Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD)

Como uma dose de adrenalina. O novo ROG Chimera G703GI da Asus é atualmente um dos portáteis de jogos mais rápidos do mercado. Graças ao seu Core i9-8950HK e GeForce GTX 1080 com suporte para overclock, até os jogos mais exigentes rodam fluentemente. O G-Sync e um monitor de 144 Hz completam o pacote.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook
Asus Chimera G703GI (G703 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i9-8950HK 6 x 2.9 - 4.8 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1682 MHz, Memoría: 2578 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 388.92
Memória
64 GB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, todos os slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM370
Disco rígido
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), 1431 GB 
, + Seagate FireCuda ST2000LX001, disco rígido híbrido, 2 TB @5400 rpm; baias: 3x M.2 type 2280 & 1x 2,5 polegadas
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Conexões
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 1x fone, 1x microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC,MMC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 51 x 425 x 319
Bateria
71 Wh Lítio-Ion, 8 cells
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2.0, Teclado: chiclet RGB, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 fontes de alimentação de 280 watts, sticker, key fob, Diversas ferramentas do fabricante, McAfee Security trial, XSplit Gamecaster trial, 24 Meses Garantia
peso
4.72 kg, Suprimento de energia: 1.67 kg
Links
Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
428 mm 314 mm 58 mm 4.6 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg425 mm 319 mm 51 mm 4.7 kg418 mm 295 mm 41 mm 4.4 kg428 mm 314 mm 30 mm 3.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s -6%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -52%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s -2%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s -52%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s -65%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
596 MBit/s -14%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
689 MBit/s +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s +1%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s -6%
281
cd/m²		281
cd/m²		269
cd/m²
301
cd/m²		285
cd/m²		284
cd/m²
272
cd/m²		247
cd/m²		254
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 301 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 274.9 cd/m² Minimum: 32 cd/m²
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 285 cd/m²
Contraste: 1295:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.93 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080		Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
Display
-0%
25%
0%
29%
Display P3 Coverage
65.8
65.5
0%
90.9
38%
66.8
2%
86.4
31%
sRGB Coverage
92.6
92.4
0%
100
8%
92.1
-1%
100
8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67
66.6
-1%
86.2
29%
67.3
0%
99.1
48%
Response Times
-90%
12%
-100%
-359%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.4 ?(3.4, 3)
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
-175%
8 ?(4.4, 3.6)
-25%
18.4 ?(9.2, 9.2)
-188%
44 ?(22.8, 21.2)
-588%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(6, 4.8)
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-4%
5.6 ?(3.8, 1.8)
48%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-11%
24.8 ?(11.6, 13.2)
-130%
PWM Frequency
26000 ?(19)
Screen
-15%
9%
15%
-1%
Brightness middle
285
274
-4%
240
-16%
280
-2%
332
16%
Brightness
275
268
-3%
248
-10%
262
-5%
313
14%
Brightness Distribution
82
80
-2%
83
1%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.22
0.29
-32%
0.22
-0%
0.22
-0%
0.28
-27%
Contrast
1295
945
-27%
1091
-16%
1273
-2%
1186
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.18
3.99
-25%
2.14
33%
1.78
44%
3.86
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.99
7.33
-22%
5.04
16%
3.91
35%
5.88
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.73
1.79
-3%
1.54
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.93
4.14
-41%
1.62
45%
0.74
75%
4.33
-48%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.58 85%
2.28 96%
2.43 91%
2.41 91%
CCT
7165 91%
7352 88%
6846 95%
6494 100%
6595 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
77
28%
60
0%
88
47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
92
-1%
100
8%
92
-1%
100
8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-35% / -21%
15% / 12%
-28% / -3%
-110% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
latencies
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +34%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
206 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
190 Points -8%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points -10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +159%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1391 Points +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points +5%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1312 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
1167 Points -11%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)
3.33 Points +42%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.34 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
2.18 Points -7%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points -10%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)
37.2 Points +146%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.14 Points
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
12.9 Points -15%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points -32%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
206 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1312 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +18%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points -1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5976 Points -10%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points -24%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points -2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4865 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6281 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points -3%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points -4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4849 Points -23%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6093 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6281 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
6607 pontos
Ajuda
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)		Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
AS SSD
-20%
-28%
-57%
-24%
Seq Read
4886
3177
-35%
3058
-37%
1518
-69%
2533
-48%
Seq Write
4110
2556
-38%
2196
-47%
1019
-75%
1771
-57%
4K Read
57.4
47.61
-17%
38.37
-33%
22.23
-61%
43.65
-24%
4K Write
141.3
148.4
5%
97.7
-31%
98.9
-30%
139.5
-1%
Score Read
1999
1633
-18%
1691
-15%
828
-59%
1716
-14%
Score Write
1855
1519
-18%
1553
-16%
916
-51%
1615
-13%
Score Total
4843
3962
-18%
4066
-16%
2145
-56%
4173
-14%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 8905 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4316 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 424.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 383.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4049 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.2 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +43%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
22240 Points +2%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
22160 Points +1%
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21849 Points
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21422 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
21104 Points -3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +47%
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29696 Points
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
29109 Points -2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28918 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
28621 Points -4%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
27966 Points -6%
3DMark 11 Performance
23488 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
214443 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38913 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18999 pontos
Ajuda
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +65%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
77.9 fps +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK
77.4 fps +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK
76.8 fps 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i9-8950HK
76.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-8700
75.6 fps -1%
baixomédiaaltoultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 145 76.7
Far Cry 5 (2018) 113 103

Barulho

Ocioso
30 / 34 / 42 dB
HDD
31 dB
Carga
53 / 53 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Asus G703
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-1%
-8%
-2%
17%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
17%
Idle Minimum *
30
35
-17%
32
-7%
36
-20%
34
-13%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
34
36
-6%
34
-0%
37
-9%
35
-3%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
42
38
10%
37
12%
43
-2%
40
5%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
28%
Load Average *
53
46
13%
43
19%
50
6%
45
15%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
48
6%
57
-12%
57
-12%
52
-2%
Load Maximum *
53
54
-2%
62
-17%
61
-15%
60
-13%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 42 °C44 °C50 °C 
 41 °C42 °C40 °C 
 29 °C30 °C29 °C 
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 38.6 °C
50 °C45 °C48 °C
49 °C42 °C47 °C
30 °C33 °C35 °C
Máximo: 50 °C
Médio: 42.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  53 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Asus G703
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-2%
9%
8%
6%
4%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
55
-10%
47
6%
43
14%
41
18%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
8%
Maximum Bottom *
50
54
-8%
53
-6%
55
-10%
48
4%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
26
19%
27
16%
30
6%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
2%
Idle Bottom *
33
32
3%
27
18%
29
12%
35
-6%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
2%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.735.52531.229.73129.929.94027.229.25025316326.140.3802451.910023.557.812524.261.816022.866.220025.166.625022.569.431520.373.840019.274.850018.477.363017.878.280017.477.8100017.880.4125017.580.2160017.277.7200017.277250017.477.7315017.377.1400017.576.7500017.272.8630017.269.4800017.467.91000017.365.41250017.258.3160001752.4SPL29.888.8N1.382.3median 17.5median 74.8Delta1.85.743.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6median 73.91.97.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Chimera G703GIMSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Chimera G703GI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 29 / 37 / 46 Watt
Carga midlight 156 / 314 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Asus G703
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-1%
5%
5%
39%
Idle Minimum *
29
26
10%
31
-7%
28
3%
32
-10%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
53%
Idle Average *
37
30
19%
35
5%
37
-0%
38
-3%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
49%
Idle Maximum *
46
37
20%
45
2%
40
13%
45
2%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
42%
Load Average *
156
123
21%
130
17%
109
30%
96
38%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
252
257
-2%
268
-6%
256
-2%
237
6%
Load Maximum *
314
341
-9%
374
-19%
353
-12%
331
-5%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
21%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
2h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 10min
Carga (máximo brilho)
0h 51min
Asus Chimera G703GI
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh		Asus G703
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 71 Wh		MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh		Aorus X9 DT
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 17
i7-8700, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 82 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
13%
29%
49%
14%
163%
Reader / Idle
169
200
18%
225
33%
252
49%
164
-3%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
234%
WiFi v1.3
130
151
16%
190
46%
142
9%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
189%
Load
51
54
6%
63
24%
77
51%
70
37%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
67%
H.264
143
174
148
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

Pro

+ Overclock opcional
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Excelente desempenho
+ Iluminação de fundo RGB
+ Ferramentas práticas
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Painel de 144 Hz
+ Ótimo áudio
+ SSD RAID
+ G-Sync

Contra

- Barulhento
- Alto consumo de energia
- Opções limitadas de manutenção
- Curta duração da bateria
- Bleeding da tela
- Pesado
ROG Chimera G703GI, test device courtesy of Asus Germany
ROG Chimera G703GI, test device courtesy of Asus Germany

Like its predecessor, the new Coffee Lake edition of the Asus ROG Chimera G703 is one of the best high-end laptops for avid gamers.

If we factor out its heavy weight and thick build, the case has a lot of strengths. The attraction of the 17-inch powerhouse lies not only with its quick and contrast-rich 144 Hz display with stable viewing angles and G-Sync support, but it is also with its modern connections (Thunderbolt 3) and good input devices.

In the realm of performance, there is simply nothing to criticize. In the device's native resolution, the hexa-core CPU and GeForce GTX 1080 run every game on the market at a fluid frame rate. The laptop does make a lot of noise under load, but other competitors like the MSI GT75 8RG and Aorus X9 DT get even louder in 3D mode.

All aspects considered together, the computer scores just enough for a rating of "Very Good". In our Gaming Top 10, the G703 once again snatches a leading position.

Asus Chimera G703GI - 06/07/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser

Acabamento
82 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
89%
Mouse
86%
Conectividade
71 / 81 → 87%
Peso
41 / 10-66 → 55%
Bateria
64%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
100%
Desempenho da aplicação
100%
Temperatura
84 / 95 → 88%
Ruído
59 / 90 → 65%
Audio
88%
Médio
79%
88%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD)
Florian Glaser, 2018-06-21 (Update: 2024-11- 4)