Breve Análise do Portátil Asus GX700
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 93 %
iluminação com acumulador: 332 cd/m²
Contraste: 976:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.45 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Asus GX700 LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8) | MSI GT72S 6QF Name: LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, ID: LGD0469 | SCHENKER XMG U726 AU B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B) | SCHENKER XMG U716 AU B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B) | SCHENKER XMG U706 LG LP173WF4-SPD1 | SCHENKER XMG P706 LG LP173WF4-SPD1 | Asus G752VT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 36% | 36% | 0% | 0% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.7 | 67.6 1% | 87 30% | 86.5 30% | 66.6 0% | 66.9 0% | 66.3 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 84.9 | 86.1 1% | 100 18% | 100 18% | 84.7 0% | 84.6 0% | 84.5 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 62.1 | 63 1% | 98.9 59% | 99 59% | 61.9 0% | 61.8 0% | 61.8 0% |
Response Times | -24% | -25% | -3% | ||||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37 ? | 43 ? -16% | 45 ? -22% | 30.4 ? 18% | |||
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 29 ? -32% | 28 ? -27% | 27.2 ? -24% | |||
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | 15% | 15% | 12% | 7% | 1% | 9% | |
Brightness middle | 332 | 356.7 7% | 330 -1% | 374 13% | 298 -10% | 306 -8% | 357.2 8% |
Brightness | 319 | 326 2% | 327 3% | 356 12% | 287 -10% | 302 -5% | 339 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 85 -9% | 86 -8% | 88 -5% | 91 -2% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.282 17% | 0.38 -12% | 0.4 -18% | 0.305 10% | 0.34 -0% | 0.366 -8% |
Contrast | 976 | 1265 30% | 868 -11% | 935 -4% | 977 0% | 900 -8% | 976 0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.35 | 4.16 22% | 3 44% | 4.23 21% | 4.16 22% | 5.49 -3% | 3.69 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.45 | 2.47 62% | 3.81 41% | 5.48 15% | 3.13 51% | 3.97 38% | 3.05 53% |
Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.29 96% | 2.52 87% | 2.35 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 7048 92% | 6860 95% | 6306 103% | 6686 97% | 6213 105% | 6163 105% | 6164 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 56 0% | 88 57% | 88 57% | 55.5 -1% | 55.5 -1% | 55 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 85 | 85 0% | 100 18% | 100 18% | 84.5 -1% | 84.5 -1% | 84 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.3 | 6.7 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
6% | 26% /
20% | 8% /
12% | 4% /
5% | 1% /
1% | 2% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT | |
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT |
PCMark 7 Score | 7933 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5669 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 8162 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6122 pontos | |
Ajuda |
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT |
Asus GX700 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0) | MSI GT72S 6QF 2x Micron M600 MTFDDAV128MBF NVMe (RAID 0) | SCHENKER XMG U726 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG U716 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG U706 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | SCHENKER XMG P706 Samsung SM951 MZHPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -24% | -30% | -30% | -16% | -32% | |
Seq Write | 2525 | 1279 -49% | 1500 -41% | 1516 -40% | 1492 -41% | 1273 -50% |
Seq Read | 2964 | 2544 -14% | 1943 -34% | 1942 -34% | 1963 -34% | 1863 -37% |
4K Read | 46.43 | 42.98 -7% | 40.45 -13% | 40.86 -12% | 48.99 6% | 39.93 -14% |
4K Write | 119.6 | 97.8 -18% | 103.6 -13% | 102.8 -14% | 141.7 18% | 95.3 -20% |
Score Total | 3655 | 2568 -30% | 1930 -47% | 1910 -48% | 2630 -28% | 2278 -38% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 15462 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 179732 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 30430 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11440 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Score (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
MSI GT72S 6QF | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 | |
SCHENKER XMG P706 | |
Asus G752VT |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U726 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
SCHENKER XMG U706 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anno 2205 (2015) | 168.2 | 156.2 | 103.1 | 34.2 | 41 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (2015) | 184.1 | 179.7 | 103.8 | 92.7 | 35.7 |
Fallout 4 (2015) | 195.2 | 173.4 | 99.8 | 80.8 | 34.4 |
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 200 | 199.2 | 123.6 | 103.9 | 40.7 |
Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 96.3 | 94.6 | 78.4 | 32.3 | 28.6 |
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 327.5 | 247.7 | 149.4 | 114.1 | 50.4 |
Just Cause 3 (2015) | 168.1 | 157.4 | 100.6 | 87 | 38.2 |
Just Cause 3 | |
1920x1080 Very High / On AA:SM AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High / On AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Rainbow Six Siege | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Star Wars Battlefront | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Assassin's Creed Syndicate | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:4x MSAA + FX (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
Desktop PC | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Fallout 4 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 | |
1920x1080 Extra / On AA:T2x SM (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High / On AA:FX (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Anno 2205 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:8x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:4x (sort by value) | |
Asus GX700 | |
SCHENKER XMG U716 | |
Schenker W504 | |
Schenker W504 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33 / 35 / 42 dB |
Carga |
| 46 / 48 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) |
Asus GX700 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Asus G752VT GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | 7% | 2% | 14% | 11% | 11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 33.1 -0% | 33 -0% | 33 -0% | 29 12% | 30.9 6% | 32.9 -0% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 33.3 5% | 34 3% | 35 -0% | 30.8 12% | 31.2 11% | 33 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 42 | 37 12% | 35 17% | 38 10% | 30.8 27% | 31.2 26% | 33.1 21% |
Load Average * | 46 | 39 15% | 42 9% | 45 2% | 42.1 8% | 40.5 12% | 36.2 21% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 52.2 -9% | 46 4% | 48 -0% | 43.5 9% | 47 2% | 45.8 5% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.7 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 0 °C / 32 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-11.3 °C / -20.4 F).
Asus GX700 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Asus G752VT GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 16% | -5% | -8% | -2% | 6% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48.7 | 39.8 18% | 46.9 4% | 48.8 -0% | 45.6 6% | 44 10% | 37.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 27.8 13% | 36.3 -13% | 36.7 -15% | 34.9 -9% | 31.7 1% | 31.6 1% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 61 | 55.8 | 52.4 | 42.3 | 38 | |
Idle Bottom * | 26 | 40.8 | 37.3 | 36.3 | 29.9 | 30.6 |
* ... smaller is better
desligado | 0.6 / 2.4 Watt |
Ocioso | 40 / 45 / 51 Watt |
Carga |
149 / 313 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus GX700 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Asus G752VT GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | 6% | 31% | 52% | |||
Idle Minimum * | 40 | 36 10% | 35 12% | 22 45% | 12 70% | ||
Idle Average * | 45 | 45 -0% | 44 2% | 28.9 36% | 17.9 60% | ||
Idle Maximum * | 51 | 53 -4% | 51 -0% | 29.8 42% | 19.3 62% | ||
Load Average * | 149 | 139 7% | 134 10% | 126.8 15% | 97.7 34% | ||
Load Maximum * | 313 | 306 2% | 298 5% | 261.6 16% | 213 32% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GX700 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | MSI GT72S 6QF GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK | SCHENKER XMG U726 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U716 GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6700 | SCHENKER XMG U706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700K | SCHENKER XMG P706 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK | Asus G752VT GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 47% | -4% | -11% | 6% | 40% | -2% | |
Reader / Idle | 201 | 387 93% | 170 -15% | 158 -21% | 245 22% | 297 48% | 230 14% |
H.264 | 136 | 161 18% | 220 62% | ||||
Load | 88 | 89 1% | 94 7% | 88 0% | 69 -22% | 97 10% | 72 -18% |
Pro
Contra
O GX700 deixou impressões muito misturadas depois que finalizamos os testes. A ideia de usar um resfriamento com água soa bastante promissor na teoria, mas dificilmente podemos encontrar vantagens sobre os portáteis resfriado a ar, na prática. Sim, o portátil é mais fino e leve que outros sistemas de gama alta, mas o desempenho pleno somente está disponível com o resfriamento a água montado. O GX700 não é silencioso, nem compacto com a Estação Hidráulica externa.
As temperaturas um pouco mais baixas do hardware e as velocidades um pouco superiores não conseguem compensar completamente as desvantagens do resfriamento a água (peso enorme, zumbidos, espaço, risco de danos pela água). Em nossa opinião, a Asus deveria ter feito o chassi um pouco mais grosso e ter usado uma CPU de desktop similar a alguns barebones Clevo (P775DM1, P870DM, etc.). Este último também tem a vantagem de um processador substituível. Os barebones Clevo oferecem capacidade manutenção mais confortável, em geral. O GT72S 6QF da MSI também deixa uma melhor impressão em muitas categorias (som, layout de portas, duração da bateria, temperatura do chassi, ruído).
O GX700 oferece alguns recursos que se destacam. Além do touchpad de tamanho generoso, você obtém um painel IPS de alto contraste e os SSDs M.2 (RAID-0) incrivelmente velozes.
Em resumo, os fanáticos da Asus devem optar pelo irmão mais econômico G752, que está disponível com uma GeForce GTX 965M, GTX 970M ou GTX 980M. Se tiver que ser uma GTX 980, recomendaríamos um aparelho da concorrência, mais especificamente, da MSI ou Clevo. O GX700 "somente" obtém uma boa avaliação no estado atual.
Nota: A atualização manual da avaliação é causada pela sub pontuação dos jogos, porque uma GTX 980M já chaga muito perto do resultado perfeito de 100% (o sistema provavelmente será ajustado em 2016).
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Asus GX700
- 02/24/2016 v5 (old)
Florian Glaser