Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019: Bom desempenho, mas nenhuma inovação real
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.1 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
| 87.7 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 13.30" | 3840x2160 | |
| 85.6 % v7 (old) | 12/2018 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150 | 1.3 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 14.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 513 cd/m²
Contraste: 1524:1 (Preto: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
78.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 APPA03E, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 APPA03E, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE LP140QH2-SPD1, , 2560x1440, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K ID: AUO 282B B133ZAN Dell: 90NTH, , 3840x2160, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Sharp LQ133M1JW41, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng InfoVision M133NVF3 R2, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -15% | -22% | -21% | -23% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.7 | 98.5 0% | 72.5 -27% | 64.8 -34% | 65.5 -34% | 64.4 -35% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 97.8 -2% | 93.6 -6% | 96.3 -4% | 91.7 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.7 | 87.3 0% | 73.8 -16% | 65.8 -25% | 66.3 -24% | 65.2 -26% |
| Response Times | -7% | 21% | -39% | -24% | 24% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 46 ? -6% | 33.6 ? 22% | 64.8 ? -50% | 57.6 ? -33% | 31 ? 28% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 32 ? -8% | 24 ? 19% | 38 ? -28% | 34 ? -15% | 24 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 118000 ? | 22730 ? | 4000 ? | |||
| Screen | 2% | -62% | -27% | 1% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle | 518 | 519 0% | 338 -35% | 428.3 -17% | 429.8 -17% | 768 48% |
| Brightness | 480 | 504 5% | 315 -34% | 414 -14% | 403 -16% | 778 62% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 95 9% | 88 1% | 88 1% | 89 2% | 82 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.33 3% | 0.43 -26% | 0.27 21% | 0.32 6% | 0.48 -41% |
| Contrast | 1524 | 1573 3% | 786 -48% | 1586 4% | 1343 -12% | 1600 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 4 -167% | 2.69 -79% | 1.08 28% | 3.49 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 2.8 -0% | 7.9 -182% | 6.19 -121% | 3.96 -41% | 7.41 -165% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.6 | 1.7 35% | 2.01 23% | 1.21 53% | 2.07 20% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.2 -10% | 6.2 -210% | 3.7 -85% | 1.3 35% | 4.09 -105% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.1 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.54 87% |
| CCT | 6898 94% | 6908 94% | 6787 96% | 6706 97% | 6452 101% | 6452 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 78.4 | 77.3 -1% | 68.1 -13% | 60.4 -23% | 61.4 -22% | 60 -23% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 99.99 0% | 97.8 -2% | 93.5 -6% | 96.3 -4% | 92 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
0% | -19% /
-43% | -29% /
-27% | -15% /
-6% | -10% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4056 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5689 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4537 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3779 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 17176 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 57033 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11806 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1903 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 705 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 78.4 | 54.3 | 49.4 | 15.5 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 84 | 63 | 33.3 | 29.9 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 42.8 | 29.5 | 25.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.9 / 41.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8279U, Apple SSD AP0512 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 Iris Plus Graphics 655, i5-8259U | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng GeForce MX250, i7-8565U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | 6% | -3% | -4% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29.6 -2% | 28.4 2% | 28.4 2% | 28.4 2% | 30 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 29.6 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -1% | 28.5 2% | 30 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 29.6 -2% | 28.4 2% | 29.4 -1% | 29 -0% | 30 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 29.6 -2% | 28.6 1% | 29.4 -1% | 29.1 -0% | 30 -3% |
| Load Average * | 33.9 | 36.7 -8% | 31.5 7% | 34.6 -2% | 42.8 -26% | |
| Load Maximum * | 41.8 | 46.7 -12% | 33.1 21% | 46.8 -12% | 41.6 -0% | 39.5 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.5 | 41.4 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.38 / 0.97 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.2 / 7.2 / 8.2 Watt |
| Carga |
54 / 63.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, Apple SSD AP0512, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -3% | -28% | -52% | -23% | -38% | -23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 3 -36% | 5.2 -136% | 6.7 -205% | 3.9 -77% | 5.96 ? -171% | 4.43 ? -101% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 8.7 -21% | 6.3 12% | 8.6 -19% | 8.6 -19% | 7.8 -8% | 8.44 ? -17% | 7.58 ? -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.2 | 12.2 -49% | 8.9 -9% | 10.5 -28% | 9.4 -15% | 10.8 -32% | 10.6 ? -29% | 9.43 ? -15% |
| Load Average * | 54 | 53.3 1% | 40.8 24% | 44.2 18% | 64.1 -19% | 53 2% | 46.5 ? 14% | 45.8 ? 15% |
| Load Maximum * | 63.9 | 64 -0% | 67.5 -6% | 47.5 26% | 64.1 -0% | 62.7 2% | 56.2 ? 12% | 68.7 ? -8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 63.7 |
* ... smaller is better
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 i5-8279U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2018 Touchbar i5 i5-8259U, Iris Plus Graphics 655, 58 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2019-20QE000VGE i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9380 i7 4K i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 53.1 Wh | HP Envy 13-aq0003ng i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 53.2 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -13% | -24% | -32% | -17% | -25% | 17% | |
| H.264 | 721 | 651 -10% | 586 -19% | 917 ? 27% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 687 | 581 -15% | 493 -28% | 464 -32% | 571 -17% | 512 -25% | 729 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 94 |
Pro
Contra
Com o modelo 2019 do MacBook Pro 13 com 4 portas Thunderbolt 3, a Apple fez apenas uma atualização leve do modelo. O foco principal do fabricante este ano foi certamente a atualização do MacBook Pro 13 mais barato (2x TB3), que também foi equipado com a Touch Bar agora.
Surpreendentemente para nós, o desempenho da CPU melhorou significativamente, apesar do processador bastante semelhante, e o desempenho não diminui, nem mesmo sob uso intenso contínuo. Isso é raro na categoria de subportáteis. Nada mudou em termos de tela também, mas o painel ainda é um dos melhores do mercado e não precisa temer a comparação com a concorrência. Além disso, também é um dos poucos painéis no formato 16:10.
Maior desempenho da CPU e um teclado ligeiramente revisado: As alterações no MacBook Pro 13 de 2019 com 4 portas Thunderbolt são pequenas e, em nenhum caso, justificam uma atualização do modelo do ano passado. No entanto, o MBP 13 ainda é um ótimo subportátil.
Além das vantagens conhecidas (excelente carcaça, touchpad perfeito, 4x Thunderbolt 3, bateria de longa duração), permanecem as desvantagens do antecessor. As portas Thunderbolt são extremamente versáteis, mas no uso diário você geralmente precisa de adaptadores. Não há leitor de cartão SD, e o teclado ainda é um assunto subjetivo, mas os problemas de confiabilidade dos últimos anos já deixaram um sabor desagradável. Finalmente, ainda há o preço alto e as atualizações de hardware que são geralmente caras. Mas nada disso muda o fato de que a versão 2019 do MacBook Pro 13 também é um ótimo subportátil.
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3
- 10/02/2019 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Price comparison
