129% | 121% | 207% | 3% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 419.3 | 369 ? -12% | |||||
Copy Program MB/s | 269.2 | 209 ? -22% | |||||
Copy ISO MB/s | 773 | 549 ? -29% | |||||
Score Total | 900 | 4122 358% | 3649 305% | 2536 182% | 2515 179% | 3282 265% | 1014 ? 13% |
Score Write | 345 | 2051 494% | 1446 319% | 939 172% | 954 177% | 1243 260% | 365 ? 6% |
Score Read | 377 | 1346 257% | 1471 290% | 1092 190% | 1061 181% | 1350 258% | 443 ? 18% |
Access Time Write * | 0.058 | 0.035 40% | 0.041 29% | 0.046 21% | 0.044 24% | 0.041 29% | 0.06829 ? -18% |
Access Time Read * | 0.278 | 0.073 74% | 0.046 83% | 0.119 57% | 0.166 40% | 0.062 78% | 0.2317 ? 17% |
4K-64 Write | 237 | 1760 643% | 1198 405% | 742 213% | 773 226% | 913 285% | 259 ? 9% |
4K-64 Read | 270.3 | 1170 333% | 1218 351% | 847 213% | 856 217% | 1057 291% | 317 ? 17% |
4K Write | 67.1 | 107.2 60% | 90.2 34% | 80.4 20% | 84.5 26% | 93 39% | 65.5 ? -2% |
4K Read | 22.62 | 48.94 116% | 43.42 92% | 23.36 3% | 23.21 3% | 41.47 83% | 28.2 ? 25% |
Seq Write | 404.7 | 1834 353% | 1580 290% | 1163 187% | 966 139% | 2372 486% | 404 ? 0% |
Seq Read | 841 | 1266 51% | 2091 149% | 2213 163% | 1813 116% | 2517 199% | 973 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (26770 - 86193, n=68) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (10708 - 12298, n=77) | |
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-52-51M6 | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (105935 - 613731, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Asus FX504GD | |
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (33205 - 257260, n=33) |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 33570 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 13082 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30938 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10370 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (51 - 68.8, n=37) |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile (24 - 42.3, n=60) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=169, last 2 years) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 194 | 173 | 162 | 99 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 166 | 120 | 66 | 39 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 163 | 120 | 71 | 57 |
Hitman 2016 (2016) | 71 | 70 | 59 | 46 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 34.2 dB |
Carga |
| 42.8 / 50.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -1% | -3% | -7% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 28.6 | 30 -5% | 29 -1% | 29 -1% | 30 -5% | 31 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 30 4% | 30 4% | 30 4% | 33 -5% | 33 -5% |
Idle Average * | 31.4 | 31 1% | 31 1% | 31 1% | 35 -11% | 34 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.2 | 34 1% | 33 4% | 35 -2% | 40 -17% | 40 -17% |
Load Average * | 42.8 | 43 -0% | 49 -14% | 49 -14% | 45 -5% | 41 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.9 | 42 17% | 50 2% | 51 -0% | 50 2% | 43 16% |
Load Maximum * | 50.9 | 44 14% | 52 -2% | 54 -6% | 55 -8% | 48 6% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.3 °C / -2.4 F).
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -1% | -6% | -10% | -7% | -21% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 49 -14% | 52 -21% | 53 -23% | 50 -16% | 61 -42% |
Maximum Bottom * | 46.6 | 63 -35% | 49 -5% | 65 -39% | 62 -33% | 69 -48% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.2 | 24 18% | 31 -6% | 26 11% | 27 8% | 29 1% |
Idle Bottom * | 34 | 25 26% | 31 9% | 30 12% | 29 15% | 32 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.08 / 0.8 Watt |
Ocioso | 12.35 / 19.98 / 25.44 Watt |
Carga |
94.28 / 140.63 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus FX503VM-EH73 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 15% | 13% | -20% | -3% | -52% | -55% | |
Idle Minimum * | 12.35 | 12.8 -4% | 7 43% | 16 -30% | 14 -13% | 25 -102% | 28 -127% |
Idle Average * | 19.98 | 15.4 23% | 11 45% | 19 5% | 18 10% | 31 -55% | 33 -65% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.44 | 15.9 37% | 20 21% | 26 -2% | 22 14% | 33 -30% | 41 -61% |
Load Average * | 94.28 | 78 17% | 98 -4% | 103 -9% | 91 3% | 102 -8% | 94 -0% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 132.9 | 107.3 19% | 132 1% | 164 -23% | 142 -7% | 194 -46% | 160 -20% |
Load Maximum * | 140.63 | 143.4 -2% | 182 -29% | 223 -59% | 173 -23% | 239 -70% | 222 -58% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 55 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 55 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | Aorus X5 v8 i7-8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 92.24 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 54 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 73% | 4% | 181% | 51% | -10% | |
Reader / Idle | 271 | 507 87% | 237 -13% | 762 181% | 294 8% | 150 -45% |
WiFi v1.3 | 240 | 362 51% | 164 -32% | 513 114% | 144 -40% | |
Load | 45 | 81 80% | 70 56% | 156 247% | 87 93% | 70 56% |
Pro
Contra
O GU501GM visa trazer o melhor do Zephyrus M para uma faixa de preço mais baixa. Na maior parte, consegue fazer isso com sucesso. A mesmo carcaça elegante e premium (sem o elegante mecanismo de dobradiça no painel inferior) faz a transição, assim como o teclado, os alto-falantes e o Corei7-8750H topo de linha.
Infelizmente, esta CPU prova ser um pouco confusa. O desempenho aprimorado é muito apreciado na maioria das tarefas, embora a CPU não pareça se manter estável sob estresse computacional. Os ventiladores são outro ponto de aborrecimento; seu ruído de alta frequência range nos ouvidos e se tornará o foco de atenção em uma cafeteria. No lado positivo, há atenuações para esses problemas. Embora o sistema trave sob estresse da CPU, todas as outras cargas de trabalho são bem geridas. Os diferentes modos do ventilador ajudam a controlar o ruído do ventilador ao custo de maior calor e menor desempenho.
Tudo dito, há pouco a não gostar sobre o GU501GM, mas considerando o preço, há poucos motivos além da estética para considerar uma compra. Em seu preço de rua recomendado de $1900, o GU501GM é simplesmente muito caro para ser viável; há outros dispositivos belamente criados com especificações similares, que sutam menos (a linha Strix da Asus vem à mente). Pelo mesmo preço ou um pouco mais, os usuários poderiam atualizar para um hardware mais potente e um pacote geral melhor, como os oferecidos pelo Aero 15x da Gigabyte ou pelo MSI GS65 Stealth Thin. Mesmo com o preço de venda atual de $1.500, é difícil recomendar o GU501GM sobre outras máquinas semelhantes.
O GU501GM é simplesmente um item de luxo. Enquanto a carcaça é bonita e a máquina é um portátil de jogos de gama média competente, é muito cara. Somente aqueles que colocam o design acima de todos os outros fatores devem considerar a compra do GU501GM; mesmo assim, existem melhores opções por aí.
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
- 07/07/2018 v6 (old)
Sam Medley