Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X5 v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070, UHD)

4K vs. bateria. A Aorus fez várias melhorias desde o modelo do ano passado do X5: Tela 4K, Thunderbolt 3 e CPU Kaby Lake são apenas algumas das adições positivas. Será que o X5 v7 tira uma melhor pontuação que o seu predecessor (83%) ou talvez pode chegar até a pole position entre os gamers finos? Vamos tentar descobrir em nossa análise.
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook
Aorus X5 v7 (X5 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7820HK 4 x 2.9 - 3.9 GHz @ 4.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1463 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.66, No Optimus
Memória
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2 de 4 slots ocupados, máx. 64 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, UHD, G-Sync, 60 Hz, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, SSD + HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. drive bays: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 (SATA-III or PCIe/NVMe) & 1x 2.5-inch
Placa de Som
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: fones, microfone, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Funcionamento em rede
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23 x 390 x 272
Bateria
94 Wh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: 2 alto-falantes de 1,5-watts, 2 woofers de 2-watts, Teclado: chiclet RGB Fusion, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Fonte de alimentação de 200-watts, Memoria USB com controladores, Adobe Reader XI, Command and Control, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, Killer Performance Suite, MS Office 365 Trial, XSplit Broadcaster Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, 24 Meses Garantia, 12 meses na bateria, 30 dias na tela por erros de pixels
peso
2.6 kg, Suprimento de energia: 714 g
Preço
2700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
390 mm 266 mm 40 mm 2.9 kg385 mm 271 mm 29 mm 2.9 kg385 mm 271 mm 28.8 mm 2.9 kg390 mm 272 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg383 mm 270 mm 30 mm 2.7 kg390 mm 272 mm 22.9 mm 2.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: Kensington, Mini DP, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, headphone, microphone
Left: Kensington, Mini DP, Thunderbolt 3, USB-C 3.1 Gen2, headphone, microphone
Right: SD-card reader, 2x USB-A 3.0, HDMI
Right: SD-card reader, 2x USB-A 3.0, HDMI
Front: control LEDs
Front: control LEDs
Back: power supply, 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
Back: power supply, 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X5 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
201 MB/s
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
153 MB/s -24%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.6 MB/s -60%
Aorus X5 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.9 MB/s -60%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s -61%
Gigabyte P56XT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s -62%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X5 v7
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244 MB/s
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209 MB/s -14%
Aorus X5 v6
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90.3 MB/s -63%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89.8 MB/s -63%
Gigabyte P56XT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s -64%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s -64%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
631 MBit/s +27%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
579 MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s +3%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
496 MBit/s
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
343 MBit/s -31%
iperf3 receive AX12
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
677 MBit/s +54%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
675 MBit/s +53%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
674 MBit/s +53%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
669 MBit/s +52%
Aorus X5 v7
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
441 MBit/s
292
cd/m²		295
cd/m²		281
cd/m²
298
cd/m²		307
cd/m²		285
cd/m²
307
cd/m²		301
cd/m²		306
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 307 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 296.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 307 cd/m²
Contraste: 1023:1 (Preto: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.72 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.79 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Aorus X5 v7
AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), 3840x2160, 15.6"		Aorus X5 v6
2880x1620, 15.6"		Gigabyte P56XT
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080, 15.6"		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
ID: AUO52ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN05.2, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
-5%
-5%
-1%
-2%
-7%
Display P3 Coverage
65.3
62.5
-4%
64.8
-1%
66.4
2%
65.9
1%
63.9
-2%
sRGB Coverage
91.9
86.2
-6%
84.6
-8%
88.9
-3%
87.8
-4%
83.1
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.3
62.5
-6%
61.8
-7%
65.1
-2%
64.2
-3%
60.8
-8%
Response Times
1%
11%
50%
60%
11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
44 ?(21.2, 22.8)
34 ?(19, 25)
23%
37.2 ?(18.4, 18.8)
15%
24 ?(12, 12)
45%
20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)
53%
37 ?(16, 21)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 ?(14, 12.4)
32 ?(8, 24)
-21%
24.8 ?(14, 10.8)
6%
12 ?(4, 8)
55%
8.8 ?(6.8, 2)
67%
25 ?(4, 21)
5%
PWM Frequency
198.4
20000 ?(95)
Screen
-3%
-14%
-38%
-48%
-3%
Brightness middle
307
280.4
-9%
301
-2%
357
16%
416.2
36%
310
1%
Brightness
297
271
-9%
280
-6%
365
23%
409
38%
311
5%
Brightness Distribution
92
83
-10%
87
-5%
85
-8%
94
2%
85
-8%
Black Level *
0.3
0.249
17%
0.32
-7%
0.5
-67%
0.86
-187%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
1023
1126
10%
941
-8%
714
-30%
484
-53%
1033
1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.72
4.94
-5%
6.21
-32%
9.93
-110%
8.4
-78%
4.82
-2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.07
8.13
-1%
10.78
-34%
14.87
-84%
15.4
-91%
10.14
-26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.79
5.13
-7%
6.08
-27%
10.32
-115%
11.2
-134%
3.94
18%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
2.11 104%
2.23 99%
2.45 90%
CCT
7690 85%
7433 87%
7375 88%
10096 64%
10036 65%
6877 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
55.9
-7%
55
-8%
58
-3%
57.2
-5%
54
-10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
85.9
-7%
84
-9%
89
-3%
87.3
-5%
83
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -3%
-3% / -9%
4% / -19%
3% / -24%
0% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
174 Points
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
171 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points -7%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
160 Points -8%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
156 Points -10%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
827 Points
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
790 Points -4%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
772 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points -10%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
739 Points -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
731 Points -12%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.98 Points
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.94 Points -2%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points -7%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.84 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points -8%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.81 Points -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.18 Points
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.9 Points -3%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.44 Points -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.17 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.15 Points -11%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8652 Points
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
Aorus X5 v7
Intel Core i7-7820HK
32769 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6836 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
32769 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
8652 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
9.18 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
81.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
127.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
827 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8 | PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5065 Points +7%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5011 Points +6%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points +2%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4718 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4320 Points -8%
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
4239 Points -10%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
5406 Points
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5261 Points
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5192 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5180 Points
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
5021 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4718 pontos
Ajuda
Aorus X5 v7
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7		Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3%
14%
2%
-47%
Write 4k QD32
556
358.7
-35%
546
-2%
511
-8%
257.9
-54%
Read 4k QD32
697
688
-1%
668
-4%
524
-25%
388.4
-44%
Write 4k
137.8
158.8
15%
177.5
29%
152.7
11%
122.8
-11%
Read 4k
44
53
20%
59.1
34%
58.8
34%
38.55
-12%
Write 512
1101
1221
11%
1216
10%
1132
3%
286.9
-74%
Read 512
1086
990
-9%
873
-20%
840
-23%
462
-57%
Write Seq
1076
1275
18%
1635
52%
1521
41%
422.8
-61%
Read Seq
1479
1565
6%
1718
16%
1219
-18%
521
-65%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
AS SSD
hddimg
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Sequential Read: 1479 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1076 MB/s
512K Read: 1086 MB/s
512K Write: 1101 MB/s
4K Read: 44 MB/s
4K Write: 137.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 697 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 556 MB/s
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
14476 Points +5%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
14447 Points +4%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
13827 Points
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
13768 Points 0%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
13179 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
13129 Points -5%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
30201 Points
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
30162 Points 0%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
28943 Points -4%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
26786 Points -11%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
26099 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
24365 Points -19%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
18156 Points +4%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17505 Points 0%
Aorus X5 v7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17468 Points
SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
16383 Points -6%
Gigabyte P56XT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15625 Points -11%
MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
15359 Points -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
17468 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30201 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13827 pontos
Ajuda
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Doom
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
66.3 fps +9%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
61.1 fps
Gigabyte P56XT
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
50.2 fps -18%
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
39.19 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
100.5 fps +4%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
97.4 fps +1%
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
96.9 fps
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
36.52 fps
Doom
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
139.4 fps
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
128.9 fps -8%
Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
126.7 fps -9%
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX
Aorus X5 v7
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK
53.3 fps
baixomédiaaltoultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 264.4 192.1 86.8 61.1 39.19
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 250 183.6 117.7 96.9 36.52
Doom (2016) 169.4 169.7 144.2 139.4 53.3

Barulho

Ocioso
35 / 36 / 40 dB
HDD
33 dB
Carga
43 / 55 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P56XT
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Noise
-1%
4%
-1%
9%
7%
off / environment *
30
29.3
2%
30
-0%
31
-3%
28
7%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
35
33.4
5%
34
3%
33
6%
28.5
19%
34
3%
Idle Average *
36
35.2
2%
35
3%
34
6%
29.2
19%
35
3%
Idle Maximum *
40
35.2
12%
39
2%
44
-10%
35.5
11%
36
10%
Load Average *
43
53.3
-24%
39
9%
46
-7%
47
-9%
40
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
48
2%
Load Maximum *
55
57.6
-5%
49
11%
52
5%
51
7%
46
16%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 63 °C64 °C45 °C 
 52 °C53 °C44 °C 
 38 °C36 °C35 °C 
Máximo: 64 °C
Médio: 47.8 °C
52 °C56 °C53 °C
53 °C56 °C56 °C
40 °C43 °C44 °C
Máximo: 56 °C
Médio: 50.3 °C
alimentação elétrica  57 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 64 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P56XT
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Heat
-9%
-13%
-3%
2%
18%
Maximum Upper Side *
64
57
11%
65
-2%
49.2
23%
50
22%
40.6
37%
Maximum Bottom *
56
54
4%
71
-27%
62
-11%
52.2
7%
48.4
14%
Idle Upper Side *
29
36.2
-25%
35
-21%
32.4
-12%
33.2
-14%
26.8
8%
Idle Bottom *
30
38
-27%
30
-0%
33
-10%
32.4
-8%
26.4
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.3372539.732.83133.1294036.637.35027.828.16327.327.38026.528.710024.932.512522.932.116020.937.220022.348.725021.152.131520.555.640018.760.350018.76263017.865.780017.666.7100017.164.1125017.169.7160017.369.4200017.468.7250017.466315017.964.9400018.259.6500017.962.8630018.264.4800018.364.11000019.161.71250019.261.4160001957.7SPL30.178N1.341.4median 18.3median 62Delta1.56.737.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9median 63.41.99.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X5 v7MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Aorus X5 v7 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 26 / 31 / 36 Watt
Carga midlight 93 / 240 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Gigabyte P56XT
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Power Consumption
-9%
28%
29%
12%
19%
Idle Minimum *
26
25
4%
13
50%
14
46%
22
15%
20
23%
Idle Average *
31
28.9
7%
17
45%
18
42%
24.5
21%
24
23%
Idle Maximum *
36
30.1
16%
22
39%
24
33%
25.2
30%
29
19%
Load Average *
93
167.3
-80%
85
9%
87
6%
97.2
-5%
82
12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
176
154
12%
177.5
-1%
Load Maximum *
240
222.6
7%
208
13%
201
16%
213.8
11%
193
20%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
3h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
2h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 43min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 24min
Aorus X5 v7
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh		Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.24 Wh		Gigabyte P56XT
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 91.2 Wh		SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 60 Wh		Eurocom Sky MX5 R3
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile,  Wh		MSI GT62VR 7RE-223
i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75 Wh
Battery Runtime
20%
124%
30%
15%
54%
Reader / Idle
208
249
20%
568
173%
204
-2%
377
81%
H.264
163
370
127%
213
31%
252
55%
WiFi v1.3
151
182
21%
384
154%
195
29%
174
15%
246
63%
Load
84
100
19%
120
43%
110
31%
98
17%

Pro

+ Boa tela 4K
+ Relativamente fino
+ Hardware de alto desempenho
+ Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0 e miniDP
+ Veloz leitor de cartões
+ Ferramenta de overclock
+ Teclas macro

Contra

- Alto consumo de energia
- Durações pobres da bateria
- Wi-Fi medíocre
- Altas temperaturas na área WASD
The Aorus X5 v7, test unit provided by Gigabyte
The Aorus X5 v7, test unit provided by Gigabyte

O Aorus X5 V7 é um bom pacote de jogos que foi notavelmente melhorado desde o seu predecessor, o V6. A boa tela 4K, as muitas portas, incluindo o Thunderbolt 3, as teclas macro e a ferramenta Aorus para overclocking, e as rápidas mudanças de configurações importantes são excelentes adições.

No entanto, ainda existem algumas deficiências, incluindo o alto consumo de energia e as curtas durações da bateria. Os potenciais compradores terão de decidir por si próprios se a portabilidade e o consumo de energia são importantes para eles ou não. O gerenciamento de temperaturas também pode ser melhor, apesar do sistema de resfriamento melhorado - particularmente em torno das teclas WASD, que são tão importantes para os jogadores.

O Aorus X5 V7 fará a maioria dos jogadores feliz, pois oferece hardware forte e bom desempenho de jogos. No entanto, sua carcaça fina apenas pretende oferecer alta mobilidade, enquanto o alto consumo de energia e as curtas durações da bateria contam outra história.

No geral, o Aorus ainda é um portátil de jogos bem feito e você pode dizer que os desenvolvedores e designers colocaram muito esforço para criar um portátil de jogos tão bom quanto possível. No entanto, o novo Aorus não é barato e está disponível por cerca de  $2.340. Isso torna o aparelho mais caro de todos os dispositivos de comparação. Sua avaliação, no entanto, não o coloca no topo. Dispositivos comparáveis estão disponíveis em cerca de $2.500, embora você provavelmente tenha que renunciar à tela aqui. Os potenciais compradores terão que decidir por si próprios se a tela e outros recursos valem o preço mais alto.

Aorus X5 v7 - 10/08/2017 v6 (old)
Christian Hintze

Acabamento
83 / 98 → 85%
Teclado
85%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
66 / 81 → 82%
Peso
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Bateria
66%
Pantalha
88%
Desempenho do jogos
93%
Desempenho da aplicação
97%
Temperatura
73 / 95 → 77%
Ruído
58 / 90 → 64%
Audio
75%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Médio
75%
85%
Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X5 v7 (i7-7820HK, GTX 1070, UHD)
Christian Hintze, 2017-10-21 (Update: 2024-11- 4)