Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook Air 13 2017 (1.8 GHz)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 327 cd/m²
Contraste: 812:1 (Preto: 0.405 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.96 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.51 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 3.83
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 Apple APP9CF0, , 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) APPA033, , 2560x1600, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 QHD+ i7 Sharp SHP144A, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | ||||||
Display P3 Coverage | 40.1 | 66.8 | 99.2 | 48.94 | 62.8 | |
sRGB Coverage | 59.8 | 95.4 | 99.9 | 73.3 | 89.4 | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.51 | 68 | 87.6 | 50.5 | 64.6 | |
Response Times | 7% | -39% | 10% | 7% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.4 ? | 41.2 ? 21% | 47.2 ? 10% | 32.8 ? 37% | 43.6 ? 17% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.4 ? | 30.4 ? -7% | 53 ? -87% | 33.2 ? -17% | 29.2 ? -3% | |
PWM Frequency | 58000 | |||||
Screen | ||||||
Brightness middle | 329 | 387 | 569 | 351.2 | 396.2 | |
Black Level * | 0.405 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.195 | 0.266 | |
Brightness | 310 | 358 | 542 | 325 | 357 | |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 88 | 90 | 89 | 84 | |
Contrast | 812 | 823 | 1016 | 1801 | 1489 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.96 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 7.4 | 3.9 | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.51 | 4 | 2.9 | 9.08 | 7.58 | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.51 | 1 | 1.8 | 6.71 | 4.16 | |
Gamma | 3.83 57% | 2.26 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.74 80% | 2.31 95% | |
CCT | 6711 97% | 6680 97% | 6877 95% | 7222 90% | 6514 100% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.4 | 61.6 | 78.4 | 50.48 | 57.5 | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.8 | 82.2 | 99.3 | 73.31 | 88.7 | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
7% | -39% /
-39% | 10% /
10% | 7% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 30.4 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 58000 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 58000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 58000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5378-0K46 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
Dell Inspiron 13 5378-0K46 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3396 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4264 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4371 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2523 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) Apple SSD SM0128G | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 Apple SSD AP0256 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Apple SSD SM0256L | Apple MacBook 12 2017 Apple SSD AP0256 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Asus Zenbook UX3430UQ-GV012T SanDisk SD8SN8U512G1002 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 19% | 35% | -5% | 73% | -3% | |
Read Seq | 1390 | 1540 11% | 1557 12% | 955 -31% | 1314 -5% | 500 -64% |
Write Seq | 731 | 1353 85% | 1505 106% | 899 23% | 617 -16% | 457.4 -37% |
Read 512 | 899 | 926 3% | 968 8% | 658 -27% | 1058 18% | 345.6 -62% |
Write 512 | 715 | 698 -2% | 1124 57% | 579 -19% | 502 -30% | 415 -42% |
Read 4k | 16.29 | 9.92 -39% | 10.76 -34% | 9.721 -40% | 37.31 129% | 28.34 74% |
Write 4k | 27.17 | 10.74 -60% | 12.87 -53% | 12.78 -53% | 133.6 392% | 56.8 109% |
Read 4k QD32 | 300.9 | 618 105% | 631 110% | 521 73% | 425.1 41% | 311.3 3% |
Write 4k QD32 | 273.7 | 403.8 48% | 468.4 71% | 370.1 35% | 431.3 58% | 251.1 -8% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook 12 2017 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1591 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5878 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2013 MD760D/A | |
Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 1.7 GHz 256 GB | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i7 Iris | |
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 | |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) | |
Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2013 MD760D/A | |
Apple MacBook Air 11 inch 2013-06 1.7 GHz 256 GB |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 42.9 | 26.4 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.9 °C / -5.3 F).
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.24 / 1 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.4 / 6.3 / 7 Watt |
Carga |
34.5 / 40 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SM0128G, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, Apple SSD SM0256L, IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz 6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SD0256F, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3" | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -100% | 32% | 12% | 29% | 36% | -45% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.4 -0% | 2.7 21% | 2.7 21% | 2 41% | 2 41% | 2.8 18% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 13.9 -121% | 2.7 57% | 5.7 10% | 5.4 14% | 2.06 67% | 10.9 -73% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 17.6 -151% | 7.2 -3% | 6 14% | 6.6 6% | 6.94 1% | 11.4 -63% |
Load Average * | 34.5 | 71.1 -106% | 22 36% | 32.1 7% | 22 36% | 22.52 35% | 55.4 -61% |
Load Maximum * | 40 | 88.5 -121% | 20.5 49% | 36.2 9% | 20 50% | 24.87 38% | 57.5 -44% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, 49.2 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.3 GHz 6Y75, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh | Apple MacBook 12 2017 m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2016 (2.9 GHz) 6267U, Iris Graphics 550, 49.2 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 inch 2015-03 5650U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) i7-7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -19% | -13% | -15% | -11% | -3% | 1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 638 | 519 -19% | 554 -13% | 540 -15% | 566 -11% | 620 -3% | 644 1% |
H.264 | 415 | 619 | 483 | 511 | |||
Load | 70 | 208 | 66 | 97 | 60 | ||
Reader / Idle | 1572 | ||||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 87 |
Pro
Contra
Os anos passam, mas o MacBook Air permanece inalterado ano após ano após ano. As mudanças mais significativas no design do portátil nos últimos anos, como resoluções de tela mais altas, painéis mais finos e telas maiores em carcaças de tamanho similar, todas passaram despercebidas pelo Air. Consequentemente, não nos surpreendeu que, ao contrário das atualizações do MacBook 12, a Apple fazer as atualizações do Air em silêncio. Aparentemente, o MacBook Air não é mais "apresentável", e de alguma forma não se encaixa no portfólio atual da Apple.
O maior problema que temos com o novo MacBook Air 13 é a sua tela. Com o seu painel TN de baixa resolução, certamente se sente muito desatualizado, no geral. Em 2017, nossas expectativas de um portátil de US $ 1000 incluem um painel IPS com resolução, pelo menos, FHD. Seu preço de $999 para o modelo de base de 128 GB é bastante elevado, e os $200 extras que a Apple cobra por um SSD de 256 GB é francamente um assalto à luz do dia.
No entanto, mesmo depois de todos esses anos, o conceito básico do Air ainda brilha em meio de toda essa escuridão e poeira. Uma carcaça de alumínio bem construída e de alta qualidade combinada com dispositivos de entrada decentes; desempenho Wi-Fi mais do que um decente; muito bom desempenho geral do sistema adequado para os cenários de uso pretendido; mais de 10 horas de duração da bateria; e por último, mas não menos importante, uma experiência de usuário silenciosa. Mesmo em 2017, todos esses aspectos merecem elogios.
Com cada ano que passa, o alto preço do Air está ficando cada vez mais difícil de justificar. Ainda assim, em resumo, o MacBook Air 13 2017 ainda é um portátil muito decente. Lembre-se, é o modelo de nível de entrada para entrar no universo da Apple e, portanto, a alternativa mais barata se preferir o MacOS em vez de Windows. E, embora seja altamente improvável que o MacBook Air receba mais uma atualização em 2018, a já Apple conseguiu nos surpreender com bastante frequência ...
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
-
06/20/2017 v6 (old)
J. Simon Leitner