Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X9 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070 SLI, QHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 346 cd/m²
Contraste: 641:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.98 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.47 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Aorus X9 AUO B173QTN01.3 (AUO1396), 2560x1440, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R4 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus G752VS-BA338T AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 37% | 4% | 41% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 60.6 | 61.2 1% | 90.3 49% | 61.6 2% | 86.4 43% |
| sRGB Coverage | 84 | 82.9 -1% | 99.6 19% | 90.3 8% | 99.9 19% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.1 | 60.5 -1% | 86.8 42% | 62.8 3% | 99.1 62% |
| Response Times | -67% | 22% | -181% | -210% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 21.6 ? | 30 ? -39% | 11.6 ? 46% | 36 ? -67% | 50 ? -131% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6.6 ? | 12.8 ? -94% | 6.8 ? -3% | 26 ? -294% | 25.6 ? -288% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | ||||
| Screen | 3% | 36% | 5% | 29% | |
| Brightness middle | 346 | 402.3 16% | 274 -21% | 307 -11% | 343 -1% |
| Brightness | 326 | 372 14% | 262 -20% | 300 -8% | 328 1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 84 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.62 -15% | 0.26 52% | 0.32 41% | 0.29 46% |
| Contrast | 641 | 649 1% | 1054 64% | 959 50% | 1183 85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.98 | 5.6 6% | 1.36 77% | 5.53 8% | 4.01 33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.77 | 9.8 -0% | 4.1 58% | 11.54 -18% | 6.03 38% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.47 | 4.7 14% | 0.64 88% | 7 -28% | 4.7 14% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.19 100% | 2.48 89% | 2.4 92% |
| CCT | 7721 84% | 7519 86% | 6551 99% | 8103 80% | 6451 101% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 55 | 53.7 -2% | 77 40% | 58 5% | 88 60% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84 | 82.2 -2% | 100 19% | 90 7% | 100 19% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-7% | 32% /
34% | -57% /
-20% | -47% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5020 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5240 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5611 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Aorus X9 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro 2x Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL NVMe (RAID 0) | Asus G752VS-BA338T Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -72% | 1% | -11% | -26% | |
| Seq Read | 2695 | 1752 -35% | 3137 16% | 2824 5% | 2237 -17% |
| Seq Write | 1678 | 735 -56% | 2352 40% | 1554 -7% | 1230 -27% |
| 4K Read | 50.6 | 35.61 -30% | 50.1 -1% | 49.71 -2% | 37.51 -26% |
| 4K Write | 134.3 | 113.4 -16% | 128.8 -4% | 138.9 3% | 120.8 -10% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1214 | 620 -49% | 1048 -14% | 744 -39% | 851 -30% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1176 | 671 -43% | 925 -21% | 1185 1% | 646 -45% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.039 | 0.042 -8% | 0.041 -5% | 0.058 -49% | 0.052 -33% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.028 | 0.123 -339% | 0.029 -4% | 0.027 4% | 0.033 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23326 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 166876 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 32510 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20379 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8931 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Battlefield 1 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Titanfall 2 - 3840x2160 High / Enabled AA:TS AF:8x | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FX | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Dishonored 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:TX | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Watch Dogs 2 - 3840x2160 High Preset | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Resident Evil 7 - 3840x2160 High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| For Honor - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG U727 2017 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 3840x2160 Very High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Prey - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:8x | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Rocket League - 3840x2160 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| F1 2017 - 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Ark Survival Evolved - 3840x2160 Epic Preset (100 % Resolution Scale) | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| FIFA 18 - 3840x2160 Ultra Preset | |
| Guru Mars K | |
| Aorus X9 | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 167 | 99.9 | 69.3 | ||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 143 | 129 | 74.1 | ||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 143 | 141 | 68.4 | ||
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 122 | 111 | 58.6 | ||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 92.4 | 78.6 | 60 | ||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 111 | 90.9 | 59 | ||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 146 | 123 | 42 | ||
| For Honor (2017) | 177 | 163 | 83.9 | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 112 | 68.8 | 53.1 | ||
| Prey (2017) | 140 | 137 | 79.1 | ||
| Rocket League (2017) | 219 | 141 | |||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 115 | 70.4 | |||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 102 | 93.3 | 37.1 | ||
| F1 2017 (2017) | 132 | 89 | 42 | ||
| Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 88.6 | 53 | 25.8 | ||
| FIFA 18 (2017) | 330 | 310 | 187 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 35 / 37 / 43 dB |
| Carga |
| 49 / 60 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X9 GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Asus G752VS-BA338T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 5% | 14% | 11% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 28.2 6% | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 35 | 35.6 -2% | 33 6% | 30 14% | 32 9% |
| Idle Average * | 37 | 35.6 4% | 34 8% | 32 14% | 35 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 43 | 35.7 17% | 38 12% | 36 16% | 38 12% |
| Load Average * | 49 | 50.2 -2% | 44 10% | 43 12% | 42 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 56 | 50.2 10% | 56 -0% | 43 23% | 44 21% |
| Load Maximum * | 60 | 50.2 16% | 62 -3% | 49 18% | 50 17% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).
| Aorus X9 GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Asus G752VS-BA338T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -5% | 16% | 17% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 49.6 -6% | 46 2% | 41 13% | 39.1 17% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 62 | 56 10% | 57 8% | 39.3 37% | 42.1 32% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 29.6 1% | 34 -13% | 28.8 4% | 27.9 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 29.2 3% | 35 -17% | 27.3 9% | 26.1 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Alienware 17 R4 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 1.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 29 / 35 / 42 Watt |
| Carga |
140 / 334 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X9 GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), i7-7820HK | Alienware 17 R4 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK | Asus G752VS-BA338T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | -2% | 33% | 23% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 37.5 -29% | 34 -17% | 21 28% | 23 21% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 37.6 -7% | 41 -17% | 27 23% | 33 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 42 | 37.6 10% | 50 -19% | 32 24% | 40 5% |
| Load Average * | 140 | 122.4 13% | 106 24% | 86 39% | 94 33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 295 | 180.3 39% | 257 13% | 165 44% | 177 40% |
| Load Maximum * | 334 | 277.4 17% | 320 4% | 206 38% | 228 32% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X9 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 SLI (Laptop), 94.24 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | MSI GT75VR 7RF-012 Titan Pro i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus G752VS-BA338T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 30% | 3% | 99% | 59% | |
| Reader / Idle | 174 | 276 59% | 182 5% | 445 156% | 323 86% |
| H.264 | 138 | 148 7% | 257 86% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 134 | 181 35% | 144 7% | 293 119% | 218 63% |
| Load | 71 | 69 -3% | 65 -8% | 96 35% | 91 28% |
Pro
Contra
Embora o X9 esteja equipado com duas unidades gráficas, a Gigabyte apresentou um portátil de jogos muito fino e, considerando seu desempenho, muito leve, que pode impressionar com sua carcaça metálica de alta qualidade, design brincalhão (queira ou não) e um teclado mecânico.
O último é uma notícia particularmente boa e separa o aparelho de 17 polegadas de muitos outros portáteis de gama alta. Também possui boa conectividade que pode acompanhar a concorrência. Por exemplo, o X9 está equipado com uma moderna porta Thunderbolt 3.
Ficamos menos felizes com a tela QHD, que suporta 120 Hz, tem tempos de resposta curtos e conta com a certificação X-Rite Pantone, mas também tem uma relação de contraste e valor preto fracos, e ângulos de visão instáveis. Também ficamos decepcionados com o tempo de duração da bateria e o ruído do sistema. O aparelho de 17 polegadas simplesmente se torna muito barulhento com aplicativos 3D para nosso gosto. O bom sistema de som não consegue compensar completamente esses problemas.
Escolher usar a tecnologia SLI criou vantagens e dificuldades adicionais. Por um lado, o Aorus X9 pode oferecer desempenho superior em programas compatíveis com Dual-GPU, que inclusive coloca portáteis com a GTX 1080 em ridículo. Por outro lado, a segunda GPU - surpresa, surpresa - tem um impacto negativo no resfriamento (temperatura, ruído do sistema, ...), consumo de energia e mobilidade - além do fato de que nem todos os jogos atuais ainda suportam SLI, tornando a segunda GTX 1070 supérflua nesses casos.
Com a alta dependência de controladores e a tendência para as micro intermitências, os sistemas com duas GPUs são feitos para entusiastas reais mais que para jogadores médio. Se você quiser simplesmente ligar o aparelho e jogar, sem ter que se preocupar com as atualizações constantes do controlador esperando ainda um bom desempenho para resoluções acima de 1920x1080, você deve optar por um portátil com uma só GPU (com uma GeForce GTX 1070 ou GTX 1080) . No geral, o Aorus X9 não é suficientemente bom para entrar nos rankings do nosso Top 10 Gamers.
Aorus X9
- 04/14/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
