Breve Análise do Portátil Asus GL703GE (Core i7-8750H, GTX 1050 Ti)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-w206ng | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 | |
| Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 331.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1068:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.86 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.66
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.268
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 Chi Mei CMN1747, TN, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 AU Optronics B173HAN01.1, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 17-w206ng Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | MSI GE72 7RE-046 N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN LED, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | -17% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 90.1 | 61.5 -32% | 67.2 -25% | 90.7 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 87.2 -13% | 93.1 -7% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 83.1 | 62.7 -25% | 67.4 -19% | 85.2 3% |
| Response Times | -172% | -174% | -68% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.6 ? | 30.8 ? -166% | 38 ? -228% | 27 ? -133% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 8.8 ? | 24.4 ? -177% | 26 ? -195% | 9 ? -2% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 200 ? -99% | ||
| Screen | -17% | -12% | -24% | |
| Brightness middle | 331.1 | 319.5 -4% | 318 -4% | 253 -24% |
| Brightness | 312 | 293 -6% | 295 -5% | 230 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 67 -22% | 79 -8% | 86 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.65 -110% | 0.25 19% | 0.24 23% |
| Contrast | 1068 | 492 -54% | 1272 19% | 1054 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.86 | 3.17 -11% | 4.7 -64% | 5.01 -75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.35 | 5.32 16% | 8.8 -39% | 10.4 -64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.66 | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 1.6 63% | 5 -16% | 7.26 -69% |
| Gamma | 2.268 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.28 96% | 2.09 105% |
| CCT | 7034 92% | 6668 97% | 7374 88% | 6329 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75 | 56 -25% | 61 -19% | 76 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 87 -13% | 93 -7% | 100 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -71% /
-39% | -68% /
-44% | -30% /
-24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 25 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4148 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5254 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5288 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4532 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | HP Omen 17-w206ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GE72 7RE-046 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | |||||
| Copy Game MB/s | 343.5 | 250.5 -27% | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 101.8 | 174.9 72% | |||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 443.6 | 392.7 -11% | |||
| Score Total | 634 | 2172 243% | 969 53% | 2536 300% | 1113 76% |
| Score Write | 196 | 165 -16% | 324 65% | 939 379% | 307 57% |
| Score Read | 311 | 1390 347% | 424 36% | 1092 251% | 595 91% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.07 | 1.881 -2587% | 0.032 54% | 0.046 34% | 0.056 20% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.27 | 0.056 79% | 0.119 56% | 0.119 56% | 0.146 46% |
| 4K-64 Write | 116 | 129.5 12% | 175.3 51% | 742 540% | 181.2 56% |
| 4K-64 Read | 193.1 | 1101 470% | 351.1 82% | 847 339% | 337.1 75% |
| 4K Write | 59.1 | 1.31 -98% | 101.5 72% | 80.4 36% | 92.7 57% |
| 4K Read | 18.93 | 48.92 158% | 21.41 13% | 23.36 23% | 24.78 31% |
| Seq Write | 212.8 | 346.2 63% | 475.5 123% | 1163 447% | 334.3 57% |
| Seq Read | 993 | 2399 142% | 515 -48% | 2213 123% | 2335 135% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 32246 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9097 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 131234 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25678 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7074 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3602 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Counter-Strike: GO - 1920x1080 (Very) High, FXAA AA:4x MS AF:8x (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile () | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (14 - 38, n=31) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Rocket League - 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX (sort by value) | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile (106 - 158, n=4) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 124 | |||
| Dota 2 (2013) | 65 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 26 | |||
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 42 | 41 | ||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 38 | 19 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 108 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 41 | |||
| Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 60 | 44 | 37 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 30 / 32 dB |
| Carga |
| 36 / 48.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 128 GB | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Acer Nitro 5 AN515-52 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -3% | -13% | -12% | -2% | -10% | -1% | 6% | ||
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 28.4 -1% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 29 -3% | 27.8 1% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 30.2 -7% | 34 -21% | 34 -21% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 31.1 -10% | 27.8 1% | |
| Idle Average * | 30 | 30.2 -1% | 35 -17% | 35 -17% | 31 -3% | 31 -3% | 31.1 -4% | 27.8 7% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 30.2 6% | 36 -13% | 36 -13% | 34 -6% | 35 -9% | 31.1 3% | 27.8 13% | |
| Load Average * | 36 | 38.4 -7% | 47 -31% | 41 -14% | 43 -19% | 49 -36% | 38.7 -8% | 35 3% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.8 | 49.7 -2% | 48 2% | 42 14% | 51 -5% | 44.2 9% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 54.5 -12% | 52 -7% | 49 -0% | 44 10% | 54 -11% | 42.5 13% | 44.2 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.6 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.4 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ | Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172 | HP Omen 17-w206ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI GE72 7RE-046 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 128 GB | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -7% | 11% | 19% | 18% | 12% | 32% | 25% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 58.6 | 64.6 -10% | 55.6 5% | 45.8 22% | 49 16% | 53 10% | 42.7 27% | 44.8 24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 59.4 | 57.2 4% | 57.7 3% | 45.2 24% | 63 -6% | 65 -9% | 38.8 35% | 40 33% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 37.6 -7% | 32.2 8% | 31.7 9% | 24 31% | 26 26% | 24.4 30% | 28 20% |
| Idle Bottom * | 37 | 43 -16% | 27.2 26% | 29.9 19% | 25 32% | 30 19% | 23.2 37% | 29.4 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GL703GE-ES73 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GE72 7RE-046 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.09 / 0.32 Watt |
| Ocioso | 12.8 / 18.1 / 24.7 Watt |
| Carga |
98.4 / 114.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, TN, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | 4% | -4% | -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12.8 | 17.3 -35% | 11 14% | 14 -9% | 14 -9% |
| Idle Average * | 18.1 | 21.8 -20% | 18 1% | 20 -10% | 18 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 23 7% | 24 3% | 25 -1% | 22 11% |
| Load Average * | 98.4 | 79.2 20% | 84 15% | 82 17% | 91 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 122.5 | 101 18% | 142 -16% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 114.6 | 158.2 -38% | 146 -27% | 135 -18% | 173 -51% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus GL703GE-ES73 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 64 Wh | Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 64 Wh | HP Omen 17-w206ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 62 Wh | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 51.4 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh | MSI GV72 7RD-1048XPL i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 41.4 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G i5-8305G, Vega M GL / 870, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -17% | 89% | -36% | 144% | -1% | 85% | |
| Reader / Idle | 347 | 241 -31% | 795 129% | 762 120% | 345 -1% | 663 91% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 286 | 189 -34% | 380 33% | 184 -36% | 513 79% | 564 97% | |
| Load | 47 | 53 13% | 96 104% | 156 232% | 78 66% | ||
| WiFi | 200 |
Pro
Contra
O Asus GL703GE é, em essência, um refinamento da linha ROG Strix de 17 polegadas da Asus. A variante GTX 1050 Ti marca muitas caixas de verificação sem deixar muitas coisas de lado. A estrela do show é, sem dúvida, o Intel Core i7-8750H. O novo processador hexa-core certamente chegará para a maioria dos portáteis de jogos este ano, e embora o GL703GE seja uma exibição decente das capacidades do novo processador, pode não ser o melhor. Há uma melhora substancial em relação ao i7-7700HQ de quatro núcleos, mas o GL703GE fica um pouco atrás de outras máquinas 8750H. Ainda assim, a Coffee Lake traz a atualização que os processadores Intel de 45 Watt precisaram por anos e com certeza será aclamada por jogadores e outros usuários avançados.
Embora a GeForce GTX 1050 Ti não seja totalmente capaz de aproveitar o 8750H, ela consegue um bom equilíbrio entre desempenho e eficiência. A tela de 120 Hz torna o dispositivo atraente para os jogadores competitivos. Os jogos parecem nítidos e fluentes, e alguns títulos competitivos podem passar de 100 FPS para aproveitar totalmente a maior taxa de atualização. Uma GTX 1060 ofereceria melhores resultados à custa de mais calor e maior consumo de energia. O resto do dispositivo continua sendo um excelente pacote.
Em resumo, o novo Coffee Lake Core i7-8750H da Intel é um benefício para tarefas que exigem muito do processador. No entanto, apesar da que a nova CPU se posiciona como o ponto de venda, a GTX 1050 Ti não é exatamente a GPU que o 8750H merece. A menos que você precise da CPU atualizada para o trabalho pesado do processador, há poucas razões para atualizar. Com o seu preço de rua recomendado de $1.250 USD, o GL703GE é um valor insatisfatório pelo que oferece; a GPU parece ser uma má combinação para o processador. O GL703VM, que combina uma GTX 1060 e um Core i7-7700HQ, pode ser um valor melhor por apenas $100 adicionais.
Asus GL703GE-ES73
- 05/12/2018 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
