Breve Análise do Portátil Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E (ASUSPRO Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1000 MHz, Memoría: 800 MHz, 20.19.15.4326
Memória
8 GB
, 4 GB OnBoard + 1 x 4 GB (slot) 1/1 ocupado, DDR4, 2133 MHz Hyundai Electronics, até 20 GB
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, INNOLUX N140HGE-EAA, 262K (6-bit), CIE1931 45%, TN WLED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Hynix HFS256G39MND, 256 GB
, M.2 2280, 153 GB livre
peso
1.603 kg, Suprimento de energia: 312 g
Preço
0 990
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
INNOLUX N140HGE-EAA, 262K (6-bit), CIE1931 45% tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 222 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 206.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 213 cd/m²
Contraste: 525:1 (Preto: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.75 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 9.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.25% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E TN WLED, 1920x1080 | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G TN-Panel, 1600x900 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 TN, 1366x768 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD TN LED, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | 8% | 3% | 25% | 6% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.25 | 46.98 20% | 42.2 8% | 40.06 2% | 48.93 25% | 41.65 6% | 42.09 7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.1 | 69.8 20% | 62.3 7% | 60.3 4% | 73.7 27% | 61.6 6% | 62 7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.63 | 48.67 20% | 43.72 8% | 41.42 2% | 50.5 24% | 43.14 6% | 43.6 7% |
| Response Times | -23% | -36% | -10% | -19% | -9% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 44.4 ? -6% | 56.8 ? -35% | 43 ? -2% | 42 ? -0% | 42.4 ? -1% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.2 ? | 29.6 ? -40% | 28.8 ? -36% | 25 ? -18% | 29.2 ? -38% | 24.8 ? -17% | |
| PWM Frequency | 204 ? | ||||||
| Screen | -2% | 19% | -16% | 10% | 20% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 210 | 216 3% | 245 17% | 229 9% | 366 74% | 226 8% | 230 10% |
| Brightness | 207 | 209 1% | 225 9% | 207 0% | 336 62% | 211 2% | 216 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 83 -5% | 80 -8% | 87 0% | 89 2% | 85 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.436 -9% | 0.24 40% | 0.69 -73% | 0.65 -63% | 0.22 45% | 0.26 35% |
| Contrast | 525 | 495 -6% | 1021 94% | 332 -37% | 563 7% | 1027 96% | 885 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.75 | 9.63 -10% | 6.89 21% | 10.16 -16% | 10.26 -17% | 6.44 26% | 7.32 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.87 | 17.62 -27% | 17.18 -24% | 17.18 -24% | 18.14 -31% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.2 | 10.72 -17% | 6.45 30% | 10.87 -18% | 11.51 -25% | 5.87 36% | 6.98 24% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.49 88% | 2.46 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.37 93% | 2.5 88% |
| CCT | 11118 58% | 12873 50% | 6857 95% | 12881 50% | 12725 51% | 6856 95% | 6683 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.46 | 44.8 20% | 40.1 7% | 38.4 3% | 47 25% | 39.58 6% | 39.97 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.96 | 61.8 7% | 60.4 4% | 74 28% | 61.15 6% | 61.55 6% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
4% | 1% /
11% | -16% /
-15% | 8% /
11% | 2% /
12% | 4% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 4889 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3309 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3867 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4192 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Hynix HFS256G39MND
Sequential Read:
445.4 MB/s
Sequential Write:
290.2 MB/s
512K Read:
327.9 MB/s
512K Write:
292 MB/s
4K Read:
22.64 MB/s
4K Write:
85 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
322.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
254.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| 3DMark 03 Standard | 18240 pontos | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8656 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1425 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 48117 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4958 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 707 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 331 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44.04 | 23.58 | 19.79 | 5.82 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 40.9 | 24.1 | 18.7 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.8 | 11.9 | 7.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.7 / 36.1 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G Intel Core i7-4650U, HD Graphics 5000 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Intel Core i7-6500U, Radeon R5 M330 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Core i5-6300U, HD Graphics 520 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel Core i7-6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -0% | 0% | -9% | 0% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 28.8 | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 31.2 -8% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.8 | 29.3 -2% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 31.2 -8% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 28.8 | 29.3 -2% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 32.1 -11% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.8 | 30.9 -7% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 33.1 -15% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Load Average * | 34.7 | 33.1 5% | 32.5 6% | 32.1 7% | 36.2 -4% | 32.3 7% | 34.2 1% |
| Load Maximum * | 36.1 | 37.3 -3% | 37.2 -3% | 36.8 -2% | 37.8 -5% | 36.6 -1% | 37.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hynix HFS256G39MND | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G HD Graphics 5000, 4650U, Liteonit LCS-256M6S | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Radeon R5 M330, 6500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -4% | 15% | 6% | 6% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 3.1 26% | 3.5 17% | 3.8 10% | 3.7 12% | 3.5 17% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 7.1 -9% | 6.3 3% | 5.3 18% | 6.3 3% | 6.8 -5% | 6.7 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.2 | 7.3 -1% | 7.9 -10% | 6 17% | 6.8 6% | 7.3 -1% | 7.3 -1% |
| Load Average * | 29.2 | 28.9 1% | 29.5 -1% | 26.3 10% | 34.4 -18% | 26.3 10% | 28.2 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 41 | 29.3 29% | 57.3 -40% | 36.6 11% | 28.3 31% | 34.6 16% | 34.6 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.35 / 0.65 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 6.5 / 7.2 Watt |
| Carga |
29.2 / 41 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E 48 Wh | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 62 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 49 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE 46 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 22% | 75% | 29% | 23% | 15% | |
| Reader / Idle | 716 | 699 -2% | 1153 61% | 1304 82% | 1020 42% | 915 28% | 953 33% |
| H.264 | 336 | 296 -12% | 431 28% | 645 92% | 534 59% | 512 52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 425 24% | 667 94% | 453 32% | 395 15% | 338 -2% | |
| Load | 129 | 120 -7% | 97 -25% | 172 33% | 146 13% | 116 -10% | 98 -24% |
| WiFi | 310 |
Pro
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
+ Baixo peso
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Trackpoint disponível
+ Muitos recursos de segurança
+ Operação bastante silenciosa
+ SSD
+ Escotilha de manutenção
+ Garantia de 24 meses
+ Preço atraente
Contra
- Tela penas média (baixa luminescência, baixa gama de cores)
- Qualidade medíocre do alto falante
- Webcam pobre
- Sem porta HDMI
- Partição nada prática do SSD
O AsusPro Advanced B8430UA é um bom e duradouro portátil empresarial de 14-polegadas. Graças aos componentes modernos, o desempenho foi notavelmente aumentado, em comparação com o predecessor. O baixo peso garante uma boa mobilidade e o preço de menos de 1.000 Euros (~$1128) certamente é tentador. O bom desempenho do sistema é um aspecto importante quando usa o aparelho todos os dias, portanto, o SSD como unidade do sistema faz muito sentido, dado que tem o maior efeito na impressão subjetiva do desempenho.
O chassi sólido e discreto aloja uma configuração balanceada de componentes – tudo por u preço atraente de menos de 1.000 Euros (~$1128).
Estamos um pouco decepcionados pela tela, que consegue oferecer bons ângulos de visão, apesar da tecnologia TN, mas não cumpre com nossas expectativas em termos de luminescência. Os pequenos alto falantes estéreo também não conseguem nos convencer. O desempenho da unidade de teste não é suficiente para modernos jogos 3D, mas não é necessário para o grupo alvo. Se não quiser renunciar aos jogos, você deve adquirir um portátil com uma GPU dedicada. Gostamos dos bons dispositivos de entrada, que são cruciais para um aparelho de escritório, bem como das boas durações da bateria. O AsusPro Advanced é um digno sucessor do AsusPro Advanced BU401LA.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E
- 07/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
