Breve Análise do Portátil Asus N552VX-FY103T

Name: Asus N552VX-FY103T
Brand: Asus

Tudo, menos o modo bateria, por favor. Uma construção e configuração bem-sucedida são omnipresentes. Comparado com o seu predecessor, a carcaça parece ser mais fina e isso é positivo. Quad-core, placa de vídeo GeForce GTX 950M e 8 GB de memória de trabalho DDR4 nos levou a esperar por um poli funcional multimídia adequado para jogos.

Marcus Conrad (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 03/27/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Skylake Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus N552VX-FY103T (N552 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1124 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.06, Optimus

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-2133, Hynix HMA 41GS6AFr8N-TF, 2 bancos de memória, 1 ocupado, máx. 16 GB

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB5, AH-IPS, cores 262k, 6 bit eDP (2 lanes) 30 pins, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Sunrise Point HM170

Disco rígido

Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, 1000 GB

, 5400 rpm, 1000 GB SSHD @ 5400 RPM + slot M.2 livre (2280)

Placa de Som

Intel Skylake PCH-H High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

4 USB 3.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de entrada/saída de áudio combinado de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, 1 RJ 45 (Ethernet)

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Unidade ótica

HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 29.9 x 383 x 260

Bateria

44 Wh, 3200 mAh, 4 células

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: by ICEpower Bang & Olufsen Technology, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação, cabo de força, guia de inpicio rápido, cartão de garantia, Office (avaliação), McAfee Internet Security (avaliação), Evernote 5.9.2, Dropbox (25 GB), Foxit PhantomPDF, CyberLink PhotoDirector 5 & PowerDirector 12, Asus software, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.53 kg, Suprimento de energia: 554 g

Preço

1000 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications


297 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	336 cd/m²	315 cd/m²
284 cd/m²	300 cd/m²	297 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 336 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 304.3 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.26 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Display		6%	23%	7%	-38%
Display P3 Coverage	67.9	67.3 -1%	84.9 25%	67.8 0%	38.55 -43%
sRGB Coverage	87.7	96.7 10%	99.8 14%	97.5 11%	57.6 -34%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	64	69.4 8%	83.3 30%	70 9%	39.86 -38%
Response Times			-7%		6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(18, 24)		44 ?(25, 19, short plateau) -5%		40.8 ?(16.4, 24.4) 3%
Response Time Black / White *	26 ?(5, 21)		28 ?(11, 17, short plateau) -8%		24 ?(4, 20) 8%
PWM Frequency			200 ?(90)		58.1
Screen		-12%	-41%	4%	-24%
Brightness middle	336	323 -4%	249 -26%	326 -3%	258.6 -23%
Brightness	304	312 3%	240 -21%	317 4%	242 -20%
Brightness Distribution	85	83 -2%	86 1%	91 7%	88 4%
Black Level *	0.34	0.38 -12%	0.48 -41%	0.31 9%	0.277 19%
Contrast	988	850 -14%	519 -47%	1052 6%	934 -5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.26	7.4 -41%	10.15 -93%	4.14 21%	8.1 -54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.49
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.26	6.24 -46%	12.13 -185%	5.46 -28%	7.23 -70%
Gamma	2.35 ^94%	2.98 ^74%	2.48 ^89%	2.44 ^90%	1.99 ^111%
CCT	6758 ^96%	8098 ^80%	13445 ^48%	7574 ^86%	6567 ^99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	57	69 21%	74 30%	64 12%	36.5 -36%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	88		100 14%	97 10%	57.2 -35%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -7%	-8% / -22%	6% / 5%	-19% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Cinebench R10		-30%	1%	-6%	-2%
Rendering Single 32Bit	5453	4773 -12%	5547 2%	5104 -6%	5283 -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit	20388	10668 -48%	20433 0%	19276 -5%	20302 0%
Cinebench R11.5		-33%	1%	-5%	-6%
CPU Single 64Bit	1.68	1.46 -13%	1.68 0%	1.54 -8%	1.48 -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit	7.42	3.5 -53%	7.48 1%	7.35 -1%	7.46 1%
Cinebench R15		-32%	1%	-5%	-6%
CPU Single 64Bit	146	130 -11%	148 1%	133 -9%	129 -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit	673	323 -52%	677 1%	669 -1%	676 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-32% / -32%	1% / 1%	-5% / -5%	-5% / -4%

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5453

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20388

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6672

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

39.67 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.42 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

673 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

44.81 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
PCMark 7		-3%	-2%	41%	36%
Score	4714	4131 -12%	4673 -1%	5829 24%	5918 26%
Creativity	7837	7266 -7%	7654 -2%	10382 32%	9899 26%
Productivity	3507	3494 0%	3382 -4%	5180 48%	5008 43%
Lightweight	3709	3941 6%	3745 1%	5889 59%	5543 49%
PCMark 8		-12%	7%	8%	11%
Work Score Accelerated v2	4503	3881 -14%	4747 5%	4972 10%	5011 11%
Home Score Accelerated v2	3452	3113 -10%	3719 8%	3637 5%	3845 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-8% / -6%	3% / 1%	25% / 30%	24% / 28%

PCMark 7 Score		4714 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3452 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4503 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

HD Tune

Toshiba MQ02ABD100H

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 51 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 112.3 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 88.3 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso: 17.9 ms

Índice de Explosão: 71.5 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 3.8 %

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	5678 Points +24%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	4703 Points +3%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	4624 Points +1%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	4579 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	4488 Points -2%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	4255 Points -7%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	4036 Points +38%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	3410 Points +17%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	2918 Points 0%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	2917 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	2726 Points -7%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	2675 Points -8%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	17554 Points +20%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	16063 Points +10%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	14828 Points +2%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	14578 Points
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	14081 Points -3%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	9818 Points -33%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	84441 Points +45%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	84067 Points +44%
Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	61456 Points +5%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	58288 Points

3DMark 11 Performance		4579 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		58288 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		14578 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2917 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider | BioShock Infinite | Dirt Rally

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	37.7 (35^min - 41^max) fps +8%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	37.5 (35^min - 42^max) fps +7%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	35 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	21.4 (19^min - 24^max) fps +2%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	21 (19^min - 23^max) fps 0%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	21 fps

BioShock Infinite
1366x768 Medium Preset
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	137.3 fps +35%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	113 fps +11%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	101.5 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	96.2 fps -5%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	67.9 fps -33%
1366x768 High Preset
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	122.5 fps +45%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	99 fps +17%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	84.3 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	78.2 fps -7%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	62 fps -26%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	46.5 fps +68%
MSI PE60 2QD GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630	38.3 fps +38%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	27.7 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	26.9 fps -3%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	26.5 fps -4%

Dirt Rally
1366x768 Medium Preset
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	106.4 fps +17%
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	102.9 fps +13%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	90.7 fps
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	53 (36^min - 76^max) fps -42%
1920x1080 High Preset
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	60.2 fps +7%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	56.3 fps
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	52.2 fps -7%
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	38.8 (28^min - 55^max) fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	24.6 fps +13%
Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	22.2 fps +2%
Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	21.7 fps
Asus N551ZU-CN007H Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	20.7 (16^min - 33^max) fps -5%

	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	101.5	84.3	27.7
Dirt Rally (2015)	90.7	56.3	21.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	35	21

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 15ISK 80NW GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Noise		-2%	-2%	5%	-0%
off / environment *	31.3
Idle Minimum *	33.1	32.1 3%	32.6 2%	30 9%	30.4 8%
Idle Average *	33.2	32.9 1%	32.6 2%	30 10%	30.5 8%
Idle Maximum *	33.2	33.7 -2%	32.6 2%	31.3 6%	33.3 -0%
Load Average *	37.7	42 -11%	42.7 -13%	36.9 2%	41.4 -10%
Load Maximum *	43.4	44.8 -3%	45.5 -5%	44.7 -3%	47 -8%

* ... smaller is better

Barulho

Ocioso		33.1 / 33.2 / 33.2 dB
HDD		33.3 dB
DVD		37.7 / dB
Carga		37.7 / 43.4 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.3 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


39.4 °C	33.9 °C	27.5 °C
41.5 °C	36.6 °C	28 °C
30.4 °C	32.2 °C	28.9 °C

Máximo: 41.5 °C
Médio: 33.2 °C


25.4 °C	30.8 °C	39 °C
25.6 °C	38.1 °C	38.4 °C
27.5 °C	26.5 °C	27.6 °C

Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 31 °C

alimentação elétrica 51.9 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).

	Asus N552VX-FY103T GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H	Asus N551JK-CN166H GeForce GTX 850M, 4200H, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A9E680	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABF050H (SSHD 500 + 8 GB)	Asus GL552JX-CN154H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF
Power Consumption		-6%	3%	4%
Idle Minimum *	7	8.6 -23%	6 14%	6.2 11%
Idle Average *	10.9	12 -10%	9.8 10%	10.3 6%
Idle Maximum *	12.9	13 -1%	11.4 12%	12.2 5%
Load Average *	72	72.2 -0%	84 -17%	77 -7%
Load Maximum *	109	104 5%	113.5 -4%	105 4%

* ... smaller is better

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Ocioso	7 / 10.9 / 12.9 Watt
Carga	72 / 109 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 57min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 28min
DVD		1h 57min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 08min

	Asus N552VX-FY103T 44 Wh	Asus N551JK-CN166H 56 Wh	Acer Aspire V5-591G-71K2 56 Wh	Asus GL552JX-CN154H 48 Wh
Battery Runtime		17%	51%	-3%
Reader / Idle	357	436 22%	715 100%	223 -38%
WiFi v1.3	268		255 -5%	221 -18%
Load	68	76 12%	108 59%	100 47%
WiFi		271

Pro

+ Sem afogamentos no modo de CA

+ Muito boa utilização do Turbo no modo de CA

+ teclado iluminado muito bom e silencioso

+ Touchpad muito bom

+ Tela muito boa

+ Baixas emissões e temperaturas

+ Slot M.2 livre

+ quad-core i7, 8 threads

+ Wi-Fi Dual-band

+ Excelente qualidade de áudio

+ Carcaça bem construída com partes de alumínio

+ Destaques visuais elegantes, design bem-sucedido

Contra

- Afogamento médio a alto no modo de bateria dependendo do aplicativo

- Bateria não removível e de baixa capacidade

- Geforce 950M somente com 2048 MB DDR3

- Slot M.2 não acessível via escotilha de manutenção

- Sem acesso à ventoinha (desmontagem necessária)

- Teclado reduzido

- Nem BluRay, nem painel 4K disponível no momento do teste

In review: Asus N552VX-FY103T. Review sample courtesy of Asus Germany

Placa de vídeo Nvidia GeForce 950M junto com 2048 MB de VRAM DDR3 não é realmente adequado para gamers ambiciosos. Jogos atuais precisarão de reduzir os detalhes gráficos e/ou resolução. No entanto, todos os outros ambos de aplicação do setor multimídia são completamente cobertos. Por isso, os usuários que podem deixar de lado sessões de jogos com configurações altas e usar normalmente o portátil no modo de CA, obterão uma plataforma muito boa com o Asus N552VX-FY103T. A construção é impecável, o mesmo que a tela, som, dispositivos de entrada, desempenho (modo CA), temperaturas e emissões.

Infelizmente, o aparelho de talentos múltiplos que provavelmente muitos esperavam não foi descoberto aqui.

Com um preço de menos de 1000 Euros (~$1121), o modelo de teste é atualmente uma solução com uma boa razão de preço-desempenho. Uma boa alternativa com um preço 30% superior é o Acer Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4. É um portátil de 17-polegadas que também sofre de afogamento no modo de bateria. O afogamento é um termo desconhecido para o Lenovo Y700 15ISK 80NW, mas ele perde pontos na avaliação da tela.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Asus N552VX-FY103T - 2016-12-09 12/09/2016 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Conrad

Acabamento

83 / 98 → 85%

Teclado

87%

Mouse

96%

Conectividade

55 / 81 → 68%

Peso

60 / 20-67 → 85%

Bateria

78%

Pantalha

86%

Desempenho do jogos

75 / 85 → 88%

Desempenho da aplicação

85 / 92 → 93%

Temperatura

93%

Ruído

82 / 95 → 86%

Audio

80%

Camera

52 / 85 → 61%

Médio

78%

85%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus N552VX-FY103T

Marcus Conrad, 2016-03-27 (Update: 2016-03-30)