Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X5 v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1070, Full HD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 271 cd/m²
Contraste: 1004:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.09 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| Aorus X5 v8 AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -1% | -1% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.1 | 63.6 -5% | 66.2 -1% | 66.1 -1% | 62.5 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 93.4 | 93.8 0% | 92.1 -1% | 92.7 -1% | 88.7 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 64.9 -5% | 67.2 -1% | 67.2 -1% | 63.5 -7% |
| Response Times | 9% | -1% | 39% | -143% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.8 ? | 16.8 ? 11% | 17.6 ? 6% | 6.6 ? 65% | 44.8 ? -138% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 11.2 ? 7% | 12.8 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 29.6 ? -147% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | 10% | -9% | -89% | -88% | |
| Brightness middle | 271 | 313 15% | 254 -6% | 307 13% | 291 7% |
| Brightness | 259 | 300 16% | 262 1% | 296 14% | 277 7% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 78 -10% | 89 2% | 89 2% | 84 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.33 -22% | 0.22 19% | 0.25 7% | 0.22 19% |
| Contrast | 1004 | 948 -6% | 1155 15% | 1228 22% | 1323 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.81 | 1.29 29% | 2.37 -31% | 5.74 -217% | 5.52 -205% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.33 | 2.04 39% | 4.71 -41% | 11.32 -240% | 10.72 -222% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.09 | 0.69 37% | 1.58 -45% | 6.44 -491% | 6.59 -505% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 6435 101% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 8395 77% | 7816 83% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 58 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 89 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
7% | -4% /
-6% | -17% /
-54% | -79% /
-79% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5773 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5953 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6154 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Aorus X5 v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 6% | 58% | 44% | 52% | |
| Seq Read | 1813 | 2213 22% | 1266 -30% | 2091 15% | 2517 39% |
| Seq Write | 966 | 1163 20% | 1834 90% | 1580 64% | 2372 146% |
| 4K Read | 23.21 | 23.36 1% | 48.94 111% | 43.42 87% | 41.47 79% |
| 4K Write | 84.5 | 80.4 -5% | 107.2 27% | 90.2 7% | 93 10% |
| Score Read | 1061 | 1092 3% | 1346 27% | 1471 39% | 1350 27% |
| Score Write | 954 | 939 -2% | 2051 115% | 1446 52% | 1243 30% |
| Score Total | 2515 | 2536 1% | 4122 64% | 3649 45% | 3282 30% |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 38437 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18621 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 172098 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37234 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15226 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 113 | 60 | ||
| Fortnite (2018) | 166 | 127 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 53.3 | |||
| Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 87.8 | 65.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 94 | 90 |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
| Aorus X5 v8 | |
| Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
| MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33 / 35 / 40 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 45 / 55 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30 9% | 30 9% | 30 9% | 33 -0% | 25.5 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * | 35 | 31 11% | 31 11% | 31 11% | 34 3% | 27.3 ? 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 40 | 35 12% | 34 15% | 33 17% | 40 -0% | 30.4 ? 24% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 49 -9% | 43 4% | 49 -9% | 41 9% | 42.8 ? 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 51 -2% | 42 16% | 50 -0% | 43 14% | |
| Load Maximum * | 55 | 54 2% | 44 20% | 52 5% | 48 13% | 53.4 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -3% | 6% | -1% | -13% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 53 -6% | 49 2% | 52 -4% | 61 -22% | 46.2 ? 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 62 | 65 -5% | 63 -2% | 49 21% | 69 -11% | 49.1 ? 21% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 26 4% | 24 11% | 31 -15% | 29 -7% | 31.3 ? -16% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 30 -3% | 25 14% | 31 -7% | 32 -10% | 32.3 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Aorus X5 v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.5 / 1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 25 / 31 / 33 Watt |
| Carga |
102 / 239 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 39% | 20% | -2% | 19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 14 44% | 7 72% | 16 36% | 28 -12% | 13.6 ? 46% |
| Idle Average * | 31 | 18 42% | 11 65% | 19 39% | 33 -6% | 19 ? 39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 22 33% | 20 39% | 26 21% | 41 -24% | 26.8 ? 19% |
| Load Average * | 102 | 91 11% | 98 4% | 103 -1% | 94 8% | 106.3 ? -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 194 | 142 27% | 132 32% | 164 15% | 160 18% | |
| Load Maximum * | 239 | 173 28% | 182 24% | 223 7% | 222 7% | 249 ? -4% |
* ... smaller is better
| Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8850H, 92.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 55 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 54 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 124% | 43% | -22% | -40% | 60% | |
| Reader / Idle | 294 | 762 159% | 507 72% | 237 -19% | 150 -49% | 565 ? 92% |
| H.264 | 216 | 504 133% | 356 65% | 159 -26% | 106 -51% | 409 ? 89% |
| Load | 87 | 156 79% | 81 -7% | 70 -20% | 70 -20% | 85.6 ? -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 513 | 362 | 164 | 144 | 375 ? |
Pro
Contra
A versão 2018 do Aorus X5 v8 é capaz de enfrentar seus rivais na maioria das áreas. Não apenas a carcaça metálica robusta, mas também a conectividade, os dispositivos de entrada e a tela foram convincentes. O painel IPS de 144 Hz oferece um compromisso perfeito entre velocidade e qualidade de imagem (palavra-chave X-Rite Pantone).
Algumas das maiores falhas são o desenvolvimento de alta temperatura e ruído, mas isso é um problema de muitos dispositivos de jogos finos. No geral, colocaríamos o X5 v8 no nível do Asus GM501, que tinha resultados de desempenho muito similares.
O rival mais forte, no entanto, vem do mesmo fabricante que o X5 v8. Aqueles que podem facilmente ficar sem o G-Sync em aplicativos 3D e que estão bem com a perda de alguns FPS podem querer considerar a compra do Aero 15X. O irmão de 15 polegadas está equipado com uma carcaça mais compacta e mais leve e tem uma duração de bateria muito melhor, sem mencionar o preço mais baixo (2500 vs. 2700 Euros, ~$2926 vs. ~$3161).
Aorus X5 v8
- 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
