Breve Análise do Portátil Asus GL752VW
Asus GL752VW-T4168T (GL752 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1097 MHz, Memoría: 5000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 353.84, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Single-Channel, 1 de 4 slots ocupados
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Chi Mei N173HGE-E11 / CMN1735, TN LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF mSATA, 256 GB
, + 1 x Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2 TB
peso
3 kg, Suprimento de energia: 359 g
Preço
1399 €
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei N173HGE-E11 / CMN1735 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 296 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 267.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 289 cd/m²
Contraste: 1156:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 7.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.6
| Asus GL752VW-T4168T | Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | HP Envy 17-n107ng | MSI PE70-2QEi581 | Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | 2% | -5% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 64.9 | 67 3% | 65.7 1% | 66.6 3% | 67.4 4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 91.3 -4% | 97.2 2% | 84.6 -11% | 84.8 -11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 66.7 2% | 67.6 3% | 61.9 -6% | 62 -6% |
| Response Times | -30% | -46% | -37% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 58 ? -32% | 49 ? -11% | 51.6 ? -17% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 28 ? -27% | 32 ? -45% | 34.4 ? -56% | |
| PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | 198 ? -81% | |||
| Screen | 15% | -32% | -9% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 289 | 346 20% | 341 18% | 305 6% | 349.7 21% |
| Brightness | 268 | 326 22% | 325 21% | 265 -1% | 332 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 88 7% | 91 11% | 79 -4% | 90 10% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.32 -28% | 1.05 -320% | 0.5 -100% | 0.304 -22% |
| Contrast | 1156 | 1081 -6% | 325 -72% | 610 -47% | 1150 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.49 | 4.01 38% | 4.6 29% | 4.83 26% | 3.99 39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.45 | 8.74 24% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 3.58 54% | 6.08 22% | 3.29 58% | 3.34 57% |
| Gamma | 2.6 85% | 2.23 99% | 2.43 91% | 2.39 92% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 8187 79% | 6426 101% | 7627 85% | 7080 92% | 6111 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 62 3% | 56 -7% | 55.8 -7% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 97 2% | 84 -12% | 84.8 -11% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
4% | -25% /
-28% | -7% /
-8% | -9% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1020 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1020 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1020 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 7 Score | 5544 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3434 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4349 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4648 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF mSATA
Sequential Read:
489.7 MB/s
Sequential Write:
448 MB/s
512K Read:
434.7 MB/s
512K Write:
434.7 MB/s
4K Read:
27.76 MB/s
4K Write:
79.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
363.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
301 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL752VW-T4168T | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL752VW-T4168T | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL752VW-T4168T | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5327 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 16847 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3913 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 105 | 55.5 | 45.6 | |
| Just Cause 3 (2015) | 63.5 | 33.8 | 28.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32 / 32 / 32 dB |
| HDD |
| 32.9 dB |
| DVD |
| 36.2 / dB |
| Carga |
| 43.8 / 44 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-15.3 °C / -27.6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-15.3 °C / -27.6 F).
| Asus GL752VW-T4168T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF mSATA | Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP Envy 17-n107ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH | MSI PE70-2QEi581 GeForce GTX 960M, 4210H, Toshiba HG5d THNSNH256GMCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 21% | 35% | -29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 14.5 | 5.8 60% | 5.5 62% | 19.1 -32% |
| Idle Average * | 19.3 | 9 53% | 10.8 44% | 24.3 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 19.5 | 14.7 25% | 11 44% | 29.2 -50% |
| Load Average * | 78 | 85 -9% | 72 8% | 88.6 -14% |
| Load Maximum * | 100 | 121.5 -22% | 85 15% | 122 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 2.8 / 3.9 Watt |
| Ocioso | 14.5 / 19.3 / 19.5 Watt |
| Carga |
78 / 100 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Pro
+ Muitas configurações diferentes
+ Chassi sólido e bem construído
+ USB Tipo C, DisplayPort
+ Veloz leitor de cartões
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Muito boa razão do contraste
+ Muito boa cobertura do espaço de cores (sRGB)
+ Muito boa utilização do Turbo
Contra
- Bateria não acessível pelo exterior
- As dobradiças se movem durante vibrações
- Portas na frente
- Sem IPS
- Um pouco de irritante "bleeding" da luz de fundo
- Erros repetidos no 3DMark 11 com bateria
- Sistema de som fraco
- Consumo muito alto durante o modo inativo
O novo GL752VW da Asus é um sucesso, em geral. Teríamos gostado de ver uma tela IPS, pelo menos como um extra opcional, mas o painel TN é um dos melhores modelos. Isto é evidente quando você considera a razoável estabilidade dos ângulos de visão e a ótima cobertura dos espaços de cores. Também é uma pena que o sistema de som do portátil multimídia seja decepcionante. Podemos ver abordagens boas, mas inconsistentes em termos de manutenção. Há ainda a questão sobre as falhas reprodutíveis com a energia da bateria, o que também pode ser um problema quando você joga jogos ou executa outros aplicativos que são exigentes com a GPU.
O Asus GL752VW com preço razoável não revela problemas sérios que nos impediriam comprá-lo. A carcaça, os dispositivos de entrada e quase todos os aspectos técnicos são convincentes.
O fabricante merece um elogio especial pela configuração de armazenamento quase perfeita que consiste de, pelo menos um veloz SSD de 256 GB e um enorme HD de 2 TB. Este também é o maior problema do Acer Aspire Nitro que foi avaliado de forma um pouco superior, onde você tem que viver com um disco rígido híbrido de 1 TB, portanto, o manuseio não é tão responsivo.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Asus GL752VW-T4168T
- 12/09/2016 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
