Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook 12 (2017)

O que há de novo? Além do Air 13 silenciosamente atualizado, o MacBook 12 também possui uma nova CPU e um SSD mais rápido. Com isso, a Apple pretende estar "anos adiante". Você deve perguntar "Comparado com quem ou com o que?" Provavelmente em comparação com o Air 13, cujos itens essenciais ainda são de 2012? Isto pode ter sucesso, pelo menos em parte.
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Processador
Intel Core m3-7Y32 2 x 1.2 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Memória
8 GB 
, 1866 MHz LPDDR3 (a bordo)
Pantalha
12.00 polegadas 16:10, 2304 x 1440 pixel 226 PPI, APPA027, LED IPS, Tela Retina, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Apple SSD AP0256, 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 3.0, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Broadcom 802.11ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 13.1 x 280.5 x 196.5
Bateria
41.4 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Apple macOS 10.12 Sierra
Camera
Webcam: Câmera 480p FaceTime
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Alto-falantes estéreo, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless
peso
920 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

349 mm 241 mm 16 mm 1.8 kg325 mm 227 mm 17 mm 1.4 kg304 mm 212 mm 15 mm 1.4 kg305.7 mm 220.6 mm 6.9 mm 677 g280.5 mm 196.5 mm 13.1 mm 920 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 469 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
363
cd/m²
362
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
360
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
APPA027 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 358 cd/m² Minimum: 6.5 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 387 cd/m²
Contraste: 823:1 (Preto: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
82.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Apple MacBook 12 2017
APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12"
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
APPA027, , 2304x1440, 12"
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
1440x900, 13.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
APPA034, , 2560x1600, 13.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4"
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
2732x2048, 12.9"
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2224x1668, 10.5"
Display
Display P3 Coverage
66.8
98.6
97.9
sRGB Coverage
95.4
100
99.9
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68
86.5
85.9
Response Times
-3%
-25%
-10%
-10%
18%
22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 ?(19.6, 21.2)
41.2 ?(15.6, 25.6)
-1%
52.4 ?(30.4, 22)
-28%
48 ?(23.6, 24.4)
-18%
48 ?(23.6, 24.4)
-18%
41.6 ?(20.4, 21.2)
-2%
39.6 ?(19.2, 20.4)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
29.2 ?(15.8, 13.4)
30.4 ?(6.8, 23.6)
-4%
28.4 ?(18.4, 10)
3%
33.6 ?(16.4, 17.2)
-15%
33.8 ?(19.6, 14.2)
-16%
18.4 ?(6, 12.4)
37%
17.6 ?(6, 11.6)
40%
PWM Frequency
116000
58000
-50%
119000 ?(80)
3%
119000 ?(80, 210)
3%
Screen
Brightness middle
387
551
545
650
634
Black Level *
0.47
0.48
0.44
0.42
0.39
Brightness
358
514
523
614
625
Brightness Distribution
88
88
86
90
87
Contrast
823
1148
1239
1548
1626
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
0.8
1.6
1
1.9
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4
1.4
3.8
1.9
3.9
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1
1
1.9
1.5
2.8
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.16 102%
2.26 97%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
CCT
6680 97%
6672 97%
6834 95%
6734 97%
7027 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
82.2
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -3%
-25% / -25%
-10% / -10%
-10% / -10%
18% / 18%
22% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.8 ms rise
↘ 13.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 116000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 116000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 116000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
141 Points +18%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
120 Points
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
116 Points -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
98 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
98 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
98 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
91 Points -24%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
90 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
383 (377min - 385max) Points +45%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel Core i5-5350U
277 Points +5%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel Core m3-7Y32
265 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core m3-6Y30
218 Points -18%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
211 Points -20%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
205 Points -23%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel Core M-5Y31
211 Points -20%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
25.61 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.3 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
265 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
120 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1293 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
637 Points
Ajuda
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4054 Points +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Iris Plus Graphics 650, i5-7267U, Apple SSD AP0256
3829 Points +24%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
HD Graphics 6000, 5350U, Apple SSD SM0128G
3396 Points +10%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3078 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
2550 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Radeon Pro 555, i7-7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L
4648 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
HD Graphics 6000, 5350U, Apple SSD SM0128G
4371 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Iris Plus Graphics 650, i5-7267U, Apple SSD AP0256
4081 Points +3%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
HD Graphics 615, m3-7Y32, Apple SSD AP0256
3946 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256
3550 Points -10%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3078 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3904 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3946 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
2568 pontos
Ajuda
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Apple SSD AP0256
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple SSD AP0256
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Apple SSD AP0256
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
Apple SSD SM0256L
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Apple SSD SM0128G
Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
15%
25%
36%
52%
167%
257%
Read Seq
955
754
-21%
1540
61%
1557
63%
1390
46%
489.4
-49%
1233
29%
Write Seq
899
638
-29%
1353
51%
1505
67%
731
-19%
431.6
-52%
733
-18%
Read 4k
9.721
14.6
50%
9.92
2%
10.76
11%
16.29
68%
26.68
174%
29.31
202%
Write 4k
12.78
20.5
60%
10.74
-16%
12.87
1%
27.17
113%
88.7
594%
116.9
815%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
14%
33%
12%
Read Seq
940
1509
61%
1572
67%
1491
59%
Write Seq
867
1345
55%
1473
70%
741
-15%
Read 4K
22.8
23.77
4%
23.33
2%
21.26
-7%
Write 4K
95.7
32.94
-66%
86.7
-9%
105.9
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
15% / 15%
20% / 19%
35% / 34%
32% / 32%
167% / 167%
257% / 257%
Apple SSD AP0256
Sequential Read: 955 MB/s
Sequential Write: 899 MB/s
512K Read: 658 MB/s
512K Write: 579 MB/s
4K Read: 9.721 MB/s
4K Write: 12.78 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 521 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 370.1 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5185 Points +323%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, Intel Core i5-7267U
2762 (2743min - 2780max) Points +125%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1545 Points +26%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel HD Graphics 6000, Intel Core i5-5350U
1487 (1466min - 1553max) Points +21%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y32
1227 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
1186 Points -3%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y31
859 Points -30%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
22624 Points +230%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, Intel Core i5-7267U
13153 Points +92%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
8177 Points +19%
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
Intel HD Graphics 6000, Intel Core i5-5350U
7825 Points +14%
Apple MacBook 12 2017
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y32
6863 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
6078 Points -11%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y31
5512 Points -20%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555)
AMD Radeon Pro 555, Intel Core i7-7700HQ
3721 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650, Intel Core i5-7267U
1698 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
963 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
735 Points
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2015) 1.1 GHz
Intel HD Graphics 5300, Intel Core M-5Y31
671 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
1324 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5035 pontos
Ajuda
Carga Máxima
 34.6 °C38.9 °C38.3 °C 
 33.9 °C34.8 °C35.1 °C 
 32.1 °C31.6 °C32.8 °C 
Máximo: 38.9 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C
42.1 °C42.5 °C38.9 °C
37.6 °C37.6 °C35.6 °C
33.7 °C33.9 °C32.4 °C
Máximo: 42.5 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.8 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.1 °C | Raytek Raynger ST
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.5 °C / -8.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203739.72532.631.13129.827.94029.229.65027.630.36331.432.58028.135.910025.342.412523.65016023.356.220023.656.725020.662.831520.763.740020.167.15001971.863018.57580017.673.7100017.972.4125017.371160017.270.7200017.270.325001770.2315016.868.240001772.650001774.3630017.272.2800017.372.31000017.374125001768.71600017.360.7SPL29.783.9N1.363.5median 17.3median 70.3Delta1.85.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook 12 2017Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Apple MacBook 12 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.13 / 0.35 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2 / 5.4 / 6.6 Watt
Carga midlight 22 / 20 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook 12 2017
m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, Apple SSD AP0256, LED IPS, 2304x1440, 12"
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2304x1440, 12"
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
5350U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SM0128G, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9"
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND , IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5"
Power Consumption
1%
-50%
-111%
7%
26%
Idle Minimum *
2
2.7
-35%
3.4
-70%
2.8
-40%
1.55
22%
1.44
28%
Idle Average *
5.4
2.7
50%
6.3
-17%
10.9
-102%
8.58
-59%
6.12
-13%
Idle Maximum *
6.6
7.2
-9%
7
-6%
11.4
-73%
8.59
-30%
6.14
7%
Load Average *
22
22
-0%
34.5
-57%
55.4
-152%
10.09
54%
8.55
61%
Load Maximum *
20
20.5
-3%
40
-100%
57.5
-188%
10.61
47%
10.62
47%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
WiFi Websurfing
9h 00min
Apple MacBook 12 2017
m3-7Y32, HD Graphics 615, 41.4 Wh
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 41.4 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017)
5350U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
i5-7267U, Iris Plus Graphics 650, 49.2 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, 41 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion, A10X Fusion GPU, 30.8 Wh
Battery Runtime
-7%
18%
-4%
36%
28%
WiFi v1.3
540
501
-7%
638
18%
519
-4%
736
36%
693
28%
H.264
512
415
676
629
Load
231
70
257
199
Reader / Idle
2919
2036

Pro

+ Carcaça de alta qualidade, extremamente fino e leve
+ Touchpad Force-Touch muito bom
+ Tela muito boa e de alta resolução
+ Operação silenciosa
+ Muito bons alto falantes

Contra

- Apenas uma porta, que também é utilizada para carregar
- Leva um tempo se acostumar ao teclado
- Tela com superfície refletiva
- Desempenho reduzido sob carga prolongada
In review: Apple MacBook 12 1.2 GHz 2017
In review: Apple MacBook 12 1.2 GHz 2017

Como o novo MacBook 12 da Apple se sai cerca de 2 anos após seu primeiro lançamento? Bem, não diríamos que está "anos-luz" à frente, já que outros fabricantes não dormiram durante este tempo e também oferecem computadores móveis finos e igualmente poderosos. No entanto, o MacBook 12 ainda apresenta muitas qualidades, que são tão importantes hoje quanto dois anos atrás.

Em primeiro lugar, não só a carcaça de alumínio de gama alta se sente muito bem ao toque, mas também é muito robusto, fino e leve (1,3 cm, 0,92 kg / ~ 0,5 pol, ~ 2 lb). A única desvantagem: Há apenas uma porta USB Type-C, que também é utilizada para carregar Sem hubs ou adaptadores compatíveis, você rapidamente alcançará os limites aqui.

Em comparação com outros portáteis, incluindo os novos MacBook Pros, o teclado ainda apresenta um deslocamento extremamente curto. No entanto, o mecanismo de borboleta revisado traz vantagens significativas em comparação com o antecessor. Em contraste, o touchpad implementa uma tecnologia Force Touch totalmente desenvolvida.

A tela permaneceu inalterada desde o primeiro lançamento. No entanto, ainda é um dos melhores painéis do seu tamanho disponível no mercado em função de sua especificação e valores medidos. Em contraste com os pressupostos anteriores, a Apple aparentemente usa PWM para controle de brilho. No entanto, isso é insignificante devido à alta frequência utilizada.

O desempenho da CPU, GPU e SSD é superior que o do antecessor. No entanto, o ganho de desempenho não é suficientemente alto para justificar a substituição de um modelo de 2015 ou 2016. A perda de desempenho durante o uso intenso prolongado continua a ser um ponto crucial. No entanto, uma vez que leva cerca de 15 minutos até ocorrer (carga total!), isso não deve causar problemas, na prática.

Operação sempre silenciosa, boas durações da bateria de até 9 horas durante o uso realista, e alto-falantes muito bons, que não indicam estar espremidos em uma caixa extremamente fina, ainda são pontos positivos importantes para o MacBook 12.

O Apple MacBook 12 pode ser recomendado para usuários ultra-móveis, que precisam transportar seu dispositivo com freqüência e não possuem requisitos elevados nas reservas de desempenho de seu companheiro (as tarefas de escritório sempre rodam rapidamente). Embora haja vários companheiros melhor equipados disponíveis no mundo do Windows por um preço de 1499 euros (~ $1710), o MacBook 12 da Apple é uma opção atraente para os usuários que possam aceitar seus poucos compromissos (falta de portas, teclado com deslocamento curto das teclas, desempenho reduzido em longo prazo).

Apple MacBook 12 2017 - 06/27/2017 v6 (old)
J. Simon Leitner

Acabamento
91 /  98 → 93%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
99%
Conectividade
41 / 80 → 52%
Peso
76 / 35-78 → 96%
Bateria
91%
Pantalha
87%
Desempenho do jogos
58 / 68 → 85%
Desempenho da aplicação
72 / 87 → 83%
Temperatura
91 / 91 → 100%
Ruído
100%
Audio
87 / 91 → 96%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Médio
79%
90%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Apple MacBook 12 (2017)
J. Simon Leitner, 2017-07- 4 (Update: 2017-07- 6)