Breve Análise do Portátil Asus G501JW

Name: Asus G501JW
Brand: Asus

Uma nova república. O ROG mais fino certamente é mais veloz, mas os recortes são inevitáveis. A Asus o chama de o portátil para jogos mais silencioso e ultra-fino no mercado, com um dos mais velozes SSDs disponíveis. O que poderia dar errado?

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 05/23/2015 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Haswell Laptop / Notebook Windows

Test device courtesy of Asus US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus G501JW (G501 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-4720HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.6 GHz, Haswell

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1097 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, 345.05, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, DDR3 SDRAM, 800 MHz, Dual-Channel, 11-11-11-28

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel, Samsung ID: SD4348, Name: LTN156FL02-101, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM87 (Lynx Point)

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL, 512 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Lynx Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Headset Combo, Card Reader: Leitor de cartões 2-em-1 ( SD/ SDXC)

Funcionamento em rede

10/100/1000 LAN Card (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 20.6 x 383 x 255

Bateria

96 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 8.1 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Câmera Web HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2-alto falantes Band & Olufsen , Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, USB-RJ45 adapter, mini-DisplayPort-VGA adapter, Asus Cerberus Headset, 3.5 mm mic-audio splitter, User manual, Warranty card, Asus Live Update, ROG Game First III, Asus ROG Gaming Mouse, Intel Control Center

peso

2.06 kg, Suprimento de energia: 540 g

Preço

1999 Euro

Links

Asus página inicial
Asus Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Alienware 15 Asus GL551JK-CN128H Acer Aspire VN7-591G-727P MSI GS60 2QE Ghost Pro 4K (2QEUi716SR51G) Gigabyte P35X v3 Asus G501JW HP Omen DIN A4 ❌

Right: 3.5 mm combo, SD reader, 2x USB 3.0

Left: AC adapter, Mini-Displayport/ Thunderbolt, HDMI-out, 1x USB 3.0


332.6 cd/m²	351.1 cd/m²	331.3 cd/m²
325 cd/m²	336.8 cd/m²	291.5 cd/m²
308.3 cd/m²	303.8 cd/m²	270.8 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Samsung ID: SD4348, Name: LTN156FL02-101 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 351.1 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 316.8 cd/m²
iluminação: 77 %
iluminação com acumulador: 275.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 635:1 (Preto: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.01 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
47.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
51.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
50% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Display 2)

	Asus G501JW	Acer Aspire VN7-591G-727P	MSI GS60 2QE Ghost Pro 4K (2QEUi716SR51G)	Gigabyte P35X v3	Asus GL551JK-CN128H
Display		16%	0%	19%	14%
Display P3 Coverage	50	64.9 30%	49.93 0%	61.7 23%	59.1 18%
sRGB Coverage	75	66.9 -11%	75.2 0%	85.1 13%	81.4 9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	51.6	66.9 30%	51.6 0%	61.7 20%	58.8 14%
Screen		15%	3%	15%	1%
Brightness middle	336.8	322 -4%	241 -28%	374 11%	284 -16%
Brightness	317	325 3%	228 -28%	350 10%	288 -9%
Brightness Distribution	77	90 17%	87 13%	90 17%	83 8%
Black Level *	0.53	0.37 30%	0.45 15%	0.45 15%	0.49 8%
Contrast	635	870 37%	536 -16%	831 31%	580 -9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	7.02	3.77 46%	3.73 47%	4.25 39%	6.02 14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.01	5.36 -34%	3.23 19%	4.9 -22%	4.01 -0%
Gamma	2.1 ^105%	2.39 ^92%	2.3 ^96%	2.36 ^93%	3.11 ^71%
CCT	6642 ^98%	7163 ^91%	6610 ^98%	6294 ^103%	6102 ^107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	47.67	61 28%	47 -1%	56 17%	53 11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		16% / 16%	2% / 2%	17% / 16%	8% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6762 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

24303 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

6713 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6699

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

18816

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5105

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

62.5 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

6.5 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.42 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

80.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

491 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

134 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R15 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M | X264 HD Benchmark 4.0

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	1.42 Points
MSI GE62 2QD	1.59 Points +12%
Eurocom X8	1.77 Points +25%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	6.5 Points
MSI GE62 2QD	7.3 Points +12%
One M73-2N	6.78 Points +4%
Eurocom X8	7.64 Points +18%
OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	62.5 fps
MSI GE62 2QD	59.2 fps -5%
One M73-2N	22.54 fps -64%
Eurocom X8	74.9 fps +20%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	134 Points
MSI GE62 2QD	140 Points +4%
Eurocom X8	157 Points +17%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	491 Points
MSI GE62 2QD	667 Points +36%
Eurocom X8	708 Points +44%
Ref. Match 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	99.6 %
MSI GE62 2QD	99.6 % 0%
Eurocom X8	99.6 % 0%
OpenGL 64Bit (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	80.6 fps
MSI GE62 2QD	92 fps +14%
Eurocom X8	128.9 fps +60%

wPrime 2.10
1024m (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	260 s *
MSI GE62 2QD	248.2 s * +5%
Eurocom X8	218.6 s * +16%
32m (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	7.546 s *
MSI GE62 2QD	8.124 s * -8%
Eurocom X8	7.004 s * +7%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	562 s *
MSI GE62 2QD	561 s * -0%
One M73-2N	550 s * +2%
Eurocom X8	491.5 s * +13%

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 2 (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	35.67 fps
MSI GE62 2QD	32.55 fps -9%
One M73-2N	37.1 fps +4%
Eurocom X8	42.9 fps +20%
Pass 1 (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	143.5 fps
MSI GE62 2QD	133.8 fps -7%
One M73-2N	152.9 fps +7%
Eurocom X8	167.4 fps +17%

Legend

Asus G501JW Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL

MSI GE62 2QD Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 2x ADATA SP900NS38 (RAID 0)

One M73-2N Intel Core i7-3820QM, Intel HD Graphics 4000, Crucial RealSSD M4 CT128M4SSD2

Eurocom X8 Intel Core i7-4940MX, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB mSATA

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		6121 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2988 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4197 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3825 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

HD Tune

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL

Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 845 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 885 MB/s

Velocidade de Transferência Média: 881 MB/s

Tempo de Acesso:

Índice de Explosão: 258.1 MB/s

Uso da CPU: 4 %

3DMark 06 Standard Score		22143 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		5112 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		29172 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		12931 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3609 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1839 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	alto	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	77.3	21.1
Guild Wars 2 (2012)	58.2	33.5
Tomb Raider (2013)	106.8	47.9
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013)	115.6	46
BioShock Infinite (2013)	104.2	41.6
Metro: Last Light (2013)	50.8	25.7
Thief (2014)	43.8	24
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)	32.6	27.1
Ryse: Son of Rome (2014)	27.6	24.4
F1 2014 (2014)	91	63

BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	41.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	46.8 fps +13%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	49 fps +18%
Razer Blade 14 2015	71.4 fps +72%
Gigabyte P37X	90.9 fps +119%
Eurocom X8	145 fps +249%
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	104.2 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	118.3 fps +14%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	112 fps +7%
Razer Blade 14 2015	147.4 fps +41%
Gigabyte P37X	173.7 fps +67%
Eurocom X8	212 fps +103%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	128.6 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	126 fps
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	162.6 fps

Sleeping Dogs
1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	21.1 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	21 fps 0%
Razer Blade 14 2015	45 fps +113%
Gigabyte P37X	57.6 fps +173%
Eurocom X8	109 fps +417%
1366x768 High Preset AA:High (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	77.3 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	76 fps -2%
Razer Blade 14 2015	124.4 fps +61%
Gigabyte P37X	139.6 fps +81%
Eurocom X8	178 fps +130%
1366x768 Medium Preset AA:Normal (sort by value)
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	108 fps

Guild Wars 2
1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	33.5 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	33 fps -1%
Razer Blade 14 2015	50.2 fps +50%
Gigabyte P37X	57.1 fps +70%
Eurocom X8	64 fps +91%
1366x768 Best Appearance Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	58.2 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	60 fps +3%
Razer Blade 14 2015	67.2 fps +15%
Gigabyte P37X	65.2 fps +12%
Eurocom X8	69 fps +19%

Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	47.9 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	50.8 fps +6%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	44 fps -8%
Razer Blade 14 2015	80.4 fps +68%
Gigabyte P37X	103.7 fps +116%
Eurocom X8	198 fps +313%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FX AF:8x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	106.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	114.7 fps +7%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	97 fps -9%
Razer Blade 14 2015	187.4 fps +75%
Gigabyte P37X	243.6 fps +128%
Eurocom X8	435 fps +307%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	181.9 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	161 fps
1024x768 Low Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	260.7 fps

StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm
1920x1080 Ultra / Extreme AA:on (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	46 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	52 fps +13%
Razer Blade 14 2015	79.4 fps +73%
Gigabyte P37X	82.2 fps +79%
Eurocom X8	92 fps +100%
1366x768 High AA:on (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	115.6 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	126 fps +9%
Razer Blade 14 2015	108.6 fps -6%
Gigabyte P37X	127.4 fps +10%
Eurocom X8	141 fps +22%
1366x768 Medium (sort by value)
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	142 fps

Metro: Last Light
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	25.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	31.9 fps +24%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	28 fps +9%
Razer Blade 14 2015	51.2 fps +99%
Gigabyte P37X	63.2 fps +146%
Eurocom X8	95 fps +270%
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	50.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	59.9 fps +18%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	55 fps +8%
Razer Blade 14 2015	89.8 fps +77%
Gigabyte P37X	98.4 fps +94%
Eurocom X8	125 fps +146%
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	91.4 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	90 fps
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	98.6 fps

Thief
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	24 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	28 fps +17%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	25 fps +4%
Razer Blade 14 2015	45.1 fps +88%
Gigabyte P37X	59.2 fps +147%
Eurocom X8	87 fps +263%
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	43.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	55.2 fps +26%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	47 fps +7%
Razer Blade 14 2015	71.1 fps +62%
Gigabyte P37X	81.6 fps +86%
Eurocom X8	93 fps +112%
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	64.9 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	53 fps
1024x768 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	75.9 fps

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (HD Package) (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	27.1 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	27.9 fps +3%
Razer Blade 14 2015	49 fps +81%
Gigabyte P37X	66.8 fps +146%
1920x1080 High Preset (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	32.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	42.7 fps +31%
Razer Blade 14 2015	66.8 fps +105%
Gigabyte P37X	86.5 fps +165%
1344x756 Medium Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	81 fps
1280x720 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	131 fps

Ryse: Son of Rome
1920x1080 Very High Texture Res. + High Graphics Quality (Motion Blur & Temporal AA On, Rest Off/Disabled) AF:8x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	24.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	27.4 fps +12%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	24 fps -2%
Razer Blade 14 2015	47.5 fps +95%
Gigabyte P37X	60.2 fps +147%
Eurocom X8	103 fps +322%
1920x1080 High Texture Res. + High Graphics Quality (Rest Off/Disabled) AF:8x (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	27.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	29.4 fps +7%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	28 fps +1%
Razer Blade 14 2015	50.3 fps +82%
Gigabyte P37X	63.1 fps +129%
Eurocom X8	111 fps +302%
1366x768 Medium Texture Res. + Normal Graphics Quality (Rest Off/Disabled) AF:4x (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	57.6 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	55 fps
1024x768 Low Texture Res. + Low Graphics Quality (Rest Off/Disabled) AF:2x (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	62.5 fps

F1 2014
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	63 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	79 fps +25%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	88 fps +40%
Razer Blade 14 2015	93 fps +48%
Gigabyte P37X	96 fps +52%
Eurocom X8	102 fps +62%
1920x1080 High Preset (sort by value)
Asus G501JW	91 fps
SCHENKER XMG A505	94 fps +3%
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	111 fps +22%
Razer Blade 14 2015	110 fps +21%
Gigabyte P37X	115 fps +26%
Eurocom X8	117 fps +29%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	108 fps
Ibuypower Chimera CX-9	114 fps
1024x768 Ultra Low Preset (sort by value)
SCHENKER XMG A505	119 fps

Legend

Asus G501JW Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Samsung SSD SM951 512 GB MZHPV512HDGL

SCHENKER XMG A505 Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, Micron M600 MTFDDAV256MBF M.2

Ibuypower Chimera CX-9 Intel Core i7-4710HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 2x Plextor PX-256M6M (RAID 0)

Razer Blade 14 2015 Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, Lite-On IT L8T-256L9G

Gigabyte P37X Intel Core i7-4720HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 2x Lite-On LMT-128L9M (RAID 0)

Eurocom X8 Intel Core i7-4940MX, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB mSATA

Barulho

Ocioso		31.3 / 33.4 / 36.3 dB
Carga		39.5 / 46.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


38.2 °C	42.2 °C	38.2 °C
32.4 °C	37.8 °C	32.8 °C
32.2 °C	30.8 °C	32.6 °C

Máximo: 42.2 °C
Médio: 35.2 °C


43.6 °C	47.6 °C	42.2 °C
38.4 °C	42.4 °C	37.4 °C
33.4 °C	36 °C	35 °C

Máximo: 47.6 °C
Médio: 39.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 48 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.7 °C / -6.7 F).

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		6h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 46min
Carga (máximo brilho)		3h 22min

	Asus G501JW	Acer Aspire VN7-591G-727P	MSI GS60 2QE Ghost Pro 4K (2QEUi716SR51G)	Gigabyte P35X v3	Alienware 15	Asus GL550JK-CN391H
Battery Runtime		-54%	-58%	-33%	7%	-50%
Reader / Idle	415	216 -48%	276 -33%	364 -12%	696 68%	299 -28%
WiFi v1.3	286	166 -42%
Load	202	58 -71%	36 -82%	94 -53%	91 -55%	57 -72%
WiFi			184		266	201

Pro

+ Desempenho ridiculamente veloz do SSD PCIe x4

+ Temperaturas e ruído da ventoinha relativamente baixas

+ Bateria de grande capacidade/ Boas durações runtimes

+ Brilhante tela IPS UHD mate

+ Superfícies de alumínio escovado

+ mDP com Thunderbolt

+ Inclui o headset e mouse de jogos da Cerberus

Contra

- Desempenho relativamente fraco da CPU e GPU

- Bateria não removível

- Sem Gigabit Ethernet integrado

- Difícil manutenção para o usuário final

- Sem teclas auxiliarias ou teclas Macro

- A tampa se sente susceptível a flexões e dobramentos

- 4K nativo para jogos, difícil com a GTX 960M

Asus ROG G501JW. Test model provided by Asus US

O Asus G501 teria recebido um passe mais facilmente se fosse de qualquer outro fabricante, mas o fato de que e um ROG automaticamente sobe as expectativas do usuário especialmente dos fãs dedicados. É difícil ignorar os aspectos mais fracos do portátil, como a CPU multi-core inferior ao esperado e o desempenho da GPU da GTX 960M. Os jogos 4K já são difíceis com uma GTX 970M e aqui são ainda mais difíceis na G501. A manutenção poderia ter sido muito mais fácil, os alto falantes integrados poderiam ter sido melhores, e a tampa deixa a desejar e termos de qualidade. Ainda falta fazer um par de melhorias antes de que possa se tornar o G751 da categoria dos portáteis ultra-finos para jogos.

Então, em que se destaca este Asus ultrafino? Sua tela IPS UHD é bela e o seu SSD de 512 GB PCIe 4x é ridiculamente veloz em termos de taxas de transferência de dados. O design do chassi design é tão liso como ode qualquer outro ultra-fino concorrente se não for melhor, devido a sua falta de grades de ventilação visíveis. A duração da bateria é boa e tanto o ruído da ventoinha, quanto a temperatura das superfícies, são baixas, pelo menos em relação a portáteis de jogos de gama alta.

O SSD super veloz e o baixo ruído da ventoinha e as baixas temperaturas resultam em um preço alto com desempenho reduzido da CPU e GPU, respectivamente. Somente não temos certeza de que os gamers hardcore estejam dispostos a fazer esses compromissos.

Ainda falta fazer um par de melhorias antes de que possa se tornar o G751 da categoria dos portáteis ultrafinos para jogos.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

Asus G501JW - 2015-06-24 06/24/2015 v4 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 84%

Teclado

82%

Mouse

81%

Conectividade

75 / 81 → 93%

Peso

63 / 10-66 → 95%

Bateria

88%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

85%

Desempenho da aplicação

91%

Temperatura

85 / 95 → 89%

Ruído

78 / 90 → 87%

Audio

75%

Médio

81%

85%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5240 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Asus G501JW

Allen Ngo, 2015-05-23 (Update: 2020-06- 8)