Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X7 v7 (7820HK, GTX 1070, QHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X7 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X7 v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Aorus X7 v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X7 v6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 375 cd/m²
Contraste: 647:1 (Preto: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.68 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| Aorus X7 v7 AU Optronics B173QTN01.4 (AUO1496), 2560x1440, 17.3" | Aorus X7 v6 B173QTN01.0 (AUO1096), 2560x1440, 17.3" | HP Omen 17-an014ng AUO149D, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), 3840x2160, 17.3" | Asus G752VS-BA338T AU Optronics B173HAN01.1 (AUO119D), 1920x1080, 17.3" | Gigabyte P57X v7 SHP145E, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GS73VR 7RF AU Optronics AUO109B, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 5% | 36% | 0% | 36% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63 | 60.9 -3% | 64.6 3% | 86.4 37% | 61.6 -2% | 87.8 39% | 64.2 2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 87.1 | 84.2 -3% | 92.9 7% | 99.9 15% | 90.3 4% | 100 15% | 96.8 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.7 | 61.2 -4% | 66.1 4% | 99.1 56% | 62.8 -1% | 98.9 55% | 66.4 4% |
| Response Times | -48% | -248% | -218% | -192% | -406% | -196% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 24 ? | 31 ? -29% | 45.2 ? -88% | 50 ? -108% | 36 ? -50% | 55.6 ? -132% | 38 ? -58% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6 ? | 10 ? -67% | 30.4 ? -407% | 25.6 ? -327% | 26 ? -333% | 46.8 ? -680% | 26 ? -333% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | ||||||
| Screen | -7% | 20% | 28% | 5% | 23% | 16% | |
| Brightness middle | 375 | 343 -9% | 314 -16% | 343 -9% | 307 -18% | 441.3 18% | 371.1 -1% |
| Brightness | 353 | 312 -12% | 309 -12% | 328 -7% | 300 -15% | 408 16% | 343 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 80 -6% | 88 4% | 84 -1% | 88 4% | 86 1% | 86 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.58 | 0.5 14% | 0.34 41% | 0.29 50% | 0.32 45% | 0.44 24% | 0.42 28% |
| Contrast | 647 | 686 6% | 924 43% | 1183 83% | 959 48% | 1003 55% | 884 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.06 | 7.33 -21% | 3.19 47% | 4.01 34% | 5.53 9% | 5.1 16% | 4.5 26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.54 | 10.79 -2% | 6.1 42% | 6.03 43% | 11.54 -9% | 9.8 7% | 9.7 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.68 | 7.6 -34% | 3.49 39% | 4.7 17% | 7 -23% | 4.3 24% | 3.1 45% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.34 94% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.08 106% | 2.17 101% |
| CCT | 7998 81% | 9024 72% | 7261 90% | 6451 101% | 8103 80% | 7345 88% | 7120 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 55 -4% | 60 5% | 88 54% | 58 2% | 87 53% | 61 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 87 | 84 -3% | 93 7% | 100 15% | 90 3% | 100 15% | 97 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-12% | -74% /
-19% | -51% /
-3% | -62% /
-22% | -116% /
-32% | -58% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 6874 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5101 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 8196 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5287 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5689 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 Samsung SM961 MZVPW256HEGL | HP Omen 17-an014ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus G752VS-BA338T Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Gigabyte P57X v7 Transcend MTS800 256GB M.2 (TS256GMTS800) | Aorus X7 v6 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Alienware 17 R4 SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 7% | 6% | -58% | 7% | -11% | |
| Read Seq | 2263 | 1736 -23% | 2791 23% | 517 -77% | 1499 -34% | 1277 -44% |
| Write Seq | 1504 | 1212 -19% | 1596 6% | 305.7 -80% | 1411 -6% | 786 -48% |
| Read 512 | 446.9 | 1044 134% | 400.8 -10% | 315 -30% | 966 116% | 894 100% |
| Write 512 | 1312 | 854 -35% | 1606 22% | 306.1 -77% | 1103 -16% | 659 -50% |
| Read 4k | 54 | 59.1 9% | 55.1 2% | 26.04 -52% | 44.33 -18% | 38.11 -29% |
| Write 4k | 148.2 | 144.9 -2% | 163.8 11% | 82.3 -44% | 155.5 5% | 128.5 -13% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 636 | 582 -8% | 607 -5% | 281.3 -56% | 696 9% | 628 -1% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 539 | 523 -3% | 527 -2% | 296 -45% | 531 -1% | 531 -1% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 32277 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17201 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 160287 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29794 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14272 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 7679 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5529 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Aorus X7 v6 | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 506 | 433.6 | 358.2 | 189.9 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 288.3 | 255.8 | 243.8 | 145.8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 249.7 | 191 | 119 | 61.3 |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 517 | 305.4 | 162.7 | 133.8 |
| Prey (2017) | 143.4 | 142.9 | 140.5 | 139 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 249.8 | 249.8 | 219.5 | |
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 323.1 | 230 | 152.8 | 82.2 |
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 130 | 130.5 | 106.7 | 78.6 |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
| HP Omen 17-an014ng | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Alienware 17 R4 | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| MSI GS73VR 7RF | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
| Aorus X7 v7 | |
| Asus G752VS-BA338T | |
| Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 36 / 41 dB |
| HDD |
| 34 dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 52 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-BA338T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -1% | 2% | 5% | 6% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30 -0% | 30 -0% | 31 -3% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 28.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 33 -0% | 30 9% | 32 3% | 30 9% | 30.4 8% | 35.6 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 36 | 35 3% | 37 -3% | 35 3% | 32 11% | 32.1 11% | 35.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 41 | 40 2% | 39 5% | 38 7% | 36 12% | 32.1 22% | 35.7 13% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 43 -5% | 44 -7% | 42 -2% | 43 -5% | 45.6 -11% | 50.2 -22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 | 47 -4% | 44 2% | 43 4% | 50.2 -12% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 54 -4% | 55 -6% | 50 4% | 49 6% | 51.5 1% | 50.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
| Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-BA338T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | 1% | 23% | 22% | 9% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47.5 7% | 48 6% | 39.1 23% | 41 20% | 51.2 -0% | 49.6 3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 64 | 54.5 15% | 54 16% | 42.1 34% | 39.3 39% | 56.8 11% | 56 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 28.6 13% | 35 -6% | 27.9 15% | 28.8 13% | 29.2 12% | 29.6 10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33 | 28.8 13% | 37 -12% | 26.1 21% | 27.3 17% | 29.2 12% | 29.2 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X7 v7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI GS73VR 7RF audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.6 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 27 / 33 / 40 Watt |
| Carga |
107 / 259 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Asus G752VS-BA338T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 0% | 16% | 8% | 19% | 10% | -11% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 27 | 29 -7% | 22 19% | 23 15% | 21 22% | 15.7 42% | 37.5 -39% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 31 6% | 28 15% | 33 -0% | 27 18% | 23.4 29% | 37.6 -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 38 5% | 35 12% | 40 -0% | 32 20% | 23.5 41% | 37.6 6% |
| Load Average * | 107 | 111 -4% | 93 13% | 94 12% | 86 20% | 184.6 -73% | 122.4 -14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 190 | 157 17% | 177 7% | 165 13% | 180.3 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 259 | 253 2% | 208 20% | 228 12% | 206 20% | 233.1 10% | 277.4 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X7 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | HP Omen 17-an014ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 86 Wh | Acer Predator 17 G9-793-70PJ i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 88 Wh | Asus G752VS-BA338T i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh | Gigabyte P57X v7 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.81 Wh | MSI GS73VR 7RF i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 65 Wh | Aorus X7 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | Alienware 17 R4 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | 26% | 60% | 8% | -2% | 1% | 4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 221 | 349 58% | 323 46% | 445 101% | 256 16% | 301 36% | 276 25% | |
| H.264 | 165 | 255 55% | 257 56% | |||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 180 | 267 48% | 218 21% | 293 63% | 155 -14% | 163 -9% | 182 1% | 181 1% |
| Load | 81 | 84 4% | 91 12% | 96 19% | 98 21% | 55 -32% | 69 -15% |
Pro
Contra
No exterior, o Aorus X7 v7 se parece muito ao seu antecessor. As atualizações e melhorias foram realizadas principalmente no interior. Por exemplo, o leitor de cartões SD atualizado e muito mais rápido, o posicionamento das portas, a nova porta Thunderbolt 3.0 ou a porta USB tipo A adicional. Além disso, o novo modelo também possui um slot M.2-2280 adicional e agora pode levar até dois SSDs NVMe ao mesmo tempo.
O Aorus X7 v7 é um portátil de jogos bem feito que vem com seu próprio conjunto único de inconvenientes, apesar do seu alto preço.
A 7ma versão do Aorus possui um processador quad-core Core i7-7820HK de 7ma geração, resultando em uma aumento mínimo de desempenho, quando comparado com o predecessor. Ainda assim, a combinação do quad-core Kaby Lake e a GeForce GTX 1070 é poderosa o suficiente para rodar todos os jogos atuais sem problemas, em muitos casos, inclusive na resolução nativa QHD da tela. Graças à Nvidia G-Sync, as taxas de quadros são sincronizadas com o painel de 120 Hz do portátil.
O NVMe SSD garante um sistema muito fluente e o disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas de 1 TB oferece armazenamento de jogos em abundância. Ambas as unidades podem ser facilmente trocadas e atualizadas, no entanto, todo o lado inferior deve ser removido devido à falta de escotilhas de manutenção dedicadas.
Nós gostamos do alto brilho da tela mate QHD em particular, mas foi decepcionante em outros aspectos, como sua baixa relação de contraste, ângulos de visão pobres e uma cobertura de espaço de cores comparativamente baixa. Nesta faixa de preços, esperamos mais. Pelo menos um desejo de amplos ângulos de visão pode ser cumprido com o SKU 4K do X7 v7.
No exterior, o Aorus X7 v7 se parece muito ao seu antecessor. As atualizações e melhorias foram realizadas principalmente no interior. Por exemplo, o leitor de cartões SD atualizado e muito mais rápido, o posicionamento das portas, a nova porta Thunderbolt 3.0 ou a porta USB tipo A adicional. Além disso, o novo modelo também possui um slot M.2-2280 adicional e agora pode levar até dois SSDs NVMe ao mesmo tempo.
O Aorus X7 v7 é um portátil de jogos bem feito que vem com seu próprio conjunto único de inconvenientes, apesar do seu alto preço.
A 7ma versão do Aorus possui um processador quad-core Core i7-7820HK de 7ma geração, resultando em uma aumento mínimo de desempenho, quando comparado com o predecessor. Ainda assim, a combinação do quad-core Kaby Lake e a GeForce GTX 1070 é poderosa o suficiente para rodar todos os jogos atuais sem problemas, em muitos casos, inclusive na resolução nativa QHD da tela. Graças à Nvidia G-Sync, as taxas de quadros são sincronizadas com o painel de 120 Hz do portátil.
O NVMe SSD garante um sistema muito fluente e o disco rígido de 2,5 polegadas de 1 TB oferece armazenamento de jogos em abundância. Ambas as unidades podem ser facilmente trocadas e atualizadas, no entanto, todo o lado inferior deve ser removido devido à falta de escotilhas de manutenção dedicadas.
Nós gostamos do alto brilho da tela mate QHD em particular, mas foi decepcionante em outros aspectos, como sua baixa relação de contraste, ângulos de visão pobres e uma cobertura de espaço de cores comparativamente baixa. Nesta faixa de preços, esperamos mais. Pelo menos um desejo de amplos ângulos de visão pode ser cumprido com o SKU 4K do X7 v7.
Aorus X7 v7
- 08/14/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
