Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Pro 15 (Late 2016, 2.7 GHz, 455)
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) (MacBook Pro 15 2016 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6820HQ 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
AMD Radeon Pro 455 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 855 MHz, Memoría: 1270 MHz, GDDR5
Memória
16 GB
, RAM LPDDR3 de 2133 MHz soldada
Pantalha
15.40 polegadas 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 220 PPI, APPA031, IPS, Brilhante: sim
Disco rígido
Apple SSD SM0512L, 512 GB
peso
1.83 kg
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPA031 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 568 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 532.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.1 cd/m²iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 568 cd/m²
Contraste: 1912:1 (Preto: 0.297 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 APPA02E, , 2880x1800, 15.4" | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 SHARP LQ156D1JX01 Dell PN: 7PHPT, , 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) Sharp SHP1453 LQ156M1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -25% | 1% | -16% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.5 | 99 1% | 61.4 -38% | 87.8 -11% | 68.9 -30% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 100 0% | 90.8 -9% | 100 0% | 98.9 -1% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.4 | 87.3 1% | 62.9 -27% | 99.4 15% | 70.9 -18% | |
| Response Times | -21% | 9% | -7% | -25% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 46 ? 1% | 47.3 ? -2% | 58 ? -25% | 54 ? -16% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39.2 ? | 56 ? -43% | 31.2 ? 20% | 35 ? 11% | 52.4 ? -34% | |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 ? | 117000 ? | ||||
| Screen | -32% | -3% | -23% | -57% | -85% | |
| Brightness middle | 568 | 420 -26% | 483 -15% | 341 -40% | 361 -36% | 400 -30% |
| Brightness | 532 | 401 -25% | 465 -13% | 315 -41% | 344 -35% | 392 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 90 8% | 92 11% | 82 -1% | 90 8% | 89 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.297 | 0.3 -1% | 0.33 -11% | 0.34 -14% | 0.38 -28% | 0.26 12% |
| Contrast | 1912 | 1400 -27% | 1464 -23% | 1003 -48% | 950 -50% | 1538 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 3.33 -138% | 1.4 -0% | 2.07 -48% | 5.34 -281% | 4.9 -250% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.7 | 5.11 -89% | 3 -11% | 3.27 -21% | 11 -307% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 2.73 -19% | 1.5 35% | 1.9 17% | 4.84 -110% | 7.2 -213% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.48 89% | 2.34 94% | 2.62 84% | 2.21 100% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 7165 91% | 6457 101% | 6650 98% | 6514 100% | 7395 88% | 6911 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.4 | 78.09 1% | 58 -25% | 89 15% | 64.2 -17% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 99.97 0% | 91 -9% | 100 0% | 98.9 -1% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-24% | 3% /
-1% | -24% /
-23% | -21% /
-38% | -42% /
-63% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3728 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4569 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4522 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Apple SSD SM0512L
Sequential Read:
1405 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1425 MB/s
512K Read:
817 MB/s
512K Write:
953 MB/s
4K Read:
9.65 MB/s
4K Write:
13.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
619 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
499 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 25873 pontos | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 16522 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5774 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15766 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3463 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1254 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| HP Omen 15-ax007ng | |
| Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T | |
| HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 | |
| Anno 2205 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:4x | |
| Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 1920x1080 High / On AA:FX | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Counter-Strike: GO (2012) | 145 | ||||
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 230 | 37.8 | |||
| Sims 4 (2014) | 50.6 | ||||
| GTA V (2015) | 37.1 | 11.1 | |||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 69.5 | 24.6 | 14.2 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 67.2 | 61.5 | 22.8 | ||
| World of Warships (2015) | 188 | 70.7 | 53 | ||
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 86 | 17.5 | 7.7 | ||
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 27.8 | ||||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 162 | 52.7 | 33.7 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 84 | 24.9 | 18.3 | ||
| XCOM 2 (2016) | 70 | 27.2 | 17.9 | 5.9 | |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 70 | 32 | 30 | 20 | |
| The Division (2016) | 88 | 25.2 | 18.5 | ||
| Hitman 2016 (2016) | 75 | 20.4 | |||
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 33.8 | 21.3 | 19.3 | ||
| Doom (2016) | 53.1 | 19.8 | |||
| Overwatch (2016) | 178 | 65.8 | 30.1 | 18.7 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 59.5 | 21.5 | 8.9 | ||
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 107 | ||||
| Mafia 3 (2016) | 32.8 | 15.1 | |||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 109 | 28.9 | 25.3 | ||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 69 | 28.8 | 21.6 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 71.7 | 25.8 | 22.8 | ||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 33.1 | 28.8 | |||
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 40.2 | 34.4 | |||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 44.1 | 20.6 | |||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 54.4 | 20.7 | |||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 146 | 59.4 | 34.6 | 19.7 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB |
| HDD |
| 30.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 38.7 / 48.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A) | ||
| 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455 Radeon Pro 455, 6820HQ, Apple SSD SM0512L | 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L | 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X, 4870HQ, Apple SSD SM0512G | 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB | i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, WDC WD10SPCX-75KHST0 + SanDisk Z400s M.2 2242 32 GB Cache | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 3% | 1% | -6% | -6% | |
| off / environment * | 30.4 | 29 5% | 30.4 -0% | 30.3 -0% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 30.8 | 30.3 2% | 30.6 1% | 28.9 6% | 31.4 -2% | 31.6 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 30.8 | 30.3 2% | 30.6 1% | 28.9 6% | 32.5 -6% | 31.6 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 30.3 2% | 30.6 1% | 28.9 6% | 33.6 -9% | 33.4 -8% |
| Load Average * | 38.7 | 35.1 9% | 34.7 10% | 46 -19% | 45.2 -17% | 47.8 -24% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 46 6% | 46.3 5% | 46 6% | 46 6% | 47.8 2% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -2% | 2% | 3% | -25% | -6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 46 | 44.2 4% | 43 7% | 43.2 6% | 55.9 -22% | 47.6 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39 | 41.6 -7% | 40 -3% | 39 -0% | 50 -28% | 42.1 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33.6 | 26 | 30 | 28.1 | 29.9 | |
| Idle Bottom * | 31.1 | 25 | 29.3 | 27.9 | 29.8 |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| Ocioso | 4 / 10.9 / 10.9 Watt |
| Carga |
64.6 / 86.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 1% | 8% | -25% | -97% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3 25% | 2.9 27% | 6 -50% | 12.5 -213% | 6.6 -65% |
| Idle Average * | 10.9 | 9.9 9% | 9.7 11% | 12.8 -17% | 19.6 -80% | 9 17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.9 | 12.5 -15% | 10.1 7% | 13.3 -22% | 22.8 -109% | 10.7 2% |
| Load Average * | 64.6 | 70.6 -9% | 65 -1% | 82.4 -28% | 102 -58% | 77.5 -20% |
| Load Maximum * | 86.7 | 90.8 -5% | 89.5 -3% | 91.8 -6% | 107 -23% | 130 -50% |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 inch 2015-05 4870HQ, Radeon R9 M370X, 100 Wh | Dell XPS 15-9550 i7 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 84 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -4% | -2% | 31% | 40% | 4% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 637 | 619 -3% | 602 -5% | 432 -32% | 309 -51% | 334 -48% |
| Load | 54 | 52 -4% | 55 2% | 105 94% | 125 131% | 84 56% |
| H.264 | 547 | 516 | 413 | 318 | ||
| Reader / Idle | 1039 | 528 | 565 |
Pro
+ Excelente chassi
+ Muito boa tela
+ Enorme Trackpad com ótima precisão
+ Resfriamento bom e silencioso
+ Altas taxas de transferência WLAN
+ Bons alto falantes
Contra
- Nem USB-A, nem saída HDMI
- Alto falantes defeituosos devido ao Boot Camp
- Problemas com o WLAN de 2,4 GHz com aparelho USB-C conectado
- As ventoinhas são (um pouco) audíveis durante o modo inativo
- Muito caro – especialmente as atualizações
A análise da terceira configuração do Apple MacBook Pro 15, de fato, revelou alguns resultados surpreendentes. No entanto, não falamos sobre os dois componentes mais velozes. O processador em nossa configuração mainstream por $2799 é 100 MHz mais veloz que o modelo base, que resulta em uma vantagem de um só dígito nos benchmarks, mas você não o notará na prática.
A placa de vídeo AMD Radeon Pro 455 se posiciona entre os dois irmãos 450 e 460, o qual não é surpresa. No entanto, está mais perto da Radeon Pro 450 regular devido á pequena quantidade de memória de vídeo (2 GB GDDR5). Se não estiver contente com o desempenho gráfico da Radeon Pro 450 regular, estará melhor optando pela 460 mais poderosa com 4 GB de RAM GDDR5.
A grande surpresa é a tela, que tem outra designação (APPA031) e consegue resultados de luminância. O valor de preto não sofre disso, portanto, o contraste também é melhor. Parece ser um questão de sorte agora mesmo, qual painel você recebe. Tanto a versão de nível de entrada como as especificações de gama alta foram equipados com o painel um pouco mais escuro, portanto, parece não haver uma relação com componentes mais velozes.
Começamos esta análise com a questão de as atualizações valem a pena. A resposta neste caso é: depende. O processador dificilmente é mais veloz e os usuários pesados receberão o Core i7-6920HQ opcional, que também é o caso para a placa de vídeo. No entanto, a atualização também inclui o maior SSD de 512 GB e modelos pré-configurados frequentemente são mais econômicos em lojas online, portanto o modelo poderia ser interessante inclusive quando você deseja capacidade de armazenamento adicional. As vantagens e desvantagens gerais do Apple MacBook Pro 15 ainda se aplicam aqui, portanto, mais uma vez queremos nos referir a nossa extensa análise do modelo de nível de entrada.
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455)
- 02/13/2017 v6 (old)
Klaus A. Hinum, Andreas Osthoff
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
