Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Asus GL702VM-GC102D
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D (jseb) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D (jseb) | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 326 cd/m²
Contraste: 652:1 (Preto: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.37 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.37
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-w110ng IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte P57X v6 IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GS73VR 6RF TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | SCHENKER XMG P507 IPS, 60 Hz, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 5% | 32% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.1 | 66.6 2% | 68 4% | 90 38% | 64.5 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.5 | 84.1 1% | 87.5 5% | 99.9 20% | 83.4 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.1 | 61.5 1% | 64 5% | 83.6 37% | 61 0% |
| Response Times | -1% | 1% | 42% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 37 ? 3% | 33.6 ? 12% | 28 ? 26% | 36 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 24 ? -4% | 25.6 ? -11% | 9.6 ? 58% | 23 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 24% | 17% | 33% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 326 | 362 11% | 329.2 1% | 337.2 3% | 288 -12% |
| Brightness | 312 | 342 10% | 321 3% | 315 1% | 292 -6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 93 2% | 86 -5% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.31 38% | 0.267 47% | 0.308 38% | 0.3 40% |
| Contrast | 652 | 1168 79% | 1233 89% | 1095 68% | 960 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 4.5 29% | 5.93 6% | 2.96 53% | 5.1 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.69 | 9.31 20% | 11.07 5% | 5.45 53% | 9.44 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.37 | 3.48 53% | 6.72 9% | 2.57 65% | 4.43 40% |
| Gamma | 2.37 93% | 2.23 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.46 89% |
| CCT | 7116 91% | 6144 106% | 7611 85% | 7114 91% | 6687 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 55 0% | 57 4% | 74.3 35% | 55 0% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83 | 84 1% | 87 5% | 100 20% | 83 0% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
16% | 8% /
12% | 36% /
34% | 6% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4114 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4670 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6361 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4809 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 | MSI CX72-7QLi581 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | HP Omen 17-w110ng Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Gigabyte P57X v6 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -20% | 12718% | 7576% | 5569% | |
| Read Seq | 134.6 | 102.8 -24% | 1156 759% | 481.7 258% | 334.3 148% |
| Write Seq | 130.6 | 100.2 -23% | 294.9 126% | 315.4 142% | 319 144% |
| Read 512 | 44.85 | 34.83 -22% | 616 1273% | 303.1 576% | 242.3 440% |
| Write 512 | 63.3 | 46.87 -26% | 294.7 366% | 314.4 397% | 254.4 302% |
| Read 4k | 0.602 | 0.422 -30% | 42.7 6993% | 25.93 4207% | 20.3 3272% |
| Write 4k | 1.146 | 1.063 -7% | 153.3 13277% | 84.6 7282% | 42.51 3609% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 1.106 | 0.918 -17% | 600 54150% | 273.9 24665% | 251.6 22649% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 1.186 | 1.064 -10% | 295.3 24799% | 274.9 23079% | 167.1 13989% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 19244 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11159 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 113032 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22619 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9432 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 5067 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3536 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| XMG P723 Pro | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| XMG P723 Pro | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI RX 470 Gaming X 4GB | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| XMG P723 Pro | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB | |
| MSI GL72 6QF | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 344.9 | 325.4 | 286.2 | 138.4 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 195.1 | 177.3 | 166.4 | 98.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 180.1 | 167.2 | 151.4 | 99.1 |
| X-Plane 10.25 (2013) | 81.8 | 46.6 | 24.5 | 24.5 |
| Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 147.5 | 130.9 | 109 | 85.7 |
| GTA V (2015) | 122.3 | 117.7 | 90.3 | 48.2 |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 51.2 | 49.1 | 47.5 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 65 | 61.9 | 48.7 | 27.3 |
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 232.7 | 216.2 | 198.6 | 197.9 |
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 51.3 | 47.1 | 40.1 | |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 116.4 | 104.9 | 87.4 | 79 |
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 209.3 | 179.6 | 165.1 | 153.9 |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 143.4 | 143 | 89.3 | 80.2 |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v6 | |
| HP Omen 17-w110ng | |
| MSI GS73VR 6RF | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| Battlefield 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.4 / 31.4 / 31.5 dB |
| HDD |
| 31.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 40.9 / 46.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -7% | -5% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 30.5 | 30 2% | 29.7 3% | 28.4 7% | 30 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.4 | 33 -5% | 33.2 -6% | 31.9 -2% | 31 1% |
| Idle Average * | 31.4 | 34 -8% | 33.2 -6% | 32 -2% | 32 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 35 -11% | 33.2 -5% | 34 -8% | 38 -21% |
| Load Average * | 40.9 | 45 -10% | 47.5 -16% | 47 -15% | 46 -12% |
| Load Maximum * | 46.2 | 52 -13% | 52.5 -14% | 49.4 -7% | 49 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.1 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.9 °C / 82.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1 °C / 1.8 F).
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | -13% | 0% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53.1 | 45 15% | 59 -11% | 50.8 4% | 49.3 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.9 | 54.3 -21% | 66 -47% | 60 -34% | 52.7 -17% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.9 | 29.6 10% | 33.2 -1% | 27.4 17% | 32.6 1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.4 | 28.6 14% | 30.6 8% | 28.8 14% | 29.5 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Asus GL702VM-GC102D audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.44 / 0.57 Watt |
| Ocioso | 15.6 / 20.2 / 21.4 Watt |
| Carga |
90 / 147 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -24% | -39% | -40% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 15.6 | 19 -22% | 18.4 -18% | 22.6 -45% | 11 29% |
| Idle Average * | 20.2 | 25 -24% | 22.8 -13% | 32.7 -62% | 16 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21.4 | 31 -45% | 24 -12% | 32.8 -53% | 21 2% |
| Load Average * | 90 | 90 -0% | 175.5 -95% | 114.7 -27% | 80 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 147 | 193 -31% | 229.5 -56% | 167.9 -14% | 174 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
| Asus GL702VM-GC102D 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 76 Wh | HP Omen 17-w110ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 95 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v6 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | 5% | -13% | 22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 353 | 432 22% | 418 18% | 353 0% | 409 16% |
| H.264 | 262 | 233 -11% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 250 | 247 -1% | 201 -20% | 213 -15% | 274 10% |
| Load | 87 | 115 32% | 103 18% | 66 -24% | 123 41% |
Com o GL702VM, a Asus oferece um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas relativamente fino. Mas não se engane pelo exterior fino; o portátil vem com uma boa dose de poder de processamento. Um quad-core Core i7 e um núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1060da Nvidia formam uma dupla que pode rodar todos os jogos atuais em resolução Full HD com configurações de qualidade altas ou máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia se encarrega da imagem suave. Apesar do poderoso hardware, a produção de calor está dentro dos limites. O ruído do portátil também é aceitável.
Com o GL702VM, a Asus entrega um sólido portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas.
Graças ao disco rígido de 1TB, o armazenamento é amplo, no entanto, pode ser substituído. Isto requereria retirar a bandeja inferior, que também seria uma oportunidade de equipar o portátil com um SSD M.2 (SATA ou NVMe), dado que há um slot livre. A tela IPS mate deleita com seus ângulos de visão estáveis e brilho suficiente. O contraste poderia ser mais alto O teclado instalado cumpre com as demandas do uso doméstico. Se você escreve muito, no entanto, deveria procurar outro modelo. Por causa da GPU integrada desativada, o consumo de energia é mais alto em um modo inativo. Consequentemente, a duração da bateria é pior do que poderia ser. Isto, no entanto, é secundário quando se trata de portáteis de jogos.
Pro
Contra
Com o GL702VM, a Asus oferece um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas relativamente fino. Mas não se engane pelo exterior fino; o portátil vem com uma boa dose de poder de processamento. Um quad-core Core i7 e um núcleo gráfico GeForce GTX 1060da Nvidia formam uma dupla que pode rodar todos os jogos atuais em resolução Full HD com configurações de qualidade altas ou máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia se encarrega da imagem suave. Apesar do poderoso hardware, a produção de calor está dentro dos limites. O ruído do portátil também é aceitável.
Com o GL702VM, a Asus entrega um sólido portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas.
Graças ao disco rígido de 1TB, o armazenamento é amplo, no entanto, pode ser substituído. Isto requereria retirar a bandeja inferior, que também seria uma oportunidade de equipar o portátil com um SSD M.2 (SATA ou NVMe), dado que há um slot livre. A tela IPS mate deleita com seus ângulos de visão estáveis e brilho suficiente. O contraste poderia ser mais alto O teclado instalado cumpre com as demandas do uso doméstico. Se você escreve muito, no entanto, deveria procurar outro modelo. Por causa da GPU integrada desativada, o consumo de energia é mais alto em um modo inativo. Consequentemente, a duração da bateria é pior do que poderia ser. Isto, no entanto, é secundário quando se trata de portáteis de jogos.
Asus GL702VM-GC102D
-
12/05/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck