Breve Análise do Portátil Aorus X5 v6

Name: Aorus X5 v6
Brand: Aorus

Sem compromissos de desempenho. O exclusivo Aorus X5 está de volta com Pascal, teclas individualmente iluminadas, e opções de tela de 120 Hz/5 ms FHD , tudo em um chassi de menos de 23 mm de espessura. Os proprietários recebem o mesmo desempenho de jogos que um desktop com gráficos GTX 1070, porém, em um pacote muito mais barulhento.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/15/2016 🇺🇸 🇨🇳 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Aorus

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Aorus X5 v6 (X5 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1442 MHz, Memoría: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 369.26

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4 SDRAM, PC4-19200, G-Skill, Dual-Channel, 1300 MHz, 16-16-16-39

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 1:78, 2880 x 1620 pixel 212 PPI, IPS, Name: Panasonic VVX16T028J00, ID: MEI96A2, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB

, Secundário: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630

Placa de Som

NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Fones de 3,5 mm SPDIF-out), microfone de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: Leitor SD

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm Killer e2200 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1+LE

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.9 x 390 x 272

Bateria

94.24 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: 2 alto falantes de 1,5 W, subwoofer de 2 W, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 2 patas de portátil, Guia de início rápido, Cartão de garantia, Unidade USB c/ controladores, Killer Network Manager, Aorus Audio Equalizer, Aorus Fusion, Command & Control, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.575 kg, Suprimento de energia: 822 g

Preço

2400 USD

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Aorus X5 v6 Gigabyte P35X v5 MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0

Rear: AC adapter, 1x USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet

Left: 1x mDP 1.3, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x audio jack, 1x microphone, 1x USB Type-C Gen. 2

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	136.5 MB/s +71%
Aorus X5 v6	79.9 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US	195.2 MB/s +116%
Aorus X5 v6	90.3 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -69%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	549 MBit/s +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	531 MBit/s +2%
Aorus X5 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	520 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	550 MBit/s +7%
Eurocom Sky X7E2 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	546 MBit/s +7%
Aorus X5 v6 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	512 MBit/s


266.4 cd/m²	264.7 cd/m²	283.4 cd/m²
244.6 cd/m²	280.4 cd/m²	270.5 cd/m²
245.9 cd/m²	286.8 cd/m²	295.3 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 295.3 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 270.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 1126:1 (Preto: 0.249 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.13 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Aorus X5 v6 IPS, 15.6", 2880x1620	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Gigabyte P35X v5 SHP144E , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-1%	11%	7%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	62.5	64.5 3%	67.8 8%	64.8 4%	64.6 3%
sRGB Coverage	86.2	83.1 -4%	97.4 13%	95.8 11%	84.6 -2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	62.5	60.8 -3%	69.7 12%	66.9 7%	61.8 -1%
Response Times		8%	11%	-24%	16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34 ?(19, 25)	38 ?(16, 22) -12%		51.2 ?(21.2, 30) -51%	34 ?(14, 20) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	32 ?(8, 24)	23 ?(5, 18) 28%	26 ?(8, 18) 19%	39.2 ?(8.4, 30.8) -23%	22 ?(5, 17) 31%
PWM Frequency	198.4		202 ?(100) 2%	200 ?(20) 1%
Screen		-2%	6%	-18%	6%
Brightness middle	280.4	315 12%	293 4%	278.9 -1%	273 -3%
Brightness	271	290 7%	279 3%	272 0%	278 3%
Brightness Distribution	83	85 2%	84 1%	80 -4%	88 6%
Black Level *	0.249	0.32 -29%	0.33 -33%	0.562 -126%	0.27 -8%
Contrast	1126	984 -13%	888 -21%	496 -56%	1011 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.94	4.88 1%	3.59 27%	4.47 10%	3.67 26%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.13	8.88 -9%	5.79 29%	8.64 -6%	8.33 -2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.13	4.17 19%	3.86 25%	6.13 -19%	2.73 47%
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.53 ^87%	2.53 ^87%	2.2 ^100%	2.49 ^88%
CCT	7433 ^87%	6683 ^97%	7229 ^90%	7047 ^92%	7029 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.9	55 -2%	63 13%	60.87 9%	55 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	85.9	83 -3%	97 13%	95.43 11%	84 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		2% / -0%	9% / 8%	-12% / -15%	7% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19 ms rise
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

198.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	171 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points -3%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	149 Points -13%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	143 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	143 Points -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	139 Points -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +9%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	790 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	719 Points -9%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points -11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	669 Points -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	348 Points -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	306 Points -61%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.94 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.7 Points -12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.68 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	1.63 Points -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	1.62 Points -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.59 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +7%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	8.9 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.96 Points -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.76 Points -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.4 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	3.84 Points -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	3.39 Points -62%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +8%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	24280 Points
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21681 Points -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	21022 Points -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20059 Points -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	10836 Points -55%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +2%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	6339 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	5671 Points -11%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5567 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE Intel Core i7-6600U	5469 Points -14%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5055 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -21%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -54%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	233.1 s * -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.6 s * -7%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	210.3 s *
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	206.3 s * +2%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +15%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	636 s * -31%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL Intel Core i7-5700HQ	574 s * -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	569 s * -17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	559 s * -15%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * -2%
Aorus X5 v6 Intel Core i7-6820HK	486.7 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6782

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

24280

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6339

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.9 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

80.8 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.94 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

171 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

123.2 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

790 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4828 Points
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points -4%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4541 Points -6%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4060 Points -16%
Gigabyte P35X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3301 Points -32%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	5053 Points
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	4924 Points -3%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4859 Points -4%
Gigabyte P35X v5 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3999 Points -21%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4828 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		7973 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5053 pontos
Ajuda

	Aorus X5 v6 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	Gigabyte P35X v5 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS73VR 6RF SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Eurocom Sky X7E2 Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-64%	-1%	-70%	11%
Read Seq	1565	485.4 -69%	1541 -2%	334.3 -79%	1673 7%
Write Seq	1275	312.4 -75%	1247 -2%	319 -75%	1576 24%
Read 512	990	294.8 -70%	1119 13%	242.3 -76%	1180 19%
Write 512	1221	287.8 -76%	1214 -1%	254.4 -79%	1561 28%
Read 4k	53	21.44 -60%	51.4 -3%	20.3 -62%	51.5 -3%
Write 4k	158.8	75.7 -52%	145.1 -9%	42.51 -73%	144 -9%
Read 4k QD32	688	149.4 -78%	593 -14%	251.6 -63%	694 1%
Write 4k QD32	358.7	256.3 -29%	385.5 7%	167.1 -53%	422.1 18%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2

Sequential Read: 1565 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1275 MB/s

512K Read: 990 MB/s

512K Write: 1221 MB/s

4K Read: 53 MB/s

4K Write: 158.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 688 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 358.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	21781 Points +22%
Aorus X5 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	17869 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K	16685 Points -7%
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	13018 Points -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points -33%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9820 Points -45%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	5120 Points +22%
Aorus X5 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	4191 Points
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K	4126 Points -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	3009 Points -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	2592 Points -38%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	2326 Points -45%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	10382 Points +21%
Aorus X5 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	8556 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	6123 Points -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points -35%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4663 Points -46%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	28321 Points +19%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K	23990 Points +1%
Aorus X5 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	23723 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	16946 Points -29%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	12890 Points -46%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points -46%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K	11482 Points +10%
Aorus X5 v6 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK	10423 Points
Eurocom Sky X7E2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 6700K	10419 Points 0%
EVGA SC17 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9256 Points -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	9017 Points -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points -20%

3DMark 11 Performance		18156 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		144778 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		30162 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14476 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		7857 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	111.3 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	79.3 fps -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	71.6 fps -36%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	55.5 fps -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps -61%

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	118.6 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	75.2 fps -37%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	59.5 fps -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	44.9 fps -62%

Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	78.8 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	52.9 fps -33%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	136.8 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	106.2 fps -22%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.5 fps -23%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	90.2 fps -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps -49%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	117.9 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	88.3 fps -25%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	82.1 fps -30%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	69.7 fps -41%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	50.5 fps -57%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	106.6 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	72.4 fps -32%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	67.9 fps -36%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	63.7 fps -40%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	47.5 fps -55%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	89 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	63 fps -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	62 fps -30%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	50 fps -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	36 fps -60%

Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	60 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	60 fps 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60 fps 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps 0%
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	60 fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	97.4 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	63.5 fps -35%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60.4 fps -38%
EVGA SC17 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	54.7 fps -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -56%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	128.9 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	96.5 fps -25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	84.3 fps -35%

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	162 fps
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	118.2 fps -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	106.3 fps -34%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)				118.6
Guild Wars 2 (2012)				78.8
BioShock Infinite (2013)				136.8
Metro: Last Light (2013)				117.9
Thief (2014)				106.6
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				89
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)				60
Fallout 4 (2015)				111.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				97.4
Doom (2016)				128.9
Overwatch (2016)				162

Barulho

Ocioso		33.4 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB
Carga		53.3 / 57.6 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)

	Aorus X5 v6 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY	MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
Noise		8%	9%	10%	11%
off / environment *	29.3	30 -2%	30 -2%	30 -2%
Idle Minimum *	33.4	32 4%	32 4%	32 4%	31 7%
Idle Average *	35.2	33 6%	33 6%	33 6%	32 9%
Idle Maximum *	35.2	34 3%	34 3%	34 3%	36 -2%
Load Average *	53.3	39 27%	40 25%	37 31%	40 25%
Load Maximum *	57.6	51 11%	46 20%	46 20%	47 18%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


45.6 °C	57 °C	38.8 °C
36.8 °C	46.8 °C	34 °C
33 °C	28.2 °C	26.6 °C

Máximo: 57 °C
Médio: 38.5 °C


46.4 °C	48.8 °C	54 °C
38.6 °C	47.2 °C	50.4 °C
34 °C	39.2 °C	39.4 °C

Máximo: 54 °C
Médio: 44.2 °C

alimentação elétrica 55.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).

Aorus X5 v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 0.85 Watt
Ocioso	25 / 28.9 / 30.1 Watt
Carga	167.3 / 222.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus G701VO-CS74K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		12%	9%	7%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	25	24.3 3%	24.4 2%	22.3 11%	28.2 -13%
Idle Average *	28.9	29.6 -2%	26.6 8%	27.3 6%	32 -11%
Idle Maximum *	30.1	29.9 1%	36.4 -21%	30 -0%	32.6 -8%
Load Average *	167.3	110.1 34%	117 30%	152.2 9%	162.2 3%
Load Maximum *	222.6	171.4 23%	163.6 27%	204.2 8%	173.5 22%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		4h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		3h 02min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 40min

	Aorus X5 v6 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94.24 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 62 Wh	MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 75.24 Wh	Gigabyte P35X v5 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 76 Wh	Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M, Wh
Battery Runtime		-12%	17%	28%	162%
Reader / Idle	249	243 -2%	300 20%	345 39%
WiFi v1.3	182	196 8%	246 35%	261 43%	476 162%
Load	100	58 -42%	97 -3%	101 1%

Pro

+ 4 baias de armazenamento, 4 slots SODIMM, 2x HDMI 2.0 portas

+ Desempenho muito veloz; CPU e GPU com suporte para overclock

+ Alta cobertura sRGB; painel WQHD+ de alta qualidade

+ Opções de telas FHD de120 Hz/5 ms ou WQHD+

+ Design elegante; fino e portável

+ Coluna de teclas Macro dedicadas

+ Touchpad maior e melhorado

+ Software Aorus com muito recursos

+ Compatível com NVMe e RAID

+ Teclas RGB iluminadas individualmente

+ Fácil de fazer manutenção

+ Base sólida

Contra

- Bobina barulhenta e bleeding da iluminação de fundo na nossa unidade de teste

- Leve afogamento da CPU sob uso intenso

- Alto consumo de energia; duração média da bateria

- PWM detectado em todos os níveis de brilho

- Retro-iluminação de teclado um pouco irregular

- O software Aorus algumas vezes é tosco

- Sem Thunderbolt 3; VGA removido

- Ventoinha barulhenta sob uso intenso

- GPU soldada; sem slot MXM 3.0

- Ventoinhas do sistema sempre ativas

- Sem portas USB na borda esquerda

- A tampa e as dobradiças parecem ser frágeis

- Imã para as digitais

In review: Aorus X5 v6. Test model provided by Aorus.

A Aorus conseguiu para si um nicho no mercado de games, oferecendo hardware normalmente encontrados em portáteis maiores em um chassi de metade da espessura. O X5 v6 inclusive oferece um conjunto de recursos exclusivo, incluindo sua tela 3K 1620p, duas portas HDMI 2.0, e hardwaer Live Stream Engine para streamers. Por que comprar uma solução robusta quando há um Aorus bastante mais fino disponível com opções similares de CPU e GPU?

A resposta tem menos a ver com desempenho e recursos e mais a ver com barulho da ventoinha. A GPU GTX 1070 em nossa unidade de teste se desempenha tão rápido quanto a nossa GTX 1070 de desktop de referência, por isso o desempenho nos games não é afogado de forma alguma. Suas opções de tela 120 Hz/5 ms G-Sync, teclas iluminadas individualmente, 4 baias de armazenamento interno com suporte para RAID, e manutenção simples, separam ainda mais o X5 v6 do visual de outros super portáteis para jogos. Adicionalmente, o pouco comum painel WQHD se complementa muito bem com a GTX 1070, ao contrário de um painel UHD 4K.

O ruído do sistema é a desvantagem mais notória. As ventoinhas são barulhentas, até o ponto de poder ser muito perturbantes quando não estiver utilizando fones, especialmente em jogos silenciosos como MGS V. Outras pequenas desvantagens aparecem rapidamente, incluindo a pouco impressionante duração da bateria, PWM em todos os níveis de brilho, ausência de Thunderbolt 3 e MXM 3.0, e afogamento da CPU quando está sob estresse extremo. Combine esta última desvantagem com o peculiar comportamento da duração da bateria (>200 W de energia sugados de um adaptador de CA de 200 W) e temos um sistema que provavelmente teria se desempenhado tão bem quanto o Core i7-6700HQ mais econômico.

O Aorus X5 v6 portável é um portátil para jogos com desempenho pleno, construído para gamers e streamers hardcore com uma infinidade de recursos. Como outros portáteis para jogos, a sua maior desvantagem continua sendo o ruído da ventoinha.

Aorus X5 v6 - 10/08/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

80 / 98 → 82%

Teclado

83%

Mouse

86%

Conectividade

60 / 81 → 75%

Peso

59 / 10-66 → 88%

Bateria